Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Irish Property Market chat II - *read mod note post #1 before posting*

1315316318320321914

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,907 ✭✭✭Villa05


    I can't think of one measure implemented by government that has not increased the price of housing in the last decade.

    If we have an affordability issue and the state has plenty of land, access to low cost finance and all their policies are on the demand side with not a single supply side measure, one cannot seriously stand over a comment like

    "of course they want to solve it"

    The first step to solving it is to stop making it worse. We haven't reached that step yet



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,480 ✭✭✭jj880


    They want to kick the can down the road as far as they can to stay in the Dail for as long as they can. Worst case if they dont get re-elected the next shower of muppets voted in can deal with it. Except they won't. They'll blame the previous government. And on it goes.... pathetic.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,367 ✭✭✭JimmyVik


    Im so glad to find someone who agrees with me.

    Too many people here think the govenrment somehow are happy to have a housing crisis and that the ministers arent at least trying.

    I believe they are, but I also believe that in an effort to be "seen" to be trying, they have, and are continuing to make it far worse than it ever should have been.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 997 ✭✭✭iColdFusion


    To be fair to previous governments one of the main reasons we have housing problems at the moment is because our economy has grown strongly the last few years and there are a lot of people with good, well paying jobs in Ireland plus massive immigration of highly educated people, that doesn't happen by accident and people seem to forget how bad it was after the 2008 crash until circa 2012 here.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,633 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    This precedent started with Dublin pyrite in the 00s - current MICA/pyrite stuff is just looking for parity with original dublin pyrite redress scheme.

    Really the government should step in to sort out other issues too - its their poor(non-existent) regulatory system for construction that has led us to these messes. Maybe if they were on the hook for it all they would get the finger out and sort the reg environment so that this never happens again.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,432 ✭✭✭combat14


    Consumer sentiment falls sharply for second month in a row as cost of living crisis spirals

    The consumer sentiment index fell from 67.0 in March to 57.7 in April. The index now stands some significant distance below its long term average of 86.6, “signalling a very nervous Irish consumer at present”, the statement read.





  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,111 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    ....lack of government regulation is a fundamental part of 'lassie faire'!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,633 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    ....lack of government regulation is a fundamental part of 'lassie faire'!

    What has lack of regulation got to do with the famous acting dog?😂

    We don't have a laissez-faire situation here, because the government DO set standards for regulating construction, they just do not enforce it at all. So ultimately liability rests with them for not enforcing. Thats why homebond and insurances wont payout (or at least what they claim)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,111 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    id class your statement as a perfect example of lassie faire



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,121 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    Remember when they tried to tell us that we're heading back to boom-town:

    That boorish nonsense seems to have disappeared from the rhetoric entirely.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,907 ✭✭✭Villa05


    2008 to 2012 was caused by Runaway house prices.

    House prices rising and falling by 12% are equally bad for the economy

    We threw our childrens futures + the kitchen sink at the problem of falling prices, there appears to be nothing the state can do to address supply.

    Paying half a million for 1 2 and 3 bed units for social housing does nothing to solve the issue, rather takes it to new levels of dysfunction

    What goes up must come....



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,604 ✭✭✭Amadan Dubh


    And that Indo article was based on the Central Bank's economic bulletin, which now looks, only 3 months later, like it has been humbled. But the competence of those in public service is incomparable to those in the private sector so I don't have any faith in our central banks that the "soft landing" can be managed from the situation of high inflation and asset bubbles. It will happen soon because there is no way that inflation can run as hot as it is for the rest of this year, let alone into next year. Populism is inevitable and the problems in the EU with populism will get worse which the whole EU project cannot afford, especially if the UK ends up looking like it is doing much better than us.

    However, if you believe that this time it's different, then the "recession" will actually not really affect the individual property market participant as much as before. Renters will be greeted with less demand for rentals so may end up with lower rents; homeowners from the Celtic Tiger years are now in the clear and buyers in the last few years have been limited in how much they could borrow so are unlikely to go much into negative equity. The "recession" in the property market will largely be a paper recession for individuals, where they had understood the value of their home was X, when actually it has ended up (X-Y% drop), but they won't have actually "lost" anything. The big losers are the commercial landlords of offices, but I would also hazard a guess that the expensive BTR (i.e. €2k+ per month) new build apartment blocks and student accommodation providers will have to write down the value of their holdings, which, in their case, is vital to their "performance" and a drop in valuation of a certain amount will trigger immediate repayment clauses in borrowing facilities.

    Long story short; for property it will be a paper recession only where home owners actually just experienced a drop in the value of their home which is not a loss at all. Institutionals still in the market have more to lose as paper losses to valuations are everything to them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,604 ✭✭✭Amadan Dubh


    I agree with this in terms of the explanation as to why we have a housing crisis, that it is actually due to the economy performing so well and jobs being created with strong immigration to fill those jobs.

    But I just think that by not looking to bed down this prosperity and build a sustainable housing market for these people, let alone the further immigrants that arrive to Ireland, we have looked the gift horse in the mouth.

    Quite simply, past performance is almost certainly not a guide to future performance. There are 350 ads for rentals in Dublin city today, when I strip out places under €500 and over €4000pm so, when we see Tik Tok or Workday or whoever announcing plans to create more jobs here, I just know that these announcements won't materialise. It is to live on a wing and a prayer to think that our dearth of rentals will somehow not end up being a hindrance to these jobs being created; it is just not going to happen unless something dramatic happens with our supply and very quickly.



  • Posts: 3,127 [Deleted User]


    But these jobs can be done remotely or on a hybrid basis, e.g. travel to Dublin one or two times a month.

    There's no reason Dublin accomdation should affect filling these jobs.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,714 ✭✭✭✭rob316


    You've to laugh both articles have pictures of people with Primark bags.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,714 ✭✭✭✭rob316


    Just wait until next month when the wage subsidy is gone, reduced consumer spending and high running costs hit businesses.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,111 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    business and employee supports should have never been removed!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 72,950 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    For the last time, general and especially theoretical economics stuff is not on topic here. Far too much leeway has been given in the past. Stop it now and stop it for good. Do not reply to this post.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,839 ✭✭✭mcsean2163


    Forked over a lot of money on the various reports for the bank to make a decision. The decision was we should buy the site at auction for 450k out of our own money and then they'd loan us the money to build.

    Unfortunately, we don't have 450k in cash lying about. A lot of money down the swanny for nothing.

    It's amazing traveling around Ireland at the moment, all the wonderful playgrounds, seaside facilities etc. If you're living in Dublin city, the facilities are being removed, it's awful claustrophobic and built up. If you want to leave Dublin e.g. Wicklow, you have to buy a derelict site for a fortune as you're not alowed to build there if you're not from Dublin. The haves and the have nots. Painful.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,907 ✭✭✭Villa05


    At least there all penny's bags so some clues were put in the article. Some intern taking the....

    I'd say it would take some down turn for that particular group of ladies to be that thrilled about their purchases at Pennys



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,313 ✭✭✭enricoh


    The bean counters have told the government that the Klondike of corporation tax could dry up easily n not to rely on it .

    The government nodded n promptly binned the reports! Can't beat the photoshoots cutting the ribbon on social housing ( even if is at eye watering rents on a 25 year lease!) Sure the shinners will be in next n they can sort it out when it goes bang!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,907 ✭✭✭Villa05


    I note you carefully sidestepped the issue of the exodus of former tds/politicians to the lobbying business

    Probably the most damaging to Irish society in recent history and heavily flagged by the imf when they were running the show.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 625 ✭✭✭Cal4567


    To provide balance, so anyone reading this won’t be accusing regular posters of just being a bunch of negative windbags, but there are some positive property related areas.

    The LDA is joining the 2 (yes only 2) largest of Ireland’s property developers. Every week now we are hearing of a very large and significant planning permission here and there. They are building up quite a portfolio.

    We need more Cairns and Glenveaghs though as the other developers seem constrained by size and their ability to attract finance from traditional lenders, i.e. our banks and not foreign based investment vehicles.

    Any other positives, out there?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,045 ✭✭✭MacronvFrugals



    Speaking of Cairns, found this sentence interesting from TASC's recently released report on land and housing.


    The speed with which it develops out its land ‘takes account of sales absorption rates across each site’ (Cairns, 2019: 38), meaning the company does not wish to build faster than its customer base will buy. The pace of construction can also be reduced to manage any ‘unforeseen stretch in liquidity’ (Cairns, 2019: 38)





  • Administrators Posts: 55,100 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    This is what all developers do now, has been the case ever since the crash.

    The overwhelming majority of houses are already sold before a single divot of turf is turned in the ground. Everything is done in phases.

    Build show house.

    Sell phase 1.

    Build phase 1.

    Sell phase 2.

    Build phase 2.

    etc. etc.

    On one side of the coin, you can say that it means there's never really going to be a big surplus of houses which will make it more difficult to drop prices. On the other side, you can say it's sensible as if there is a crash it'll avoid ghost estates and will minimize the risk of a developer going tits up.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,918 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus


    i think its often built into bank lending as well, maybe even planning its to avoid ghost estates.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 997 ✭✭✭iColdFusion


    Most developers have to pre-sell a number of units to finalise the finance for the development unless they have the cash in the bank, banks not interested in repeating that particular speculative development mistake of the past but its pushed developers into the wide open arms of social housing bodies and vulture funds prepared to buy up a whole phase from the plans.

    Materials inflation being a whole new issue now though that time will tell its full effects, at least in the past developers could be pretty certain when they pre-sold a house how much it was going to cost to build, lack of price certainty now is an issue for all sides considering how contract heavy buying a house is and how inflexible budgets can be, I doubt many social housing bodies can easily find an extra 15 or 20% now to pay for those 100 houses they signed up to buy a year ago, that could be a three million euro dilly of a pickle.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,067 ✭✭✭Murph85


    How is it then, that many properly runs European countries, dont have this issue? It's easy to solve, there is just no will. The only constraint is the manpower to build them. It's not infinite obviously. But maybe commercial or hospitality construction should he halted for a few years, to throw all resources at residential...

    Residential held up for years in the courts. Low density Developments. Very expensive construction costs, like dual aspects, high lift ratio. Sure nothing could possibly be done ...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,067 ✭✭✭Murph85


    Are the decision makers, all homeowners and probably landlords too.. yes... I just cant see any vested interest there at all. Can you ?

    Huge amounts of land in and around Dublin. Government can borrow for nothing.



  • Advertisement
  • Administrators Posts: 55,100 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec




Advertisement