Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all, we have some important news to share. Please follow the link here to find out more!

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058419143/important-news/p1?new=1

F1 2022 thread - see post 1 for rules

16061636566137

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,007 ✭✭✭✭AMKC
    Ms


    Live long and Prosper

    Peace and long life.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,972 ✭✭✭✭dulpit


    From the grid walk at miami, Zak Brown promised him the chance live on sky...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,838 ✭✭✭✭blade1


    And Mario nearly pissed his pants with excitement. 😂



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,811 ✭✭✭✭mickdw


    He will just trickle around for a lap I'd say.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,342 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    He will be taking the record from our own Rosemary Smith.

    She was 79 when she drove the Renault F1.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,153 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Listened to a podcast interview with her. Nobody told her what she couldn't do. Some woman.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,838 ✭✭✭✭blade1




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,790 ✭✭✭✭Burkie1203




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,790 ✭✭✭✭Burkie1203



    I wonder if the sidepods being lower on the Merc are contributing to the porpoising



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,265 ✭✭✭✭Frank Bullitt


    The general consensus is that it’s the floor area being so big and it flexing. RB and Ferrari have a similar front area concept which has a smaller floor area.

    The rumour of Merc going back to its original concept is still going around.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 823 ✭✭✭steinbock123


    I was there sitting at Tabac corner and I thought he very nearly lost it there on the previous lap.

    During the actual racing, 2 other guys went off at Tabac and absolutely totalled the cars in the process, one guy losing two corners. Some bang when they hit and I was amazed how far they travelled before the cars actually came to a halt. An expensive hobby for rich guys indeed. Some of those old F1 cars must be worth serious money.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,711 ✭✭✭✭flazio


    Yeah, but who wants to see them just sitting idle in a museum. They were made to be raced. Race them.

    This too shall pass.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,338 ✭✭✭✭MadYaker


    Ferrari can still make parts for those cars. Isn’t that the same one Alesi was driving last year when someone crashed into him?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,153 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Missed Apex reporting shenanigans between Ferrari and red bull. As part of the cost cap they're only allowed so much money for in-season development. And Ferrari have done some costing and suggested RB is relatively close to its cap already.

    It's more about making sure the FIA keep track and maybe to an audit. So RB has to stay honest for the rest of the season. Playing the long game.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,265 ✭✭✭✭Frank Bullitt


    7061302B-8EC1-463C-921D-3BB9E36F5D86.jpeg

    Aston with a big upgrade for Spain!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,728 ✭✭✭bennyx_o


    Very similar to the Red Bull


    EDIT: Forums have really gone to the dogs, no way to just post the image without all the Imgur stuff?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,265 ✭✭✭✭Frank Bullitt


    You can upload it directly!

    As for AM, that’s a legit copy of the RB.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,185 ✭✭✭Hijpo


    How is an upgrade even costed?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,153 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    They'd be estimates based on what it usually costs to design and develop similar upgrades, I suppose.

    The point wasn't to create an accurate estimate, it was to draw attention to the topic so the FIA would maybe do a random audit. That threat keeps Red Bull honest and, assuming they have front-loaded their development, it ensures that they don't keep up their current rate of upgrades.

    It's shithousery rather than science



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,185 ✭✭✭Hijpo


    Ah yeah I was just wondering how confidently the FIA can call bullshit on the cost of a new front wing if they audit fudged numbers.

    Comparing costs of previous upgrades of one team? Compare that upgrade cost of a similar part of other teams? Then it's up to the team in question to dispute the analysis of the FIA by explaining where they saved any expenses?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,153 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    I don't know. I just heard on the podcast I mentioned, that they have a cost cap on upgrades. I don't know how itemised or detailed it needs to be. But if they have to be able to defend their spending in an audit, i presume it'll need to be fairly detailed.

    I'll link the podcast so you can hear it for yourself.

    The story starts at 2 mins.

    The host is a dose but the info is good.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,811 ✭✭✭✭mickdw


    I honestly don't see how they can police the cap. Mercedes could spend 20 times that of williams for example in refining a front wing prior to production. The production Costs will be similar but design costs can be anything under the sun.

    Add in then the big car manufacturers who could, if so minded have a team of guys doing background work for a new road car that just happens to share front suspension geometry with the F1 car for example.

    I'm sure there are checks around all this sort of stuff but in the dirty world of F1, it's very hard to police a team just being presented with 100s of hours of design work done in the background for little direct cost from the f1 budget.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,811 ✭✭✭✭mickdw


    Re Aston Martin upgrade, I don't think F1 is as easy as just copying the visual bits of a competitive car.

    I think the team is a shambles.

    Whitmarsh and Mike Krack in there and daddy stroll attending technical meetings and likely throwing his weight around.

    It's abit like the billionaire football club owner wanting to pick the team.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,153 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Ah,I don't want to get into a position where I'm arguing on behalf of the FIA, but i'd say theres a bit more to it than that. It's a forensic audit. They have a legal remit and they can push for details up to the point of the law. So it won't be about how much it cost to make the carbon fibre, it'll be about how much it cost to design and test the part too.

    I've no idea what the limit of the law is for the auditors, and I presume there are plenty of loopholes. But they'll need to be able to show the design iterations emails and presumably the costings. If anything. There's probably too much data to properly analyse.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,711 ✭✭✭✭flazio


    On the 3rd anniversary of Niki Lauda's passing McLaren have unveiled a new bronze statue in his honour.


    This too shall pass.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,811 ✭✭✭✭mickdw


    No doubt they have every power in audit situation but it doesn't answer how you prove you didn't come up with a new front wing in 2 iterations as opposed to 10.

    An off site design office could have tried 10 differing designs in between and decided not worth developing.

    They won't have power to audit all connected businesses surely.

    I don't agree with the cap to be honest. Who can cheat it best will win.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,185 ✭✭✭Hijpo


    Had a listen, not much in the detail just speculating along the lines that we are.

    The three things that stood out to me:

    1. Ferrari are keeping an eye on other teams spending, costing that teams upgrades and providing it to the FIA? I may have taken that up wrong.

    2.Mercs issue with the porpoising stems from their floor flexing, other teams have stays in the side pods to help but because the Merc have no room in their sidepod design they can't implement the same fix. Surely that means it's a fundamental flaw and the side pod design needs to be rolled back to the older iteration?

    3.They came to the conclusion that RB have spent a huge chunk of their allowed budget on upgrades extremely early this season and that the next upgrade will be the last one they can implement while staying under the cap. Seems a bit made. Aston Martin have brought 8 upgrades to this weekend, they seem pretty significant. Surely they are tapped out now as well if the RB situation is anything to go by.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,153 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Yeah that's a fair assessment. It's shenanigans. It's just designed to slow the opposition down and make them more conscious of bringing upgrades.

    In a way, it's interesting as it shown Ferrari's anxiety too. They probably had the fastest car at the first couple of races, and it looked second best at the last race. They're concerned that they've been overtaken with some big upgrades and can't keep up. So they want to ensure RB is limited and can't keep bringing big upgrades all season.

    Red Bull made their biggest steps forward in pace early last year too. The end of the year was all Mercedes and ended with Mercedes being significantly faster. Its a change from the old pattern of RB being slow out of the blocks and getting on par with Mercedes in the last few races when the season was over.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,829 ✭✭✭quokula


    I think people are reading way too much into this. Binotto made a few throwaway comments about how Red Bull must be running out of steam on their budget cap, probably to keep morale up at Ferrari as much as anything else. This "dossier" they supposedly have ready to unleash comes from an Italian tabloid journalist and I haven't seen any major respectable news sources pick it up. I doubt it's a real thing and if it is it will have zero impact as a list of hypothetical guesses at other team's expenses is completely meaningless. The budget cap isn't measured in number of upgrades, it's measured in actual monetary expenditure.

    I'd suspect the reality is that Red Bull are simply working more efficiently than Ferrari. Looking at the 2019 budgets for example, pre-budget cap (and pre covid weirdness), Red Bull spent 335 million while Mercedes spent 425 million and Ferrari spent 435. So Ferrari's excess spending over Red Bull has typically more than two thirds of the entire budget cap this season. And Verstappen finished ahead of both Ferraris in the championship that year. If you go back through the years you'd find it's generally always been similar with Ferrari and Merc spending the most, Red Bull spending about 75% as much, then McLaren and Renault a bit behind that. Even back when Vettel was dominating, Red Bull's budget was well behind the other big teams.

    Plus it's not like Red Bull have been unique in bringing a bunch of updates. Arguably Ferrari are the outlier across the whole field for bringing the least upgrades so far this season, though obviously they started with a strong enough car not to need to.

    I have wondered about the budget cap and how it would be policed should some designers have inexplicable "eureka" moments and come up with new designs in minimal working hours. If anyone breaks the spirit of the regulations I'd imagine it's manufacturers who have extensive sports car programs including ones that boast of featuring F1 technology that would be in an easier position to do so than an energy drink company.

    The main thing to note is that FIA have been clear previously that they will come down extremely hard on anyone found to break the budget limit rules, with punishment potentially going so far as complete expulsion from the championship, which is the biggest reason why teams are unlikely to risk doing anything dodgy.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,711 ✭✭✭✭flazio


    Regarding Ricciardo future. If he is let go at the end of the season, it's worth noting that McLaren are taking over the Mercedes-Benz Formula E team. Driving for them at the moment is Stoffel Vandoorne and Nick De Vries who will be looking for drives next Formula E season. Can't see Vandoorne making his way back to the F1 team but De Vries has been in the paddock a lot recently. Firstly in Williams team kit in Miami and now in Mercedes-Benz gear this weekend. If he stays with Mercedes-Benz FE team as it becomes McLaren then I reckon he's a contender for Norris teammate.

    This too shall pass.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement