Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Looking for stats on % of unvaccinated people in ICU with underlying conditions

2

Answers

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,210 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    @Danno To make it a little easier for you I won't even use "soccer" or "hair colour". I will use actual names.

    Below is a list of 100 boys (taken from some random list of top 100 boys names but that is irrelevant.) What is relevant is that the first 6 have chosen to be unvaccinated. They are identified by name and their names are in bold. The rest have chosen to be vaccinated.

    Under your (conservative) assumptions used in your example, these unvaccinated 6 will provide 50% of the ICU patients coming from the population (100). The other 94 will provide the other 50% of the ICU patients coming from the population.

    Your assertion is that, if those 6 boys had instead got vaccinated along with everyone else, (Suppose they were initially hesitant because they were afraid of needles but after 5 minutes the doctor convinced them), then they would have instead provided 43% of ICU patients . And the other 94 would have provided the other 57%. You need to be able to tell us why {Liam, Noah, Oliver, Elijah,William,James} have 11x the probability of ending up in ICU just because they were initially a little hesitant. Everyone is equally vaccinated in the alternate scenario.

    Liam

    Noah

    Oliver

    Elijah

    William

    James

    Benjamin

    Lucas

    Henry

    Alexander

    Mason

    Michael

    Ethan

    Daniel

    Jacob

    Logan

    Jackson

    Levi

    Sebastian

    Mateo

    Jack

    Owen

    Theodore

    Aiden

    Samuel

    Joseph

    John

    David

    Wyatt

    Matthew

    Luke

    Asher

    Carter

    Julian

    Grayson

    Leo

    Jayden

    Gabriel

    Isaac

    Lincoln

    Anthony

    Hudson

    Dylan

    Ezra

    Thomas

    Charles

    Christopher

    Jaxon

    Maverick

    Josiah

    Isaiah

    Andrew

    Elias

    Joshua

    Nathan

    Caleb

    Ryan

    Adrian

    Miles

    Eli

    Nolan

    Christian

    Aaron

    Cameron

    Ezekiel

    Colton

    Luca

    Landon

    Hunter

    Jonathan

    Santiago

    Axel

    Easton

    Cooper

    Jeremiah

    Angel

    Roman

    Connor

    Jameson

    Robert

    Greyson

    Jordan

    Ian

    Carson

    Jaxson

    Leonardo

    Nicholas

    Dominic

    Austin

    Everett

    Brooks

    Xavier

    Kai

    Jose

    Parker

    Adam

    Jace

    Wesley

    Kayden

    Silas



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,392 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    I've heard it reported that certain groups are more likely not to be vaccinated. Including those with poorer grasp of English and Irish travellers. It'd be interesting to know if they are over represented in hospital and ICU wards due to Covid. And if so, what is being done about it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,137 ✭✭✭✭Lumen




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,392 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    It'd be interesting to know if the HSE is actively addressing these groups. It's always dangerous to fingerpoint at minority groups...but if the rest of us are doing our bit and they ain't. Well there needs to be a crackdown.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,913 ✭✭✭Danno


    A "crackdown". As pointed out in the PT article, 1-in-4 unvaccinated are originally from eastern European nations, nations with different attitudes to governments than native Irish people have. And for very good reason too - many of those nations are formerly communist.

    You want to give them more of that style of rule aka crackdown. That won't end well.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,317 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    The foreign-born stuff is interesting. Perhaps we need to look at an EU-wide campaign by the ECDC that offers local information to expats. So a Polish person listening to Polish radio hears an ECDC ad about the vaccine and is directed to a website that contains information in Polish that tells them how to get vaccinated (as well as all the other health measures) in Ireland?

    The 2016 census indicated that just under half a million people were foreign-born and spoke a foreign language at home. 83% of these reported being able to speak English "very well", but as the article above points out, they may still listen almost exclusively to their home media.

    Seems like a strong push to get the message out to them could yield good results.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,137 ✭✭✭✭Lumen



    Are you suggesting applying sanctions to unvaccinated people based on their ethnicity?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,850 ✭✭✭Cianos


    The only possible argument left from anti-vaxx point of view to seek to excuse the disproportionate burden the unvaccinated are placing on the healthcare system, and in doing so degrading the level of care for everyone else (ref to cancelation of elective surgeries etc), is that their numbers can be explained by those who weren't viable for the vaccine anyway. ie that their profile is typically;

    John

    Suffering from condition X.

    Condition X excludes John from getting vaccinated, even though John would otherwise probably get it.

    John gets Covid and ends up in ICU and is counted as unvaccinated

    (I believe quite a few pregnant women were of this type, although afaik the vaccines have been approved for pregnancy since).


    rather than;


    Joe

    No underlying conditions

    Unvaccinated because afraid of needles.

    Joe gets Covid and ends up in ICU

    (I believe most people's impression of the average unvaccinated ICU Covid patient would be represented by this type)


    Can the John scenario even explain the disproportionate representation of unvaccinated?

    Post edited by Cianos on


  • Subscribers Posts: 41,830 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    How does an individual getting vaccinated protect others from Covid?

    congratulations on the posting the dumbest question on boards.ie in years



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,634 ✭✭✭✭Graces7


    Excellent point. As one of the folk not viable for vaccination /immunocompromised I wonder about that too. BUT I am also sure that those of us in that situation take extra care to avoid infection simply because we know the danger we are in if we get infected. I certainly do. NB just a thought but is age factored in also? And I do not think the anti vaxxer has a valid point by the way.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    So if we follow your logic what should we do with smokers, alcoholics, the obese as they place a disproportionate burden on the health system?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,850 ✭✭✭Cianos


    Can you explain what logic you think I'm putting forward here?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,997 ✭✭✭✭Cuddlesworth


    26% of Irish Adults have a underlying condition as of a 2019 survey.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,392 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    Sanctions? Dunno - first maybe mobile vaccination centres that target them actively. And if they don't avail - well then perhaps some consequences.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,170 ✭✭✭pimpmyhat


    I'm getting tired hearing people saying they have done their bit!!

    The reality is the vast majority of people only got vaccinated so they could travel go to pubs etc.

    It wasnt on any moral ground.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,137 ✭✭✭✭Lumen




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,913 ✭✭✭Danno




  • Registered Users Posts: 578 ✭✭✭VillageIdiot71


    There's a lot of questions that could be answered if flat weekly figures were produced. For some reason, there's only detailed figures for September/October available - which, absolutely, point to the picture being more complex than people would like it to be. Blindly lashing out at "anti-vaxxers" is emotionally satisfying. Digesting that non-Irish born people comprise nearly 30% of ICU admissions, with 90% of them being unvaccinated, is somewhat harder to turn into a catchy chant.

    But, yes, there's something more to be understood about the event of someone turning up in ICU.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,676 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    An individual getting vaccinated protects others from Covid by reducing their own chance of getting Covid themselves. If you don't have it, you can't pass it on. This is how herd immunity works.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,676 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,137 ✭✭✭✭Lumen


    Sept and Oct stats are in the CSO report posted at the bottom of the first page of this thread.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,597 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    here's a useful graphic that shows even if vaccinated people are just as infectious as unvaccinated people, the reduction in severe illness still has dramatic effects on the number of people who end up in hospital clogging up our health services




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,210 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    When you say that the vaccine doesn't do anything to stem the spread, how do you square that with the fact that, high and all as the numbers are now, they aren't up to where there were at their peak at the start of the year?

    Back then we had:

    Much more restrictions compared to now

    A less dangerous variant compared to now (delta has a much higher R number)

    and hardly anyone vaccinated



  • Registered Users Posts: 578 ✭✭✭VillageIdiot71


    That gives an inaccurate view, as age (and some other things) is such a huge factor in determining who needs hospitalisation.

    The whole gap in the discussion could be closed by just including the age factor, and showing what that means.

    A graph structured like yours for the over 60 age group would be meaningful. Lumping everyone in, it isn't.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,137 ✭✭✭✭Lumen


    @VillageIdiot71 wrote

    A graph structured like yours for the over 60 age group would be meaningful. Lumping everyone in, it isn't.

    Why are you particularly focused on the over 60s?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,181 ✭✭✭patnor1011


    Interesting debate. People seeing red, screaming murder and calling for sanctions against 6% of compatriots who didn't get jab for whatever reason. Who knows how many of them for medical reasons. All this while director general of WHO is stating that no vaccine should go to any country with over 40% of population vaccinated due to what they call vaccine apartheid where rich countries hoard vaccines and poor countries cant get them. Well, since they cant pay for them anyway "let it rip" main thing is we are OK.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,885 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    Effectively 0% for medical reasons (it's in the rounding error area).

    We've just shipped half a million J&J vaccines to Nigeria and our excess stock is going to COVAX via the European supply. Logistics is a huge issue in Africa and COVID vaccines are not top of the list for aid in a lot of the countries.

    But with this, I presume you now agree with vaccination but want equitable supply? Or is it another tangent for you?



  • Registered Users Posts: 578 ✭✭✭VillageIdiot71


    ? Really?

    "People aged 65 and over accounted for 50% of all those hospitalised through the whole period of the pandemic"

    "There were 25 deaths among confirmed COVID-19 cases in the week ending 12 November and of those, 17 deaths (68%) were in people aged 65 and over. Most deaths in this pandemic have been in older age groups."

    Is this news?

    https://www.cso.ie/en/releasesandpublications/br/b-cdc/covid-19deathsandcasesseries36/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,137 ✭✭✭✭Lumen


    This is a thread on ICUs, and many deaths never go near ICU. If you look at the age breakdown from that link you posted, the three largest groups in the Sept-Oct ICU admissions stats are:

    25-44: 19%

    45-64: 34%

    65-79: 39%

    This is not an over-60s issue.



  • Registered Users Posts: 578 ✭✭✭VillageIdiot71


    Absolutely. It's obviously an over 50s issue, instead.

    Can I suggest you might also consider those proportions in the light of the relative proportion of national population? Something like 14% of the population is aged over 65.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 230 ✭✭TalleyRand83


    Compare apples with apples, let’s see start of New year, but by the same token how did we have very low cases during the summer with no vaccine?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,210 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    We had low cases during the Summer after a cumulative effort of observing social distancing, coupled with better weather meaning more outdoor activity. If you will recall, less things were also opened up. It is not apples and oranges to look at January 2021 vs 29th Nov 2021. Not that far off in terms of time of year to compare. You cannot try to argue that we are as restricted now as we were during January. It is simply not the case by any stretch of the imagination. Yet our case numbers are still not as high as they were.



  • Registered Users Posts: 230 ✭✭TalleyRand83


    But wasn’t it all us bold people letting loose over Xmas that causes the hysteria? That’s the argument I saw here and in many media outlets……



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,913 ✭✭✭Danno


    This again...

    Most folk who are vaccinated are unlikely to go forward for testing. Whatever happened to the asymptomatic super-spreader? Here's a hint: They haven't gone away you know!

    NPHET have admitted as much that they are optimistically catching 4/10 cases through testing. And as we all know how NPHET do numbers, it is probably safe to say they're getting about 1/10.

    You've had many large urban testing centres unable to intake people for testing for a while now... and Covid likes large urban areas to spread.

    It wouldn't be far off the mark to say that once a few weeks have passed (we reached ~full~ vaccination in September) vaccines are less effective in hindering spread.

    The above is a perfect sh!tstorm and now throw Omnicon into the mix! Fun times ahead, but at least we're hurtling towards herd immunity with the vaccines holding back a tsunami of hospitalisations, for now.

    The virus will no doubt win this out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,210 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump





  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,210 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    Yes. What in my post contradicts that or says otherwise? There was some socialising over Christmas. Hardly to the same extent as the mixing of people over the past few weeks. If ya came out from under your bed you'd have realised that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,181 ✭✭✭patnor1011


    Well, drop in the ocean but it seems that nature will sort it out itself anyway. Looks like some countries are close to our level of people with antibodies even without any meaningful vaccination program. Lets hope omicron will push it further as for now it seems it is just that. High transmission and low danger.

    What tangent do you mean? Also to say "I presume you now agree with vaccination" is strange as I said it multiple times, anyone who think they need vaccine should go ahead and get it. And if someone do not want it then it is their choice and none of my concern. I am not interested to know why anyone want or do not want it since majority of the people can assess potential risk vs benefit and decide what is the best for them.



  • Registered Users Posts: 639 ✭✭✭Thats me


    At least alcoholics and smokers are being charged for their habits, this charge is included into price of beverages and tobacco.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 172 ✭✭PureIsle


    You think unvaccinated do not pay the taxes necessary to support our health service?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 639 ✭✭✭Thats me


    I've just pointed an error.

    In relation to financing health services from taxes - these taxes calculated to support minimal level of service and do not even cover all needs in normal HS operation mode, not to tell about current emergency situation. If you want my opinion, i would make any service for COVID patients paid in full from their pocket. Sure, after that we will see much less antivaxers and people would self-isolate much better than they typically do.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 172 ✭✭PureIsle


    Will you apply the same logic to adverse events from the vax?

    It is not a necessary element to live like air and water and food, and it is a choice that the jabbed took - a large percent to prevent social exclusion - so you want to hold everyone financially responsible for any health issues because of their choices?

    or is this just in one situation?

    In any case it is a despicable reaction to other peoples' choice not agreeing with yours regardless their reasons.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,310 ✭✭✭bloopy


    This question just got a whole lot harder to track.

    The HSPC has discontinued the vaccinated/unvaccinated icu and death reports that people have been using to track weekly admissions and deaths for the last three months.

    It has been replaced with a new type report that makes it a lot more difficult to figure out.

    I will also note that the CSO has not updated their report that breaks down cases by vaccinated and unvaccinated. It should have been released this morning at 11am judging by how they've been doing it for the last year or so.

    Will have to keep an eye on it, maybe they are just a bit late with it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 639 ✭✭✭Thats me


    >Will you apply the same logic to adverse events from the vax?

    No, it is in interests of community to have members vaccinated.

    >you want to hold everyone financially responsible for any health issues because of their choices?

    Cases of pandemics like this makes whole society vulnerable which requires higher degree of responsibility than average person could afford with no some kind of enforcement. Even doctors themselves, who are telling us we should isolate as much as possible, do not go to office with no real need - what you think they do? They are flying around the world just to have a meeting which could be done on-line, sharing omicron there and bringing it to their countries. If you cannot believe, here is a proof: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/dec/01/israeli-doctor-believes-he-caught-omicron-variant-of-covid-in-london

    >or is this just in one situation?

    Currently in this one situation. But generally speaking tax paid HS does not work anyway. For the tax money they have grown enormously large bureaucratic structure which has the only purpose - prevent people from accessing their doctors. Just because doctor's salary is too big to let them work. Per each doctor they have dozens of employees who are busy with anything except treating patients, so probably a bit of healthy capitalism would help this system to improve when people will start voiting by their money for more adequate service. But this is future, now we need to stop C19 and this measure aiming only this at the moment.

    >In any case it is a despicable reaction to other peoples' choice not agreeing with yours regardless their reasons.

    It is not reaction to anybody's choice.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,137 ✭✭✭✭Lumen


    Per each doctor they have dozens of employees who are busy with anything except treating patients

    This is not true. You can read the latest workforce breakdown here:

    so probably a bit of healthy capitalism would help this system to improve

    Probably not. The US has more health service bureaucracy than we do.

    In my own experience of public and private health services the Ireland, private is not less bureaucratic. When I attended a clinic in the Beacon there was a row of reception staff, each apparently dealing with the needs of one private consultant. Those needs included gouging me for additional fees not met by my extraordinarily expensive private health insurance.



  • Registered Users Posts: 639 ✭✭✭Thats me



    This is not true. You can read the latest workforce breakdown here:


    This is not true. You can read the latest workforce breakdown here:

    Hmm... you're right, ratio is significantly lower:

    • Consultants 3583
    • Management & Administrative 21322
    • Health & Social Care Professionals 18723 (also conistiting of managers and clerical)

    ( 18723 + 21322 ) / 3583 = 11.18


    private is not less bureaucratic. When I attended a clinic in the Beacon

    Sorry for rhetorical question, what managed you to attend that clinic instead of using tax pre-paid services? Only existence of such clinics on its own is sign that something wrong with the system paid from the tax, isn't it?



  • Advertisement
  • Subscribers Posts: 41,830 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    Theres loads wrong with the public heath system... But the existence of a private health system is not an indication of this.

    We don't have a pure public only health system in Ireland. We have a public / private mix where those who can afford to pay for private health care do, and reap the benefits of not being a drain on the public funded system.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,291 ✭✭✭Mr. teddywinkles


    If that be the case why is it spreading so fast with 93% of populace vaccinated.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 705 ✭✭✭marilynrr


    We don't know what the real numbers are.

    It's almost impossible for many people to get a test at the moment. The slots are getting booked up instantly! There's an outbreak in my childs school at the moment and the people who have managed to get tests are the ones refreshing the page constantly over a few days in the hope something will come up.

    There was a thread on here a few days back where people can't get GP appointments because the GP's phones are getting clogged up with people trying to get covid tests!

    I bet the real numbers are absolutely sky high!



  • Registered Users Posts: 26 Mr shmar


    I’m not going to say that you are correct or incorrect about “knowing what the real numbers are”, but if it is the case that they are not-known, then the entire justification that the government has used for most of it’s covid based legislation over the past 12+ months would surely be put into question, if not completely crippled.

    They point to “the numbers” as a basis for a lot of things that have been done or else promote a certain way for something to be done.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,284 ✭✭✭paul71


    Since the vaccine is not important to the unvaccinated they must therefore believe that the consequences are unimportant. I am all for free will, let them go unvaccinated, but let them then go without a ICU bed which is required for a road traffic incident, heart attack or other medical emergency.

    We will of course hear the piteous cries of discrimination, but we do after all deny liver transplants to unrepentant alcoholics, where is the difference here?



  • Advertisement
Advertisement