Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Taxed to the hilt

Options
123468

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 3,078 ✭✭✭salonfire


    Wanderer78:

    We can run the country by endless government borrowing.


    Also Wanderer78:

    Tax the rich!


    Why the need to tax anyone based on your theory of endless borrowing? Why did you pick the rich to be taxed? You jelly of people who made more of a success of themselves than you can?



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,438 ✭✭✭McGiver


    These are clichés that resonate well in Ireland but they are a myth.

    CGT is indeed very high I'd change this immediately. It discourages investment and fuels property bubbles.

    But CGT is NOT calculated in overall tax burden for international comparisons, while VAT indeed is. All "hidden tax levies" are negligible in effect in terms assessing average tax burden and comparing countries.

    The notion of Irish HIGH taxes is... a myth. They are low to the average, even if I include "hidden duties".

    Please show me a comprehensive analysis of average tax burden for an average/median person including income taxes, social insurance, compulsory medical insurance and VAT between European countries.

    I made the analysis based on Institut Molinari paper and the conclusion is clear.

    You can start here and take it from there:

    Low earners pay no tax here. The 40% higher rate is not high, it's much higher in France, Belgium, Scandinavia etc.

    Examples:

    55k gross here gives you the same net salary as

    56k gross in Spain

    58k gross in Sweden

    59k gross in Denmark

    61k gross in France

    62k gross in Austria

    63k gross in Netherlands

    63k gross in Germany

    64k gross in Finland

    64k gross in Italy

    69k gross in Portugal

    70k gross in Belgium

    Assuming similar tax credits and personal situation. And I'm not counting much higher Employer's social security payments in virtually all EU countries. They are amongst the lowest here hence social system especially pensions is very weak here (2nd lowest state pension in OECD).

    As I said cost of living is high here but it ain't taxes.

    Post edited by McGiver on


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,546 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    ^^^ What he said.

    The cost of living is high in Ireland because the cost of living is high. As it is in Sweden, Denmark, and many other countries. Wages have to be high because of the high cost of living, and those wages are passed on causing higher prices.

    There is a custom of people/voters being unwilling to pay for things that are provided by the Gov. Bin charges were opposed by 'the people' and were abandoned (for a while). Everyone now pays them.

    Water charges were opposed 'by the people' and the project was abandoned - but the water leaks require huge investment. A pipeline to provide water to Dublin requires huge investment. The sewage system in Ireland is in need of huge investment, but lumpy water is Ok as long as you do not swim in it, and you get used to the smell. Who is going to pay for all these required investments?

    Of course if we had the revenue from a fair and transparent water charge system, the Irish Water might be able to invest and improve our water and sewerage systems. It works for gas and electricity - the user pays based on the meter, so why not water?

    It is a very populist argument to say taxes are too high and should be lower, and that services are too scant and should be improved. Who could argue against that? We just need to borrow to fill the gap.

    The only problem with borrowing to fill the gap, is that the lenders will want their money back.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,438 ✭✭✭McGiver


    The reality is that the Irish government and the Irish electorate are cheapskates, tight-purses, however you name it.

    It's impossible to build European grade infrastructure, health care or public services with such LOW taxes as they are here.

    The point is that by millions paying little bit more tax the government gets money to invest in infrastructure, services etc. Most European countries concluded, on population level, that everyone paying little bit more pays off in the end by getting infra and services. Ireland has not reached that conclusion yet and on the contrary the population is opposed to this idea, this myth of high taxes only exacerbates the notion. This thread demonstrates that too.

    The higher 40% doesn't have to change much to accomplish this. But there should be more bands especially on the lower side. So it's not about tax the rich, but tax everyone. I could imagine 10%, 20%, 30% and 40% tax bands to start with. 0%, 20% and 40% is not a good system.



  • Posts: 3,801 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    The overall level of taxation is all taxes I assume, not just taxes on labour.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 4,438 ✭✭✭McGiver


    Overall level of taxation is not a term that is used in academia, OECD etc. It's extremely challenging to calculate. It is basically not done for international comparisons for that reason. Hence, it's really pointless to discuss that, because you can't demonstrate, calculate and compare that between countries.

    Income tax, mandatory social & medical insurance contributions and estimated VAT effect it the best data that's used for tax burden comparisons. That's the best method. And in that method Ireland is low-average at worst.

    For example:

    The Tax Burden on Global Workers - A Comparative Index - First Edition, 2021 - Institut économique Molinari (institutmolinari.org)

    Note: I've minor in Economics, just FYI.



  • Posts: 3,801 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I’m a Nobel prize winner in economics. So much for credentialism on the internet

    I haven’t fully looked at that but these surveys on tax that show a low tax burden in Ireland relative to income tend to measure not just personal tax but the tax the company pays (ie company prsi or equivalent). The tax wedge

    Which is valid in a sense but isn’t reflected in the persons take home pay relative to earnings.

    And Ireland has a very high marginal rate at up to 50%. That really can’t be hidden particularly when people get bonuses. I’ve seen European immigrants here shocked at the take home after a bonus. It’s “balanced” by low taxes on lower income and high tax credits, to rebalance that to European standards we would increase taxes on lower income groups and maybe add a third tier.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,438 ✭✭✭McGiver


    Exactly, very high labour costs here -> higher overall price level -> higher labour costs. Plus add quite high VAT to it, that only exacerbates it.

    The government here balances it by very LOW social employers' as well as employees' contributions (taxes), to keep the labour costs in check else they'd be not competitive at all.

    As a blow-in, I find the "water charges" thing so bizarre - you pay for water in the whole EU, this has been in place in Europe for several decades, I'd guess since after the WW2 including the Eastern block. It's so bizarre, it's like saying electricity or gas supply should be free. You have to pay what you consume, it's an essential service but must be paid per unit of consumption just like the electricity. Parodixically, free water for all regardless of consumption is totally SOCIALIST, that even Socialist Eastern Block countries didn't have this in place 😎

    And yes "Taxes are too high" in Irish context is a populist argument, nothing else.

    If you want a functioning civilised society with a functioning EU-grade infrastructure and public services everyone needs to pay income taxes. It's not about the rich, the "squeezed in the middle", the poor - but everyone. Unless you want to end up in a PIIGS situation again by borrowing to the point of bankruptcy. One more option is crappy infra and public services - anyone wants that?

    Btw - Irish Gov Debt:GNI ratio is 110% which is alarmingly high.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,438 ✭✭✭McGiver


    Should I show you my degree? Why would I lie? This is not a fair argument.

    I mentioned it because I've a degree in economics, understand these concepts, am interested in this topic and regularly read papers on the topic and run my analyses.

    Better stay on topic and present data to support your notions. So far no actual data with international comparison.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,438 ✭✭✭McGiver


    Marginal tax rate you mentioned is quite irrelevant without internal comparison for the same target group etc.

    Irish taxes are simply not high in any sense, however you look at it.

    Good analysis here:

    Comparing Irish Income Taxation Rates with other EU Member States | Public Policy

    Ireland is demonstrably on the lower-average to lower end in all target groups. In line with my pervious posts.

    At average incomes and below, the Irish income tax burden is relatively low when compared to other EU Member States (MS)

    ...

    Notwithstanding the lower income tax burden in Ireland relative to other EU MS, the OECD has highlighted that the Irish tax and welfare system is the most progressive and redistributive in offsetting market income inequalities (i.e. earnings from employment and self-employment, rents and investment incomes) (OECD, 2020)



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,068 ✭✭✭Murph85


    its an appalling run country and very juvenile. There shouldnt be water charges, because water falls free, from the sky... Nobody should pay any meaningful tax, except the "elite" on 80k etc plus... How convenient that the massive majority of voters, want someone else to pay...

    Its a joke, but I would scrap LPT , can be financed by not hiking welfare for a year or two... and of course it can be financed by economic growth alone... The biggest winners, will be those already robbed on marginal tax rates. The rest pay as good as nothing on their properties any way... Its a populist political move across the board and will reward those, hammered the most...

    start hiking motor tax rates too and substantially. This can be used to further reduce the marginal rate of tax...



  • Posts: 3,801 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I was talking about marginal taxation for a reason. It’s high and it comes in at a low multiple of the average income, see

    Ireland’s 48% marginal tax comes in at 1.5 times average income. Germany’s 47.5% tax comes in at 5.4 times average income ie 282,000. in terms of the marginal rate and where it comes in Ireland is up there with the most taxed countries

    And in fact because of how USC is calculated the average wage (or slightly above) is taxed about 46%. That used to be 48% so we have the highest rate at near the lowest wage at one stage.

    The marginal is high but the tax paid by lower earners is low, and overall tax is average, in fact that’s what your last bold point says - Ireland has a highly distributionary tax system



  • Registered Users Posts: 20,006 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    Now add the cost of owning a car, where motoring taxes and fees makes up 10% of total government revenues.

    "...Government which charge the highest taxes and driving fees in the EU....Ireland tops the league for the cost of taxing and insuring a car, and is second only to Holland for the cost of buying a new car."

    https://www.independent.ie/life/motoring/car-costs-in-ireland-are-close-to-highest-in-europe-survey-reveals-26223392.html

    This is not a small deal They usually say car ownership is the second highest lifetime expenditure after housing. I suspect it is probably higher in this country.

    Might as well chuck in tertiary education fees as well. And while we are there, by at least one metric, Ireland has the second highest childcare costs in the EU, which might be explained by it having the lowest expenditure in the EU on provision of pre-school services.

    The cost of living is high because the government make it so - deliberately. It doesn't count as taxation, which is intentional, not least because of the prohibition on state support for industries in the EU, but it's there in spades. The example of the covert subsidisation of the Pharmaceuticals industry I mentioned is just one. Can you explain to me the logic behind legislation that dictates that a brand name drug can be sold over the counter, but that a generic version of the same drug can't, and that the on-costs of obtaining that same drug that retails in the Uk for €4.50 amount to €57 on top of that?

    Ireland's 'cute' to the gills public sector has perfected the end run around EU legislation to subsidise industries at the expense of the consumer. VRT blatantly replacing import duty and protecting the local sellers from UK imports is probably the standout. Common market my arse.

    What happens when you make car insurance compulsory, with no regulation of the fees the industry can charge while having a legal system with no limit on payouts?

    Unfortunately it has been expunged from the internet, but years ago you could find an Irish newspaper article, from around 2004?, that claimed that the Irish vehicle insurance industry made more profit than the combined total profit of the UK car insurance industry.

    The net effect of using legislation configured to provide industry subsidies is the same as if the government increased income tax and then handed out massive subsidies directly to all of it's pet industries.

    The government seems particularly fond of the insurance, legal and banking industries. The Irish government deliberately reduced competion by driving out several foreign banks, namely Rabo and Ulster bank.

    And I haven't even got to CGT and CAT yet.



  • Registered Users Posts: 20,006 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    Speaking of taxes and how the government does a lot of it by shifting or inducing costs...

    "The majority of the new Climate Action Plan's costs will fall to individuals, households and the private sector, not the State, the coalition leaders have confirmed.

    The €125 billion plan"

    When this was first announced, the first thing I wondered was how many additional public sector workers, the sector would tell the government needed to be employed to enact and oversee the plan, because there isn't a hope in hell of a magical productivity transformation in that sector which would see them adding any of that to their plates. Of course that additional staffing cost, which by it's nature is always shoulderd by the taxpayer, will be in addition to that €125 billion.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,445 ✭✭✭fliball123




  • Registered Users Posts: 7,445 ✭✭✭fliball123


    How does this compare when all income taxes (PAYE, USC and PRSI) is included and how is the return for the tax payer for paying this tax? How good is Ireland's Public services in comparison.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,280 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    The very high price level here is not due purely to high wages.

    Wages are high, yes, but not very high.

    Our consumer price level is 138.3 compared to EU = 100, that is the price level for AIC.

    See here:

    Our labour costs are high, yes, but they are 10th in EU, and are just at the eurozone average.




  • Registered Users Posts: 13,280 ✭✭✭✭Geuze




  • Registered Users Posts: 2,066 ✭✭✭HerrKuehn


    For an individual it doesn't really matter what the average tax take is. In Ireland we have a high marginal rate kicking in early. It means that in comparison to somewhere like Germany, when you hit around 120k or so, the tax payable is around the same. Lower paid, say 20k or so would pay far more in Germany. I think you also need to compare service provided, which in Ireland are terrible, we need to pay for dental, health insurance, medications, doctors visits. The state pension system is one size fits all with your previous earnings not taken into account.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,367 ✭✭✭JimmyVik


    I just got paid for the month of November.

    I did loads of overtime, busted my gut for it. I got paid over €1000 for the overtime. less than €500 went into my bank account. You are welcome revenue.

    Dont anyone try to tell me that this is a low tax economy.



  • Registered Users Posts: 68,499 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Where else would someone on your income take home more of that at their marginal rate, precisely? Remember to include social insurance as most people who do these comparisons grab what looks like a low income tax rate and ignores a 10+% social insurance charge.

    And how much would their property tax (which can apply to renters, e.g. in the UK), local taxes (if they exist), water charges etc be?



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,367 ✭✭✭JimmyVik


    Of the places I have worked and paid tax in over the years. France, UK, US, Germany, Australia. Im sure there are plenty more but i havent paid tax in any other country. But all the ones i have paid tax in its a lot better than here for sure. Over 50% tax on my overtime is very hard to swallow.

    I dont pay property tax myself, but I can tell you you get a hell of a lot more for your taxes in other countries too. Stealth taxes in Ireland are worse than anywhere else too. But feel free to do a break down of the taxes paid in each of those countries if you dont believe me.



  • Registered Users Posts: 68,499 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Without knowing your exact income, which I don't expect you to state, I can't do a specific tear down. But it's highly unlikely that the total tax take was actually lower in France, Germany or the UK - with hefty social insurance and property / residence taxation. Or the US when you pay for health insurance



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,367 ✭✭✭JimmyVik



    I can tell you that having worked in all of those countries and paid tax them, Ireland is indeed the worst for tax. Its also the worst for cost of living, the worst for what you get for taxes, the worst for stealth taxes and dont get me started on the likes of VRT and VAT.

    This country sucks money out of you from all angles with taxes in various hidden and not so hidden forms.



  • Registered Users Posts: 68,499 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    And I can tell you that the actual hard figures don't agree with you in any of those cases.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,367 ✭✭✭JimmyVik


    Thats just not true.

    Show us these hard figures you have then?



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,438 ✭✭✭McGiver



    Marginal tax is a bit academic, it doesn't tell an average person much and it's pretty bad at comparing countries because income tax on its own is only one of main elements of overall taxation in the EU.

    Social insurance is not included, medical insurance is not included.

    Social insurance is low here in EU terms and there's no mandatory medical insurance.

    Other EU countries have much higher social insurance and most have mandatory medical insurance. These are types of taxes or are considered as such in the EU. Also, you should use an average

    If you add it all together Irish tax burden is belie average.

    "High taxes" myth collapses at even a mild scrutiny. Maybe we should define what is high and for whom they are high.

    We should take average or median salary in the country and compare the tax burden between the countries. High would be in the 1st quartile in the EU in my book. Ireland isn't clearly there, it's in the 4th quartile in fact.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,438 ✭✭✭McGiver


    Populist cliché. Cherry picking as well.

    Average Joe in Ireland pays much more less income tax + social insurance + medical insurance + VAT than average Jean in Belgium or average Johann in Germany. And that's the point 😎



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 3,801 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    taking the median hides the high tax rate which comes in at just higher than the median. I’ve said that we have too low a rate under the median and too high above it, compare to Denmark.



Advertisement