Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Russia - threadbanned users in OP

1170617071709171117123690

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,050 ✭✭✭Polar101


    The main issue with Russia declaring a war is that the current "special military operation" is actually a bullshit term. It's already a full-blown war. Russia declaring war would indeed allow them to mobilise reserves, and go to war production, but there isn't exactly anything stopping them from doing all that at any point right now.

    If their production goes to "war mode", then sure, they'll have new tanks, guns and ammo, but not any time soon. The same with mobilisation, it takes a long time call troops, equip them, and train them to a basic level, and then move them to the war zone. None of this is going to happen this year, even if they started right now.

    Then there's the matter of sanctions - I'm sure they can get some parts needed for production, but it's not simple.

    It's true Russia didn't have enough troops to start a full-scale invasion of Ukraine. Yet they did. That's why it hasn't gone great for them. Maybe they can gather up more strength, and re-launch their offensive, but who thinks they'll do better next time?



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 24,146 Mod ✭✭✭✭robinph


    Will the West keep sending money to Ukraine?

    Yes.

    And even if you add on the money that they are currently sending to Russia for gas it is still by far the better option than allowing Russia to take Ukraine. The West/ EU/ NATO will do absolutely everything they can to stop Russia in its tracks, and they would much rather spend money to achieve that than spend lives of their military... But will if they need to.

    Allowing Russia to take over Ukraine just isn't an option. If the public in the west starts to get a bit bored, the various governments will still be sticking with the sending money and equipment to Ukraine option. Letting Russia win is far worse than a few disgruntled voters.

    Whilst the Russian public may be indifferent to what is happening in Ukraine, I don't think the western public is indifferent to the idea of Ukraine being taken over by Russia and they will support the Western governments actions for longer than Putin will be able to avoid getting assassinated which is the inevitable outcome for him.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,274 ✭✭✭EOQRTL


    I doubt the Russians could even get the missiles out of the silos anyway nobody is talking invading Russia just freeing Ukraine of the orks. There should be at the very least a massive NATO lead force deployed to the nuclear plants tomorrow to take them back from the pricks. Enough to NATO being a wet blanket talking shop and time to start standing up to the Russians.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,400 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    But the win ratio with AK is better

    but that is sitting with a pair of duces with one in the pocket and only against one other player. Getting dealt a pair of two's and managing to sit out and win a game against 5-6 other players is my h higher odds

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Posts: 7,946 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    One option for Putin is to supplement the depleted Russian army with conscripts. Maybe replace Russian troops on NATO or China’s border.

    So, you now have 500,000 formerly repressed pissed off Russians with guns. You think Vlad is comfortable with that?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,491 ✭✭✭zv2




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,609 ✭✭✭Tonesjones


    It's Eastern Ukraine Putin is after. An area approximately half the size of the UK is now under Russian control.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,082 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    On BBC site Russians are saying they shot down a drone before it could hit the Sevastopol naval base...

    The Russian-installed regional head Mikhail Razvozhayev did not mention any damage caused, but said in a Telegram post that a Ukrainian drone had been shot down over naval headquarters and fell onto the roof of the building.

    He posted a picture online, saying nobody was hurt.

    "It was hit right above the fleet HQ. It fell on the roof and caught fire. They did not manage to carry out the strike.

    https://www.bbc.com/news/live/world-62615601

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,491 ✭✭✭zv2


    It looks like history is starting up again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,609 ✭✭✭Tonesjones


    One one hand posters are saying you can't believe numbers estimating the size of the Russian military . Numbers that anyone can google and find multiple sources ie governments, media etc

    People gave the post a thumbs up.

    Then on the same page someone posts supposed Russian military loses from "sources on the net" and people give the post a thumbs up.

    The exact opposite! This time we are supposed to believe the sources.

    It's amazing. And what are the bets some of the thanks on both posts( saying the exact opposite from the other) are from the same posters.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 859 ✭✭✭mikewest


    Stop with the nonsense, Putin wanted all of Ukraine but got stopped.

    Now he has a somewhat larger chunk than he had last Christmas but is getting pummeled all along the front line and will most likely lose a chunk of what he controls now by the end of the year.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,609 ✭✭✭Tonesjones


    200k troops wouldn't take a country the size of Ukraine.

    Don't be ridiculous.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,395 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    How do you assess that? Nobody seems to know what Russia's objectives are/ were/ will be with this 'special operation'. Do they know themselves? Variously we hear that they regard the whole of Ukraine as Russian territory and they'd also have their eyes on all the Baltic states as they regard this as part of their heritage & empire. This is an imperialist war, driven by a desire to expand territory and command natural assets. Nothing else.

    Putin's only weapon this winter is gas, gas and gas.

    You say above he could throw in thousands more troops into a winter campaign - sheer madness.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 477 ✭✭Mullinabreena


    It's also a gas rich area too, along with the south.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,609 ✭✭✭Tonesjones


    Russia had taken an area have the size of the UK. What do you think is happening in this seized land behind the lines?

    People are being given Russian passports.

    Russian currency is now being used

    Anyone who resists is being shot

    This is part of Russia now.

    Ukraine does not get this back. Thats the reality.

    200k troops would never have been enough to take Ukraine! They would need the entire Russian military to even have any hope. This is about Eastern Ukraine. Just like Crimea.

    A land grab



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,609 ✭✭✭Tonesjones


    Exactly. Massive reserves that Russia has spent a fortune disrupting any attempt by Ukraine to develop the resources for themselves.

    There is also year round ice free shipping giving access to the Mediterranean Sea.


    This is going on years. Its a land grab and they have grabbed a lot of land



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,759 ✭✭✭weisses




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,609 ✭✭✭Tonesjones


    With only 200k soldiers spread accros multiple cities and no attempt at air dominance despite having a 10/1 ratio airforce in their favour?

    It's obvious.

    Bombing kiev using cruise missiles is a distraction. Eastern Ukraine is where the soldiers are based.

    Odessa isn't viable. It's too far west and Ukrainian military is fighting tooth and nail on the battle lines in the East.

    Check out the map. BBC have a good one

    Ukraine cannot win on their own. Russia has taken Eastern Ukraine. Again look at the map. 160k odd square kilometers



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,400 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    You are talking through your proverbial. Russia taught it only had to send a battle group of paratroopers to swan into Kyiv and use a special forces unit to capture and/ or kill Zelenyshi and the war would be over. Another 20-50k would rock up the Ukrainian M50 and slap bam thank you mam there special operation would be over.

    They taught the Ukrainian's would either p!ss in themselves or welcome them with flowers. They got it badly wrong.

    You think now that 200k more conscripts and border guards are going to make a difference. If Puntin was going to mobilize he have done it last May. He could not do it then as the quality of the Russian conscripts are sh!the. These have not even has a proper basic training when they were originally conscripted 2-10 years ago.

    These are not ex US troops that joined the army to get through college got 2-3 years of top class training and are now in the national guard. They did not do a tour of duty in Iraq or Afghanistan. These are the same as putting a gun into an 20 or 22 year old college kids hands in Ireland. Not only that they are not motivated

    Look at what the US did to the Iraqi army on the roadways out of Kuwait city. It will be much the same if Putin trys to add another 200 k to his army.

    The reason people thanked my posts was not because I posted drivel from the net but because I gave a reasoning to my figures and to what is happening.

    Wars are no longer about the number of troops you have it's about technology. And Russia has no f@@king technology

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,002 ✭✭✭Dufflecoat Fanny


    The fact Russia has been sending out T-62s tells it all, artillery shells are running out and Infantry vehicles are almost depleted. He could send a million men into Ukraine but without armour and they'd be blown to bits. Russia is going to slowly beaten back inside its borders and left to rot in sanction hell.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,328 ✭✭✭Banana Republic 1




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,747 ✭✭✭firemansam4


    Ahh come off it. It was pretty obvious to nearly everyone analyzing this war that Russia and Putin had planned to try and take Kyiv quickly by overwhelming it. But they seriously misjudged the Ukranian resistance and the capabilities of their own logistics.

    Dont try and spew this rubbish about it being their masterplan to draw resources from the East.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Someone needs to find a new hobby,

    putinbots



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,609 ✭✭✭Tonesjones


    200k to take a country the size of Ukraine who have over 7 million of a population fit for military service with an active personnel of 200k and a reserve of 900k.

    Absolute nonsense



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,400 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,082 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    They didnt think they would have to fight them. Ukraine was supposed to be run by a nazi cia regime that no one would fight for. Collapse like a house of cards. Zelensky smuggled out of the country by the CIA.

    They dropped their elite paratroops into hostomel airport ahead of the rest of the army.

    They werent planning for a war but a coup detat.

    This is reflected in all their military dispositions down to use of riot police and lack of rations.

    How about before repeating the same question over on over - engaging with the multiple rebuttals already provided.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,609 ✭✭✭Tonesjones


    I'm not asking any question

    I'm dealing in fact. The fact that Russia has taken Eastern Ukraine with a force of 200k. The pro separatist regions of donetsk and luhansk are now part of Russia. Just like Crimea. 160k Square kilometres

    Hopefully Ukrainian forces using western military equipment can reclaim this ground but its highly unlikely.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,759 ✭✭✭weisses


    That 40 km convoy near Kiev was a distraction as well ?

    As for Odessa

    "Major General Rustam Minnekayev, acting commander of Russia's Central Military District, said on Friday that Moscow plans to establish full control over the Donbas region and southern Ukraine, as part of the "second phase" of its military operation.

    He also claimed that control of southern Ukraine would give Russia a gateway to the breakaway Moldovan region of Trans-Dniester, where there are "facts of oppression of the Russian-speaking population."

    https://www.dw.com/en/russia-eyes-route-to-trans-dniester-what-do-we-know/a-61559127



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,609 ✭✭✭Tonesjones


    Its an unwinnable argument. One minute everything Russia says is lies and propaganda the next their word is taken as gospel

    Let's just stick to the facts. donetsk and luhansk is where the fighting is.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,655 ✭✭✭Dubh Geannain


    Russia didn't say the convoy was 40 km long. Satellite pictures showed that. Your argument is unwinnable. Russia went for Kiev and lost a lot of equipment and paratroopers on the effort. As with Sumy, Chernihiv, Kharkiv. The fact is Kherson is the only regional capital they managed to take and that was aided by sabotage on the Ukrainian side.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement