Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

United Ireland Poll - please vote

1116117119121122132

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,189 ✭✭✭Brucie Bonus


    Why? There'll be jobs for 'our own' coming out their ears. Committee on reconciliation, boards to see the change over. A new board of health, Public works. There'll be plenty of our tax and EU money to go around the cronies. Also I'd imagine the same civil servants will be needed.

    Politicans try get business for their areas. Nobody tells a politician trying to get a factory in cork moved to Dublin ffs.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,076 ✭✭✭trashcan


    I don’t know about a United Ireland, but your proposed “third way” is certainly wishful nonsense. No longer a binary choice ? Yes it absolutely is, and will remain so.



  • Registered Users Posts: 89 ✭✭BringingSexyBack


    LOL.


    These issues WILL be serious central points in deciding the case

    Selfish ? What ? Why would the people of the areas that I mentioned wish to give up their power and influence to a group who mainly hide under the bed during 1916-1922?

    Considering your typical Shinner probably contribute next to nothing to society in terms of enterprise (not talking about selling dodgy cigarettes and diesel btw) or community action, they have some nerve to waffle about "selfish".

    Why would Southerners sell themselves and risk economic oblivion ? And for what? To have a tiny minority dictating to us ? Both communities being as worse as the other

    I have read some total BS earlier threads about how we owe it to Nordies to unite. LOL. Most of us in the South have little to nothing in common with people of Donegal , Monaghan and the 6 counties. There are thousands who have never stepped foot in the North, bar maybe drive through , and do not really have much intent or interest in doing so. Even Donegal , loads of Southerners haven't gone near the place. Many of those areas have more in common , culturally and economically, with Glasgow than people in Cork, Dublin or Galway -

    so how are we been selfish ? We owe them nothing . And what are we going to get out of this Unification ? Sweet FA



  • Registered Users Posts: 89 ✭✭BringingSexyBack


    "no body tells a politician trying to get a factory in Cork moved to Dublin ffs"

    Very naive lol! Dangle a cushy Dáil committee seat or better, a Ministerial office, in front of them and see their objections to government decisions melt away .

    Some TD's have lost their seats because they supported government decisions on the closure of army barracks - said barrack being the main employer in the home town of said Politician. He was more worried about keeping his Ministerial job.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,571 ✭✭✭tinytobe


    I'd leave things as they are, however that's not so easy with UK and Brexit.

    The best solution is to have the border as transparent and as invisible as possible, both countries in the EU and adhering to the Good Friday Agreement. However that's all not so easy now with Brexit.

    The main concern I would have with a united Ireland is that Northern Ireland and the complex society up there would very soon be a problem for the government in Dublin. A united Ireland would certainly be ruled from Dublin, not from Belfast. Let's assume, just for the exercise, that the government in Dublin would decide on something which provokes the UDF or the UFF in some way, and they would start riots or other terrorist acts in Dublin, or elsewhere on the soil of the now Republic of Ireland? Or Orange men marching in Dublin? I think that would be pretty nasty and a very very high price to pay just for unification.

    And then as you correctly mentioned, the SF voters in the North are too far on the left, too socialist in thinking and then all these unionists who used to vote for Ian Paisley back in the days, - all very problematic, I think. It's a society the current Republic of Ireland can easily do without.

    Yes, it's a nice and even a romantic idea to re-unite Ireland, however there are grave risks and also financial concerns. And Northern Ireland and the society in the North is like a problematic child whose both parents don't want to be responsible for, - currently it's the UK's responsibility. I take it if the UK could and it was London's only choice, not Belfast's choice, they would get rid of Northern Ireland as well.

    I would imagine that in 20 or 30 years things are different, with a different generation.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,189 ✭✭✭Brucie Bonus


    Lol none of this relates to my point rotfl lol.

    There isn't and won't be a move to deprive areas of Ireland from industry to favour Dublin just because its Dublin.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,189 ✭✭✭Brucie Bonus


    Let's not upset the terrorists?

    If the seat of government is Dublin, each area will have representatives from that area. If its a DUP stronghold, the DUP will be representing them. Belfast doesn't rule the North now.

    Its not nice or romantic, its decent. We left them their to suffer because it suited vested interests on both sides. You talk like the last hundred years was merely an inconvenience.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,571 ✭✭✭tinytobe


    I'd say, before you do all that, you need to weed and root out the UFF and the UDF first. Terrorists would have no place in a united Ireland. Also the SF would have to go as with the Brits completely gone from the island, Ireland would be "among ourselves" and SF would lose any justification other than their senseless socialist ideas. That would be the decent thing to do, if it's realistic and possible, it's another debate.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,189 ✭✭✭Brucie Bonus


    All you need is more people to vote for it than against it. The conflict/troubles was about one element with the backing of the British state, treating the other communities like dirt. It was undemocratic also.

    A UI would see everyone treated equally, at least the public anyway.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,571 ✭✭✭tinytobe


    A democratic referendum would have to be the basis of this.

    I think ultimately Ireland will unite at some point, it's more only a question when this is going to happen rather than if. May it'll be 10 years, may it'll be 20 years, I don't know.

    It's just a logical result out of Brexit. And when it happens, I hope it will all be peaceful.



  • Registered Users Posts: 89 ✭✭BringingSexyBack


    The point was utter nonsense - no offence

    Did you even understand the point that you tried to make ? Does not look like it . It is evident that you do not have a scooby doo as to what goes on with TD's when they are canvassing for business to come to their door step either

    Your latest claim is very naive .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,189 ✭✭✭Brucie Bonus


    The claim was made that Ulster would suffer under a UI because any new industry or business would be shifted to Dublin.

    I'm saying thats nonsense.

    I don't know where your comments fit in there.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,571 ✭✭✭tinytobe


    The possible re-unification of Ireland between the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland is a completely different matter.

    For starters, Germany was always one country, not really settled upon by force or "planted in" by another next door nation. Germany was only partitioned because of WW2 and because the occupying forces had different economic systems and it was soon obvious that the one system would be more prosperous than the other one. Once communism in Russia collapsed it was clear that reunification of Germany would be the logical result of that. In the end you are looking at a German partition only from 1945 to 1989 and a reunification shortly later on where real borders went up in the early 60ies when the wall was built in Berlin.

    In Ireland the matter of Northern Ireland is historically very long, you're going back in time to the plantation, to Oliver Cromwell, to the English civil war, if you want to, - and even further back, thus Irish partition is way way stronger and longer rooted in history. Thus it's way more difficult to resolve. There are cultural as well as religious obstacles, in Germany it was only that one "economic system", the one in the east collapsed and one occupying force ran out of money and the rest just took more or less it's natural course of things.



  • Registered Users Posts: 85 ✭✭FullyComp



    More relevant examples would be the Unification of Syria and Egypt and the United Arab Republic

    The closest parallel in Europe at the moment is probably Moldova and Romania (in fact you could argue both these are majority ethnic Romanian so would actually be closer in some ways than Ireland where we have two distinct peoples, each a majority in their relevant jurisdiction).


    Germany is completely different, it was hardly ever really separated.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,189 ✭✭✭Brucie Bonus


    You're only needing go back a hundred years. Are you suggesting Ireland was never Ireland? Ulster and Connaught never part of Ireland?

    You are also using an illegal undemocraticly created gerrymandered portion of Ulster, to claim its not part of the rest of Ulster.

    Doesn't hold water.

    Germany was overrun and Russia held on to the East. Very similar, not identical, but similar.

    Religion only comes into it when people are oppressed because of their religion. Thats mostly what NI was but somehow that was okay for generations.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 89 ✭✭BringingSexyBack


    What ? Are you taking the piss ?

    No such claim was made that Ulster would suffer under a UI . NO ONE . In fact, it was claimed that cities like Cork , Limerick and Galway would suffer as Derry and Newry along with Belfast getting Second City Status who be kicked to the end of the que while the South panders to basket cases that are NI cities

    For a start, no one seriously wants to go near Ulster to invest

    Learn to read and comprehend or jog on. It is of no coincidence that another poster has highlighted your ability to twist what was said .

    This is ridiculous . But fair due, you proved that you did not even understand what you said .


    This is your original statement

    "Why? There'll be jobs for 'our own' coming out their ears. Committee on reconciliation, boards to see the change over. A new board of health, Public works. There'll be plenty of our tax and EU money to go around the cronies. Also I'd imagine the same civil servants will be needed.

    Politicans try get business for their areas. Nobody tells a politician trying to get a factory in cork moved to Dublin ffs."

    You explain how there will be "jabs" coming out for their ears during recessions ? How can anyone justify 200 plus TDs in a country under 6 million ? Both sides of the border have blotted civil services

    Days of getting large chests of EU lolly are over, baby!

    The laughable part was the last line.....................as I already pointed out, swing a Ministerial job before a TD, they will soon forget their obligations for their areas when a crunch vote is required (unless, it is advantageous to lose the party whip eg Denis Naughton in 2011)



  • Registered Users Posts: 85 ✭✭FullyComp


    Very true on the investment point. Before Brexit there was very little regulatory difference between investing in the North or in the Republic beyond the Republic being far more expensive.

    In a UI what would be different? Before Brexit the UK was happy to cut sweetheart deals and you had full access to the EU market yet NI was not seen as a good bet. Maybe this is something everyone in Stormont should consider.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,571 ✭✭✭tinytobe


    I am not suggesting, you're interpreting.

    Ulster and Northern Ireland, for instance are not congruent, - 3 counties of Ulster are actually part of the Republic, but I am sure you know that anyway.

    Russia and the Russians only had Russian military in East Germany, - the used the barracks the Nazis built, - mostly at least. What they didn't do is take farmland from Germans and gave it to Russian settlers in a system of plantation. Russia's interest was military and ideological, farming was collectivized under communism and ownership not allowed or not encouraged, but only for ideological reasons of communism, not to give the land to Russians instead.

    The border between the two German states was hermetically sealed with electrical wiring of high voltage and automatic shotguns triggered by the minutest movements, preventing any travel from East to West and preventing East Germans from fleeing to the West, - East Germany was like a prison system with a tiny bit of freedom to walk in plein air.

    The British were never into that, like imposing communism on Northern Ireland, or preventing citizens to leave. Border checks were there as far as I remember but one could have left, patience and long wait times included.

    A comparison better suited to the situation in Northen Ireland would be South Tyrol especially during WW2, Italian fascism and later on, during the 1960ies and 1970ies. Plantation of Italians and Italian speaking people in the cities of Bozen and Meran and forcing German speaking Tyrolean to give up farms and jobs and leave their land...... The matter is largely resolved today, also thanks to the EU and both countries being part of the EU.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,189 ✭✭✭Brucie Bonus


    Will Cork , Galway and Limerick be prepared to be second fiddle to Derry and Newry ? One assumes and expects that Belfast would be the Second city . And what of Dublin ? Will they be keen on being told to hold back and let Belfast campaign for contracts and big business to go their way ? Hardly

    We have business outside of Dublin.

    We will not be forced to behave any differently. Belfast, Newry and Mallow will be equally represented. You are throwing up complete nonsense IMO.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,189 ✭✭✭Brucie Bonus


    The country was divided on the basis of land and money. Religion was the back of it and used to control one side over another, but money, land and power of control were the key reasons.

    Ulster was a province on the island of Ireland? You accept that surely? It is now divided and partially under foreign jurisdiction.

    This is where we can compare, somewhat, to Germany.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,571 ✭✭✭tinytobe



    Post edited by tinytobe on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,292 ✭✭✭✭blanch152




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,189 ✭✭✭Brucie Bonus


    Google all the factories not in Dublin and cop yourself on with your scaremongering.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,292 ✭✭✭✭blanch152




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,292 ✭✭✭✭blanch152




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,936 ✭✭✭Dickie10


    if there were a border poll and UI got the vote, surely there would be another referedum needed in ROI, what reaction would there be if the population of the south voted no to a UI? I can only imagine how toxic the atmoshphere would be between catholics in NI and ROI. another thing is anyone in the ROI who is not in favour of a UI are they a unionist?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,936 ✭✭✭Dickie10





  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,189 ✭✭✭Brucie Bonus


    The point was we already have business operating outside Dublin. You wanted proof. You got it. I suspect you jumped in before you were aware to the conversation.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,854 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Northern Ireland is not an illegal entity. We all know this, yet you repeat the lie again and again.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,292 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Lies are the only form of currency that are traded by those who favour a united Ireland in the short term.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,189 ✭✭✭Brucie Bonus


    I don't actually. The people of Ulster weren't consulted. They gerrymandered electoral districts. They denied Catholics the vote. Its legal because Britain said it was and FF/FG accepted it. Its as legal as the BA murdering civilians and assisting terrorists murder civilians.

    You talk like everything and everyone on the British side was beyond reproach.



  • Registered Users Posts: 85 ✭✭FullyComp



    Most of this stuff stopped 50 years ago at this point? Why are you still fighting about it now? Think you should get two votes to make up lost time?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,292 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    What has gerrymandering of local electoral constituencies in the 1950s got in any way to do with the democratic legitimacy of partition?

    The people of Northern Ireland also voted in 1974 to accept partition.



  • Registered Users Posts: 89 ✭✭BringingSexyBack


    Even a half wit would understand that the poster clearly and correctly was pointing out that Ireland was never a 32 county sovereign nation (or anything close) , totally free from England.

    No comparison whatsoever to Germany .



  • Registered Users Posts: 89 ✭✭BringingSexyBack


    Respectively, You still haven't a clue ! This was proven in earlier posts and it is beyond doubt now. You genuinely do not really understand or know what you are saying .

    People like you who have no experience or knowledge of business, trade, and politics , really should be sitting down and STFU and stop embarrassing yourselves.

    You had to resort to blatant distortion to save face in the previous post.

    The vast majority of business and industry in this country is in Dublin and the commuter belts of Kildare . IT , pharama etc

    Proper business that is ! Cork has Pzifer , Limerick had (past tense) Dell, now have nothing ..........................

    All the major industries and banks have GHQ in DUBLIN

    THe second last sentence about not having to behave any differently is cute. How on earth did you put Mallow in the same sentence as Belfast and Newry ?

    Please stop waffling. People did not realise that this was comedy section . At least actually back up your argument with facts . Your statements are already devoid of any credibility, so bald claims like that do not amount to much



  • Registered Users Posts: 89 ✭✭BringingSexyBack


    Ulster has ALWAYS been divided in terms of culture, religion and nationality . You have to go back to myths before you hear about a United Ulster of one people - even in the days of the Gaels, Ulster was sub divided into sects .

    Who thought you history ? FFS lol This really is not funny anymore.

    Nothing remotely comparable to Germany.

    Your knowledge and understanding of Irish history is shoddy enough so I don't expect you to understand much about ze Germans . You do know that Germany as a Nation State existed before World War 1 , right ? Good grief .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,292 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Have you not been sold the legend that was Brian Boru who ruled all of Ireland until those nasty Brits took it from him?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,854 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    They were actually.

    Stormont voted to cede from the Free State and rejoin the Union.

    We voted to accept the GFA which accepted that NI is part of the UK.

    It's legal because Ireland, the UK, the UN and every other institution that is worth their salt accepts it.

    Just because some armchair 'up da ra' Republican shouts and roars about 'da brits' every now and again does not make up for those incontrovertible facts.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,292 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    You are also forgetting that a majority of the Northern Ireland electorate voted to accept partition in the 1970s referendum.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,418 ✭✭✭BluePlanet


    Curious, how exactly can a people be divided by "nationality", before there were nation states?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,292 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Conversely, how can they be united before there were nation states?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,139 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    none of that matters as the treaty that partitioned ireland and created the free state and the sectarian apartheid statelet of northern ireland was signed under duress via the threat of violence upon the irish people.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,189 ✭✭✭Brucie Bonus


    A state that murders civilians and assists terrorism in murdering civilians, rigged elections were Catholics couldn't vote, said it was. We accepted because it was convenient for FF/FG.



  • Registered Users Posts: 89 ✭✭BringingSexyBack


    So, you one of them tulips that thought 1798 was about religion did ya?

    Pretty sure that era was the first era where the concept of Irish Nationality (that included everyone) really got taken seriously, not to mention the first attempt to get out of the Kingdom of Ireland which was an agent Kingdom of England

    Catholic lads tried establishing a self governing Confederation of Ireland in 1642 and 1649 based as a nation of Catholics (but still loyal to King Charlie) - You can bet that Belfast and the surrounds were VERY VERY different in attitudes and culture to Kilkenny

    I have no intent in offering free history lessons. Library is your friend



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,418 ✭✭✭BluePlanet


    Oh people can be United in all sorts of ways besides Nationality blanch.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,854 ✭✭✭✭markodaly




  • Registered Users Posts: 89 ✭✭BringingSexyBack


    Epic fail in basic historical facts

    Partition and the creation of NI arose via the Government of Ireland Ireland 1920, which the South Rejected.

    Nothing to do with the Anglo Irish Treaty of December 1921 , which came into effect in December 1922, which went beyond mere Home Rule , which NI got in 1920

    Northern Ireland came into existence on 3 May 1921. The Tan War was still going on in the South

    Naturally, the Treaty was not going to go back on a status (Existence of NI) that had already being established, especially since the Treaty removed the South out of the UK itself.

    The public had enough time to digest the arguments over the merit and demerit of the Treaty when they were called to vote in the spring of 1922. They overwhelmingly supported the Treaty and the TDs who voted for it .

    By the summer of 1922, the South were too busy bating the daylights out of each other, in areas that saw little fighting during the Tan War , and you can be damn sure, that barely anyone, not even the TD's during December 1921 - January 1922 talked very much about the North or the continuation of the 1920 partition!!

    Remarkable, despite the amount of time that history lessons from Primary to Secondary School is spent on the period of 1916-1940; despite all the books, despite all the documentaries, despite all the archive papers etc , you and maybe like you still can not even get the most basic facts in order ...........



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,854 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    We accepted the GFA because it was the right thing to do.

    FF and FG did not exist when the treaty was signed so you are not only demonstrating your complete lack of understanding of history, you are outing yourself as an anti-government zealot.


    Still, I see you didn't challenge me on the facts but went to the usual bull about 'da brits'.


    FUN FACT: The PIRA killed more nationalists, civilians and Catholics than the British Army did.... AWKWARD!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,854 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Good summary.


    Partition was inevitable as I keep saying. Only backward Republican types still cant realise this today.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement