Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

F1 2022 thread - see post 1 for rules

19293959798135

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,790 ✭✭✭✭Burkie1203




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,635 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    That's a very idealistic and servile attitude. Alpine would dump him if they felt it suited them and he should do the same. They were outside the contract which obliged Piastri to do what Alpine told him.

    They made a contract, and Piastri fulfilled his contract. Alpine tried to strong arm him into driving for them by simply announcing him as their driver, even though they knew he had free reign to find a seat elsewhere. Is that good behaviour?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,635 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Renault had a winning engine when the technology had been done to death and the engines were all roughly the same. They haven't won anything with the post 2014 engine and they won't win anything with it either (flukey Ocon win in a wet Hungary aside). They're never going to compete at the front with such an unambitious engine programme.

    Even red bull couldn't compete at the front with the post 2014 Renault engine. So Alpine has no chance.

    Piastri isn't livestock to be moved from paddock to paddock as Alpine want. They announced him as their driver whe. He was contractually free to sign for anyone. What was he going to be paid? What were his conditions? Very difficult to negotiate when you're accepting the drive just because they announced it and hope you 'go quietly'.

    Things an astonishing attitude to labour. He should just go quietly and accept whatever slop Alpine feed him? He needs Mick Lynch advocating for him, not @mickdw



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,167 ✭✭✭✭AMKC
    Ms


    They made a contract, and Piastri fulfilled his contract. Alpine tried to strong arm him into driving for them by simply announcing him as their driver, even though they knew he had free reign to find a seat elsewhere. Is that good behaviour?

    No it's not good behavior you are right but what the other three drivers and there managers got up to was not good behavior either.

    Live long and Prosper

    Peace and long life.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,140 ✭✭✭muckwarrior


    He may have had a torrid time at McLaren, but he was a top driver, so obviously they'd be hoping he can regain that form. It'd be fairly low risk for them to give him a 1 year contract, or maybe a longer one with strict performance clauses in it. Especially since they can probably get him for a fraction of the price they paid him before.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,046 ✭✭✭✭flazio


    Channel 4 could get themselves a rating boost for Spa if Mark Webber is part of the presentation team.

    This too shall pass.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 683 ✭✭✭Lawlesz


    Scott Mitchell discussed it on The Race during the week. The understanding was that Alpine were giving Alonso a 1 year deal, with the option on the teams side for a second year. Alonso, being Alonso, was upset by this, and the thought that he was keeping the seat warm for a young whipper snapper. On the other side, Alpine were trying to place Piastri at Williams to serve his apprenticeship for a season or two, which he/his management was not keen on. Seems like both drivers were upset/insulted by the deals on offer which made them look elsewhere.

    Then add in the fact that there is a whole other layer to this, with Alonso and Webbers relationship, Flavio lurking in the background etc. its fairly clear it was a coordinated move from both driver camps to make sure they both got what they wanted and punished Alpine for trying to string them both along.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,635 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Sure. There's no great example of good behaviour by any of the parties in this case. So why are you only pissed off at Piastri?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,046 ✭✭✭✭flazio


    Interesting to see the Tommy Byrne documentary "Crash and Burn" was added to Disney+ yesterday.

    This too shall pass.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,873 ✭✭✭McFly85


    The fault is Alpines if they let his contract lapse. They put a lot of time into his development but if he was that important to them then they should have sewn him up regardless of their plans for next year.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,907 ✭✭✭rock22


    Unless the rumours that Webber refused to return their calls are true.

    Wonder will Alpine consider going to court ( in France presumably)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,321 ✭✭✭✭klose


    Up untill Vettels retirement and all this kicked off he was going to be sitting on the sidelines next season as Alonso would have still been at Alpine. Did Piastri/Webber know vettel was retiring meaning Alonso would just ship to Aston? Hardly. They were obviously negotiating all this with mclaren before any of that kicked off, the vettel/alonso switch just happened at the same time.

    I agree it's **** from Piastri not staying "loyal" to Renault/Alpine but its a cut throat business and you have to take your chances when you get em asap.


    Alpine are 4 points ahead of Mclaren in the constructors and that's with a massively struggling Ricciardo on board. If Ricciardo was pulling similar results to Norris they would be miles ahead of Alpine.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,167 ✭✭✭✭AMKC
    Ms


    Because he does not appreciate how lucky he was to have Alpine develop him and give him a chance to get into F1. What harm would a year or two at Williams have done him? It done George Russell no harm.

    I Have a feeling the Piestri will regret moving straight into Mclaren with the extra pressure and what will be expected of him there. He could end up like Kevin Magnussen at his stint in Mclaren. They will be a lot more pressure on him at Mclaren than if he had went to Williams.

    Live long and Prosper

    Peace and long life.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,635 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Ah be serious. You think he should spend a couple of years at Williams out of loyalty, instead of taking a seat at Mclaren?

    If he's ready to step up, he'd be a fool to muck about at the worst team on the grid.

    Mclaren want him and he wants Mclaren. There's no loyalty in reality. And outside a contract there isn't even an expectation of loyalty.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,990 ✭✭✭✭mickdw


    I said he should have gone quietly to them to reverse it, release a joint statement and keep his options open for the future, not accept the drive.

    You are taking a very narrow view of Renault performance in F1. Yes they didn't win titles with the hybrid engines but they did win a number of races with red bull in the hybrid era. They are a serious manufacturer with a history in F1 as good as anyone out there. I'm thinking 10 or more titles as an engine supplier in the years since 1990 - the length I've been watching F1.

    Piastri has got involved here with Alonso and flavio, yesterdays men with a grudge.

    If he goes well and is the equal of Norris at McLaren, he will be on safe ground.

    If he is looking for other seats in a couple of years, well he might be a sorry boy to have pissed all over Renault.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,426 ✭✭✭Hijpo



    "According to a report from racingnews365, however, Pierre Gasly has an exit clause in his contract that allows him to leave Alpha Tauri if the team approaching him is higher in the standings. "



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,635 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Both he and Renault did each other dirty. Loyalty is a lovely idea. But it doesn't exist in F1.

    I doubtbhes burned his bridges at Alpine. Could end up there yet. It depends on whether he's good. If he's crap, Alpine might be highly principled and never hire him. If he's good and Alpine want him, they'd hire him in a heartbeat. In other words, there is absolutely no principle.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 485 ✭✭guyfo


    The idea of "Loyalty" in F1 is just hilarious to me. People didnt get to where they are in F1 by making sure they didn't step on anyone's toes. Motorsport is cutthroat.

    Look at George Russell, he played the loyalty game and got rewarded with 3 years stuck at the back and by the time he got to the big team it wasn't on top anymore, and his carrot on a stick was Mercedes... not the mid-field Alpine.

    Hamilton jumped ship from McLaren, Alsonso from Renault (3 times now) Vettel and Riccardo from RB and I could go on. The idea of Alpine training up Oscar is a bit of a push too, they only started their support after he won Euro F3 in his rookie season, another team was always going to snap him up if they couldn't.

    Oscar is a man who won the Euro f3 championship, then the FIA F3 championship and FIA F2 championship first time of asking and should have been in a seat this year. Instead he is on the sidelines because of his links to Alpine and they were going to stick him into the worst team in the grid for at least a season after that. Why on earth would he not jump an opportunity with a team that is performing vetter than Alpine themselves and would actually put him in their car?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 485 ✭✭guyfo


    Can you elaborate on the Alpine "developing" Piastri statement? Back it up with some facts etc?

    From what I can see he was well into his career, was already with the best team for junior series (prema) and had a deal signed in FIA F3 for the 2020 season before Alpine took him on, so I'm struggling to see what they actually did for him bar come in after he had proved himself in Euro F3 and make him unappealing to other teams for a seat this year.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,499 ✭✭✭✭dulpit


    Odd that nobody seems to be talking much about how McLaren look in all this. Currently have 2 very messy contract issues ongoing, I can only assume it's Zac Brown stirring it in the background. Whereas Aston Martin swooped in and got their deal done quickly, McLaren are looking like the villain of the piece.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,635 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    I don't see it that way. They were hamstrung by Ricciardo's poor performance but he also had all the contract power. Now they can give him a few bob and 'allow' him to go to Alpine. Ricciardo gets what he wants, Piastri gets what he wants and mclaren get what they want. Alpine are the only one losing out. Mclaren and Ricciardo did a good bit of business.

    I'm assuming Ricciardo ends up at Alpine.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,790 ✭✭✭✭Burkie1203


    Unless the Gasly clause sees Alpine swoop for him. Leaving Ric out in the cold.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,635 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Yeah I suppose. 2 French drivers isn't ideal though. It sounds good but it's actually covering the same base twice. Ideally they'd have a driver from the top 2 markets they want to expand into. I've no idea who Alpine want to market their cars to though.

    Driver nationality aside, I'd prefer Gasley Ricciardo. Gasley isn't having a standout season like the last 2, but he's a good driver with decent experience now. He'd be my pick if he's available and it doesn't cost too much to pay him and buy him out of his AT contract.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,990 ✭✭✭✭mickdw


    To a point you are correct. But it's a dangerous stance to take - publicly snubbing a large works team before you have sat your ass in an F1 car.

    I'm not saying he shouldn't have gone to McLaren but it was short sighted to publicly humiliate the Renault company like that.

    You might say there is no loyalty but at the same time, nobody knows who will have the best car in 5 years time so to potentially narrow your options in any way is silly stuff for a young lad to be doing.

    Alonso and flavio will be on a beach somewhere retired in 5 years time and won't give a f*CK about Piastri.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,635 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    I thought his statement was just being legally clear where he stood. Alpine were trying to pressure him into driving for them. They probably wanted to collapse any talks he might have been holding with other teams. I did t see it as deliberately humiliation. Rather I saw it as being explicit about thr fact that he jad not signed for them and as things stood, would not be driving for them.

    Contracts mean naff all in F1 so he probably had to make clear to Mclaren that he wasn't going to leave them in a sticky situation by turning around and signing for Alpine.

    Nobody seems to be recognising that Alpine tried to sabotage any negotiations he might be having and bully him into meekly accepting their drive. Bad behaviour from Alpine.

    Nobody looks good in all this, bit I don't see any one bad guy either.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,046 ✭✭✭✭flazio


    Because, as I sit here at 7:15pm Saturday evening. McLaren have not actually done anything. All we have are journalists quoting "sources". No statements from anyone bar Ricciardo posting on social media before Hungary stating he's staying. Zak did say he'd look for exit plauses but that was months ago. The current official line at McLaren is that Lando Norris and Daniel Ricciardo will have their contracts honoured next year. If that changes, then we can talk about how they are looking.

    This too shall pass.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,635 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Yeah McLaren have kept it all very civilised. When Ricciardo wanted to stay they gave him public backing. They've always publicly backed him throughput his struggles during the 2 seasons.

    Now there's a seat Ricciardo might be very interested in, I'd say they're delighted. But they haven't aired any dirty laundry in public. Textbook performance by McLaren.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,343 ✭✭✭thefa


    I get your point and agree to an extent but George Russell is such a bad example to use.

    Like what’s the alternate reality where it works out better for him? Goes to RB instead of Perez for 2021 and be in Max’s team or go to the mess of Ferrari instead of Sainz that year? Maybe he wins a race a bit earlier but he’s got an opportunity to become the number one driver for Merc when Hamilton is gone (not happening at RB) at arguably the best organized team (which Ferrari are nowhere near).

    After only half a season at Merc he has as many career podiums as Norris, another guy with clear talent but who started off and is still in an upper midfield car that is a distance outside the top 3 teams.

    Russell’s loyalty to and patience with Mercedes is paying off.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,635 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Russell's loyalty paid off because the carrot was Mercedes and the stick was Williams.

    For Piastri, the stick is Williams but the carrot is only Alpine. Why bother with Williams when he could just jump straight into the mclaren instead. The end result is similar but without doing 2 years at Williams



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,167 ✭✭✭✭AMKC
    Ms


    Alpine are the only one losing out. Mclaren and Ricciardo did a good bit of business.


    They will not lose out if Ricciardo performs well for them assuming of course that he gets the Seat. Now if he joins Alpine and is still performing as he is at Mclaren then that's bad for both Alpine and Ricciardo more for Ricciardo than Alpine as his F1 career could be over. Let's hope it does not come to that. F1 would be a sadder place without Ricciardo in it.

    Live long and Prosper

    Peace and long life.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement
Advertisement