Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

sick of propping up non performing farms

  • 23-03-2022 3:04pm
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 453 ✭✭


    every year its the same story - farmers are loosing money, and we need to support them.

    just saw this headline now (and haven't read it , sorry), but, why do we (tax payers) need to keep bailing out the farmers every time something doesn't go their way??



    if a farm isn't making profit, enough to withstand the never-ending problems of the world (wet weather, dry weather, war, covid, inflation, etc etc etc ) - then the farmer needs to re-organise, re-establish his/her enterprise to make it more sustainable, without support from everyone else. Somehow they can still afford to buy tractors worth 30k, when a tractor worth 10k will do the same job.

    Its the construction industry that are suffering the most in todays climate - some who are stuck in a contract to finish buildings that they priced maybe 2 years ago! No one on about a "fast delivery of money into their pockets".


    So my question before I get banned from boards - d you agree with above statement? Yes / No poll.

    Post edited by greysides on


«13

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,823 ✭✭✭Allinall


    No.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 579 ✭✭✭Conversations 3


    People need to start paying a proper price for their food.

    Then we'll see how much you want the CAP back.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,495 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck


    Pay for it directly on the food or pay it indirectly through taxes, either way I'm paying for it.

    Doesn't address the point though, in any other industry a business either makes money or it fails, yet in this industry we continue to prop up loss making enterprises. Read the farm forum here and you see lots of lads declaring their intention to keep just enough stock to get the "payments". What sort of warped industry model is that?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,413 ✭✭✭epfff


    No

    People want and governments need bellow cost of production food in current economic system.

    At current rates of support you are going to see people die from starvation inparts of Europe within 18 months.



  • Registered Users Posts: 453 ✭✭abnormalnorman


    so a farmer thats loosing money daily on his farm, should just plough on?? "keep the show on the road" - because that's all it is if its not making profit - a big show for the neighbours to be looking at, while its kept propped by government handouts and tax payers money



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 453 ✭✭abnormalnorman




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,413 ✭✭✭epfff


    Good for ypu now can you u go and sell that idea of paying cost of production to the other 500 million people in EU so farmers can have a fair market to sell into instead of putting your time into trying to start a keyboard warrior war.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 778 ✭✭✭cap.in.hand.


    Its the EU mostly not Irish taxpayer that make the payments to farmers



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,256 ✭✭✭Ubbquittious


    The supermarkets are the greatest winners from farm subsidies. Follow the supply chain and see how much the price rises between the farm and the shelf in the supermarkets.

    and the way things are set up now the supermarket can't lose. People are entrenched in their habits, local markets have been all but eradicated and there are EU rules to make life awkward for those wishing to bypass the supply chain. Even back in 1995 the local shopkeeper here would ask people if they wanted "gugs" because she wasn't officially allowed to sell them anymore.

    Farm subsidies end up in the pockets of Mr. Dunne/Aldi & Lord Tesco so they can buy more self-checkout machines and a new superyacht for themselves



  • Registered Users Posts: 592 ✭✭✭GNWoodd


    When consumers start paying the cost of production plus a margin for their food you can come back and have your poll.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 849 ✭✭✭Easten


    Farmers here are very good at lobbying Government, the construction Industry not so good, I'd even go further and say the Construction Industry has a poor reputation and is goes through too many cycles of boom and bust along with all the price gowging and Tax payer bailouts along with it. I'm still paying USC from the last Banking/Building bailout. It's a hard penal Tax hitting the average Joe for an extra €70/week on average.

    But you do have a point that farmers are always moaning about prices and costs etc yet there has been a boom in land prices, New buildings/expansion and new Tractors and Machinery over the last few years. The amount of money some of these farms are on the hook for is staggering. Let's just hope Interest rates don't rise too much or there could be trouble ahead



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,901 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    life and markets are not as simply as this, subsidisation is common practice all over the world, in many sectors, including in agriculture, without which, we simply wouldnt survive, the idea of efficient markets is simply a myth. what has occurred has been our modern approach to production, we re simply over producing, and in turn squeezing the life out of many producers, loading them with debt, and hammering every aspect of their business, so much so, returns are poor, while their produce is sold at next to nothing, hence the subsides......



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,901 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    again, this is one of the main conundrums, increasing prices will more than likely cause inflation, causing an increase in pay, causing.....

    its a potential feedback loop, we ve shafted ourselves, with modern economics



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,392 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    What does the OP mean by non performing farms? I mean there are some very substantial agricultural businesses in the country, which if you talked to their accountants, might be considered non performing, despite big turnovers and large farm payments. And at the opposite end, small farms and upland farmers turning over the bare minimum. And everything in between. You'd be better off redistributing farm supports towards smaller enterprises and keeping rural Ireland populated. There's a value in having people on the land, managing it in as environmentally way as possible, for all citizens including urban tax payers.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,148 ✭✭✭893bet


    People don’t want to “bail out farmers”


    but they do want the “Aldi super 6” and “5 meats for 20 quid”.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,901 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    yes people want these things, but many simply need them, as the cost of living is sky rocketing, our reality is far more complex than just people wanting their wants.....



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    The construction industry, you mean the industry that offered my friend €1200+ a week cash in hand to barrow cement to two block layers? Without even having to mix said cement.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,495 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck


    A "Bailout" implies a one off support in a time of need, not this eternal propping up of unprofitable businesses.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,062 ✭✭✭Kevhog1988


    Any decent construction contract has a clause for inflation price rises.



  • Registered Users Posts: 592 ✭✭✭GNWoodd


    They wouldn’t be unprofitable if consumers paid a proper price for their food.

    In all honesty do a significant percentage of people not understand that ?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,495 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck


    People keep repeating that as if we don't already know it, and also as if it addresses the actual point at hand, but it doesn't.

    I'm paying for this food either way so I have no specific issue with food prices rising in line with a change to the business model. People will pay the market price for anything, whatever that might be.

    You have an industry that encourages people to basically have a shell company doing just enough so that it can receive support payments, that is a broken business model. If doing something about it means higher prices at the till then so be it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,755 ✭✭✭jaymla627


    The large majority of the population don't to be honest, but their all about to get a crash course in food inflation pretty shortly, the sense of dread I have for 2023 and food security worldwide and the geo-political fallout from it is frightening



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,665 ✭✭✭White Clover


    You're making the assumption that agriculture is the only sector that is subsidized. It's not.



  • Registered Users Posts: 687 ✭✭✭bunderoon


    Find out WHY the are loosing money the last 20-30 years and then you'll have your answer.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,286 ✭✭✭thefallingman


    It's losing money not loosing money good god, we need our farmers though but any help should be done correctly



  • Registered Users Posts: 592 ✭✭✭GNWoodd


    I assume that what you are saying ‘by either way ‘ is your paying by both taxation and product price . The sum of both is still not sufficient . This is the reason that a lot of farmers are reducing stock numbers/ inputs and leaving the land barely ticking over .

    The price received for most farm produce doesn’t cover the cost of production. Adding in the subsidies barely makes it worthwhile.

    It is a perverted system that has become acceptable to all. The only way to have a true market is to get rid of farm subsidies and let food find its own price .

    No government will ever allow that to happen .



  • Registered Users Posts: 687 ✭✭✭bunderoon


    A typo, good god.....

    And you forgot your full stop. Good god......



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 778 ✭✭✭cap.in.hand.


    Parts of the farming business are now being pushed towards paid environmental schemes instead of food production so it's not a broken business model as the environment is now the business and what is required by the state or EU.

    Post edited by cap.in.hand. on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,572 ✭✭✭JeffKenna


    I find it hard to believe that you actually want a serious discussion when you didn't even bother reading the article that sparked your outrage.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 52 ✭✭JoeCasey


    Last year 33 billion spent on social protection, 1.6 in farming.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,901 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    happy days, a lot of that goes straight back into the economy, so all good



  • Registered Users Posts: 791 ✭✭✭Pinsnbushings


    Where do farmers put it under the mattress? They multiply that 1.6 billion investment into more than 16 billion of exports, much of which props up the rural economy..how much of that social protection money goes the other way on imported cigarettes and cheap beer??



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,495 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck


    Sounds like you are agreeing with me. Yes the market should be allowed to operate normally, and yes that would mean higher prices. But eventually it would also be more efficient, the lads who run a good farm and a tight ship would see the benefit as all the poor operators drop out of the market. Farmers as suppliers would gain more leverage instead of being beholden to the supermarkets.

    No it probably won't happen, just as with the health service governments have created a problem too big for them to fix. But that doesn't mean it shouldn't happen.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,040 ✭✭✭Jonnyc135


    So If 500g of mince went from €3.50 to €14 in order for beef farmers to become viable and payments to be cut, you would have no problem paying it which would be the fair price for the poorest cut of meat. If the answer is yes then fair play, I suspect most people reading this would not agree.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,148 ✭✭✭893bet


    Great point re the money that is brought into the country. For balance alot of our inputs are however imported also.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,495 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck


    I would have no problem paying the fair market price, whatever that may be.

    I also don't agree that it would be a jump from 3.50 to 14 overnight, none of this happens in a vacuum. The supports need to be phased out, the market will be turbulent for a period and then will stabilise, then become competitive again. That would take place over years or more likely decades.

    None of this addresses the core point made, which is that farming includes a sizeable cohort who run a business solely with the aim of doing just enough to qualify for government payouts. In many other industries that would simply be considered as a scam.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,380 ✭✭✭Deub


    Do you have a number or percentage for “sizeable”?



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 3,258 Mod ✭✭✭✭K.G.


    Because we re worth it



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,124 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    Ultimately the problem is that people want to eat too many times a week and repeatedly so. Nor have they any interest in changing that filthy habit.


    We certainly can continue to rely on the Ukraine and Russia for grain, as can the rest of the world. Vlad is apolitical when it comes to resources and leverage. Maybe we need to completely hand over supply, even more than now, to Russia and China etc



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,210 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    Tractor worth 10k?????

    I think the 1990's called and asked when you are coming home from your time travel escapades.



    Any subsidy and scheme is there to benefit the consumer - not the farmer. Let's see how much the consumer is whinging later on the the year when food inflation bites.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,086 ✭✭✭alps


    Subsidisation goes on across the board with most industries in some format, be it tax breaks (multinationals), infrastructural, (including electrical supply, services, roads, ports), direct job investements (IDA), foreign diplomatic backup.

    Investement in jobs that produce goods and services sold abroad return handsomely for the country. Its really not important that the primary producer (where most of these subsidies are targeted) makes profit, rather than they can keep producing.

    Regardless of my farm profit, if I sell €200,000 product from my farm, typically €700,000 is brought into the country on the back of it.

    Countries can only survive by selling stuff...money in..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,665 ✭✭✭White Clover


    Are you suggesting that something as essential as food production should be left to the mercies of capitalism and "the market" ?



  • Registered Users Posts: 791 ✭✭✭Pinsnbushings


    Fair point as we are discovering with fert this year.. but we will adapt and contribute a hell of a lot more than the vast majority of social welfare spend..how much of that 33 billion is spent on hap payments going to pension funds and the wealthy among us and farmers are the ones bothering the op.



  • Registered Users Posts: 791 ✭✭✭Pinsnbushings


    Honestly that's great in theory but it won't work out for society as a whole on a number of fronts..social, environmental, animal welfare, food security, food safety and I could go on and on. Are we learning nothing from this energy crisis



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,495 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,495 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck


    Are there animal welfare companies that only exist to pick up animal welfare subsidies? Are there food safety regulators that only do the bare minimum to justify their government subsidies? Are there energy companies that carefully produce just enough to get their subsidy and stop there?

    Is this thread about the non performing farms or is the thread title badly inaccurate?



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,994 ✭✭✭c.p.w.g.w


    Something that most people seem ignorant about it food prices...if we made it so farmers had to turn a profit without government help, the cost of food would be vastly higher than it currently is..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,271 ✭✭✭Packrat


    Tractor for 10k? Go on done deal and send me the links for all those 10k tractors which aren't 35 years old or a garden toy.

    Good for you that you've no problem paying the real price of your food. You're in a tiny minority there though, - most supermarket customers never buy any lamb (Just one example) because they can't afford even the heavily discounted loss leader prices it's sold at. Same with steak.

    They buy mince - at a third of the production cost.

    Tell me, what do you do yourself?

    “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command”



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,460 ✭✭✭✭mickdw


    In my opinion farm grant payments have ruined farming.

    Go back 30 to 35 years ago and here in west of Ireland a fairly average few week old calf was going for 300 punts plus and meat was affordable in shops.

    Now a similar class of animal at same age might go for 450 euro. A tiny rise in prices over 35 years yet diesel and everything else is likey at least 10 times the price now.

    This is only sustainable due to grants.

    Now shop meat prices have not stayed down at 1980s prices - they have gone up with cost of living so I can only assume that the meat factories, distributors and retailers are making a mint.

    I don't think meat needs to be produced so cheaply in order for meat to be affordable in shops.

    I think there is enough margin the system that would allow farmers be paid reasonably and the meat in the supermarket shelf still affordable.

    Grant aids allows prices be pushed Into the ground.



  • Advertisement
This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement