Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

30k speed limits for all urban areas on the way

Options
1246757

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 1,258 ✭✭✭Unrealistic


    Was there a bike line on the inside of you? If there was, I'd question whether your attribution of blame is accurate. If not, yes, it's more debatable.

    I had that recently cycling to work. Lights were green and left hand traffic lane was moving more slowly than I was cycling on the cycle lane on the inside of it. There was a cement truck in that lane so I slowed down and matched the pace of the car behind it rather than going up the inside of the truck which might decide to turn left, even though it wasn't indicating. As we got up to the lights the traffic started moving a bit faster and the cement truck accelerated. The thick driver beside me decided that was her opportunity to speed up and cut left right across me. I roared something NSFW, that she heard from inside the car and she came to a stop just before I collided with her left front wing. By the look on her face I'm quite sure she that twenty minutes later she was telling her friends in college about the crazy cyclist who almost crashed into her, still oblivious to the fact that she was completely in the wrong.

    I had a similar experience on another left turn where I was going straight ahead and there was a bus lane to the right of me and two traffic lanes to the right of that. A driver in the centre lane wanted to turn left but there was a bus in the bus lane matching his speed. So he came almost to a complete stop until the bus went past and then pulled into the bus lane and tried to cut across me travelling straight ahead. I ended up swerving to the left out of the bike lane as we were going through the junction to avoid him and he came to stop in the bike lane to avoid hitting me. I was now stopped in front of him and asking him what did he think he was doing. His response was "I know you saw me". In his mind he had to stop for the bus that was going straight forward, and he wouldn't dream of cutting in front of it because he'd get crushed, but even though he knew I was in the bike lane and going straight forward he felt it was fine to cut in front of me because, if there was a collision, he wouldn't be getting hurt. Pure 'might makes right' stuff.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Reducing the speed limit is not suddenly going to get people cycling nor walking.

    A big whiff of "Look, cyclists, we're trying."

    Ireland is, and will remain, decades behind the rest of Europe.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 48,637 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    i'll see if i can find it, but IIRC a TfL study from about 10 years ago found that something like 60% of KSIs involving cyclists were solely the fault of the motorist, and the remaining 40% spread about even between mutual fault, and the sole fault of the cyclist.


    found this table ( https://content.tfl.gov.uk/pedal-cyclist-collisions-and-casualities-in-greater-london-sep-2011.pdf )

    it's not KSIs, but injuries in general by the look of it. the figures seem fairly conclusive.




  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 48,637 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    true, plenty of cities in europe have embraced 30km/h limits.



  • Registered Users Posts: 342 ✭✭reniwren


    You might me in the wrong there on that occasion.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 28,739 ✭✭✭✭_Kaiser_


    Nope.. No cycle lane and the cyclist was behind me on the inside, not ahead of me or in a stopping area.

    I had right of way and she either chanced her arm or had a dangerous sense of entitlement.

    Its lucky I spotted the silly twit and more so that I wasn't driving something larger with a bigger blind spot like a bus or truck



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,303 ✭✭✭patrickbrophy18


    I would argue that designing roads with bike lanes on the inside is inherently dangerous given that it opens up the very real possibility of left hooks from motorists. Seriously, motorists are often advised not to pass fellow motorists on the inside. So, why design a road to encourage more vulnerable users to pass on the inside?

    Now, I think cycle lanes passing on the inside should have sensors built into them on the run up to junctions which would trigger a red light for motorists turning left. In theory, this would remove the element of uncertainty for drivers turning left.

    I think variable speed limits would be a better approach in urban and suburban settings where they would become more laxed when there are fewer pedestrians to look out for. Unlike motorways, these speed limits wouldn't go above 60KMH as a rule of thumb.



  • Registered Users Posts: 28,592 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    Your trust in motorists stopping when they see a red light is unfounded.

    We don't need more tech solutions. We need drivers to look around before they turn.


    Again, why would you think that you had right of way? And indicator does not give right of way.


    If the cyclist is filtering past a line of traffic, as they are legally entitled to do, they are continuing on their journey straight ahead. If you're turning across that lane, you need make sure it is clear before you cross it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 28,739 ✭✭✭✭_Kaiser_


    Top of the queue, no cycle lane, cyclist behind me when I started moving, not alongside or in front of me.

    If she wanted to "skip ahead" she should have overtaken on the right, not risk getting clipped on the inside. This is even more so if she was behind a bus or truck.

    As I said earlier, all road users need to be aware of the situation around them and take responsibility for their own safety as well.

    Anyway, moving on..



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 48,637 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    what's the alternative though? remove the cycle lanes? or ask cyclists to pass on the outside?



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 39,074 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    I would argue that designing roads with bike lanes on the inside is inherently dangerous given that it opens up the very real possibility of left hooks from motorists. Seriously, motorists are often advised not to pass fellow motorists on the inside. So, why design a road to encourage more vulnerable users to pass on the inside?

    It is because traditionally cycling infrastructure is designed by drivers for drivers as it is simply designed to remove the risk of cyclists from delaying drivers on the road . It is not designed by someone who will ever use it or understands the risks of bad design.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,161 ✭✭✭Citrus_8


    When car makes a turn, it's already done at a very low speed so in this case a strict rule who has a priority and a serious enforcement would help to create people's habits.



  • Registered Users Posts: 23,772 ✭✭✭✭zell12




  • Registered Users Posts: 11,734 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    For me, the safest way as a cyclist, is to move out of the cycle lane (if there is one) and go center lane. Become a car, until past the junction then move back left. This also works well on roundabouts. I think you need to be experienced and very aware (as a cyclist) what you are doing to pass on the outside as there's a lot more variables in play.

    As a driver, I'm happy to wait for cyclists to come past me on the inside. Because I'd prefer to be delayed and hit someone, than insist on right of way and hit someone even if its their fault.

    Indeed I've had that happen a cyclist going full pelt up the inside with wands marking their lane, not paying attention, and not seeing my indicator and I had no visibility of them until it was too late. Before the wands I would have moved tight to the kerb to block undertaking cyclists before making a turn. I try to avoid junctions now with this layout of wands and heavy cycling traffic.



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,734 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997




  • Registered Users Posts: 11,734 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    Be easier to remove the cycle lane 25ms from junction to allow the cars to take left turning position. It would also create space on the right of the car for the passing cyclist to move into.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 48,637 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    For me, the safest way as a cyclist, is to move out of the cycle lane (if there is one) and go center lane. Become a car, until past the junction then move back left.

    this is also my approach. however, it's not something it's easy to advise a nervous novice to do, and the wands at junctions now make it a bit harder to claim the lane.

    e-bikes might make people more confident about taking the lane; the improved acceleration should help with it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,261 ✭✭✭markpb


    Do you mean putting the cyclist between two lanes of moving traffic?



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,734 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    If you've ever turned right on a bicycle or needed to go straight where the two lanes and a filter turning left. Cycling between lanes of moving traffic is normal.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Its also more than a little terrifying for many which is why you only see the bravest doing it



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,184 ✭✭✭Thinkingaboutit


    People adhering to this needless limit just results in needless and dangerous overtakes of the law abiding in sensitive places. There should not be overtaking in residential areas, but there BMW and VW Golf / Bora / old Passat drivers on the road, and so it will happen.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,081 ✭✭✭Stephen_Maturin


    I might be reading the table incorrectly but it looks like this says exceeding the speed limit is one of the least common factors for vehicles causing injuries to cyclists?



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 48,637 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    certainly looks as if it's recorded that way. but that doesn't really prove anything in the '30km/h vs 50km/h debate'.

    also, they may only record that when it's provable the motorist was exceeding the speed limit anyway.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Some people already drive 30kph, or don’t move off at the green light. Same folk then tend to drift through the red light. The behaviour is due to using mobile phone. Lowering the soles limit could encourage more people to drift into inattention from the road as the decide to make use of the crawl to peek at their messages etc.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,275 ✭✭✭km991148


    hmmmm so the reason for not lowering the speed limit is because we acknowledge people are driving dangerously...



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 48,637 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    so if we slow people down, it'll make the roads more dangerous?



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,734 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    I think it's more nuanced then that. It will depend on the road and how it's being used.



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,734 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    It's not speed it's inappropriate speed. Quite a different thing.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 48,637 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    i was just addressing the comment that suggested that if people drive more slowly, they'll be more likely to be looking at their phones and thus the implication is they drive more dangerously, which is an argument i don't buy.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 11,734 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    You don't have to buy it. They've done research into it.

    Not that I'm suggesting the Phoenix Park is the same. But these sweeping generalisations are opinions not fully thought out. It's very easy to look up all this research, but no one seems to bothered to do it. Or be bothered that no one else has done it including the people making the changes.

    I suspect this is why they seem to have started collecting traffic data in the park recent. They realize they have no recent data.

    That said some people only to learn that fire is hot by touching it. With that mind why not do a trial and see how it works out.



Advertisement