Are there any credible conspiracy theories?

A lot of this is speculation from you. Richard Clarke also says that the Bush adminstriation wanted to put the blame on Saddam. The CIA may have been watching al qaeda but I dont think any western Intelligance agency saw them as a threat.

As tragic as the September 11th attacks were there is not enough evidence to state that it was anything but an attack by a well orgnised terriost group that no one expected to have the ability to make a major attack on western soil.

Posting the same debunked sh1t over and over and over. For years.

Everyone has seen the videoes, everyone has seen the documenataries, everyone has read about it. 21 years ago. Not a shred of credible evidence. There was no conspiracy. Its over. There is no truther community anymore. Everyone has moved on. Case closed.

Reasonable individuals having watched the video will receive a hard knock of truth, You people are lost a long time ago

Draft conference for building seven study:

NIST is on video (this is not a lie) video proof of it- freefall did not happen according to them. Saying to people there is no proof really (got video of them in the flesh) means their collapse hypothesis is just not right in any way. Sorry you dont see it thats not my fault, on you.

Actually, listen to NIST's answer you may get a bit of cope on.

Point out where I said they didnt recieve intelligence. What I said was that the western Intelligence agencies didnt see them as big threat (very obvious that they were wrong).

The first thing tha Bush adminstriation did was to see if there was any connection to Saddam in Iraq:

"Clarke wrote that on September 12, 2001, President Bush "testily" asked him and his aides to try to find evidence that Saddam was connected to the terrorist attacks. In response, Clarke wrote a report stating there was no evidence of Iraqi involvement: all relevant agencies, including the FBI and the CIA, signed off on this conclusion."

There may be some conspiracy behing the September 11th attacks but not the ones you think there i.

911 conspiracy theorists are always subjective. They look at the event and in their eyes "something fishy happened" or "they can't believe/understand it". That's a belief. You are never going to be able to disprove their belief. Basically if someone thinks the thing looks "fishy" you're never going to be able to prove it doesn't look "fishy" to that person. It's always a debate the conspiracy theorist "wins" because they can always choose to obviously reject anything you provide to the contrary.

So that's a no-go.

The logical approach is to accept it, say okay, it's "fishy", something happened, what is that something?

And that's where they fall down. They can't demonstrate to others what alternatively occurred. They often know this, which is why they go back to luring you into trying to prove that it's not "fishy"

Same video you've posted over and over. Everyone has seen it. No one believes you.

There are hundreds of conspiracies that are misleading and incorrect.

Big ones JFK, UFOs, and 9/11 I spend enough of my time on because there is excellent evidence the official narrative is not on solid ground. UFOs less so today spend time on because they’re genuine push to tell the public the truth and up to debunkers to take on the reality they denied for so long.

Holocaust regarding Jewish people. . There is no evidence it didn't occur as official testimony shows. Holocaust kept in a broad spectrum of what happening during a war that people died from illness and other things the six million figure can be factored in, Nonsense to claim six million were gassed in sheds of stone. Logistics of that are impossible. Some of the gas camps closed in early 1942. How many million got gassed ( discussion), but not really a conspiracy, not change the actual event, because even just hundred, thousand, or hundred thousand, the deed itself that mattered. 

Dohnjoe: I change my mind based on evidence. I thought the Skipral poisoning originally was suspicious, but as more evidence came out I think the Russian GRU did it. Still stand by that change, Russia did for what reason still unsure. Skipral working with Ukraine not sure? Guys are fixed humans unable to change. I am not rigid I change opinion if see the evidence good for it.

If 9/11 was an inside job it would be one of the most incredible, exciting stories ever. I'd be all over it. But it isn't.

None of the people who claim it's an inside job or try to hint at it through denial can even invent a remotely plausible story (let alone support any)

We ( meaning us who don't believe the collapse narrative) can support the demolition theory by the very fact NIST said that freefall could not have happened as none of the failures inside the building are instant.

NIST walked back on that claim once they realized that freefall was a measurable event and was proven by science.

Problem: you and others on here not getting is there collapse by fire never had freefall. How can you change and incorporate it when all the work of seven-plus years is done? Denial of freefall was the proof here NIST and others don't understand truly why that building collapsed as it did..

Freefall is proof of controlled demolition because the collapse would occur instantly. Not by fire.  

And flat-earth people use a technique of not understanding science and other stuff to support their belief the world is flat. You are using precisely the same technique. There's no difference. This has been explained around a 100 times here.

"I don't get it, therefore conspiracy". Handy way of thinking isn't it..

It's no coincidence that quite a few people (read: all) in the conspiracy community are more than happy just to stick it to the experts, intellectuals, investigators, science, etc via denial. They don't give a crap about explaining the conspiracy itself. Same with most conspiracies.

Ever seen someone provide a detailed explanation as to how the moon landings were shot in a studio? Neither have I. Like you, they don't care, they just deny the science/evidence. Same cult, different subject.