Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

solve the housing problem easily...some solutions?

Options
  • 23-09-2022 2:10am
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 16,167 ✭✭✭✭


    1. allow owners to evict non paying tenants very easily
    2. people on the housing list, take a free house where its going
    3. allow higher builds - even by 1 story

    i'm sure there are many more, buts that's just 3 off the bat that would address the problem.

    i feel sorry for students who have to defer a year in college cos they cant get accommodation.



«13456717

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 19,767 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    Ban councils and commercial interests from purchasing existing housing and make them build. It should save the taxpayer 40-50% as councils don't pay vat on materials or development charges and the like, which make up a verly large portion of the total cost. Germany banned REITs and other funds from buying existing housing. If they want them, they have to build them from scratch.

    New Zealand managed to stimulate the construction of an extra 27,000 homes by relaxing planning restrictions. Do the same here, wind back on the councils powers to impose myriad conditions on houses that drive up costs and dilute the means by which nimbys and other vested interests can object to or block accommodation from being built.



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,473 ✭✭✭✭Cookie_Monster


    except that hasn't really worked at all in NZ. average house price is $1m NZD, 600k Eur. Houses in Auckland can easily be $4-5m for a standard 4 bed. the delays in building is massive due to supply chain issues.

    standard housing stock here is also appalng bad, building standards are very low.

    The easiest way to solve the long term housing problem is to deal with the population growth problem, but that has been and will continue to be swept under the carpet



  • Registered Users Posts: 19,767 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    You seem to expect an instant quick fix to something where that is clearly impossible. Very little time has passed since NZ introduced these measures and Auckland isn't the only place they apply to. You jumping the gun crying failure, several years too soon. Anything that increases supply should eventualy lead to lower prices, this is a fundamental tenet of economics, but expectations there have to be realistic as prices can't sustainably fall below the cost to build and supply.

    Just to confirm I'm getting this right - you are an Irish person living in NZ and saying population growth is the real problem, implying NZ should never have let you and other immigrants in?



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Supply and demand.

    Failure to address the demand side is foolish. We will end up in the same situation again and again. Forever suggesting that we densify and build up.

    Out birth rates have been below replacement since 1990 we should literally be enjoying a reduction on the demand side of the equation.

    With housing the main cost in life it's time to consider the opportunity costs. I.e if we spent less on housing but more on pensions what is the true net benefit of an increasing population (which is/was supposedly the solution to the pension crisis).

    Build build build is the part of the solution but it's fools gold without considering things like the population aims of government (I say that because the population itself is self regulating already).

    Endless shortages otherwise

    There are of course many policy/ planning reforms possible but it's tinkering around the edges compared to the rest.



  • Registered Users Posts: 398 ✭✭jimmybobbyschweiz


    Raise mortgage rates to 6% and the property market will crash



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 215 ✭✭hello2020


    population growth may be low but Immigration from India and other countries is growing every day.. just visit any private college in Dublin and its full of foreign students who are living in shared accommodation but will be looking for new houses in next 5 to 7 years as they settle down !



  • Registered Users Posts: 17,973 ✭✭✭✭rob316


    I'd start with limiting the numbers we take in seeking asylum.

    Stop councils from buying up existing housing stock.

    Getting rid of the current coalition, they only serve REITs and big developers.



  • Registered Users Posts: 351 ✭✭NiceFella


    The first and most important thing that needs to be done is Ban big commercial buyers of houses at least until the crisis is over. They can buy apartments but not houses which are for people who primarily want a family.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,903 ✭✭✭✭Del2005


    Ban councils and commercial interests from purchasing existing housing and make them build. It should save the taxpayer 40-50%

    It would also reduce the cost for private buyers. Plenty of people bidding on properties only to find out that they are being out bid by their own taxes!



  • Registered Users Posts: 292 ✭✭pjdarcy


    Ban Airbnb



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 215 ✭✭hello2020



    build some seaside high rises



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Lot of good suggestions already.

    Councils need to move away from providing forever homes, low cost and basic purpose built social accommodation is required that will provide shelter and basic human needs when required but will encourage the tenants to make an effort to provide for themselves and move on when their situation improves.

    This would free up funds to focus on those that really need social supports.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]




  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Not to be too socialist but I'd ban corporations from making profits out of the housing market.


    Private individuals could own properties up to a maxinum of 10 or a value of 10 million euro.


    That allows them to make a few bob out of their investments. If they have excess they can look to invest in the million other possible investments (shares, investment funds etc).


    Housing is a fundamental human need and our housing market should not be tossed around in the winds of globalised commerce.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Possible public-private partnership to build modest low cost/low price homes using modern materials. Surely there is a way to build cheaply these days without compromising too much on safety/quality.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,274 ✭✭✭EOQRTL


    Agree with point 1 and 3 but point 2 makes no sense. There is no free houses available all social housing tenants pay rent.



  • Registered Users Posts: 215 ✭✭hello2020


    Bray could look like that or much beautiful with world class high rise hotels and apartments ...

    city planners needs to visit island countries like Singapore to learn how to build modern cities



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,274 ✭✭✭EOQRTL


    The majority of people in social housing are in low paid employment and will find it hard to buy their own home unfortunately. Thankfully the assurance of having rental security provided by the council is never going to change for them. Of course if employers want to start paying these people in low paid jobs better wages they could possibly one day be lucky enough to get a mortgage.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,693 ✭✭✭donaghs


    The ECB sets Ireland's interest rate. So they won't be changing it to suit specific conditions in the Irish housing market. Part of the give and take of being in the Eurozone. They need to look at the bigger European picuture (e.g. how Germany is doing 😀).

    Although if the ECB go hard on inflation and jack up the interest rates, it could indeed take a lot of heat of out of the Irish property market, temporarily.

    Don't forget the ECB had low interest rates which helped fuel the runaway housing boom pre-2008 - because of low growth in Germany and France. And in 2008, when the world was heading into the Great Recession, Ireland facing a massive housing crash, the ECB raised interest rates, over concerns about inflation in Germany: Trichet reaffirms ECB inflation line in German TV | Reuters

    As a small number of poster have mentioned, you need to tackle both supply and demand. Changing planning regulations is "tinkering around the edge", and will inevitable lead to problems like Priory Hall, and other safety and environmental issues. Building more is only part of the solution. A rising population will continue to absorb new builds.



  • Registered Users Posts: 39,641 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    The populous needs to stop hyperventilating about property. The same fúcking bi-polar attitude for the past 40 years. Commentators creaming themselves at crashes and peaks and homelessness.

    It wasn't long ago we were bulldozing houses.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,693 ✭✭✭donaghs


    Do you mean bulldozing ghost estates etc due to the recession?

    The population of Ireland in 2008 was 4.9 million. Its now over 5.1 million, and rising.

    The news seems to give the impression that house building hasn't restarted properly since the recession, but look at CSO figures you can see house completions jumping up year on year from 2015.

    House Building & Other Construction - CSO - Central Statistics Office



  • Registered Users Posts: 25,715 ✭✭✭✭Mrs OBumble


    They were low paid when they entered social housing. Doesn't mean they stay that way afterwards. Clever ones make sure they're poor for just long enough.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,274 ✭✭✭EOQRTL


    Yeah that's right, it's their fault we've invited half the world into the country to keep wages artificially low.

    Also rent in social housing is based on the households income and doesn't stay the same. If you earn more you pay more.



  • Registered Users Posts: 39,641 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    We weren't bulldozing estates in 2008.

    The current demand although it has slowed now is being driven by record deposits because of Covid and cheap interest rates (although gone up recently).

    The supply side according to the industry is because of material costs. Although we are set to exceed or new build targets this year. This will all normalise given time.

    If we don't stop and analyse exactly what the cause is and just jump in with more knee jerk reactions we will just keep continuing having a batshít housing market.



  • Registered Users Posts: 39,641 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    We have the second highest minimum wage in the EU and second highest hourly wage across the board.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,726 ✭✭✭Greyfox


    Most important thing is to build lots and lots of high rise apartments that are of reasonable quality and we tell anybody against high rise without a very strong reason to f*** off. No more d*ckheads refusing planning for silly reasons. To get the money for this we can promise companies lots of tax credits if they finance and own the buildings. Or we can get a massive loan to fund all this.

    It's time we actually started treating the issue as a crisis and not just as a problem



  • Registered Users Posts: 19,767 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    Ireland has an unusually large percentage of children still living with their parents well into adulthood, including my household, so this vast pool acts as a counter to any expectation that demand should fall when supply picks up. The supply never increases enough to reduce this pool by more than a tiny amount.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Having a temporary buffer might take some of the heat out of the market hopefully making housing and rentals more affordable for all, instead of the councils competing for existing housing and rental stock. Unless you have a disability the state should only be providing the bare minimum until your situation improves. First time buyer grants and HAP supports provided up to this point have just made the housing and rental market more expensive for everybody. The state needs to stop relying on the private market and offer its own solutions where it can control costs. State could build basic low cost housing directly for first time buyers and low income families that act as starter homes you move on if your situation improves and sell back to the state so it can be offered to somebody else starting off or on a low income. Now there are plenty of issues that would have to be resolved first like the state having a skilled workforce to build these houses but any solution at this stage will require a lot of work. When there is a low end to the housing market the rest might start to balance out. Obviously there are many issues that have gotten us to this point, I'm merely offering one suggestion that might ease things.



  • Registered Users Posts: 23,246 ✭✭✭✭Dyr


    Ban AirBNB

    Hard stop on Immigration/Fugees/language students

    Watch problem disappear like the snows of yesteryear.


    Too much money being made from the problem to want to stop it.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 8,481 ✭✭✭lawrencesummers


    While that sounds like a potential solution it can have terrible consequences.

    Hotel prices are high enough without removing a lot of competition from the market, tourism will suffer if hotel prices become unaffordable, and removing airbnb is a dangerous game.


    while not a fan of high rise living we should be increasing the high rise commercial developments, the less footprint commercial takes up the better.


    We need infrastructure to make areas attractive to live in, and the more ambitious the infrastructure the more attractive the areas.



Advertisement