Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

Would you be happy for your children to receive covid-19 vaccine

15455565860

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 147 ✭✭Thou


    Discredit it anyway you want, I just did the search on Twitter the video is on multiple accounts.

    They may be anti-vax or whatever.

    I have received the jabs myself, I am just concerned for the potential affects of these on children.

    But unfortunately people consider this an irrational and unreasonable point of view.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,676 CMod ✭✭✭✭faceman


    You dont trust fact checkers but you trust a guy you had never heard without validating his claims who has since admitted he lied and has been proven to be full of sh1t.

    Covid really has me thinking that there are more morons on this planet than there are sane people.

    At least the debate with Schmittel, he has taken the time to read reports before coming to his/her own conclusion. Ive greater respect for that, even if I disagree.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,345 ✭✭✭TaurenDruid


    He did not invent mRNA vaccines. He did not invent a "vaccine technology platform". He was one of a huge number of people who worked on such research. Here's another article about the man: https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2021/08/robert-malone-vaccine-inventor-vaccine-skeptic/619734/

    If I'm making big decisions for my kids, y'know who I'm not going to trust? Anonymous accounts on Twitter or Facebook, giving me their "opinions" and "debate" about scientific facts.

    ===
    boards.ie default cookie settings now include "legitimate interest" for >200 companies, unless you specifically opted out!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 147 ✭✭Thou


    Ok point made, I am sure they will be 100% safe and carry no potential risks or harm to children 😉



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,345 ✭✭✭TaurenDruid


    Every vaccine (and medicine, and food) carries risks of side effects or reactions. We know this. We also know the risk from side effects from COVID-19 vaccines is far less than the risks to health from COVID-19 itself. Further up the thread, there are links to the scientific papers demonstrating this.

    ===
    boards.ie default cookie settings now include "legitimate interest" for >200 companies, unless you specifically opted out!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,173 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    Go do your own research if you don't like fact-checkers.

    Malone is by all accounts a man tortured by spite and grudges as a result of being exploited and used in his early career. He did some pioneering work in the 1980s, joined a company who profited from his work, and then got shat out the rear end with little recognition. Since then he has done little of consequence, a Captain Ahab constantly chasing down his opportunity for revenge or recognition. He was involved in some early anti-Covid drugs trials which failed to produce good results and had put a lot of his stock in supporting the use of ivermectin and such as treatment. The failure of this, only strengthened his begrudgery.

    On a personal level, Malone would love nothing more than to see the rollout of mRNA vaccines become a complete disaster, so he could finally see the white whale of established pharma and academia gets its comeuppance.

    So all of his contributions should be viewed in that light.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 147 ✭✭Thou


    Nah still goin to hold off, what's the rush, would like to wait and see more safety data, and no child in the state under age of 14 has died from Covid.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 147 ✭✭Thou





  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 147 ✭✭Thou




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,345 ✭✭✭TaurenDruid


    /shrug

    Your kids, your choice. No, I'm not aware of the death of any child under 14 from COVID, in Ireland, either. They have been hospitalised, been admitted to ICU, and had long COVID, though.

    But Twitter and Facebook.

    ===
    boards.ie default cookie settings now include "legitimate interest" for >200 companies, unless you specifically opted out!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,784 ✭✭✭hometruths


    We also know the risk from side effects from COVID-19 vaccines is far less than the risks to health from COVID-19 itself.

    According to NIAC as far as primary school kids are concerned, we do not know this.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,676 CMod ✭✭✭✭faceman


    Yet they are still recommending the vaccine, along with the CDC and the ECDC.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,784 ✭✭✭hometruths


    Yes, they are strongly recommending that immunocompromised kids are vaccinated.

    For healthy kids, they are recommending that they are offered the option to be vaccinated.

    A very different grade of advice for healthy kids vs immunocompromised.

    I suspect the fact that they are not certain for healthy kids in this age group that the risk from side effects from COVID-19 vaccines is far less than the risks to health from COVID-19 itself, is precisely the reason for the different advice.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,507 ✭✭✭✭Lumen


    Not quite. They are recommending the vaccine be offered to everyone in that age group, and they are strongly recommending vaccination for those aged 5 to 11 years

    • with underlying conditions
    • living with a younger child with complex medical needs
    • living with a person who is immunocompromised


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 224 ✭✭PicardWithHair


    I suspect the fact that they are not certain for healthy kids in this age group that the risk from side effects from COVID-19 vaccines is far less than the risks to health from COVID-19 itself, is precisely the reason for the different advice.

    ^^ exactly this.

    My kids are perfectly healthy and don't need this vaccine.

    I have the vaccine and so does my wife, but our kids don't need it.

    simple as.

    I am amazed however the amount of parents that are boasting to sign their 5 year olds up for vaccines.(I live in Spain)

    What do they think it will change ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,318 ✭✭✭patnor1011


    Could you please be so kind and offer your credentials?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,354 ✭✭✭copeyhagen


    school kids dont even need to self isolate if someone in their 'pod' tests positive, unless they are showing symptoms (what kid doesnt have a runny nose now?)

    "if you want, you CAN contact the HSE for antigen tests in this situation"

    that explains the seriousness of it on children.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,345 ✭✭✭TaurenDruid


    "Simple as."

    Yeah.

    What do they think it will change ?

    Well, the chance of my kids ending up in hospital, sick with COVID. Simple as.

    All stats below for 26/11 to 9/12, from here: CIDR 14 day report 20211210_website.pdf (hpsc.ie)

    Age Cases Percent (of all cases) No. hospitalised % hospitalised

    0-4 3309 5.3% 27 4.9%

    5-12 13164 20.7% 21 3.8%

    (Sorry for formatting, no idea how to do tables on the new boards.ie)

    Yeah, 48 kids under 13 hospitalised isn't many. Still sucks to be one of them, or to be the parent of one of them. But if they're vaccinated, the chances of them needing hospitalisation are far less. Simple as. As they say.

    ===
    boards.ie default cookie settings now include "legitimate interest" for >200 companies, unless you specifically opted out!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 224 ✭✭PicardWithHair


    Are they in hospital because of covid or with covid ?

    There is lots of evidence to say their risks of getting serious covid are less then side effects.

    Again they don't need it, nothing is 100% certain, but I'm not giving them a vaccine for a disease they have practically zero chance of dying from or even getting anything serious from it ..



  • Posts: 10,049 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    There is zero evidence that the risks of serious covid are less than the side effects.

    Also, I am sure you asked that you kids not receive the rubella vaccine also, the dont need it. Rubella is very mild in children



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,345 ✭✭✭TaurenDruid


    There is lots of evidence to say their risks of getting serious covid are less then side effects.

    No, there isn't. Not from reputable sources. And further up this thread (e.g., previous page), there are links to actually reputable scientific studies showing exactly the opposite - e.g., your chances of getting myocarditis from COVID-19 are far higher than of getting it from the vaccine. Don't accuse me of spreading misinformation when that's exactly what you're doing!

    ===
    boards.ie default cookie settings now include "legitimate interest" for >200 companies, unless you specifically opted out!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 17,626 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    Not a chance, but why would you need them? Is the grifting of Robert Malone not plain enough for you to see? Or is there anything he's now pushing that you factually believe?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 224 ✭✭PicardWithHair




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 224 ✭✭PicardWithHair



    Conclusions Post-vaccination CAE rate was highest in young boys aged 12-15 following dose two. For boys 12-17 without medical comorbidities, the likelihood of post vaccination dose two CAE is 162.2 and 94.0/million respectively. This incidence exceeds their expected 120-day COVID-19 hospitalization rate at both moderate (August 21, 2021 rates) and high COVID-19 hospitalization incidence. Further research into the severity and long-term sequelae of post-vaccination CAE is warranted. Quantification of the benefits of the second vaccination dose and vaccination in addition to natural immunity in this demographic may be indicated to minimize harm.


    Yeah no thanks, he can get it if he wants it when he's 18....



  • Posts: 10,049 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    This analysis of your referenced report certianly checks out

    He described the analysis as “half-baked” with “data that will certainly be co-opted by the antivaccine movement.”

    Real data is different

    Also

    increased risk of myocarditis “is clustered around puberty and adolescence” in young men, which would mean a lower risk in children under 12.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 224 ✭✭PicardWithHair


    So depends on what experts you want to trust, you trust the Sponsored by Pfizer guy ... fair enough.

    Look if you want to get the vaccine for your kids fair enough - I would never want to force them not to have it.

    The problem is I eventually will be forced to have them get the vaccine, from pressure by the school etc - for a vaccine that they do not need.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,345 ✭✭✭TaurenDruid


    Oh dear, looks like you've been caught out there. Maybe you just weren't aware of the subsequent articles? And I already pointed out to you that the previous page of this thread (57) contains links to at least three such studies, again all showing higher risk from COVID than from the vaccine.

    Also, your kid(s) can get jabbed at 16 without your permission, not 18. Although you live in Spain, so maybe the law is different there.

    ===
    boards.ie default cookie settings now include "legitimate interest" for >200 companies, unless you specifically opted out!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 224 ✭✭PicardWithHair


    Ive only joined the discussion, well even if he wanted it at 13/14 I'd let him- if he made that choice himself , my nephew got it at 13 ... his choice he wanted to stop doing PCR tests ... poor kid, he has had to do about 4 since.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,784 ✭✭✭hometruths


    contains links to at least three such studies, again all showing higher risk from COVID than from the vaccine

    Are you talking about the post with two links to new reports criticising other studies? If so they are not research papers.

    Which is the most credible study you have seen showing the risk of myocarditis from covid infection is greater than vaccine? i.e one with "real data".



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,345 ✭✭✭TaurenDruid


    Sorry, yeah, I've got,

    * Myocarditis risks from Covid-19 vaccines are still less than the risks from Covid-19 - The risk of myocarditis has been found to be roughly 16 times higher in Covid-19 patients than in the uninfected. (Source: https://www.pharmaceutical-technology.com/comment/myocarditis-risks-covid-19-vaccines/ 1st December 2021)

    * Myocarditis (or pericarditis or myopericarditis) from primary COVID19 infection occurred at a rate as high as 450 per million in young males. Young males infected with the virus are up 6 times more likely to develop myocarditis as those who have received the vaccine. (Source: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.07.23.21260998v1 27 July 2021 - NB: paper not yet peer reviewed at time of publication)

    * Covid-19: Study that claimed boys are at increased risk of myocarditis after vaccination is deeply flawed, say critics (Source: https://www.bmj.com/content/374/bmj.n2251 14 September 2021).

    Good catch. My bad.

    ===
    boards.ie default cookie settings now include "legitimate interest" for >200 companies, unless you specifically opted out!



Advertisement