Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/

Parking and traffic in Phoenix Park

1787981838486

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,074 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    Even if it was just optics (which it isn't). Optics are important.

    It's a good compromise.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,939 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,939 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Shouldn't be news to anyone that they are. Ryan is causing consternation by interfering in road projects all over the shop that are funded and shovel ready, including ones to enable new house building and economic activity, as well as those to bypass congested and overburdened rural towns.

    In Dublin City there can be no question but that a vocal lobby of Green zealots like Chu, Pidgeon, Byrne, Horner, Cuffe et al are wagging the dog by forcing an anti-car and anti-business agenda - especially in relation to the Phoenix Park for some inexplicable reason.

    As much as I'd regret seeing Sinn Féin in power in the Dáil, part of me wishes they'd won the vote of no/confidence last week just to bring about a General Election that would detonate the Greens.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,074 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    Through traffic being stopped entirely.

    If drivers won't agree to compromise then neither will the OPW. They closed the ave before when they rebuilt it. Took their good time about reopening it. Almost a year.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,074 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    You can't fix these issues by facilitating more cars. The demand will fill all the capacity you create. The solution is restrict capacity.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,939 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    As I've said before many times on many threads on this Forum - start implementing genuine alternatives before restricting capacity.

    More carrot, less stick.

    Oh, and public transport in the City that isn't infested with the scum of the Earth would be good too. Thanks in advance Eamon.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,786 ✭✭✭MojoMaker


    If you want traffic to start moving at 50km/h or less then set the target speed limit to 30km/h, then you have some chance folks might actually drive at 40 or 50, instead of the 60 or 70 (or higher) they used to drive down Chesterfield Avenue at off-peak times prior to this recent change.

    The park also has deer don't forget, and yes there has been quite a few incidents over recent years involving cars and deer in the park. Traffic moving a lot slower through the park at off-peak times and at night helps reduce those incidents.

    In a nutshell, that's the Irish way.



  • Posts: 15,801 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Given the level of PT thats available as an alternative to driving through a park, I imagine no amount of additional PT would ever be enough as you would never use it anyway.

    As for your scum comment.....



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,074 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    If you're not willing to sightly reduce your speed. Theres no chance you'll embrace other means of transport unless you've no alternative.

    People will keep choosing journeys that require a car while it's still viable.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,399 ✭✭✭✭Hurrache


    -Hi guys, let's make things a bit safer and more convenient for alternatives like cycling and buses. It'll mean taking road space from cars though.

    -**** that, Larbre34 the hypocrite will lose his ****, check under his bed and decry the greens are declaring a war on motorists.

    -But isn't that the sensible thing to be doing?

    -Yeah, but it may inconvenience him and he'll never stop whinging.

    -And aren't SF the majority party in DCC, what's he on about?

    - Not so much now, used to have the lord mayor until recently but their policy wasn't a whole lot different. It's the green scare don't you know. The commies don't have a thing on them.

    -What's his solution?

    Start implementing alternatives?

    -Erm...

    -I know, but I think he just means alternatives that don't inconvenience him in his car.

    -FFS.

    -I know.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,939 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    I've no issue reducing my speed to 30 anytime. Its an appropriate speed for winding residential streets where kids are running out and at school zones. Its not an appropriate limit for Chesterfield Avenue and doesn't meet the profile of a 30 km/h warrant.

    And this is about the credibility of speed limit byelaws, nothing more, nothing less.

    Oh and, anytime I'm in the Park by car, its for leisure, I get the train into the office anytime I'm in and I have done for years!

    Why would I leave myself unable to enjoy a nice cold creamy pint if the opportunity arises....



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,074 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    Well it's a park with kids, families, a zoo, a school. The OPW can set any speed they like at the end of the day.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,939 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Actually, they cannot.

    It has to have a statutory basis and it has to have the approval of the Guards as Traffic Authority of the State.

    The Guards have agreed to 30 for the trial period, but it could just as easily be the Guards that turn around in the review and say, 'this is a nonsense, we have 90+% non compliance and 50 is appropriate so change it back and leave it'



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,074 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    And yet currently you have the 30k that OPW wanted.

    The minister claims is being adhered to despite reports that it isn't.

    So good luck with that fantasy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,939 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    The Minister will be given his orders locally, at the end of the trial.

    Just like when he opened the gates the day after the OPW said they were to stay closed.

    Then we'll see who's dealing in fantasy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,074 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    They got their road closures and one way though.

    I don't think "I can't drive at 30k" is going to hold much sway.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,939 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Correction, its a pilot for the moment.

    And anyway, nobody has much of a problem with the closures, all gates are still usable and that's all the users and local neighbourhoods wanted. It keeps the traffic spread out and avoids any one adjoining area being unfairly inundated.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,759 ✭✭✭Former Former Former




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,939 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    It absolutely is correct.

    Road Traffic Acts, 1968-2016, as amended.

    A Road Authority (in this case the OPW) in exercise of the powers conferred on it by Section 9 of the Road Traffic Act 2004 (No. 44 of 2004), as amended by Section 86 of the Road Traffic Act 2010 (No.25 of 2010), and Section 22 of the Road Traffic Act 2016 (No. 21 of 2016) and following consultation with An Garda Síochána, may make (speed limits) bye-laws in respect of the area comprising the administrative area.

    Phoenix Park Act, 1925, as amended.

    Section 4, Phoenix Park Bye-laws, 1926, as amended.

    If you have evidence to the contrary of the process for making statutory speed limits, and the approval necessary from the Garda Commissioner (or his delegate) and the preserved role of enforcement by An Garda Siochána, as sole Traffic Authority of the State, lets have it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,759 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    The evidence is in that text you quoted.

    "Consultation with" is not the same as "has to have the approval of"



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,074 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    These threads are very flat earther.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,939 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    I've spent 30 years building new developments.

    In all that time, I've liaised with City and County Councils on the engineered design for the road network of them and appropriate speed limits. That has involved the local Traffic Consultation group, consisting of the Area Planner, the Area Traffic Engineer from the Council and the Divisional Garda Roads Policing Inspector (or his delegate of rank no lower than Sergeant).

    You can take it from me (or don't, I couldn't give a ****), if the Gardaí don't like a proposed limit, for any reason, such as being unenforceable or otherwise inappropriate, it DOES NOT happen.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,759 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    Not sure what to say to this tbh.

    You originally said

    has to have a statutory basis and it has to have the approval of the Guards as Traffic Authority of the State.

    This isn't true. It just isn't and you cited chapter and verse disproving your own argument.

    I don't know why you're so angry but I don't think it changes much.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27 HMS Erebus


    Just popped in to see what this was all about and it seems to be this gentleman ranting about the junior Government party like they were the illuminati. No evidence to support any of this, I live in Castleknock and I’m not remotely inconvenienced, in fact the park is a delight lately, the fewer cars the better and they can go at walking speed for all I care



  • Posts: 4,806 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Shocker, person that lives in Castleknock doesn't want cars in the park.

    What if you lived further away and enjoyed the park but couldn't get there without a car?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,399 ✭✭✭✭Hurrache


    Any nobody will deny that new developments in the last 30 years have been pretty poor for a whole variety of reasons, particular in terms of sustainable transport.

    So your declaration will hold little sway if it's a way for you to try claim you know what you're talking about.

    I was in the park over the weekend, and it was a delight. Car didn't combust due to the low speeds either.



  • Posts: 15,801 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    What a silly argument, you can still drive into and through the park

    Also, driving at safe speeds is not discriminatory against those not living in Castleknock, despite Laber's claims



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,939 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Says it all really.

    Costello contending that because traffic travels closer to 50 than that pilot limit of 30, the Avenue resembles a motorway, makes him sound a complete moron.

    Its shyte like this that puts people off the Green Party's agenda. Rather than want to bring people along, they prefer to preach at them for breathing.

    Ryan's pending announcement of carbon targets that will savage business and agriculture just at the time its already being pummelled every which way, could well sound the death knell of Green Party public representation. Again.



  • Posts: 15,801 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    There are some simple solutions and some not-so-simple solutions if the objective is to make the park a safe place for all users and not just a through road.

    Going from easiest to most complex

    • Remove through traffic completely
    • Add avg speed cameras at several points at the beginning / end of stretches of road
    • Lay a blast of speed ramps down every 20-30 meters
    • Re-engineer the road to make it physically impossible to drive above 30kph (chicanes, curves, lights, bumps, etc etc).

    I'm sure there's others but personally I'd go with option #1 and it could be done within a day.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27 HMS Erebus


    There are so many silly horses in this race I was just addressing the one about everyone in Castleknock being inundated by cars parking in the locality because of reduced parking in the park - I live beside the park and I’ve had zero issues.

    There are multiple parking options, generous available spaces and complete access. Funny that people say they can’t walk in the park but then are unwilling to walk from a designated car park.



Advertisement