Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Prime Time housing debate: Eoin O Broin vs Darragh O'Brien

Options
2456714

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 1,401 ✭✭✭Finty Lemon


    Thats what happens when you've never had a real job and spend your spare cash self-publishing your books to appear clever



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,401 ✭✭✭Finty Lemon


    O Broin has had an easy ride in the media for the last 2 years. He is little more than an ageing student union debater with zero experience of the real world economy.

    On the SF gravy train for years.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,187 ✭✭✭emo72


    That was classed as a debate? The biggest critical issue we have, and what, 15 minutes on the national station? Rte presenter couldn't handle them. Let them dodge questions. Then again it's probably a great result for rte, they don't want to hurt their paymaster, current or future.

    That was absolutely diabolical. That needed about 2 hours, to try and pin the fuckers down and get an answer out of them. Basically they were both running the clock down from the start. They only had to not **** up for 15 minutes. And rte are hyping this all week? Ah lads. Go home, rte you are an embarrassment.



  • Posts: 18,749 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    They are illegal immigrants living in this country. Do you not think they already have somewhere to live?

    Nothing to do with it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,407 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    I really expected O'Brion to have answers seeing as he was the one calling for the debate and up to tonight he sounded like he knew what he was talking about and had a plan.

    My take away was that O'Broin will concentrate on social housing and take all the resources away from developments for FTB's as he couldn't explain how more housing could be built. Surely he knew he was going to be asked that question and had a few answers prepared.

    What really took the biscuit was not being able to answer how he would deal with institutional investors and after a bit of waffling says that he would get the council to buy them... nearly fell of my seat because surely he realises that he has alienated all the FTB's by reducing the supply to buy.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 345 ✭✭orecir


    O Brien looked and reflected his housing policy which is unhealthy. .

    His constant shouting and interrupting was very unprofessional.


    O Broin has some new and exciting ideas which can't come quick enough.

    Post edited by orecir on


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,470 ✭✭✭Luxembourgo


    An absolute charlatan, and he's top 4 in SF.

    We as a nation are screwed. Reduce the number of politicians and increase the pay. We might attract talent to the job



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,470 ✭✭✭Luxembourgo


    Adding 20 percent to the social housing list at a minimum is related to social housing.

    Even at a more basic level asking about immigration should happen, even at the projected builds we are just a standing still given net projected immigration. Now immigration isn't an absolute bad thing but it impacts housing supply and should be discussed.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,770 ✭✭✭griffin100


    It was like Dumb and Dumber. We need 40,000 extra houses a year........that’s 110 houses per day being released to market........who’s going to build them? Err no one.......every builder and tradesman in the country will be on the mica gravy trail in Donegal.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Well done, Eoin O' Broin.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 6,131 ✭✭✭screamer


    So out of touch those two. Saying things like we won’t put money in developers pockets….. vulture funds will be kept out….. well easy to see they don’t understand economics. Construction is a high cost low margin industry. Who is making the money? The tradesmen who are in short supply and earning more than either of those 2 clowns. I don’t blame them though, they got fudged the last recession. I seriously think they need to change the rules for FTB, renting should be seen as ability to pay, smaller deposits and 2 generation mortgages. Why not? If your family don’t want to pay for the house when you’re gone they sell it. It’s already available in other countries. Time for us as a country to explore other options than the usual ould rabble rousing popular sound bites that help no one but a career politician.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    What a stupid post.

    How did we build all our current social houses?

    It was an economic boom.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,764 ✭✭✭downtheroad


    What are O'Broin's new and exciting ideas? Because every time the presenter asked him how he would fix the issue he just smiled and talked garbage before saying we need more houses.

    He completely deflected the fact that a Sinn Fein controlled Dublin City Council have blocked development at Oscar Traynor Road and O Devaney Gardens.

    Sinn Fein are the emperors new clothes and we are going to find that out the hard way in a couple of years time.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,764 ✭✭✭downtheroad


    And claiming an Artists Exemption from Revenue on said books so as not to pay income tax on the sales from them, all while playing the I'm a socialist card.

    Same socialist O'Broin I saw in Aniar restaurant in Galway last year dropping a few hundred quid at dinner (no issue, I did the same) but there he was laughing and joking with the sommelier while earlier that week was pretending in the Dail to be a man of the common people. Champagne socialist if ever there was one and he will be found out big time in a few years when he takes on the Minister for Housing role and nothing changes.

    There is only 1 solution, supply supply and more supply. And he has no ideas on how to do that.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,230 ✭✭✭Jinglejangle69


    Ah that was refreshing.


    Hopefully more of these debates to expose SF for what they are.



  • Registered Users Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    Social housing has been the rationale and answer to this for SF for quite a long time. Why wouldn't it be, it's where a lot of their voters are. As others have said SF are very quick on the soundbytes which garner more interest and potentially votes. Their proposed policies by and large and how they might be achieved don't stand up to too much scrutiny at all but that's less of an issue while there is government to blame for all of this.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,230 ✭✭✭Jinglejangle69


    Blackrock college privately educated, 6K a year.


    Him and Mary Lou also privately educated , the great saviours of the working poor.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,386 ✭✭✭olestoepoke


    I watched the debate, if you could cal it that. Reading through this thread it is clear that people are looking for point scoring. Let's be honest neither of them came across well, the presenter Fran should run for office he seemed to know more than the two egits sitting in front of him.



  • Registered Users Posts: 28,667 ✭✭✭✭_Kaiser_


    Just like first year college dropout (and ironically now Minister for Higher Education) Simon Harris for example?

    I'd be careful relying on real world experience to try discrediting politicians you don't like considering the level of "quality" among the FF and FG parties these days.

    We have an incredibly weak and ineffective set of politicians in Government. From the likes of Helen McEntee who seems to be more concerned with hand-waving away illegal immigration for the social media kudos, to Leo who has managed to base his entire political career on his public image and social media profile than any actual results, to Micheal Martin who his own party admit can't make a decision without a dozen reports and is only in power because there's no clear successor in FF, or how about Eamon Ryan who may be well intentioned but clearly has no notion of life in the real world.

    The bottom line is that I don't think there is even ONE current TD that you could see as effective and who consistently delivers, never mind one who you could see the country getting behind as leader of the Government.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,611 ✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    Completely agree. I was thinking earlier that the government should have appointed someone more capable than O'Brien to this vital ministry. But for the life of me I couldn't think of anyone. Perhaps Paschal. O'Brien will fail, the only question is how badly.

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth House?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,386 ✭✭✭olestoepoke


    Our minister for education has no third level education, dropped out of college in 1st year. How on earth did that alone not put him out of the running? The Covid-18 howler makes sense now .



  • Registered Users Posts: 30 ChampagneFever


    He didn't completely deflect the fact that they blocked development at OT and O'Devaney. He was about to say the reason why and O'Brien started shouting over him. The reason why they were blocked was because they wanted it a council led plan rather than selling the developments to property developers. The homes that were to go on the market were not "affordable". That's a simple fact and FF/FG shouting down SF for voting against it, know this, but continue to say it as it is a good "sound bite" to say SF voted against building homes. It's not just black & white.



  • Registered Users Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    The issue about the likes of Mary Lou, Murphy and O'Broin and others is their claim to be an ordinary citizen. There's nothing wrong with their privileged education but they should own it. Not sure what the Harris thing is supposed to suggest, apart from an assumption that it produces smarter people. In my experience, that education is wasted on an awful lot of them.

    Government TDs, bad and all as they might be, it gets markedly worse on the other side.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,433 ✭✭✭touts


    O'Brion was embarrassing. He was devoid of any depth of analysis or solutions. Dresses like a socialist intellectual but clearly now that's all window dressing. Not much going on behind the glasses. And he'll be one of the best in the cabinet in a year or two. God help us. We're so screwed as a nation.



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,386 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Your dead right on one thing here. I have been renting for 15 years and never once had a problem with making rent payments of up to £800 a month.

    But if I go look for a mortgage the bank will tell me they can't trust me to make monthly payments because I was so good with my money I never needed a massively overdrawn credit card or loan off them.



  • Registered Users Posts: 28,805 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    havent watched yet, but let me guess, those that advocate for the fire sector approach(ffg approach) are screaming socialists, or some sort of nonsense at o'broin!



  • Registered Users Posts: 68,317 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    O'Broin has been held up by the Shinnerbots as some kind of prodigy when it comes to housing, but it's become very clear that he's an absolute spoofer without a clue.

    Remember, if the housing issue was easy to fix, they would all be doing it. Housing is absolutely crucifying the government in the polls. The idea that the government are deliberately keeping the housing market as dysfunctional as it is because <insert cartoon villainy here> is one step removed from Illumanti/Bilderberg nonsense.

    Politicians want to get elected. To get elected, they want to do things that please as many people as possible. Fixing housing would do that. If it was as simple as O'Broin has been banging on about for years, they would be doing it already.

    Anyone who claims there are easy answers to complex issues is a spoofer and a populist. This is what O'Broin is.



  • Registered Users Posts: 28,667 ✭✭✭✭_Kaiser_


    Similar questions were asked when he became Minister for Health:

    It seems that his youth (and presumably intended to appeal to that demographic) and from a FG family and Young FG seem to have been the deciding factors.

    Optics and party loyalty first. Suitability way down the list. But again, far from the only example.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,992 ✭✭✭Stone Deaf 4evr


    I dont usually tune in for these type of things, but a few points stand out,


    The SF guys answer to everything, was that we need more availability of affordable homes. while hes exactly right, its like dying of thirst in the middle of the desert and being told that the answer is to drink some water. Not an scratch on how it could be achieved, given the current labour shortage and materials crisis, and also very dodgy to his answer as to why SF opposed the 100% social and affordable housing development mentioned by the FF guy.

    Whilst not covering himself in glory, At least the FF guy acknowledged that this isn't a problem that can be solved overnight, and that the process of turnign it around is going to be a long one.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,764 ✭✭✭downtheroad


    Council led social housing leads to unpaid rent. €38m owed to Dublin City Council. Maybe if these people actually paid the pittance they owe for the roof over their heads there would be more funding available towards more housing projects.


    https://www.irishtimes.com/news/social-affairs/dublin-city-council-owed-38m-in-unpaid-rent-1.4781829



Advertisement