Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Austria hits panic button.

18911131426

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,133 ✭✭✭I see sheep


    Reports today that Germany will be next for mandatory vaccines.

    I like to laugh at conspiracy loons but seems they were correct on this one.

    "a terrible war imposed by the provisional IRA"

    Our West Brit Taoiseach



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,075 ✭✭✭jackboy


    If Germany goes this route then others will follow. It will be a massive test for our government to resist.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,062 ✭✭✭✭titan18


    You have no idea if it is a thing or not. We've nowhere enough data to say that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 757 ✭✭✭generic_throwaway


    Scientifically, there is no such thing as 'seasonality' as an element of virus biology. And if you live in some parts of the world, seasons don't even exist.

    However, you raised 'flu being seasonal for some reason (and I do agree it spreads more in the winter here due to human behaviour). I'm trying to understand what that reason was. Can you help?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,088 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    We've had mandatory vaccines before (e.g. smallpox) and many have been saying we might see mandatory jabs during this pandemic. The "conspiracy loons" endlessly fearmonger about everything and anything then try to claim credit when anything remotely related happens



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 217 ✭✭ohnohedidnt


    Why do you assume it's due to disinformation or scaremongering? It could just be that people are doing basic math in assessing the risk to them, and deciding that they are less at risk from Covid than many other things they do daily, so they just don't care enough to take it. If the only piece of information that they have is the mortality rate for their age and health status, then it's a rational decision. Some people don't like injections, some don't like to take any drugs at all. Can it not be as simple as the virus is no risk to them and they don't want to take this drug?

    Some people are hysterical about this virus, and to them the ability to asses risk has been so skewed by constant fear mongering that they will obviously disagree that it's rational, but the fact is, the virus won't kill young healthy people unless they are very unlucky.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,875 ✭✭✭lawrencesummers


    You spout so much nonsense that you cant even keep up with it.

    Go read back over your posts if you cant follow what your saying.

    Seasons dont exist in some places. Yea. Righteo.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 757 ✭✭✭generic_throwaway


    So you can't explain why you raised 'seasonality' as an issue. I thought not.

    Anything intelligent to contribute at all?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,132 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    Flu' vaccines are given out to between 15% and 25% of the population and clearly the other 75% or so feel the risk of adverse outcomes is very low.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 757 ✭✭✭generic_throwaway


    Yes indeed - flu these days is far less dangerous than COVID. This has not always been the case (as I'm sure you know). Vaccine take up for a less dangerous disease is a data point but maybe not that useful in talking about take up for other diseases.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,133 ✭✭✭I see sheep


    The 'fearmongering' I see is from mainstream media.

    i.e. Pat Kenny having an daily anurism about people checking hotels not having to show Covid passes.

    "a terrible war imposed by the provisional IRA"

    Our West Brit Taoiseach



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,132 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    It is likely to indicate where we might go to on boosters for this. Under 40s, even under 50s may not take up offers of boosters in huge numbers.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,088 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    The virus is much more risky than the vaccines. Lay-people don't know more than the global medical consensus on this. In Oct, ICU wards in Ireland had 26 children under the age of 18 due to Covid.

    If they don't like injections or don't like to take drugs, okay that's not a valid reason to put themselves and others at added risk.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 757 ✭✭✭generic_throwaway


    There are rules in place to control the spread of COVID. If these rules are not widely respected, COVID spreads, requiring MORE restrictive rules. Which nobody wants. I'm happy to show my COVID cert to get into an open pub. If the pubs are closed because people don't respect that rule, I don't have the option of going to the pub at all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,088 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    Okay, but cases are rocketing up, which is being reported on, there's a genuine basis for concern there



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 757 ✭✭✭generic_throwaway




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 217 ✭✭ohnohedidnt



    The virus is more likely to kill you than the vaccine, that's correct. And you're orders of magnitude more likely to die on the roads or from a drug overdose, or from a fall, or from suicide than you are to die from either of them. The risks to young healthy people from Covid are tiny. If eliminating risks from their life became the primary concern of young healthy people, and they start with the riskiest things, Covid will long be a thing of the past before they get around to worrying about that.

    I'd be interested to see your source for those ICU numbers, because I suspect it is precisely the kind of fear mongering we see everyday from the media. Is there 26 children in ICU because they have Covid. Or was there 26 children in ICU who tested positive for Covid, in a hospital that is likely full of Covid?

    You think it's not a valid reason, and your entitled to that opinion. But even the vaccinated carry the virus, albeit to a lesser extent than the unvaccinated. But I'm sure you go out, and socialize, and go to work, that's putting people at risk no? Granted, it may be slightly less of a risk than the unvaccinated, but you do it? Why? Wouldn't it be safer for everyone if we all stayed at home? 6 months after vaccination you're not really that much safer to be around than the unvaccinated, so if protecting others is of such importance we really should go back into lockdown forever, because we don't have another plan. Places with 100% vaccination rates are seeing surges, so that's not the answer.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,088 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    "The virus is more likely to kill you than the vaccine, that's correct." Exactly.

    "The risks to young healthy people from Covid are tiny." Yes but the risks from the vaccine are much lower than that.

    Correction on the ICU numbers, it's 26 children with in Oct with a "number" admitted to ICU


    Being "afraid of needles or drugs" is not a valid reason against the vaccines in terms of pure risk. If someone chooses to avoid the vaccination due to their "fear of needles", they are making an illogical choice in terms of that risk.

    "Places with 100% vaccination rates are seeing surges, so that's not the answer" Bizarre statement. Vaccines reduce the risk of a) contracting Covid b) transmitting Covid to others and c) the severity of Covid (which is why we see an overwhelming proportion of those in ICU and wards are unvaccinated Covid patients). Countries are naturally striving to have as many vaccinated as possible, because vaccinated people are less likely to contract, spread and die from Covid than unvaccinated people. Keyword: Less likely. It's not an absolute. Having 100% vaccination in a rate in a country does not automatically mean Covid disappears. It's just a far better situation than a country with a 50% rate.

    Unless someone has a medical reason not to do so or unless they live completely isolated from everyone in a country with no Covid, then getting the vaccination is a no-brainer in terms of risk.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 757 ✭✭✭generic_throwaway


    I would quibble with some of your points, but I think you make a good case for your view.

    One thing I think needs to be called out though is that COVID deaths are not the only thing to think about, although it has the advantage of being something we have absolute numbers for. But how many young people suffer serious long-term consequences (physical and mental) of being hit hard by COVID? It's difficult to discuss because we don't know if these survivors outnumber the fatalities by 2 to 1, or 10 to 1, or even 100 to 1. But these people do seem to be ignored a lot of the time, and they almost certainly outnumber the fatalities.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,337 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump


    Imagine being the poor person waiting on an organ transplant. One is found and then they can't do the operation because there are no ICU beds available.


    There were probably a few people in that ICU would didn't need to be there in that it was easily preventable by taking the vaccine they were offered. Very sad. And a life-saving donated organ gone to waste



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,594 ✭✭✭Harika


    Yesterday 35k demonstrators in Vienna, while at the same time 130k vaccinations provided. 30k in Vienna alone. If this is kept up, no need to punish people in February.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,088 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    Yes indeed, I think it's more to get people to vaccinate, and if they have levels of 85%+ come Feb (and if the hospital situation is alright) I reckon they'll suspend the mandate



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 757 ✭✭✭generic_throwaway


    These are more COVID casualties that are ignored or minimised.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,337 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    I would say though that they shouldn't. Once they have announced it then they have to follow through on it. Else it it will be perceived as unfair by those who will complain they were "bullied" into it and it will cause issues if it ever arose again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 217 ✭✭ohnohedidnt


    You could say the same about the things I've listed too. In fact car crashes are probably more likely to injury than to kill, likewise for falls etc.

    Lockdowns have at least a mental health toll, and hospitals in the US and UK are seeing much higher than normal rate of heart conditions, possibly/likley due to lockdowns, and those statistics are equally ignored



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,443 ✭✭✭brickster69


    On the day they rule out mandatory jabs and all over 40's can now book a slot, it looks like Boris the clown and his band of crazy scientists are going full speed ahead with the booster program.

    Another 450 K done and dusted today to smash though the 15 million barrier

    7 day averages for deaths, ICU and hospitals all down for the first time in months suggest they are kicking in very quickly now.

    boost.jpg


    "if you get on the wrong train, get off at the nearest station, the longer it takes you to get off, the more expensive the return trip will be."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,962 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    More like people ignoring the recommendations then complaining when they aren't as effective as they could be.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 962 ✭✭✭Burty330


    They could have been all fully vaccinated. My assumption is just as valid as yours.. Any reason why a private clinic couldn't have taken in that patient?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,962 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,502 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    We do, there's been no data to suggest that anyone "unvaccinated" in ICU is there because they can't take the vaccine, it's just not a thing they were tracking (unless you think there's some conspiracy to hide that information to put pressure on the rest of the vaccinated for some reason?). The only people that fit in that category are people who are a subset of who can't be vaccinated and who are also vulnerable, it's a very very small number of people.



Advertisement