Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Interesting articles

1679111268

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,243 ✭✭✭roadmaster




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,428 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    'The future's bright, the future's Navy.'

    Cabhlach na hÉireann - súil eile.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 243 ✭✭ancientmariner


    What I want to see is that all ships are fitted in the first instance with relevant defensive armament such as the SIMRAD missile system using MISTRAL missiles. We have worked with Simrad on the Compass and stabilisation for gunnery during P31 construction. Their unit is SIMBAD R.C. Mistral. It covers air defence and fast boats.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,428 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Its a great system, compact, simple, rugged, anti-air and anti-surface, easy to plumb in to the Navy's existing fire control IT, effective against all but major surface combatants.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,428 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Exactly!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,202 ✭✭✭jonnybigwallet


    Looks like the bizzo to me! Bring it on...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,243 ✭✭✭roadmaster




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,243 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    This bit when you read the article

    The 15-person vessel is in the concept and assessment phase and is scheduled to launch in 2024. It will be capable of launching undersea drones which then monitor undersea cables.

    A Department of Defence spokesman said there are currently no plans for the Irish and British governments to co-operate on the project.

    Its only a concept plan and they havent said they would be in irish waters



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,910 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    Even if they did operate in Irish EEZ waters, so what?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 243 ✭✭ancientmariner


    It is time to evaluate what can we do , Service by Service. On the navy side we reached certain peace time capabilities such as much use of drones at height and distance to show self manoeuvring for PR, and continuing support to Civil agencies such as SFPA and ICG. All our main guns have optronic control with auto loading and optronic tracking. Everything else is eyeball local control for engagement less then 2000m and 1000m. The main guns have 5nm or better depending on the inputs to FCS. Eithne was the only one with Laser RF and an ability to fire blind on ball marker bearing and range.

    This is a crucial time. what we need at sea is and adaption of existing tonnage and impending MRV, OR add specialist ships for ASW, MCM, and AD. Extra vessels will require New Naval planning for manpower, training, Supports, Bases, and cross fleet training with others. Take into account the requirements also to man two Lakes and 4 Coastal M.B's. In the interim with laid up ships for disposal and new tonnage arriving the base will be overcapacity requiring definite agreed , planned permanent action by Defence.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,818 ✭✭✭donvito99


    It is misleading - it isn't being launched and it is not being built, as the headline goads, to do a job that the NS cannot do.

    The headline that doesn't sell papers should read "Royal Navy plans undersea cables monitoring ship".



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,243 ✭✭✭roadmaster




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,367 ✭✭✭sparky42


    Yep, in my experience fishermen of any nationality would happily strip the ocean while complaining about how everyone else is overfishing. However I doubt the RN will care much since we won’t do it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,243 ✭✭✭roadmaster




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,428 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    2019026_bg4_130 Focus on Vessel .png

    But sure can't the RV Tom Crean do the same for Ireland?

    Anyway, the whole notion of building a ship to sit in one place to do one job is daft. The EU and UK should get together to fund a system of monitoring rigs or underwater detectors like SOSUS to protect the cables.

    The UK already has HMS Enterprise and theres no way they'd ever permanently assign that to one task, such as this.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 243 ✭✭ancientmariner


    TC is a sophisticated Survey and research vessel which has a crew which includes 12 or more scientists. She can operate an ROV and AUV's, deploy and recover buoys and other marine sensors. She can deploy to 4000m or 13,200 ft. She will have a range of UW search sounders and multibeam equipment. She also has Dynamic Positioning and can also be used as a training platform at sea. It might be worthwhile for the Navy to familiarise key personnel by getting training time on board. A 52 metre sturdy ship with A-Frame can handle side scan sonar and most underwater equipment types including those required to "look at " cables.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,243 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    I believe Tom Crean is available to the Naval service and other state bodies.

    In regards to checking cables with Modern teck can the gear that is needed for the montioring not be just bought in modualar form and placed in 20ft containers on the back of any of ships in the fleet and lifted on and off depending on the mission.

    The US/EU probaly know The movements of the russian subs so when they believe they are heading for the cables , Our friends can give us a heads up and we can throw the containers with the gear on the back of the ship and head out to survey or simply take tom crean when needed



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 243 ✭✭ancientmariner


    My only experience of bottom side scan sonar search was with P31 at the time of the Air India Crash. We were joined by a middle aged USN team, all in civilians. They installed a large A-Frame aft and a large winch on the F.Dk. They had a monitoring and recording set up in the hangar and Briefing room. They carried two 3metre fish and after a leaking incident at sea bed level which required a full reel in and replace and repair, we had some weeks of plotting the debris field which at times was so clear as to be photographic. Equipment of this nature is transportable worldwide but needs certain ship adaptions and power to make it work. P31 was a powerful tow vessel at 6,800 HP and had no difficulty to keep the fish swimming at the correct height over the sea bed. I'm sure TC will be the ticket.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,202 ✭✭✭jonnybigwallet


    Great news and a good find Doh! I wonder will they also be looking at other mods: EG fitting an enhanced radar mast as catered for in the original design. Fitting enhanced defensive measures. IE AA/ AS missiles and enhancement / replacement of the Rhinemettal Weapons, ( as recommended by more knowledgeable posters than meself).

    I hope so. We might as well make the best of what we've got while awaiting arrival of the proposed additions to the fleet.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 243 ✭✭ancientmariner


    We must take on board that MBES units are at their forte in mapping sea bed features and obstructions. We are familiar with all the seabed data on Facebook pages including outlines of wrecks. Tracking a target for bearing, classification, and range as a principal feature will require a version that is adjustable to a few nodes when contact is established. There is a lot of data available on the Net on use and mounting MBES but little revealed on using it as an ASW sonar. The TC would be useful as a training platform until we achieve our own standard.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 243 ✭✭ancientmariner


    Noting that there is a cross type (P60's) upgrade. These are opportunities for further role enhancements and potential life extension for the ship.

    An RN type 23 frigate, designed to be multirole, has just completed a number of LifeEx periods with BAE systems. She was built 1990 and commissioned in 1992.

    The work briefly was improvements in Bridge, Crew accommodation and messes, swap out for two diesel generators, improvements in navigation, communications and Defence systems, attention to hull, engine room, and propulsion train including propellers. These are 30 year old ships and are for world wide deployment.

    Unless we can get new tonnage we must adapt with what we have and improve range of fleet capabilities. We must apply a general policy of DETECT and INTERVENE across the spectrum. Discussion with BAE or Konigsberg might be apt.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,367 ✭✭✭sparky42


    From another forum I ran into a random bit of info, with a suggestion that there was some sort of talk between the US and Dublin about S 2 Trackers back in 1977 for Fisheries Patrol? Now obviously it never went anywhere but Anyone ever hear any tall tales?

    https://archive.org/details/StateDeptcable1977-39873/mode/1up



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,367 ✭✭✭sparky42


    Totally different animals, assuming they had been fully fitted even without weapons our patrol capabilities would have been on a different level. Like I said not sure was it ever a thing or just a passing discussion, just a random What If?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,243 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    The Americans told the DOD how much the trackers would cost and DOD asked have you anything cheaper



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,428 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Not an Irish story, but an interesting example of the scale of challenges facing volunteer Militaries internationally, that is reflected in Ireland when it comes to the retention of highly skilled personnel.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,243 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    Why have they mot just bought rights to something like the M346 and build it in the UK like they will do with the Puma replacement



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,428 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Yeah, when you put it that way....

    I was aware of many of those programme level issues over the last 30 to 40 years, but when you put them all together and see no fundamental systematic response from the MoD, its clearly a mentality failing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,920 ✭✭✭Lorddrakul


    Interesting, non-hysterical article here on the likely successor to the SR-71, known as Project Mayhem.

    From Popular Mechanics...

    projectmayhem1-apple-speed-tgm-dw-1658255690[1].jpeg

    Everything We Know About the Air Force's Secret Plan to Develop a Hypersonic Bomber

    After Russia launched a nearly unstoppable missile, America is hitting back with a bomber that can travel at Mach 10.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,243 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    But then they wouldnt have made 1.3 billion and counting on a budget of 170m



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,243 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    Its a good job the state doesnt owe any brickies any cash espically 40k!!

    https://www.newstalk.com/news/defence-forces-soldier-leaves-dream-role-for-better-pay-1372681



Advertisement