Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

F1 2022 thread - see post 1 for rules

13637394142135

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,167 ✭✭✭✭AMKC
    Ms


    I think the 2018 Livery was the best Haas Livery myself.

    Live long and Prosper

    Peace and long life.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,021 ✭✭✭✭duploelabs


    I'm surprised that Haas are allowed to use that money and it's not frozen



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 753 CMod ✭✭✭✭LIGHTNING


    Ha they go and take a jump. Love hear the cheek of Russian companies coming out with such statements. Pot calling the kettle black and all that



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,873 ✭✭✭McFly85


    Be interesting to see what happens with the Mercedes - one of the goals the FIA had for this season was closer racing and the potential for more race winners, given how much less leeway there is in the new regs. The FIA has also said that if any car violates the spirit of the new regs then they're ready to change the regulations.

    Would they hamstring Mercedes if their gains are as big as expected? I suspect they'll be playing catch up to Mercedes again and will update the rules at best midway through the season when the title's done and dusted.

    I suppose you have to appreciate the innovation but sometimes it feels like Mercedes have no actual interest in racing, just having a car so much faster than the others that it's basically in a different formula.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,167 ✭✭✭✭AMKC
    Ms


    I would say Uralkali had given it to them long before this year maybe to help Haas fund the development of there new car. So either way its gone and hopefully no chance of the Uralkali getting it back.

    Live long and Prosper

    Peace and long life.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,646 ✭✭✭✭Vicxas


    Seen yesterday someone said that Mercedes have changed their car, anyone know what they've changed?



  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators Posts: 11,484 Mod ✭✭✭✭Andrew76


    Big changes to their sidepods (and I guess internals we can't see to allow for the lack of space):

    image.png image.png image.png




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,281 ✭✭✭✭Jordan 199


    Those sidepods on the Merc remind me of the Modena 291:

    Untitled Image




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,095 ✭✭✭Captain_Crash


    So Mercedes’ say F1 and the FIA have been aware of the design they’ve shown up with for weeks…. But Ross Brawn says F1 didn’t anticipate such a radical interpretation, so we’re they aware or not?

    He wouldn’t be drawn into giving any details about its legality other than saying it’s good to see such innovation but that the spirit of the rules is to have racing (paraphrased of course). To me he suggested that the FIA are looking at it and will close any loophole if it’s streets ahead of what the rule changes intended…. As someone mentioned above, it’s almost a car from a different formula!



  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators Posts: 11,484 Mod ✭✭✭✭Andrew76


    Binotto questioning the mirrors too - something that shouldn't have an aero purpose he mentions.

    Looks completely different to their Barcelona car:

    image.png

    It's great to see innovation but at the same time it'll be depressing if they run away with the championship. Hopefully won't be the case. Maybe they'll have cooling issues and get engine blow ups every second race. 😂



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 25,909 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    FIA have a choice between putting a line in the sand and putting up with hysterics from Merc and the British media or else allow a **** free for all. I don't know about the sidepods but the mirrors is just taking the piss and likely a red herring "What!? Sure we got rid of the mirror supports, sure they did nothing!".



  • Posts: 25,909 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Haven't watched really today. Looked like Russell had a decent bit of porpoising along the main straight roughly around the start line.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,417 ✭✭✭Diemos


    Isn't that the point, it looked that way with Ferrari & Schumacher and RedBull & Vettel. Wouldn't every F1 love to dominate?

    This is just the latest phase, everyone is up in a flap because Merc have done something different. We don't know if it will work. If it doesn't no one will give a sh!t. And for me that is the most telling thing.

    Everyone LOVED it when Brawn came out of no where to win with Button.

    If Merc do pull this off, then you have to say fair play to them, they battled and won the constructors last year (I won't go down the other rabbit hole) continuing development through out the season and even with the reduced wind tunnel and budget they still manage to pull off something game changing for the following season. Love them or loathe them, it's bloody impressive.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,045 ✭✭✭✭flazio


    No doubt when Drive to Survive lands tomorrow there will be a lot to say, so as to not derail the 2022 thread I've started a new discussion thread.


    This too shall pass.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,873 ✭✭✭McFly85


    There’s a difference between a team coming out of nowhere to win a championship(I’m sure everyone could enjoy Haas coming out of nowhere now on some level), and a massively dominant team increasing their dominance.

    Also 2009 wasn’t settled until the last day I think, with Mercedes they could have the championship sewn up in the autumn.

    I don’t care if Mercedes win, I want an exciting season. You can admire these innovations by Mercedes but if it ends up with them so far ahead of the rest then ultimately it’s bad for F1.

    None of this might come to pass, we haven’t seen it race yet, and I really hope it doesn’t!



  • Posts: 25,909 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    decided at the 2nd last I think?

    Funny enough the long-ass 2009 season review came up on my YouTube a while back. It's very easy to forget that really Red Bull threw the titles away that season. It was kind of masked by doing most of their ****-ups at the start of the season so isn't really remembered that way.



  • Posts: 25,909 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    So far good point: Cars look almost undrivable. Fronts of the cars are rock solid and they look a bit faster at least.



  • Posts: 25,909 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Talking about DRS there on commentary. While I'd rather it was gotten rid of completely, what they should have done before (and it's not too late) is move the zones to earlier in acceleration zones but have the DRS zone way, way before the braking zone. With the cars being closer together on track this year the DRS is going to be way overpowered. Having the zone end earlier in the straight will allow the person behind to get a run but not just blast pass with a 25kph top speed difference.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,095 ✭✭✭Captain_Crash


    I kind of agree with the view of “fair play to anyone who figures the new formula out”…. But at the same time the intention of the rule change is to create more exciting and close racing and reduce the chances of one dominant team, Ross Brawn reiterated that very point earlier today again!

    If one team (in this case Merc) manages to find a loophole that has them even further ahead than before then the whole process of these changes has been a waste! Brawn effectively said earlier they’ll close any loophole that results in that without actually saying it!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,593 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    I thought mirrors had a strict set of requirements set by the FIA? Its one of the safety rules iirc.

    Those look suspiciously different.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,569 ✭✭✭recyclebin


    So only 2 days of testing left. Who looks good and who looks in trouble?

    I'd say Alpine are the most disappointing of the works teams.

    Mercedes was porpoising badly again today going by some videos from this morning.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,281 ✭✭✭✭Jordan 199


    The Williams looks interesting from this pic:

    Untitled Image




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 49,266 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    My interpretation is that they are talking about the ability for cars to race close - rather than the performance of the cars being close. To my view, the issue would arise more so if the Merc implementation created a massively different wake behind the car that made it more difficult to follow a merc than any other car - and the regs were changed to allow cars to follow more closely.

    Of course it seems they can look to change the rules if they want - but I don't think Brawn was talking about the possible speed of the car, but its wake.



  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators Posts: 11,484 Mod ✭✭✭✭Andrew76


    I'm not sure on the details of what would make the mirrors illegal or not but if they're not supposed to produce an aerodynamic effect (according to Binotto's quotes) then I'd be throwing in a complaint to the FIA if I was another team - "it's not in the spirit of the rules" or something like that. The green section highlighted here that the mirror is sitting on is clearly going to produce some sort of aero effect:

    image.png

    Here's another view of it. Clearly not just a support for the mirror.

    image.png

    Taken from this video:




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,095 ✭✭✭Captain_Crash


    You could well be right, and considering Ross’ position within F1 he was being deliberately vague during his interview, which is understandable… the first time he saw the car in person was during the actual interview so it wasn’t like he had many answers lined up



  • Posts: 25,909 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Is the top part a part of the new crash structure? I know it's gotten bigger this season but can't find much on it. What I think is the issue is that they have that detached from the sidepods. Which I'm assuming wasn't explicitly banned in the rules but if they're the "sidepod crash structure" then one would think they need to be part of the sidepod.

    And just to keep the disclaimer, going the above is guessing and supposition.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,669 ✭✭✭✭Frank Bullitt


    We all get wooed by the small side pods, but the tech heads in F1 look at the strakes above it. This is why I am not an are engineer.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,045 ✭✭✭✭flazio


    Who tried to mount their mirrors on the Halo a couple of years back?

    This too shall pass.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,921 ✭✭✭Joeface


    Got to see a decent amount of that to day.

    All the teams seem to struggle with lock ups under breaking

    Mercedes and Alpha Tauri seem to me to me the most uncomfortable to drive with the "bouncing " pretty sure a full length race with that is going to hurt in those cars. Ferrari look pretty rough as well but seems to have the pace.

    Williams look pretty good and consistent which I think I am happy about , didn't think I like Williams

    Aston Martin to me oddly looked like one of the more stable cars even with SKY commentators say it was rough , I didn't think Vettels or Strolls head was bouncing around as much as others.

    Mclaren was hard to read , really struggled on breaks when Lando Norris did get out , mostly replays of him giving up corners a running wide .

    Alpha Romeo , Didn't look too bad when Bottas put in his laps . Kind of gives me the feeling the Mid field his year might be from Third place all the way back . A much clearer picture will Come once Kevin Mag and Mick Schumacher get a run in the Haas , might give an idea if they are closer in the group this year.

    Redbull , Perez ran all day and looked consistent only thing I could see from them was small struggles like the rest under breaking , mainly at turn 10


    I really like how different all the cars are , even the ones that look like they are going in the same direction have something different

    And yes I haven't posted a single thing since the Final race last season ..........avoid all the non stories with bored journalists when they have nothing to report :D



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,790 ✭✭✭✭Burkie1203




This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement
Advertisement