Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Relaxation of Restrictions, Part XII *Read OP For Mod Warnings*

17237247267287291111

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,229 ✭✭✭✭normanoffside


    In this tweet Tony is telling us that these new restrictions on kids are in order to coerce them to get vaccinated once approved (very soon).

    That's even though the current vaccines don't stop spread and kids don't need them to reduce severity of disease because they don't get severe disease.

    People really have to start seeing what is going on.





  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,536 ✭✭✭Deub


    I think further restrictions are coming with a minilockdown for Christmas. The mandatory test for people travelling will have 0 impact on covid numbers but it is to prepare the population for new restrictions.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,328 ✭✭✭bloopy


    The replies to that tweet are not quite as supportive as they used to be.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,100 ✭✭✭prunudo


    That has been said many times in the last 21 months and I'm still waiting. Every time I hear another hair brained restriction, I think, right this is the one that will tip us back to normality and for people to see nphet for what they are but nope the nodding dogs lap it up.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Better let 0.6% of the population die than distribute a vaccine that will reduce transmission by 70% and serious impacts by over 90% eh



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,681 ✭✭✭Penfailed


    I don't do Irish media or listen to NPHET so I'm pretty oblivious to the 'fear machine'. Which restrictions do you think are here to stay?

    Gigs '24 - Ben Ottewell and Ian Ball (Gomez), The Jesus & Mary Chain, The Smashing Pumpkins/Weezer, Pearl Jam, Green Day, Stendhal Festival, Forest Fest, Electric Picnic, Pixies, Ride, Therapy?, Public Service Broadcasting, IDLES, And So I Watch You From Afar

    Gigs '25 - Spiritualized, Supergrass, Stendhal Festival, Forest Fest, Queens of the Stone Age, Electric Picnic, Vantastival



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,100 ✭✭✭prunudo


    Wow, thats seriously one sided but good to finally see people being vocal against restrictions. The cmo will finally get to see what twitter is really like rather than all the fanboy replies he was getting last year.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Why the lies?

    Myocarditis is usually self resolving and for about the 10,000th f*cking time occurs more frequently with the virus itself. And cases associated with the vaccine have been overwhelmingly mild




  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    More kids will get myocarditis from Covid than from the vaccines, and in both instances will overwhelmingly be mild



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,328 ✭✭✭bloopy


    Not just the cmo. Judging by the conversations in the office today, this masking of children is not going down well at all.

    The shaming is not going to work for much longer either.

    The Journal and others might like to pretend that it is just right wing trolls who are against what is happening, but the government has lost, and is losing, a lot of the public.

    It has become a farce and people are starting to notice.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 725 ✭✭✭M_Murphy57



    When the site updated, so too did the ignore settings. That explains why I'm seeing your posts again.


    I'm not vaccinating a small child for a disease that won't harm them and gambling on side effects when there's no need.


    No need to respond again with goady comments about lies, I'm putting my old settings back on. Byeeeeeee.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,240 ✭✭✭✭PTH2009


    You couldn't make the **** up

    NPHET and St Tony truly going after kids

    Seriously this is going too far and they have lost their heads



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Echo…echo…echo….echo…

    people can choose to believe bullsh*t they read on their Facebook feed or Telegram without doing even the briefest check as to whether it stacks up. Choosing ignorance is no different to deliberately lying. And when challenged on their bullsh*t retreat to going after the source of the challenge rather than seek to inform themselves. Always with the belief that those gullible gobsh*tes queueing up to thank the lies somehow make it true



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,712 ✭✭✭storker


    That depends on different times during the past 18+ months, but for example...

    • Expressing approval at restaurants/bars not checking vaccination certs.
    • Not social distancing and/or expressing approval of other people not distancing
    • Not wearing masks when required and expressing approval of same in others
    • Attending illegal pub lock-ins
    • Attending multi-household get-togethers when mixing more than the recommended number.
    • Travelling beyond the allowed limit

    Etc



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,993 ✭✭✭Captain_Crash


    A year ago, a cmo twitter post that’s 3 hours old would have hundreds of supportive comments and thousands of likes! Now theres less than 30 likes and not a single supportive comment!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,416 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    That's simply not true though.

    Myocarditis is common for infections with many virus including the common cold. Most people don't realise they have had it unless they went for a test.

    The majority of cases of vaccine induced myocarditis have been mild and easily treated.

    Sars-COV2 also causes myocarditis with a much higher chance of severe myocarditis.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,416 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    That's a bet you would lose, the odds (risk/benefit of vaccines vs. virus) are not in your favour.

    Vaccines should remain entirely optional for children but quit the scaremongering.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    An everyone knows likes and retweet’s on Twitter are the true arbiter of objective truth.


    By the way masks in primary schools and testing for travel are not things I agree with



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,038 ✭✭✭JDxtra


    Today is certainly a low point in our management of this pandemics.

    Our young have silently endured so much, and now we point the finger squarely at them. This is beyond cruel and completely disproportionate.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 6,916 Mod ✭✭✭✭shesty


    Part of the problem is that while Tony is sitting on his pedestal lecturing to parents about what we should and shouldn't do, he completely fails to recognise or acknowledge the fact that the same parents cannot access PCR tests, or,in many cases, basic GP care, for their kids.In the same medical system that he is CMO of, when he is not busy with his NPHET blinkers on, only advising on covid.

    Kind of takes away from whatever he is trying to say there.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 24,433 CMod ✭✭✭✭Ten of Swords


    @bettyoleary taking a holiday from the Covid forum for posting while threadbanned



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,978 ✭✭✭growleaves


    I disgree. I think following restrictions helps to "bring on restrictions" - politically, not medically. Most people don't understand how autocratic societies work and think that if they do what they're told they'll be "rewarded" with freedom, which never happens.

    Its in countries like Serbia, Georgia and some of the US red states where people won't follow restrictions that restrictions fall by the wayside (in practice, if not in law).

    The most compliant countries, like Ireland and Scotland, are the ones where restrictions will linger for a long, long time.

    The medical effect of things like social distancing is unknown. There were a few obscure studies modelled on influenza pandemics before 2020, then SD was 'rolled out' to the whole world via WHO and national governments. Almost from the moment it was accepted politically by the masses it was assumed to work due to the simple cause-and-effect logic ('Its not rocket science guys!') and defended with intense and fierce loyalty beyond reason. The actual effect of it is unknown/unproven still.

    Same with many of the restrictions. I asked someone on this thread for a comparison pre-cert and post-cert rates of infection and they took their ball and went home. Even before vaccination we had rates of infection in certain settings and they were miniscule, I remember gyms in particular were tiny. There isn't even faint evidence that certs do a thing, there's just nothing. We get layered extrapolations of hypotheticals in lieu of hard evidence from posters who maybe don't understand the difference.

    Its always been the case that the "efficacy" of the restrictions has been unknown and a mish-mash of different measures are taken in toto and defended as one - even though its possible for instance that one meaures works and another doesn't. But they are all handed down from on high which is what connects them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,416 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    I don't think using phrases like "beyond cruel" helps your cause that much, what is the scale of "cruel" that this has now gone beyond?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43,039 ✭✭✭✭SEPT 23 1989


    children will be refused an education without a mask

    children are asked not to play with other children

    Do people actually hear what’s coming out of their mouths?

    its **** insanity



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 290 ✭✭Bumpstop


    If That Geert Vanden Bossche chap is correct, and he seems quite convincing, we're screwed.

    It's a long interview, you need to be sitting comfortably, but it's worth the time.

    The one thing that stands out in all this to me is, no one is allowed question the narrative.


    People who do question are being shunned and silenced, why is this.

    It's a scientific thing which is driven by finding answers and then questioning them.

    Turning them upside down inside out, and seeing if they hold up.


    One part of his theory is, it's a big flaw is using a vaccine that allows transmission during the pandemic.

    Anyway worth a listen, time will prove if he is right, and maybe it already is!

    Here's a link to it. EPISODE 242: THE VANDEN BOSSCHE INTERVIEW - The HighWire



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,893 ✭✭✭the kelt


    It’s just their turn to be the bogeymen to distract the simpletons from the failings above.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,038 ✭✭✭JDxtra


    OK, I’ll retract that and just describe it as plain cruel then.

    It will cause upset for children, they’ll struggle to wear them and will be uncomfortable. Remember they’re also restricted to pods and the windows are open, even in cold weather. They also have to go on regular ventilations breaks.

    This is all just a precursor to what’s coming. Pressure on parents to vaccinate 5+ year olds.

    All because young children are the new bogey men in this pandemic and this country has an obsession with case numbers.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 933 ✭✭✭robfowler78


    They are been asked in public but told and enforced in private. And people see nothing wrong with that.

    again it’s not the mask wearing that’s the problem it’s the way it’s been enforced along with all the other mandatory things been brought in.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,399 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    Screenshot_20211130-212706.png

    I don't think the incidence rate in kids 5-12 have ever been as high as it is now.

    I wonder if you can spot where they stopped close contact testing in schools.

    They could have at least seen if antigen testing in schools helps reduce cases in schools before mandating masks ffs.



Advertisement