Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Public Pay Talks - see mod warning post 4293

«134567141

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,550 ✭✭✭jaffa20


    RTE were saying it should be agreed within 1-2 weeks, whether that is true or not.



  • Registered Users Posts: 170 ✭✭Risoc


    I'd say it'll be done in time to amend the 1% in October to something like 3.5% with something similar for 2023 in a 1.5 year deal.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 170 ✭✭Shuffl_in


    Talks will be tough. God knows what the unions will be happy to accept. Forsa will probably bend over easily enough but not sure on some of the others.

    New South Wales public servants are currently on strike after receiving an offer of a 3% pay rise (and 0.5% 'likely' next year). They want at least 5.2% to match inflation.

    My best guess would be 3% this year and 2% next.



  • Registered Users Posts: 279 ✭✭HartsHat


    Have Fórsa not done better in recent talks?

    The lower grades have got higher percentage increase than the higher grades, I thought?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,579 ✭✭✭prettyboy81


    Surely this is the moment to bring the four day working week to the table. I have read some organisations are piloting this.

    Yes it doesn't fit the whole of the public & civil service. However, it would allow for them to do a pay % increase for frontline workers Garda Nurses etc. Whilst, for office type workers no increase in salary but one day less to work no commute spend, childcare & same salary for 4 day week.

    Further implementation could come into affect for Garda health care etc over time but to get this deal done without a dramatic increase to the civil public service pay costs.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 279 ✭✭HartsHat


    ..

    Post edited by HartsHat on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 170 ✭✭Shuffl_in


    The head of Britain’s largest union has warned of potential strikes this year if the government does not heed its call for inflation-linked wage increases for staff in the NHS and local government.  

    https://www.ft.com/content/7266de82-6510-4b10-a655-d57ab21335ec



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 170 ✭✭Shuffl_in


    ICTU wants to see 'very significant' pay increases for all workers

    https://www.rte.ie/news/business/2022/0612/1304391-pay/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,308 ✭✭✭Quitelife


    Public Sector Workers already get increments every year -these increments each year could be 2 to 4%..These increments were given the last 2 or 3 years when inflation was zero......are we on for giving them another 2 to 3% separate to increments because inflation is high?

    If so public servants will get rises of 4 to 7 % whilst private sector get 2-4%??

    We should all be in the Public Service not to mention the super pension for a minimal 5% contribution again far superior to the private sector worker.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 170 ✭✭Shuffl_in


    Its normal for pay to rise with experience, in both private and public sectors.

    The new contributory pension (since 2013) is not very good at all.

    You can be in the public sector. It's open to everybody.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,468 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko




  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Public Sector workers do not get increments every year. They get increments annually until they hit the max of their scale, and then, increments stop until they are promoted. Plenty of people get left stuck at the top of scales for years with the only increases being those small percentages from pay agreements..

    (Anyone want to give a wild guess at howmany times this will need to be repeated on the thread? )



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 910 ✭✭✭Get Real


    I don't even work in the public sector and I never understood this type of attitude.

    Join the public sector if you feel that way. Plenty of private sector areas these days where gains can be made by jumping from ship to ship, on top of good yearly reviews. Its an employees market.

    Also, if public sector pay increases, this trickles to the private sector as people will leave their private sector roles for this pay and private sector will raise rates accordingly to retain staff.

    I can assure you, private companies aren't going to voluntarily increase wages across the board. So it's a positive that a rise in public sector wages forces them to. Benefits all.

    Post 2013 pensions are pittance from what I understand, and a reason I wouldn't consider a job in the public sector. If you want it, go out and get it, ironically the free market also applies to obtaining public sector jobs.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,934 ✭✭✭SouthWesterly


    What super pension is this I'm supposed to be getting?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,273 ✭✭✭combat14


    many of the increments attract no pay rises for 3-4 years at a time

    as on poster mentionned when hit top of scale no pay rise for 10 years ...



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    this is almost all a botch of a post tbh and if you wanted to actually know any of what you were botching its all been corrected a hundred times before - so you clearly dont want to know any better but you got your word in anyways so congrats- i think the talks will probably carry on without you but we'll keep you informed how it goes 👍



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,308 ✭✭✭Quitelife


    6.5% over 2 years is 3.25% per year which is less than Public Sector Increments not to mind the Extra percentages Public Sector Unions are looking for .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,308 ✭✭✭Quitelife


    Its a GUARANTEED defined benefit pension on your salary for a minimal 5% contribution as opposed to private sector who are totally dependent on their own contribution and their employers which will never match a Guaranteed Defined benefit Public Service pension.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,753 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    The PS pension contribution is not 5%.

    It is 6.5% plus 10% ASC on wages over 34k approx

    So if you earn more than 34k, and you get a payrise/increment/promotion, you pay 16.5% pension contribution at the margin.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 82 ✭✭08122019


    It worked, all of you quoted them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,934 ✭✭✭SouthWesterly


    It's based on your average salary over your career and on the years service.

    The days of the gold plated pensions are long gone but do keep up the propaganda.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,699 ✭✭✭Gusser09


    Hmmmm. Public servant here lads.

    I don't think that solving a cost of living crisis caused by inflation should be solved by throwing public money at the problem. That includes any PS pay rise. It'll be swallowed up quick enough. I think anything that happens needs to be balanced. I'd prefer conditions were reverted (6:57 rather than 7:24 working day) flexi leave reinstated. And also a decent WFH policy. I don't think private or public sector workers should be made go into an office if they can do their job from home.

    I'd prefer all of the above than a pay rise. I think the unions have a finite opportunity here to really shape the future of public service in Ireland. The payrise is way to easy to go after.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 170 ✭✭Shuffl_in


    It's all well and good saying you'd prefer this and you'd prefer that but understand that some public servants are really struggling to get by. Whether it's commuting costs, child care costs, energy costs etc etc.. everything has gone up. Others are trying desperately to get on the property ladder and every penny counts.

    It's very normal for wages to increase with inflation and inflation has shot up. Not everyone can afford the loss of earnings/ spending power which has resulted.

    Yes there's the argument that people have to struggle (especially middle/low earners) to ease spiralling inflation. But there are counter arguments too.

    All in all, I think most don't expect any new pay agreement to match inflation. Most public servants I know expect to take a hit and understand that they'll take a hit, they just want it minimised as much as possible which is very fair.

    We've fallen too far behind inflation. The government have agreed and have opened talks.



  • Registered Users Posts: 123 ✭✭Alonzo Mosley


    You will be working 7:00 per day from July 1st.....



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I knew someone would use this argument, I predicted it on the WFH thread.

    If increasing our hours under the HRA agreement was not classed as a paycut when it was implemented, then reverting to Pre-HRA hours now should not be classed as a pay increase.

    Pre-HRA hours are being reinstated from 1st July 2022, The pilot schemes for re-introduction of flexi are also beginning and WFH is underway.

    But NO. This time I will not be guilted by "think of the economy, think of the country". We were asked to do that during the last recession and we got SHAFTED. And it was barely even acknowledged. 10 years for pay restoration in dribs and drabs.

    The responsibility for fixing the "financial crisis" should not be put on us again. This time, I want pay increases and I want them to be decent, and not drip fed.

    Sorry, but privileges like the return of flexi and shorter working days will not pay my rapidly increasing food, energy and general cost of living bills. Cash money will.



  • Registered Users Posts: 156 ✭✭mtb_sends


    @[Deleted User] Is the reinstating of pre HRA hours for civil service only or does it extend to the wider public sector. Im starting a public sector role imminently and am wondering if the working hours stated in my contract will basically be changing after the first month.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,120 ✭✭✭Augme


    As @[Deleted User] says, time for cash money and nothing less. Wfh sounds good and it is, there's also the fact that wfh will require a significant additional cost for people to pay. Wfh places many benefits on wider society and the climate too, so it's not a one sided benefit.


    Even if the said more annual leave I wouldn't take it, free time with no money to spend ain't exactly ideal tbh.


    In saying that, I do understand the difficult situation of dealing with high inflation and gving out pay raises as its a vicious circle. But the government have simply shown zero interest in being creat8ve and trying to address that problem w8th sensible solutions so quite frankly I'm going to demand the cash at this stage.


    Also, private sector works are going to lie and spin things to guilt and making public servants look greedy. It is essential they are ignored aswell. This isn't a popularity contest we are entering.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,699 ✭✭✭Gusser09


    Well inflation will reduce and the cost of living will come back down.


    We might be waiting a long lone time for us to be in a position to shape wfh policies etc.

    If we were to get 3 percent straight up that would be around 800 or 900 quid a year for a CO on the top of the scale?? That's after tax.

    Take the working conditions folks. It'll work out better for your pocket over paying commuting costs including diesel etc.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 483 ✭✭Fred Astaire


    It isn't an either or. The reduced working hours are already happening.

    It won't just be 3% either. It'll be something like 3% in October and another 2.5% at some point next year, before another re-evaluation. There is also a good chance of a new 30% tax band so you'll have to re-evaluate your calculations.

    Working from home will never be something worth sacrificing pay to strive for because there are certain public sector jobs that physcially cannot be done from home. You land in one of those departments and what have you then? Nothing.

    When will inflation reduce? When will the cost of living come back down? When another recession comes, and when that happens, they will be back trying to cut those wages like they did before.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,222 ✭✭✭✭ELM327


    Try and get a defined benefit pension privately and you'll see how much of a gold plated pension even the watered down PS one is.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,375 ✭✭✭Indestructable


    I don't know how people manage on Clerical Officer wages at all. The lower paid need a bigger boost if at all possible.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    Unions getting excited at the chance to pursue huge wage rises is nothing new at all. €250m is the cost for each 1% increase in PS salaries, so some government plans could be knocked on the head. 8% proposed for the private sector is lunacy personified, never mind the inevitable increased cost to consumers. As some have suggested there is a lot more scope in looking at conditions and benefits in conjunction without pay although personally reckon it's unreasonable for anyone to assume that can WFH full time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,273 ✭✭✭combat14


    and most of that 8% will go back to government in paye,usc, prsi, pension levy (Public servants), vat ...

    the remnant more than gobbled by rampant inflation...

    signifcant pay rises needed now to barely if that keep up with run away living costs .. but something more will be required or we are onto upwards spiral ... costs in this country need to be DRIVEN down...



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Inflation may come back down in time (when? a year? two years?) but that's no guarantee that prices will be revised downwards to match.

    And in the interim, 800 or 900 quid a year for a CO on the top of the scale? What about those not on the top of the scale?

    Flexi / WFH should not be accepted as bargaining tools as part of these negotiations, full stop. Every department is supposed to already have their WFH policy in place or at least 90% of the way there by end of Q2. The accural of flexi leave was the only part of flexi that was suspended due to Covid.

    I appreciate the point you're trying to make Gusser09, but I don't need more time off work, or more days WFH then I already have.

    I need more money coming into my bank account on pay day.

    Post edited by [Deleted User] on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,468 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    Are you suggesting that many large private sector businesses don’t have graded salaries?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,550 ✭✭✭jaffa20


    Why are the % increases always the same for everyone? Shouldn't it be something like 6% increases up to say 30k, 4% up to 35k, 3% up to 40k etc.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,651 ✭✭✭wench


    They have differentiated for the last few changes, eg 1% or €500, whichever is greater, which favoured the lower paid.

    The higher paid were the last to have their final restorations, as some waves only applied under 30K, or under 60K.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,699 ✭✭✭Gusser09


    For sure. Id be happy to forgo my pay rise for them to get more and me to get better conditions in terms of WFH and Flexi etc.



  • Registered Users Posts: 470 ✭✭rogerywalters


    Hrs are reinstated , flexi is back, 40% more attendance. I need more money so im.not aggreeing with this



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,273 ✭✭✭combat14


    employers need to improve terms and conditions anyway or many workers will walk.. it is an employee market in many sectors out there at the moment..



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,239 ✭✭✭Pussyhands


    Are politicians negotiating their own pay? I.e does this agreement apply to politicians too?


    I can see a bit of "outside the box" solutions. Hour less a week or something..


    They can't give too big a pay rise or else the tax payer will not be happy.


    The Irish government never lead with anything so they'll copy other countries. What are other countries doing?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,753 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    TD pay is subject to the same pay increases/decreases as other public servants.

    Ministers pay is not, AFAIK.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]




  • Registered Users Posts: 1,609 ✭✭✭Tonesjones


    I got no pay rise in the private sector



  • Registered Users Posts: 470 ✭✭rogerywalters


    A lot i know have though, maybe get a new job or join the public?



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,609 ✭✭✭Tonesjones


    I think you could be right. Employer raised prices for customers to vover extra costs but no raises for staff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,325 ✭✭✭cuttingtimber22


    6% pay rise but then through attrition I.e not filling vacancies from retirement/resignation etch cut the overall salary bill by 6%.

    We also need a new wise person’s group to look at all the stupid regulation introduced in last few years e.g. minimum alcohol pricing, recommend reversing the legislation and disbanding the units involved.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,273 ✭✭✭combat14


    time to look for one so, negotiate, accept, reskill, move jobs or be left behind..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,273 ✭✭✭combat14


    say for example someone on 50k gets 1% nominal "rise" in this environment after tax this works out at a generous 20 euro a month net or 250 annual "raise"

    between the price of your oil tank refill increasing by 1000+ euro if we are lucky

    your car refill say increased (10 euro per week) 500 per year again very conservative

    your electic bill say increasing 20 per month est 250 per year

    the average worker is conservately down net 1500 euro a year ignoring grocery price rises and all the other deaths by a thousand cuts out there ..

    meanwhile businesses are piling on the price increases with zero to feck all rise in wage bill - many workers are working even harder than ever before for nothing extra

    its amazing employees are not screaming for pay rises at this stage.. we are far too soft!!



  • Advertisement
Advertisement