Are there any credible conspiracy theories?

Oh Jesus he posted the same video again.....

Cheerful, other people are very direct about what they do and don't believe.

You rarely actually ask them and instead resort to strawmen because it's more convenient to your silly arguments.

And yes, people are attacking your beliefs because they are very silly and you aren't able to defend them in an honest and coherent way. And in the case of your holocaust denial, it's dangerous, offensive nonsense.

We're sorry if that upsets you, but this is not a safe space for your beliefs to be protected.

Rather than just spamming your same old shite over and over again like a drone, maybe try addressing questions?

This is the 4th or 5th time you are repeating the exact same truther talking points you brought up before.

You are reliving a fantasy of having "special knowledge" about something, in the exact same way the other poster believes they have "special knowledge" that the space program is fake.

Case is closed, a long time ago.

That's a story from our 911 truthers group who spammed a whole bunch of sites with it. Some actually ran it, like that construction blog, probably for filler or clicks. They even managed to sneak some of their quackery into a scientific journal (and the editor had to resign after)

9/11 was a terrorist attack, that's taught in schools all over the world. If you believe something else involving secret Nazi's happened, okay, feel free to share it. Other people can make up their mind if it's plausible.

Or not. Up to you.

Isn’t there a whole sub forum for this crap?

Anyone else find it funny that the only conspiracy theorists still arguing are now claiming that all space flight is fake and that 9/11 was done by 16 guys over a weekend are examples of "credible" conspiracy theories?

Proves the point pretty good I think.

Yup. It's the only explanation that actually makes sense.

Your claim that they were rigged by 3 people using secret silent explosives does not make sense and is not plausible.

Lol. What a cringey video...

Lol why?

While on a musical theme, it turns out that those who suspected that the first live broadcast of a nightingale accompanying a musician, broadcast live on radio by the BBC in 1924 was a fake were correct:

The Cello and the nightingale (link)

That one has been top of CT’ist lists right up to 2920 when Covid knocked it down to 2nd place. There have been thousands of posts about it.

This was investigated by the FBI and the SEC and was found to be innocuous

"

The UAL trading on September 6 is a good example. On that day alone, the UAL put

option volume was much higher than any surrounding day and exceeded the call option

volume by more than 20 times—highly suspicious numbers on their face.170 The SEC

quickly discovered, however, that a single U.S. investment adviser had purchased 95

percent of the UAL put option volume for the day. The investment adviser certainly did

not fit the profile of an al Qaeda operative: it was based in the United States, registered

with the SEC, and managed several hedge funds with $5.3 billion under management. In

interviews by the SEC, both the CEO of the adviser and the trader who executed the trade

explained that they—and not any client—made the decision to buy the put as part of a

trading strategy based on a bearish view of the airline industry. They held bearish views

for a number of reasons, including recently released on-time departure figures, which

suggested the airlines were carrying fewer passengers, and recently disclosed news by

AMR reflecting poor business fundamentals. In pursuit of this strategy, the adviser sold

short a number of airline shares between September 6 and September 10; its transactions

included the fortunate purchase of UAL puts. The adviser, however, also bought 115,000

shares of AMR on September 10, believing that their price already reflected the recently

released financial information and would not fall any further. Those shares dropped

significantly when the markets reopened after the attacks. Looking at the totality of the

adviser’s circumstances, as opposed to just the purchase of the puts, convinced the SEC

that it had absolutely nothing to do with the attacks or al Qaeda. Still, the SEC referred

the trade to the FBI, which also conducted its own investigation and reached the same

conclusion.

The AMR put trading on September 10 further reveals how trading that looks highly

suspicious at first blush can prove innocuous. The put volume of AMR on September 10

was unusually high and actually exceeded the call volume by a ratio of 6:1—again,

highly suspicious on its face. The SEC traced much of the surge in volume to a California

investment advice newsletter, distributed by email and fax on Sunday, September 9,

which advised its subscribers to purchase a particular type of AMR put options. The SEC

interviewed 28 individuals who purchased these types of AMR puts on September 10,

and found that 26 of them cited the newsletter as the reason for their transaction. Another

27 purchasers were listed as subscribers of the newsletter. The SEC interviewed the

author of the newsletter, a U.S. citizen, who explained his investment strategy analysis,

which had nothing to do with foreknowledge of 9/11. Other put option volume on

September 10 was traced to similarly innocuous trades.

Another good example concerns a suspicious UAL put trade on September 7, 2001. A

single trader bought more than one-third of the total puts purchased that day, establishing

a position that proved very profitable after 9/11. Moreover, it turns out that the same

trader had a short position in UAL calls—another strategy that would pay off if the price

of UAL dropped. Investigation, however, identified the purchaser as a well-established

New York hedge fund with $2 billion under management. Setting aside the unlikelihood

of al Qaeda having a relationship with a major New York hedge fund, these trades looked

facially suspicious. But further examination showed the fund also owned 29,000 shares of

UAL stock at the time—all part of a complex, computer-driven trading strategy. As a

result of these transactions, the fund actually lost $85,000 in value when the market

reopened. Had the hedge fund wanted to profit from the attacks, it would not have

retained the UAL shares.

These examples were typical. The SEC and the FBI investigated all of the put option

purchases in UAL and AMR, drawing on multiple and redundant sources of information

to ensure complete coverage. All profitable option trading was investigated and resolved.

There was no evidence of illicit trading and no unexplained or mysterious trading.

Moreover, there was no evidence that profits from any profitable options trading wen uncollected.171"