Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Relaxation of Restrictions, Part XII *Read OP For Mod Warnings*

15625635655675681111

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,417 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    So you've noticed you were out by 100x on your original maths, we have about 300 beds, possibly 350 at latest count, there is also surge capacity and private capacity we can use but this comes at the expense of other procedures happening.

    From a COVID perspective, we have ICU capacity up to 150 before it starts to bite on other services (and depending on where the concentration of cases is).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,682 ✭✭✭Penfailed


    Gigs '24 - Ben Ottewell and Ian Ball (Gomez), The Jesus & Mary Chain, The Smashing Pumpkins/Weezer, Pearl Jam, Green Day, Stendhal Festival, Forest Fest, Electric Picnic, Pixies, Ride, Therapy?, Public Service Broadcasting, IDLES, And So I Watch You From Afar

    Gigs '25 - Spiritualized, Supergrass, Stendhal Festival, Forest Fest, Queens of the Stone Age, Electric Picnic, Vantastival, And So I Watch You From Afar



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,831 ✭✭✭Healio




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,422 ✭✭✭Snooker Loopy


    Sadly a lot of people in Eastern Europe are learning the hard way that rejection of modern medicine has a huge cost. 561 Covid deaths in a single day in Romania (population 19 million) recently and death numbers hovering around the 500 daily.

    These are utterly catastrophic figures for an EU country, for any country.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,249 ✭✭✭✭PTH2009




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,072 ✭✭✭JoChervil


    I am a Pole and you must be completely oblivious, who is ruling Poland now



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,289 ✭✭✭Blut2


    Our ICU capacity in Ireland reached 97-98% usage in bad winters in the last few years. The hospitals were at breaking point even without covid. As I posted earlier in the thread the HSE and Irish governments were told repeatedly between 2005 and 2015 that we needed approx 500 ICU beds for our population by the year 2020. Instead we had under 300 - half the EU per capita average, one quarter of Germanys. We had the lowest ICU per capita capacity of any 'rich' country. Its scandalous, and is only now very slowly coming to light thanks to corona.

    So that article is absolute nonsense - throughout the entire crisis the main issue has been preventing our hospitals from being (even more) overrun. Of course having more ICU capacity would help. But if people start asking why our ICU capacity was so low to begin then heads will need to roll in FF & FG, and the HSE. So every effort is being made to obfuscate the issue.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,399 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    It's impossible to increase ICU capacity overnight. Isn't there wards closed in some hospitals? It's not the lack of equipment, it's lack of staff etc... Lot's of people banging on about our badly run healthcare system etc....

    They are correct, but trying to fix that during a pandemic is not going to happen. You could definitely make it more efficient though, outpatient appointments via phone consultation (unless in person is needed) I'm sure helps. But all this is going on when scans etc... are spread out due to social distancing, lack of staff due to having to isolate etc...

    There's definitely a framework on that to build upon. I don't like having to go to an outpatient appointment, queue for an hour just to have a quick back and forth with the consultant that everything is ok etc... It wastes my time, their time, and more importantly slows other's getting into the system etc...

    Would be nice to see hospitals discharge on weekends as much as they do during the week. That does seem odd from an outsider.

    And finally, I was surprised to learn NZ have the same, if not less ICU beds than we do. Guess they ain't a rich country though.


    I certainly believe this will be a watershed moment for the health system to finally be put on the correct path in Ireland.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    you should see my left arm, I had so many needles for blood donations that it looks like a junkie arm. It's pretty painless. And all in the mind. Fair play if you get over it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,566 ✭✭✭Risteard81




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,682 ✭✭✭Penfailed


    No, he's not. He wasn't concerned about the Mu variant you kept posting about either.

    Gigs '24 - Ben Ottewell and Ian Ball (Gomez), The Jesus & Mary Chain, The Smashing Pumpkins/Weezer, Pearl Jam, Green Day, Stendhal Festival, Forest Fest, Electric Picnic, Pixies, Ride, Therapy?, Public Service Broadcasting, IDLES, And So I Watch You From Afar

    Gigs '25 - Spiritualized, Supergrass, Stendhal Festival, Forest Fest, Queens of the Stone Age, Electric Picnic, Vantastival, And So I Watch You From Afar



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,277 ✭✭✭✭Lumen


    The maths isn't quite this simple. Many people that end up in ICU are from the age groups that have incredibly high vaccine uptake, but also where the vaccines are less effective (I posted an age stratified vaccine efficacy chart a week or so ago).

    Median age in ICU was mid 80s last time I checked.

    We're not told much about people in ICU any more, but the stories about ICUs being filled with people in their 40s and 50s have long gone. Assuming those stories were true, that's because that group are incredibly well protected by vaccines.

    The question of how people in their 80s are becoming infected isn't told much either, for whatever reasons. The official response is basically just "careful now".

    Despite the calls of "demonisation" on these threads, what has distinguished Ireland's official pandemic response has been a fear of demonising and of mixed messages, resulting in a thick fug of obfuscation. Good luck unpicking the stats, I've given up.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,052 ✭✭✭✭titan18


    Pregnancy is a choice so if a place banned pregnant people, you'd be ok with that? Since you know it's solely down to a choice that you made.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 542 ✭✭✭PhoneMain


    Sorry to hear this, I've a friend who also was terrified of needles. Maybe talk to your GP and see if there's anything they could offer you for the severe anxiety you have getting this. A 1 off low dose tablet could settle you enough to get the vaccine.


    I started feeling a bit crap on Saturday evening, went to bed early. Not feeling much better yesterday morning and took an antigen test which was positive. Awaiting swabs now. Feel like I've been hit by a train and really tired but breathing is ok thankfully. If I feel like this with the vaccine, I dont like to think what I'd be like without it (that said, maybe my immunity has wained, I would have got the vaccine early enough in the roll out).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,671 ✭✭✭✭mahoney_j


    Question for you ….how can a qr code offer any greater level of protection in a restaurant than a responsible unvaccinated person abiding by guidelines and doing antigen tests …I’m one of these who dosnt have an issue with doing a few antigen tests weekly ,socially distancing when out wearing a mask etc …I’d feel safer with a simillar person than a vaxed person …both can shed the virus …govt has made a balls of this mass antigen testing should be the norm



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,842 ✭✭✭Don't Chute!


    Does that article not read as basically “we are not improving the health service because the restrictions are enough to get us out of this and if we improved the health service the peasants would stop following restrictions and doing what they are told”? It seems like a complete admission of their incompetence to me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,271 ✭✭✭brickster69


    Amid rising hospitalsations and cases it looks like Denmark are reconsidering bringing back restrictions. There will be nobody open on the mainland for Christmas at this rate unfortunately. The problem is the second wave of this never goes away, it started the end of July in the UK and it's still on the go now.


    "if you get on the wrong train, get off at the nearest station, the longer it takes you to get off, the more expensive the return trip will be."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,417 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    Because a vaccinated person can also do all those things or none of those things and be safer than an unvaccinated person. A vaccinated person is both less likely to get infected and less likely to be infectious for as long a period as the unvaccinated (even though peak viral load can be the same), you're also 12x more likely (based on hospitalisation numbers) to end up in hospital if you contract COVID vs. a vaccinated person.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,417 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    Pregnancy isn't always a choice unless you're going the forced abortion route.

    However, unvaccinated pregnant people are some of the highest risk from COVID and shouldn't be going anywhere they are likely to be infected with SARS-COV2.

    There is also lower risk to others from a vaccinated pregnant person.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,612 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    A recent study shows that vaccinated people pose an equal risk of transmission as unvaccinated people - so no, vaccinated person is not lower risk to others.

    Unless you suddenly dont trust the science?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,977 ✭✭✭Russman


    Don't they clear the viral load quicker and therefore remain infectious for a shorter timeframe though ? I'd argue that puts them at lower risk.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,277 ✭✭✭✭Lumen




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,190 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    Pregnant people are frequently disallowed from accessing services or places where they would be at higher risk of injury or their presence would create safety complications.

    You're basically proving the point that preventing people from accessing things on the basis of a higher risk is commonplace and perfectly acceptable.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,417 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    The same studies we've been talking about on the forum for days which does show reduced transmission even in the home environment when people are in contact with others for extended periods of time? (if you read past the clickbaity headline of course).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,052 ✭✭✭✭titan18


    Tbf some countries are barring people from work for being unvaccinated. Would you support the same for pregnant people, or smokers, or obese people? Barring people from doing things cos of choices like that is ridiculous, and it is the same for vaccination choices imo (I'm not even anti vax, I'm one of the few who'd get the flu vaccine here but I disagree with the tactics being used)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,492 ✭✭✭floorpie



    Here: Community transmission and viral load kinetics of the SARS-CoV-2 delta (B.1.617.2) variant in vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals in the UK: a prospective, longitudinal, cohort study - The Lancet Infectious Diseases

    It shows an increased but non-significant risk for unvaccinated people transmitting to unvaccinated people, and describes a similar risk for all other configurations but does not cite significance tests (e.g., vaccinated people are more at risk from vaccinated people, than they are from unvaccinated people). These findings make Covid certs illegitimate imo.

    It doesn't show that, as you should know by now



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,190 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    I have no real issue with someone being barred from a place - be that a restaurant, a gym or a workplace - based on choices that they make, IF the consequences of that choice place the individual themselves or others at risk.

    Pregnancy we place in a semi-special bucket not only because having children is kind of essential for the human race, but also because it's a fundamental human right. Other choices like smoking, are not. Nevertheless we do restrict the ability of pregnant people within workplaces and other areas for the safety of the person and their colleagues and customers.

    Whether being vaccinated in an office constitutes an exceptional risk is of course well up in the air. But certainly for a healthcare worker for example, or even someone working in the kitchen in a nursing home, it would seem like a no-brainer that if you refuse to get vaccinated, you can go find another job. It's far more nuanced than, "Nobody should ever have to be vaccinated for their job under any circumstances".



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,612 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    But where do you draw the line? Banning immunocompromised people from going to any crowded places?

    Banning the elderly? etc. Because in terms of absolute risk, these groups are all much higher even when vaccinated compared to younger people. I think its shown that unvaccinated 30 year olds have similar risk from covid as vaccinated 50/60 year olds - so if you want to bar people based on risk, it will mean barring a substantial portion of the elderly



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,417 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    You probably draw the line at the actions a person can take (i.e. get vaccinated) rather than telling a vaccinated 70 year old they can't go to a restaurant, but an unvaccinated 30 year old can.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,417 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    As you know, this reading is at the lower end of probability on the confidence interval :)



Advertisement