Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Parking and traffic in Phoenix Park

1383941434452

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,934 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    I see. You want me to show you the data that I've demonstrated isn't collected. The theory being if there's no data on something it doesn't exist. Makes sense.

    I quoted the Garda statement on their definition on inappropriate speed. Do you not believe the Garda? How about Richmond Park example.

    The speed limit on the outer roadway is 20mph. It applies to all road users. Sensible speeds create a more welcoming environment for everyone.

    The speed limit on the quietway is 10mph. Please pay special attention to children, walkers and learner cyclists who frequent this mostly car-free area which runs through the centre of the park between Ham Cross and Sheen Cross.

    Never race or time trial. Doing so creates a shorter time for you to react to hazards, less time for others to see you, and you are likely to exceed the speed limit. If you want to ride within the speed limit without being impeded by so much traffic, consider visiting the park when its roads are quieter.

    They actually banned cyclists for a while.

    Poor obedience with regards to Park bylaws was also a cited issue: ‘Sports cyclists were gauged as reaching up to 34mph on several occasions.’ Richmond Park has a speed limit for bicycles of 20mph, and cyclists have historically been fined for being recorded over this limit.


    The letter also mentions fast pelotons of riders passing ‘less experienced cyclists on shopping bikes with no safety helmets.’

    They put speed cameras on the cyclists in case anyone's wondering. But there no speeding defined in law for cyclists. But thats a whole different issue.

    Maybe you'll back up your allegation that drivers speed in the phoenix park, with some links to some peer reviewed studies that have captured statistics on speeding in the phoenix park, captured in the last 12 months.

    Post edited by Flinty997 on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,291 ✭✭✭em_cat


    I was in the park today as per usual around mid day & no one, not even the park rangers, obeyed the new speed limit. Nor was there a Garda in sight attempting to enforce it.

    The new 30kph along Chesterfield Ave is frustrating tbh.

    In normal circumstances I can see a need for the 30kph and on residential roads & I support it.

    I also support improved cycling infrastructure in the park, however forgetting that the park is to be accessed for all is beginning to feel like a siege on anyone who dares to use a car to get there.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,479 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    Ah jaysus. You should have just told us you never go to the park and you're only on this thread for a row, could have saved us all some time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,934 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997



    I expect some Cinderella period when they enforce it for a little while then go back to ignoring it.

    It is habit though. We have lot of driver aids these days to stick to limits if people want to.

    I don't think its a siege. Discouraging car use is inevitable. Its unsustainable.

    Shifty summed up it nicely by telling us just to go away somewhere else. So we've basically done that a lot more often.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,757 ✭✭✭Phil.x


    I've been hitting 46km/h on they pushbike this week on Chesterfield avenue, much faster than the speed limit and most cars, I love how I'm above the law!!



  • Posts: 4,727 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    30km is way too slow for that road. 50 was actually too slow also. It should be 60 at the very least



  • Posts: 18,749 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    What Garda statement did you link? I just missed it



  • Posts: 18,749 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    The new parking spots along the North road are great, well marked out too, which means (hopefully) no crappy parking!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,934 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    Yup, speeding doesn't apply to bicycles :)

    There are fixed penalty fines, but barely enforced. :)



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,934 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    I came through tonight just to see what it was like. No one doing 30. Very weird in the dark and almost no cars. Passed by one bike. They are burning off the old road markings. Interesting to see how it works out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,934 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    Anyone realize what day it was...

    National Slow Down Day




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,254 ✭✭✭✭Hurrache


    Such a ridiculous post. Driver struggling to drive at 30kph could do with more lessons for starters. and the siege mentality might be dealt with by counselling.



  • Posts: 4,727 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    It's unnatural to drive that slow. It requires much more effort to maintain such a slow speed than to just drive at a speed that suits the road



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,561 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    No, 60 would be excessive. Cos if you post 60, folk will do 70. And a big issue, especially at night, is deer roaming out and not being seen in the dim lamp light.

    50 was fine, it was a relaxing spin to enjoy the view, while still being safe. I suspect after this trial of measures, it will revert to 50 again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,760 ✭✭✭Effects


    It was the same with people on the coast road at Sandymount. It was more dangerous, as drivers would lose concentration travelling that slow. And another guy who said cars aren't designed to drive that slow, and it would break their engines. 🤣



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 40,861 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    I used to think like that. It suited my views at the time but in reality it feels unnatural because you simply don't want to drive at that speed.

    Saying that, there is nothing natural about driving so I guess that it is correct to claim that driving at X speed is unnatural.

    With climate change looming, it is believed that many urban limits will be reduced soon enough. However, with a muppet like O'Donovan in charge, I can't see the park limit staying at 30km/h



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,934 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    A limit that's mostly never enforced is meaningless.

    I look forward to seeing the speed data from the park over the last 12 months.

    Appropriate Speed Limits


    The selection of the speed limit for any particular section of a road type is an exercise in weighing the objectives of safety and operational efficiency. The operational efficiency is measured by travel time and the safety level, measured by the incidence of crashes and resulting injuries and fatalities with consideration of the road function

    I'd like to see the stats they used to come up with the limits here.

    Is there even one pedestrian crossing on the Ave anywhere?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,254 ✭✭✭✭Hurrache


    You mightn't have heard, but it's unnatural to drive, full stop.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 40,861 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    A limit that's mostly never enforced is meaningless.


    I look forward to seeing the speed data from the park over the last 12 months.

    If there are next to no speed checks than any data from the few that are there is likley to be meaningless.

    I'd like to see the stats they used to come up with the limits here.

    Are you looking for speeding related stats or carbon emissions stats or noise pollution stats or what?

    Is there even one pedestrian crossing on the Ave anywhere?

    There is not which is why drivers should be even more careful as pedestrians may be crossing almost anywhere



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,934 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    Proper Data stats on traffic speed in the park over the last 12 months.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,934 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    The lack of pedestrian crossing makes a mockery of any pretence of safety. They could even have a few ramps to slow cars down if they were serious. They've had those ridiculous ones on the north road for a decade or so.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,760 ✭✭✭Effects


    So you're saying the road needs to be changed so that it's more suitable to 30 kph. Like just make it a bunch of chicanes with speed bumps and zebra crossings every 100 metres or so.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,934 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    Only if you actually want speeds to drop.

    Other wise you can pretend by putting signs up and not enforcing them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,934 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    I wonder what the highest speeding ever recorded in the park was.


    Excluding actual racing obviously.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,254 ✭✭✭✭Hurrache


    Road traffic enforcement, country wide, is a joke. The whole idea of a national slow down day, yesterday, makes a mockery of the gardai.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,934 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    Maybe they need more signs....



  • Posts: 4,727 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    No, I'm saying that 30KM is a ridiculous speed to drive at unless you are in a housing estate or somewhere similar.

    I don't see why they had to change it at all. If anything it should have been increased to 60.

    But as mentioned, it won't be enforced or obeyed anyways.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,934 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    Well it's a park. They don't want anyone driving down the middle of it.

    Which is why they are directing all the drivers down the middle of it.

    "This is the way"



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    It won’t be obeyed, but maybe speeds from from 60 to 40 or 45.



  • Registered Users Posts: 79 ✭✭gerrykeegan


    I was running in the park this morning, it was funny to see one driver observing the 30km which resulted in about 15 cars all wedged behind them forced to do them same, all it takes is one. On the way back out I saw exactly the same thing happen.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,934 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    Maybe they could hire that driver to do that all day. Maybe they could call him something like a ranger, park ranger or something....

    Maybe a couple of speed cameras disguised as deer. Maybe that would too dear for the opw though.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 40,861 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    Looking on Twitter just now, it seems that Pat Kenny had former AA lobbyist Conor Faughnan on his show.

    Faughnan apparently claimed that the 30km/h limit risks risk undermining the 'credibility of speed limits'. Apparently a slower speed limit is not necessarily the safer one. Somehow!?!?!

    Seemingly Kenny went on to say "When the speed limit is only 30km/hr, the temptation to be on your mobile phone may be overwhelming"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,934 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    Lots of things are counterintuitive.

    There are studies that show inappropriate speed limits have a net negative effect. But generally higher speed has worse outcomes. But not always, motorways are generally are high speed but low accident rates.

    But to know what's appropriate you have to have lots of statistical data and engineering studies. Sometimes even with that there some other reason to set the limit.

    However in Ireland there doesn't seem to be any method to it.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 40,861 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    There are studies that show inappropriate speed limits have a net negative effect. But generally higher speed has worse outcomes. But not always, motorways are generally are high speed but low accident rates.

    Higher speed always has a worse outcome. Motorways are simply designed to remove the vast majority of risks that exist on non-motorway roads and therefore they allow for a higher speed limit. However, a collision on a motorway at speed will always be worse than a the exact same collision at a lower speed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,561 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,757 ✭✭✭Phil.x




  • Posts: 15,362 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Not really. the route was chosen, its been found to be unsuitable, and now a solution needs to be found.

    The solution will be new buses, a new route or new infrastructure

    Not a big deal and stuff like this happens in literally every project



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,934 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997



    Roads with 20 and 30mph speed limits are MORE dangerous than motorways, say experts


    Motorways are the safest roadways in the State despite the higher speeds travelled on them, according to new research from University College Cork. The most dangerous are three-lane roads (those with a climbing lane) and undivided two lane roads, the study concludes


    In the process they discovered that there is serious under-reporting of accidents, something that made the project difficult. While almost all fatal accidents are reported, many injury accidents, especially those involving minor injuries, are not.

    But what would they know.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 40,861 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    I'm not sure what you're getting at. I made the point that higher speed always has a worse outcome when you compare the same incident at a lower speed. I made this claim in response to you saying "But generally higher speed has worse outcomes. But not always". Speed will always make an incident's outcome worse.

    What you are doing is comparing different road types and different incident types as well as different speed types to prove wronog something I never said.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,934 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997



    Considering they've refused for years to make changes to the gates for modern practicality or safety, I can't see them doing it for this.

    Last time they had a bus the OPW caused caused so much gridlock with traffic that the bus was unable to move around the park.

    At least we have a cycle lane now. Which fits nicely into the historic and natural aesthetic they've refused to compromise on with the gates.



  • Posts: 15,362 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Eh? The gates are a protected structure so they are not going to be changed regardless.

    As I said, the solution will be new buses, a new route or new infrastructure, with the new infrastructure being a new bus only access point into the park.

    Really not a big deal



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,555 ✭✭✭daymobrew


    If you have cruise control you can use it to maintain the speed limit when the "design speed" is much higher, as it is on Chesterfield Avenue. At a lower speed it's quieter, less stressful, there's lower emissions and you have more time to react to any issues.

    There's a very interesting video discussing speed limit signs and "design speed" at the end of this article: https://irishcycle.com/2022/03/02/sorry-but-putting-up-a-sign-is-not-a-good-way-to-lower-speeds/

    It describes designing a street so that drivers naturally driver the desired speed e.g. narrowing a road slows drivers down while multiple wide lanes results in faster driving. In my submission to the OPW I did suggest such changes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,934 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997



    I compared nothing. Its demonstration of something being counter intuitive when it comes to speed limits.

    Post edited by Flinty997 on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,934 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    The OPW progress in the park speaks for itself when it come these kind of projects.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 4,727 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    What will eventually happen there is people will get impatient and start overtaken which can be very dangerous.

    Suddenly a road with a very safe history could have accidents.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,934 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    Do you think people drive fast because they lack the ability or technology to drive slow. Or they don't know the speed limits, or the journey time differences.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,934 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    What history? been asking for the statistics that cover the past 12 months. No ones provided any.



  • Posts: 15,362 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Its going to go one of two ways

    Either they'll enforce the limits through design elements (chicanes, speed bumps, tables, narrowing etc etc) or they'll use cameras.

    Also, the potential for dangerous driving is not a reason not to try make things safer.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,934 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    You're basing that on what, OPW record on traffic issues, road design, or statistics, or a study of some kind?



  • Advertisement
Advertisement