How excruciatingly annoying is Brian Kerr's commentary?

It's just the accent that's against him. Non-Dub Irish men just don't like it, weirdly, non-Dublin Irish country girls just LOVE the Dublin accent.

Speaking as an Irish man, a Dub married to a country girl, someone who know's a lot of country girls married to Dublin men (as you do)... much more than country men married to Dublin girls. When I was younger and dating I'd come across a lot of rural women looking to hook up with Dublin men.

They just love the accent. I know you don't and it gets up your nose that women from your area just love the Dublin accent, but it's the way it is.

Experience my friend. Sure look at the amount of country girls married to Dubs?

I guarantee you. There won't be many women logging on to deny the fact either. 😉

Very cranky tonight, was our Brian.

For those that aren't allowed on the internet in work.

(from Wiki)

Damien Finbarr Delaney (born 20 July 1981) is an Irish former professional footballer who played as a defender.

Delaney began his career at Cork City. He later played for Leicester City, Hull City and Queens Park Rangers before moving to Ipswich Townin 2009. He became a free agent after leaving the club in August 2012. He then signed for Crystal Palace and was a vital player in the centre of defence in their promotion season. He played for the club for six seasons and rejoined former club Cork City on 1 July 2018, after his contract expired. He departed Leeside at the end of the 2018 season and on 3 January 2019 it was announced that he had signed a one year deal with Waterford.

Damien Delaney is a nobody, he’s completely clueless, it was funny watching him get get so thick when Kerr pulled him up on the rubbish he was spouting last night. Grealish doesn’t start more games for Man City because he can’t be arsed making the effort to defend, its obvious that Pep doesn’t trust him.

I think when they got tetchy with each other it was 50/50 genuine/by design.

I think they're encouraged by producers to have these "lively" debates and contradict each other as this sort of "genuineness" ,

unfiltered real analysis was always praised in the Giles/Brady/Dunphy axis. This type of thing is lauded and favourably compared to the

supposed sanitised, pallid discussion on the BBC and elsewhere.

It can be overdone though when people start barracking each other and talking over the other pundit. Or if it comes off as preplanned entertainment.

Feck you!

Now I'll not see anything else.