JK Rowling

Poster who has the audacity to tell me what my 'pet' obsessions are and whom I can be compared to based on an anon post in a thread on a discussion forum also claims I am 'reading too much' into a series of books.

Oh the irony.

No proof of JKR being homophobic has been presented in this thread, which is what this thread is about.

I'm willing to consider further evidence if there is any presented.

Something more convincing than hand clap emoji's please lol

Oh look, there's the lovely Suzanne Moore who recently outed the obnoxious lgbt activist Owen Jones as a bully last week. Good for her, we all knew something like this was going to transpire sooner or later.

Anyways, in a reply to me asking for some proof of JKR being a homophobe which is what this thread is about, not for you to get things off your chest, you present to me a photo of JKR in the company of at least 5 homosexuals out to lunch as evidence. I wasn't expecting anyone to present evidence that supports my case, so, thanks!

As for the latter point you make I have no reason to believe a word of any of those accounts. Particularly because I know the lengths trans activist allies go to to make false allegations as seen in this thread.

Translation:

I will not accept any evidence, I will, however, introduce an utterly irrelevant topic - while later declaring what this thread is about - again.

Then I will make a point of calling the women at the forefront of the GC movement - (who make an enormously big deal, with the support of JKR, about being both biological women and 'butch' lesbians and claim that trans activists seek to render them invisible) - the gender neutral term 'homosexuals'.

I will also demonstrate my complete and utter disregard for JKR's big publicity stunt by referring to it as "out to lunch".

To finish up I will once again insinuate that any issue is in the minds of those members of the LGBTQ community voicing concerns, including those posting in this thread, thereby ending my whole nothing to see here themed monologue with a spot of gaslighting.

I see JKR is promoting Lesbian Awareness Week today, if any more evidence was needed what a nasty homophobe she is.

And that's Allison Bailey marching for LGB rights. Very odd kind of self hating homophobe.

I'm not an expert on Aliison Bailey, the only reason I know of her is because of media reports that she is suing Stonewall UK, the case starts today I believe.

You do know what homosexuality means don't you, it means of one who is sexually attracted to owns own sex, which means lesbians are homosexuals, so Allison Bailey is a homosexual. I would have thought being a homosexual yourself you'd know that. Or are you saying when 'gay' marriage was given the green light it only applied to gay men and not lesbians?

I haven't a clue what Allison Bailey has to say about transgender women, as I said I'm not an expert on her, apparently it is you that is the expert.

The only purpose I'm interested in in this thread is to show as I've already shown that no proof of JKR being homophobic has been given and in doing so expose the tactics of the Leftist trans allies.

I don't know why you think I need to be an expert on Bailey to show you have no proof that JKR is homophobic. Your whole post is making the argument that JK and Bailey are transphobic, but that's not what this thread is about, therefore all you say there is completely irrelevant.

I was qualified enough to know what's relevant in this thread and that is that Dennis Kavanage is gay, clearly isn't homophobic, which obviously the OP and Twitter activist Comerford didn't know, because if they did they they wouldn't have been that dim to make the accusation that Rowling is homophobic but is nonetheless colluding with transphobic homophobic homosexuals.

This popped up in my FB memories from 7 years ago.

How appropriate given the recent upsurge in those who make it clear they don't think LGBT people are like 'them' - who now, thanks to the GC Movement and it's willing homosexual lackies, feel emboldened to spread the hate again.

Such sad, pathetic, hate-filled creatures they are. But do not pity them. Take it from this old Dyke. They are not worthy to be the dirt beneath our sensible shoes, or even the wet wipes we use to remove our glitter.

They fear our fabulous.

Our honesty in living our lives as who we are, not who they think we should be, shines a spotlight on their cowardice.

Highlights their lives of stifling conformity.

They fear to dance while we trip the light fantastic.

They cannot dare to even dream it, while we have the courage to be it.

They will twist words, gaslight us, scream in faux outrage when challenged, roar their battle cry that being called phobic is worse than being phobic. Some will seek our deaths.

All participants in a spectrum of hate.

This is nothing new. For millennia this has been the way.

They won't go away. But neither will we.

We're Here.

We're Queer.

Get used to it.

Do you lecture members of minorities in real life or are you only brave when you are posting anonymously?

Gotta love the people who pop into the LGBT forum to gaslight us from the safety of their keyboards.

I provided several examples of comment's by Rowling where she directly links transgender women with sexual predators. Echos of the attempts made to link gay men to paedophiles - which is now expanding to include all trans supportive cis LGB people. We are being called "groomers". But apparently JKR had no hand or part in that.

I provided several examples of Rowling on social media celebrating her links to the leading lights of the Gender Critical Movement, and giving them her unqualified support. But hanging out with people who own their transphobic, supporting people who own their transphobia, publicising people who own their transphobia apparently does not make one a transphobe.

I was met with fingers in the ears denial and whatabouts.

I asked one poster to give me an interpretation of Rowling's comments that showed they were not transphobic - I was answered with a homophobic diatribe.

Then it was stated that myself and Annaspora are soapboxing - that is up to the mods to decide, not some random poster who pops into the LGBT forum to tell members of the community how wrong we are, how mistaken we are about what we are experiencing, and generally trying to define us according to the principle of "as I understand it".

Rather than counter the points being made - and the evidence supplied - the main tactic has been to attack members of the LGBT community who are trying to have a discussion in the one forum designated a safe space for Trans people. Apparently trans people can't even have this one little corner of this whole site as a space where they don't have to listen to constant invalidation of their existence.

Rowling is still at it by the way, currently she is busy defining what a lesbian is. Straightsplaining at it's finest. I can safely say I have far more experience of what being a lesbian is than either a straight woman or most of the she's not transphobic posse rushing to her defence in this thread and I reject her definition outright. No doubt there will now be posts telling me I am mistaken -and I bet none of them will be written by a lesbian.

If it quacks like a duck, hangs out in the pond with the ducks - chances are it's a duck. Show us the evidence she is a swan if that is what you think she is.