Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

F1 2022 thread - see post 1 for rules

14041434546135

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,845 ✭✭✭quokula


    The FIA can make changes for the purpose of safety without all teams agreeing. Mercedes' successful lobbying to get the pitstop rules changed on utterly preposterous safety grounds to slow down Red Bull last year is a classic example of that. This is why Mercedes keep using the word "safety" when they mention porpoising, to set the narrative that it has to be fixed in the same way.

    A simple way Mercedes can fix the issue is by raising ride height. They don't want to do that though as it will make them slower, they'd rather the FIA force everyone to increase ride height including those that have designs that aren't prone to the issue, so it slows everyone down and suddenly the Merc is more stable.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,845 ✭✭✭quokula


    Yeah Haas Automation is a machine tooling company and is a brand in and of itself that's emblazoned across the car, in the same way that Red Bull is a brand and Mercedes is a brand. People were talking about Andretti coming in and saving the team but Gene Haas' net worth is actually more than that of the Andrettis, and he's advertising his company on the car, something the Andrettis couldn't do as their only business is the racing team.

    Now F1 sponsorship is almost certainly not producing a good return on investment to Haas Automation so obviously there is a need for a proper title sponsor, but they have the money to tide over for a while.

    I wouldn't be too critical of Haas for accepting the Uralkali sponsorship. Nobody predicted a couple of years ago that the world would be where it is today. And they were no more shady than the various cryptocurrency sponsors that adorn a lot of F1 teams these days. Rich Energy though, I've no idea how there weren't huge red flags stopping them committing to that deal.

    I'm not sure Haas were doing low fuel glory runs so much that the track conditions were much more favorable in the evening when they had the track to themselves. Headline lap times can't hurt in sponsorship negotiations but I imagine no potential sponsor will put pen to paper until they see what happens in competitive conditions - something that is less than a week away.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,671 ✭✭✭✭Frank Bullitt


    Serious boy who cried wolf vibes from Merc...or should I say...the team who cried Wolff?




    I'll be off then.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,050 ✭✭✭✭flazio


    @quokula Were you ran over by a Mercedes-Benz or something? You really think everyone working there has evil intentions for Formula 1.

    This too shall pass.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,640 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    I'd be fairly sure the Haas time was a classic, low fuel glory run by a team in need of a new title sponsor. They used the track conditions like temperature and rubber to actually get all the way to the top.

    They're probably at the back again this year so they probably needed every advantage available to get to the top of the times. Ko chance Haas is anywhere near the top. Total glory run.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,671 ✭✭✭✭Frank Bullitt



    This would have Haas in the midfield. I think Haas will surprise plenty once things get going, granted they will just be compared to how they were last year, so it can't be any worse.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,508 ✭✭✭✭dulpit


    I'd love to see Haas do well.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,610 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    Haas had a rookie and a meme driving for them last year. Magnussen is a veteran and should at the very least provide valuable feedback on in season car development. And Mick has his odd record of poor rookie years followed by titles the next year.


    Unless the car Haas have spent two years making is an absoulte dog they should be much improved.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,811 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Lewis Hamilton to compete in the 2022 season as Lewis Hamilton-Larbelestier, after his mother's surname.

    At 37 years of age.

    35 years after his parents split.

    After 16 seasons in Grand Prix racing.

    Let no one ever utter in this thread again that Hamilton isn't an attention seeking little tw....



  • Advertisement
  • Site Banned Posts: 12,341 ✭✭✭✭Faugheen


    And let no one ever utter in this thread again that people don't get hung up on absolutely f*ck all just because it's Lewis Hamilton-Larbelestier.

    He wants to incorporate his mother's name into his. So what? Why do you care so much?

    The reason why trivial stuff like this gets the attention is because people jump up, make a big song and dance about it and use it to have a go at him, like you have done here.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,401 ✭✭✭Stallingrad


    ^ This. Very personal decision, previous poster makes themselves look very foolish trying to ridicule it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,811 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    I don't need to ridicule it. It is, of its very nature, ridiculous.



  • Site Banned Posts: 12,341 ✭✭✭✭Faugheen


    Ron Artest changing his name to 'Metta World Peace' is ridiculous in it's nature.

    Someone wanting to incorporate their mother's name into theirs isn't. Like I said, it's just another excuse to have a pop at him.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,908 ✭✭✭✭Itssoeasy


    Does it matter what he’s called ? It’s adding his mothers surname to his name which compared to some utter stupid names people have changed to isn’t that bad. I don’t see how it’s news worthy though and it was a breaking news item on sky news which I found strange, but again it’s his choice.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,845 ✭✭✭quokula


    I agree with this. People forget that Haas have a track record as a decent midfield team. Last year was unusual in that they put no effort into the car as they built for 2022. They also hit some difficulties with Rich Energy not paying out before that so had some rocky times.

    But before then they were consistent point scorers. With full focus on the new car for the last two years and an injection of Uralkali cash when it mattered I wouldn’t be at all surprised to see them up there again, getting in amongst Aston and Alpine. They have a vastly superior driver pairing to Alfa and Williams too which has got to count for something.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,096 ✭✭✭Captain_Crash


    This is very true, didn’t they get a couple of wins too and make life difficult for the front runners for a season or two?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,170 ✭✭✭✭AMKC
    Ms


    They certainly did not get any wins not in F1 anyway not even a podium there best position was in 2019 when they got 6th in Australia and that was with Magnussen by the way. So definitely a good call on Haas bringing him back.

    Live long and Prosper

    Peace and long life.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,096 ✭✭✭Captain_Crash


    Maybe that’s what I was thinking of, Deffo remember them fighting near the front and being a pain in the hole for the front runners



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,845 ✭✭✭quokula


    You might be thinking of Grosjean in the Lotus - very similar livery to the Rich Energy Haas he later drove. They got a couple of wins and regularly fought for podiums. Eventually bought out by Renault and are now the Alpine team. (They were owned by Renault previously too before their independent period)



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,640 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    You're leaving out the main factor in determining how fast Haas is, and that's how fast the Ferrari is. The Ferrari Engine might be improved and that can't hurt and we'll see how good the rest of the ferrari parts are. But Haas has a terrible track record in the last couple of years. They had the debacle in 2020 when they couldn't tell if the improvements since the start of the season were better or worse than the spec from the very first race of the year. So they started racing one driver in the newer car and the other in the original spec car and they never figured out which was faster. So they developed a car throughout a season and weren't sure if it was any faster than the first attempt from the first race - an absolute disaster of a team. If Ferrrari is very fast, they might be fast. If Ferrari isn't very fast, Haas has little chance of even being midfield.

    We all like Steiner because he sounds funny and makes good Drive to survive jokes, but I wonder if he's a good team manager.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,096 ✭✭✭Captain_Crash


    You are 100% right! Maybe it was the couple of beers in me clouding my memory but that was exactly it! The fact he want in to drive for haas put the nail in the coffin of my bad memory haha



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,401 ✭✭✭Stallingrad


    The DTS Haas episode was a very entertaining. Wonder why they didn't give Mazepin a shot in Mick's car to see if there was something amiss with his. Still, not a very likable chap and he was way out of his depth.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,508 ✭✭✭✭dulpit


    Because clearly Mazepin is a bad driver relative to Mick. Why affect the decent driver?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,459 ✭✭✭✭Dont be at yourself


    I vaguely recall that they did swap chassis at one point, and Mazepin Snr even paid for a new chassis, which I think Nikita subsequently binned.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,401 ✭✭✭Stallingrad


    To put the matter to rest?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,050 ✭✭✭✭flazio


    Drive to Survive discussion, this way please.


    This too shall pass.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,640 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Yeah they needed to build a new chassis because Grosjean broke one in the big accident he caused. The new one was a few kilos lighter. Mick got that one. Mazepin found out about it and wanted it. Haas said the weight made negligible difference In handling or speed but mazepin needed something to blame for his huge lack of pace.

    Mazepin Snr first threatened to pull funding unless they swapped, then agreed to fund the building of a new, lighter chassis. He drove it for a race or 2 and broke it in a crash in practice (Qatar, i think), so he had to go back to his old, heavier chassis.

    Look, mazepin was a pay driver. Not the first and certainly not the last. He was crap and only got ahead due to definite supply of money from his father. Lance Stroll with slightly less speed and a lot less charm. He's gone now and been replaced by another pay driver with a lot of experience. If KMag can make up the money then its a good result for Haas.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,671 ✭✭✭✭Frank Bullitt


    Grosjean got 6th in 2016 on the teams debut as well.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,050 ✭✭✭✭flazio




This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement
Advertisement