Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

solve the housing problem easily...some solutions?

Options
1356717

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 8,481 ✭✭✭lawrencesummers




  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 37,369 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    Not every objection is valid and should be acceded to.

    We sat again for an hour and a half discussing maps and figures and always getting back to that most damnable creation of the perverted ingenuity of man - the County of Tyrone.

    H. H. Asquith



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,481 ✭✭✭lawrencesummers


    Try telling someone whose house is falling down on top of their family that they are just flag flying.


    And learn how to quote.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,133 ✭✭✭screamer


    I certainly think the criteria for valid objections needs to be laid out. There are people who object just because they don’t want a house built somewhere that doesn’t even affect them. That’s absolute rubbish and shouldn’t even be entertained.



  • Registered Users Posts: 39,626 ✭✭✭✭Boggles



    Objections to planning that have merit are upheld. People have a right to object

    Not always unfortunately not when you have County Councils creaming themselves at how much costs they can charge it's inevitable.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 8,481 ✭✭✭lawrencesummers


    And they get rejected if they have no merit.

    The issue with planning is that its slow, it should and could be faster, but its not holding up the entire construction sector, there are plenty of houses granted planning what have not started construction for lots of other reasons.

    So maybe you speed up the planning process that doesnt solve the supply problem.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,481 ✭✭✭lawrencesummers




  • Registered Users Posts: 6,133 ✭✭✭screamer




  • Registered Users Posts: 8,481 ✭✭✭lawrencesummers




  • Registered Users Posts: 1,274 ✭✭✭EOQRTL


    So all the people living in Dublin okay so who's going to wipe your parents arses in their nursing home? Who's going to drive the Tesco delivery van? Who's going to mind your kids in the creche? etc... etc....

    Are they all going to drive from Clare to Dublin every morning to do it? You haven't thought this through have you.

    Maybe the creche owners can start paying their employees 60k a year so they have a chance at a better house?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 21,473 ✭✭✭✭ELM327


    Well then they will need to get a better job or better pay to afford a house in dublin. I have moved 1.5 hours away from Dublin as I couldnt afford to buy there.



  • Registered Users Posts: 39,626 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    That is true, but it very much is the thin edge of the wedge, but it does make the headlines.

    Extremely bad or adverse planning decisions rarely do.

    There was case in Dublin recently of a large housing development granted on provision a new school and other resources would be built in tandem or in the near future to cope with the population increase.

    The council identified a site for the Department of Education to buy, the department bought it for 1.2 million and then council denied planning for the new school.

    Of course that sort of fúckery is unaccountable.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,274 ✭✭✭EOQRTL


    That's not the point. If someone replaces that person who gets a better job where do they live?

    It's not as black and white as you would like. Having social housing in our major cities is a vital part of keeping those cities functioning.

    You are lucky you can afford to buy a house and commute to Dublin so you must be on a good salary. I've a friend working who drives up from Gorey every day to Rathgar and it's costing him 130 euro a week in diesel alone luckily he's able to afford it but someone on 400 a week working in a nursing home not so much.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,481 ✭✭✭lawrencesummers




  • Registered Users Posts: 1,781 ✭✭✭mohawk


    What effect would this approach have on build quality, housing size, environmental impact etc. Can you still make sure if you do this that the housing is appropriate to the site and that the local area has all the amenities required for the people that will eventually live there. We don’t want a repeat of all those apartments in Dublin and the Fire regulation issues.

    There is definitely places where we should be able to build higher etc so there is easy things we could do.

    Land cost if definitely an underlying issue. That cost will get passed on to final purchaser.



  • Registered Users Posts: 21,473 ✭✭✭✭ELM327


    I work from home.

    I'm a firm believer that no one should be given a free house (or a subsidised house) in Dublin. If the working folks (and even ones like myself on 6 figures) can't afford a decent house in Dublin, why should non working or menial working folks get a free or discounted house?

    Equally , while house ownership is aspirational, everyone has a right to shelter. Therefore provide a free house to anyone who wants one, be they homeless or michael o leary, but just not in the cities.



  • Registered Users Posts: 28,838 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    thank fcuk some boards members have fcuk all to do with trying to resolve this one! holy fcuk!



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,781 ✭✭✭mohawk


    Dublin is where most of the population is. There are many, many jobs that are and/or will always be low paid. Just because they are low paid doesn’t mean they aren’t necessary and important jobs. Those people can’t afford 2hour commutes. The people of Dublin need those workers, crèche workers are a great example. Take all those crèche workers out of Dublin and what would happen? If you wanted to argue that those who have never had a job or obtained a skill shouldn’t be housed in Dublin then I could see your point.

    Not everyone has the ability or the skills to earn 6 figure salaries. Some peoples skill sets are suited to careers that aren’t well paid.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,274 ✭✭✭EOQRTL


    You are just going round in circles now. I've already explained why we need social housing in cities.

    "Menial working" folks don't get a "free" house. Repeating it again and again doesn't make it true. They pay RENT according to their means.

    Now if you want to get into people on long term unemployment then yes there is no need for them to be living in the middle of a city like Dublin if they aren't going to contribute towards our society but moving someone who let's say works in a nursing home in Rathgar and lives in social housing in Harold's Cross down to Roscommon is your solution to the housing problem then i completely disagree.



  • Registered Users Posts: 296 ✭✭Ham_Sandwich


    let Sinn Fein have a go they'll sort us out with houses if we look after them in the electon



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 19,762 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    There is no need to undermine engineering specs, just some of the other ridiculous stuff, like specifying your front wall is constructed from stone and sod and that you must plant a perimeter hedge containing these species of trees, that x percent of the front of your house be built of natural stone, that your windows must have glazing bars interrupting perfectly good latge windows, to make them look like a 200 year old cottage - etc, bloody etc.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,481 ✭✭✭lawrencesummers


    Or we could let FFG continue the road they are on, which has served us so well thus far.



  • Registered Users Posts: 28,838 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78




  • Registered Users Posts: 1,614 ✭✭✭victor8600


    One approach to solving this issue is the decentralisation. Firstly, move more government departments out of Dublin. Secondly, promote creation of new jobs outside of Dublin.

    And then build more and prevent investment funds from gobbling up new estates unless they have build them themselves. Give money to city councils to build high rise student accommodation in Dublin, Cork, Galway city centres so that any full time student is guaranteed a place at a reasonable cost. This will remove students from the competition for the sparse city accommodation + gives students more time to party study without the long daily commute.

    There are lots of solutions that do not involve finding space in Dublin to put another 50,000 three-bed semi-Ds.



  • Registered Users Posts: 39,626 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    Bertie tried it years ago, there was a concerted campaign in the media and opposition against it for some absolute badshít reasoning.

    Bertie Ahern argued that “moving a large core of departments out to regional locations is good for departments”. It would also be “better for the staff in terms of quality of life and will make for better balanced development in the country”

    But of course.

    The Irish Timescolumnist Fintan O'Toole saw the plan as "a classic Fianna Fáil operation, in that it appeals vaguely to a broad swathe of the population and sharply to an insider elite . . . the little inner circle of property developers that has a special place in the government's heart . . . Ask the old question, 'cui bono?' – 'who benefits?' – and the whole thing starts to make sense."

    By choosing 53 centres for “decentralisation” ministers were ensuring that the State’s largesse would be spread widely. The beneficiaries would be local auctioneers, estate agents, builders, shopkeepers, publicans, car dealers, property developers and landowners with sites for sale – all of whom would gain from having a clutch of public servants moving in.

    Good lord local business might benefit can't be having that as our towns and villages subsequently died. Said Dublin native Fintan O'Toole.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,491 ✭✭✭Tombo2001


    Nobody.

    Who was lending in the last recession?

    Nobody.

    There were heaps of empty houses.

    This is a discussion about the housing market. Not emigration.

    But I see you are proving EXACTLY my point, which is that the conversation will IMMEDIATELY move away from housing and towards the shocking waste of our best and brightest heading away.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,781 ✭✭✭mohawk


    That sounds good Victor. Plenty of part time work in city centre’s for students too and they are good spenders for a local economy.

    Every city centre can definitely go higher. If you target city centre accommodation to students, young professionals and those here temporarily (such as some tech employees) there is less pressure on schools and other things families need to expand as they will have limited space in a city centre to do so.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 27,130 CMod ✭✭✭✭spurious


    Presume by 'Ban AirBnB' people mean entire properties on AirBnB?

    Stopping me having occasional guests in the back bedroom will not change the housing situation one bit.



  • Registered Users Posts: 39,626 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    Stopping me having occasional guests in the back bedroom

    That sounds beyond dodgy.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,445 ✭✭✭CorkRed93


    airbnb wanted you to make some cash renting out a spare room in your house. now people hold one/multiple properties for the purpose of letting them short term to tourists worldwide. airbnb is a net negative on the world in its present form taking much needed housing stock from the market.



Advertisement