Relaxation of Restrictions, Part XII *Read OP For Mod Warnings*

Who said it was fine? I pointed out it's not a new concept. Posters really need to stop repurposing other posts for their own agendas.

There has been absolutely no mention of lockdown, apart from posters on here tbh. I find friends, family, work colleagues, etc. are fairly oblivious to "de numbers" and are just getting on with things and not thinking about lockdowns. Why would they? We are continuing to reopen instead of reversing progress. Eamonn Ryan even said yesterday that they are not considering the reimposition of restrictions. I guess that's because we are still subject to a lot of restrictions as it is, but there is no lockdown talk. I'm not saying this won't happen, I think it unlikely, and I won't be worrying about it.

Lately, there seems to be a lot of rhetoric on how things will get worse before they get better. There have been references to models (I know, they are unreliable based on past performances) that predict November highs, followed by a tapering off in December. From what I can see they are trying to prepare people for the fact that cases/hospital admissions will rise, but we will just have to accept this. Such a strategy would be a welcome change in policy and force the perpetually-frightened to actually move on and live with Covid.

sure.

as I said, nothing to see.

Surely the creepiest thing the WEF did was a dry run of the pandemic back in 2019.

The segment 4 video, complete with acted-out news stories about social media companies needing to shut down "dis- and mis-information" is pretty wild. We can't trust (democratically elected) political leaders to give out correct information, but that's okay because the Gates foundation is funding projects to create algorithms to search through and sift out information we shouldn't be allowed to see and save us from ourselves or whatever. 👍️

When all else fails just throw out the anti-semitic card - whether it's relevant or not. Brilliant 😁

I wish I could believe you when you say none of this is permanent but the cynic in me sees health passes in some guise as a long term fixture of our lives.

It's just this thing where, when someone doesn't actually see group X as people but rather as a sort of fetishised pitiable pet cause they can use as window dressing for their own displayed virtue, any suggestion that group X contains undesirable people the same as any other group is declared proof of anti-X sentiment in order to simultaneously shut down discussion about a subject that makes said virtue-signaller uncomfortable and to bolster said virtue-signaller's fragile self-esteem.

As you can see by the fact that we are now discussing anti-semitism (or, more accurately, a complete lack thereof in this thread), rather than the repeated and increasingly sinister "coincidences" that seem to orbit the WEF, it's not a bad tactic.

Right, who in this thread claimed the WEF were connected to the Rothschilds?