Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Deathloop

1234579

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,307 ✭✭✭The Phantom Pain


    1.      So you haven't played much of the game; your experience with it has been mostly watching a friend play. A video game. Which distinguishes itself from other entertainment mediums specifically for its interactivity. OK.

    2.      I read the article you linked twice just to make sure I hadn't missed anything. Earlier in the thread you said, not once, but twice that Arkane are "using the lore as an excuse for their bad A.I. coding". But at no point in that article that you have linked to prove Arkane said this is there a quote or anything coming from the horse's mouth, i.e. Arkane studios or Dinga, that the A.I. behaviour is for lore reasons/externalists' attitude. Not a single line or paragraph is from Arkane Studios.  James Troughton, the author of this think-piece, has said that, sure, but James Troughton does not work for Arkane Studios and therefore does not speak for them. James Troughton is a photo editor and staff writer at the linked website. The entire article is James Troughton's interpretation of the A.I. In other words, this is just James Troughton's opinion. So again, please, could you kindly find an example of where Arkane Studios has said that the dumbing of the A.I. was because of lore/eternalist attitude reasons? I genuinely want to know as I want to dissect exactly what has been said and see if they’re talking BS or not.

     

    Actually, on the subject of something Troughton mentioned in his write-up: I'd be interested @Penn on your opinion about the A.I. in Updaam at night which is the hardest section in the game. The A.I. is noticeably way more aggressive and relentless to the point that when I did my stealth run I found I had to use back passages rather than go "through" the level as I would be instantly spotted. In fact, Updaam at night is probably my least explored map because I couldn't make discoveries without being hounded every 5 seconds. How did you personally find that?



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Computer Games Moderators Posts: 53,284 CMod ✭✭✭✭Retr0gamer


    Wow, that's some unwarranted saltiness!

    1. So? I played a little, seen a good bit of it and the AI was poor enough that it stood out like a sore thumb. I doubt the AI is going to get better if I played more of it.
    2. Fair enough. Can't find anything when I look but there's a lot of articles I read that have said this. Maybe it's from Arkane, maybe they've come up with it themselves. It still doesn't excuse the fact that the AI is just noticeably bad. Thought it would be more interesting if they did try to explain it with lore.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,626 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    I almost completely played stealth, so the enemy AI in Updaam at night never seemed that different to me. One or two times I was caught there, just planted myself in a small room, mowed most of the enemies down as they just rush in blindly, then legged it. But again, by that point in the game, you're so used to the maps that getting around the enemies or knowing where best to escape to was just simple.

    The biggest area I had trouble in was Frank's place early in the game because of the Classpass thing. But that's not due to enemy AI, but just not being able to use slabs.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,307 ✭✭✭The Phantom Pain


    1. Well, funny you mention that, because in the article you linked - that I trust you have actually read - James Troughton details how the enemy A.I. in Updaam at night is significantly more difficult due to it being, in theory, the end of the loop. You reach Updaam at night very, very early in the game which begs the question: how much of the game have you played to form such a strong opinion on the enemy A.I.? Because in the previous post you said you've played a "little bit of it" but now you're saying  a "good bit"  🤔 However, again, the player experiences Updaam at night very early in the game that you say you have played which has a noticeable difference in A.I behaviour as detailed in the article you linked...
    2. But in the previous post you said it was obvious, again, quote, "obvious", end quote, that Arkane is using lore/story as an excuse for bad A.I. coding but now you're saying that maybe it's from Arkane. 🤔 And yet I have asked you twice now if you could kindly link me to unfiltered evidence that Arkane Studios, i.e. the studio you said that it is "obvious" is using lore/eternalist behviour as an excuse for bad A.I. coding but, alas, you have not been able to do so... 🤔


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Computer Games Moderators Posts: 53,284 CMod ✭✭✭✭Retr0gamer


    1. Again so what? The AI is still bad from what I've seen and it's the common consensus. That hasn't changed. I haven't read a review that hasn't mentioned it let alone praised it.
    2. I already said I can't find anything directly from Arkane but Arkane are hardly going to say that. Anyway Eurogamer seem to come to the same conclusion with the AI's voiced lines and behaviour when not in an agressive state perhaps giving justification so I guess I'm not the only one. https://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2021-09-12-deathloop-review

    Anyway, just thought it would make for interesting discussing but you are just getting way too defensive about the game.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,574 ✭✭✭Cordell


    At least we can all agree that this game is a love it or hate it type of game.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,307 ✭✭✭The Phantom Pain


    1. Oh, it's absolutely a common consensus but it's a common consensus amongst people who have, and bear with me here, actually played the game and therefore are in a perfect position to criticise it. If you could be so kind as to answer my previous question as to how much of the game you have played, please? Where have you got up to? What was your experience in the "little bit of it" that you played?
    2. Indeed, I am aware you're not the only one. As I mentioned in a previous post, there have been fans on social media who have used the the lore/eternalist behaviour as an explanation for the dumbing of enemy A.I. Evidentially now, as you have linked, even some journalists who agree with them. However, again, these are merely interpretations and opinions from people who are not in any way, shape or form affiliated with Arkane Studios. And yet you said:

    and


    🤔



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,307 ✭✭✭The Phantom Pain


    With Updaam at night I was thinking more of the first time you go there (the A.I. placements and amount of enemies at night is different to the other time periods). I'm just trying to imagine how heightened aggression and awareness of A.I. would be as a new player. btw dunno if you know this but you can actually enter Frank's place with all your slabs if you get to the rooftop and hack the door. Only the front door on ground level detects when you have a classpass or not. There was no way I was even gonna try without my slabs once I saw the amount of enemies so I scouted the area for secret entrances and voila. ☺️

    100%

    Post edited by The Phantom Pain on


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Computer Games Moderators Posts: 53,284 CMod ✭✭✭✭Retr0gamer


    I played about 2 hours of it. And in those 2 hours and what I'd seen from it, it was quite obvious the AI was a bit lackluster. So what's the issue here? Am I right about that or am I wrong like every publication that I read that came to the same consensus.

    As for the second point I said I couldn't find anything from Arkane when I went back to look. I guess I took it was something a bit more concrete since a lot of the reviews and people on twitter I follow had similar opinions and I could see it myself when I played it from the enemy dialogue. Maybe my opinion was coloured from reading those reviews. Maybe instead of saying obviously I should say it's very likely in my opinion.

    Anyway thinking about it there's no way that Arkane will say anything along those lines considering they are deep in a PR cycle. Perhaps in a few years time more will come out about it.

    Who knows, maybe I'm wrong. I did recently stick up for Resi 4 and Metroid Prime that the stiffness of their controls is by design. Maybe the simple AI is lackluster. Could be by design, development pressures or hardware limitations. But I also wouldn't take Alanah as gospel either. I think there is evidence of both, and there's a lot of dumb stuff the enemies say in their flavour text that can't be ignored and there are a lot of creative devs that worked on Thief at Arkane that used the same tricks on Thief guards.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,307 ✭✭✭The Phantom Pain


    Interesting. So you've played 2 hours, i.e. the tutorial section, approximately 2 hours after I last asked you how much of the game you have played. 🤔 What was your experience? What happened, story wise, in those 2 hours? Can you give your overall impressions of the game so far?

    Alanah's video which, by the by, was what the original discussion was about, is in response to people - a lot of whom are reviewers - just saying the A.I. is "bad/dumb", full stop. Her video is not in response to those saying the "A.I. is bad for lore reasons". You brought that up and credited Arkane as saying as such and even went as far as to say Arkane think their players are dumb for that. However, you have so far not been able to produce evidence of anyone from Arkane studios actually saying this and when asked to produce such evidence you posted a link of other people's interpretation of the A.I.  Now you are saying Arkane never said this but it's "likely" from the 2 hours you have, allegedly, played and what other people on social media have said... 🤔

    I am sure you clicked on the link inside of the first article you posted where you would have been taken to a quote from Arkane where they do discuss a little bit of the process in regards to combat, more specifically why there isn't the ability to parry. The reason? Due to latency issues for online - they found the host player had an advantage in this area and so scrapped it. So again, what little they have said about combat/A.I. has nothing to do with the lore. Additionally, by speaking about the latency issues in the online Arkane has demonstrated that they are, in fact, more than willing to be candid when it comes to technical issues they have endured during the PR cycle🤔

    Lastly, on the subject of "not taking everything Alanah says as gospel", there is more evidence to suggest that she is right when she says that Arkane deliberately dialed down the A.I. to not detract from the player's experience of pursuing leads, seeing as in the noclip documentary Arkane spoke about ciritcisms they received for the so-called handholdy nature of the puzzles. The reason for this decision? They were worried about "cognitive load" . This can be viewed at the 7:59 mark. Again, showing Arkane stand by decisions they have made and are not using lore reasons as an excuse for alleged faults in game design. 🤔


     



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Computer Games Moderators Posts: 53,284 CMod ✭✭✭✭Retr0gamer


    I didnt play the tutorial. Purposely didn't start from the start as I knew like all new games it would be a two hour tutorial. So jumped in and messed around and my friend guided me a bit. And it's pretty obvious from that the AI is lacking. My friend brought it up before me.

    As for Alanah's video I totally get what she is saying as well about dialing back the AI. If you make the AI too good it's not fun so you dial it back until it's fun. Had to do it myself in my own game projects. What stands out to me about the AI and why I call it bad isn't that it's dumb. It's that it's that it doesn't add to the game, the firefights just aren't that fun and can be exploited pretty easily. It's like the balance it wrong and it's an after thought to the rest of the game.

    On another note, you'll find that the interpretation of art isn't just based on what the people that created that art have said or documented. There is an academic process where you analyse the evidence and create discussion about it and being totally dismissive doesn't help that discourse.

    Also if you read my posts, I never said arkane flat out said they were justifying the dumb AI. I came to that conclusion from what I saw and heard in the game which was probably coloured by reading what other journalists were saying.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,307 ✭✭✭The Phantom Pain


    OK. So again:

    1. What part of the game did you play?

    2. What happened in the story?

    3. What discoveries did you make?

    4. What were your overall impressions? 

    You can spoiler tag it if you like for those reading who potentially haven't played Deathloop. Additionally, I'm sure your friend would have told you that the A.I. has adaptive difficulty and that the more visionaries you kill in a single completed loop the more aggressive it gets with each loop. It's called "loop stress". Likewise, when Julianna invades, the A.I. becomes more aggressive and starts actively hunting for you. 🤔

    Indeed, a deliberate choice doesn't necessarily mean it's the right choice but then at that point we're talking about preference. Alanah's video is not about preference or whether Arkane got the balance right. It's her simply explaining that the A.I. behaviour is not by accident as many people believe it to be.

    Indeed, interpretation of art isn't just based on what the people that created that art have said. However, what we are actually discussing is you claiming that the person who created the art lied about their intent for said art, but when asked to provide evidence of such a lie you could not find it. 🤔You are now saying that you never said Arkane flat out used the lore as an excuse for the A.I. behaviour and yet in previous posts, which I have quoted many times now, you said, "Arkane expects us to be dumb dumbs and accept it". You said, "Arkane are using it as an excuse for their bad AI coding." Would you like me to quote you again as a reminder? Here ya go :

    🤔



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Computer Games Moderators Posts: 53,284 CMod ✭✭✭✭Retr0gamer


    Honestly don't know where I was in the story and didn't care. I was just messing around getting a feel for it. My friend wasn't all that far in it either. Never said anything about the adaptive difficulty. Only really had the chaining ability which was fun.

    I liked what I played. The ai stood out as being a bit basic but I was enjoying it all the same and it's something I will play eventually.

    Honestly I think Alanah is going on just as much assumptions as I made. I mean there's no concrete statements from Arkane to back up what she is saying either and she is just going on her intuition from how she knows game design goes. I'm going on the same thing. I'm not going to go looking for her direct quotes and references as she is doing exactly the same thing I'm doing. I feel both view points are interesting and worthy of discussion until they can be refuted.

    Also you've yet to show where exactly I said arkane lied or anything like that. You are taking my quotes out of context. Read them again please without your confirmation bias because I said no such thing. I'm making assumptions based on the evidence I've seen and never said anything but.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,307 ✭✭✭The Phantom Pain


    So, just so we're clear:  You claim to have played approximately 2 hours of a game that you have formed a strong enough opinion on to conclude that the A.I. is bad and that Arkane are using the lore/eternalists as an excuse for poor A.I. coding, and yet when asked the very basic, simple questions of where you got to in the story, what discoveries you made and, most importantly, what part of the game you played your response is, "I don't know." 🤔 And yet you've also said in a previous post that you've watched a "good bit" of your friend's playthrough but you're now saying your friend wasn't all that far in either. 🤔

    Yes, Miss Alanah Pearce, the Sony Santa Monica dev currently working on God of War Ragnarok, is making assumptions in a field she is researched and well experienced in. However, Miss Pearce is not out here claiming that Arkane has said this is their intent, nor has she said they're using this as an excuse to mask poor A.I... Additionally, Miss Pearce makes a good point that in Arkane's previous games the A.I. is more punishing, and seeing as they are using the same Void engine and the same team as Dishonoured 2 it would not make sense that they have suddenly forgotten how to code "good" A.I. Furthermore, you're now saying you're going by your "intuition" as to how you know game design works but earlier you said that was coloured by what you read in reviews and from the people you follow on twitter. 🤔

    Oh, my sincerest apologies. I guess the quote I've reposted many times where you quite blatantly say Arkane used the lore as an, "excuse for their bad A.I. coding" and that the "lore explanation" is a "band aid for poor design" that "Arkane expect us to be dumb, dumbs and just accept" - which at the very least shows you're saying Arkane endorses this - was just my lying eyes deceiving me once again. 🤔



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,626 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    There is definitely a lore reason to explain the AI of the general grunts in the game, both through the enemies knowing they're in a loop and there being no consequences (so it doesn't really matter if they live or die as they'll come back to life the next day), and a lot of the enemies are drinking/drunk due to the hedonistic lifestyle they're living due to being in the loop.

    I would say that counts as Arkane using the lore of the game to explain the enemy AI. Either way, I think it stands that just because Arkane explained why they balanced it that way, doesn't mean people can't say they think the balance is off. Even small changes like when you override a turret, if enemies took cover or tried to flank or grenade it more, rather than running right in front of it and shooting at it.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Computer Games Moderators Posts: 53,284 CMod ✭✭✭✭Retr0gamer


    I really don't think you need more than 2 hours to come to the conclusion the AI is lacklustre. It's really obvious. My friend had only gotten the game the day before so hadn't that much time to play it. I was just messing about in a snowy area and a kind of a city bit. I just wanted a feel for the game so wasn't paying attention.

    As for Alanah, I dont want to belittle the point she is making making because it's equally valid but I'd you want to bring up credentials Alanah isn't a dev. She is a writer for Santa Monica. Ive finished a game design course and had a project published and I was brought on to that project because nobody on the team knew how to do the AI for it. Wasn't exactly fps AI code but I did a state machine got character pathfinding.

    As for arkane 'forgetting' to code AI, it would be stupid to claim otherwise. Most balance and issues that crop up in games aren't because the devs are incompetent but usually due to publisher and release pressure. No game is sent out complete. If anything it's more than likely they ran out of time and balancing the enemy AI took a hit.

    Also just last night Jim Sterling came out with a review and said that the AI was explained by lore.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,307 ✭✭✭The Phantom Pain


    I think you've entirely misunderstood the point.  We're not discussing whether or not the eternalists being hedonists is the reason for the dumbing of the A.I. We're discussing the fact that the poster said the dumbing down of A.I. was not intentional by Arkane and that Arkane, in response to the criticism about it, are now using the eternalists behaviour/lore to cover up this A.I coding error. But as we have clearly established, Arkane never actually said this and therefore the poster's original assertion that Arkane are trying to deceive players by using the lore as an excuse to mask a mistake is demonstrably false. 

    What we have clearly established is that this is some people's interpretation of why the A.I. are dumbed down and whether they are wrong or right these people do not work for Arkane. Yet the poster was saying Arkane Studios said this. However, when asked specifically for a quote where Arkane Studios said this he tried to pass a random journalist's think-piece off as Arkane's own. When asked again to produce a quote from Arkane Studios the poster could not, and then admitted they were just parroting what he had just seen on twitter. Always a trustworthy source, as we know...

    Again, I must stress, whether there's a lore explanation for the "dumbed down" A.I. is irrelevant; that's not what we're arguing here.  What we've actually been discussing is that the poster said Arkane Studios confirmed this and are using it as an excuse to mask a mistake but could not produce evidence from the horse's mouth.

    The lesson is one needs to be careful of outright lying and spreading fake rumours to prove a point. If one has an opinion by all means express it but don't put words that haven't been said in people's mouths.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,307 ✭✭✭The Phantom Pain


    "A city bit"  🤔 Oh yes, the "snowy area". Such highly descriptive terms... that can easily be viewed on YouTube and marketing screenshots. Indeed, for many games we don't necessarily need more than 2 hours to come to the conclusion about A.I. but what we do need is to actually play the game.

    Oh, you're now saying game dev writers aren't developers? 🤔🤔🤔 Is that right???  Let me get this straight: You finished a game design course that apparently taught you that game dev writers aren't developers? Is that right??? May I introduce you to some quotes from, bear with me, developers:

    "I don't know wtf thinks writers/narrative people aren't devs, but that's completely ignorant of how games actually get made. I can't believe this even has to be said. I work with writers and narrative folks consistently throughout development, from preproduction to ship. They're involved in dialogue recording, implementation, quest/mission text, in-game readable text, subtitles, all of it." - Mark Kilborn, Forza and Call of Duty sound designer.

    https://gameworldobserver.com/2021/09/13/game-developers-on-why-everyone-from-writers-to-hr-and-designers-should-be-considered-devs

    Evidentially, according to this developer and other developers in that article, if one is developing a game they are a developer. It's why they appear on the end credits of games on the development team which, by the way, includes the writers. Who are developers... 

    Indeed, whether or not you agree with Alanah that the A.I was intentional or not is a discussion...but that's not our discussion. We are discussing the fact that you said Arkane said that the "dumb" A.I. is due to lore reasons/eternalist behaviour and are using that as an excuse to mask A.I. coding errors. And yet you have not been able to produce any evidence of Arkane saying this.

    Yes, I watched the Jim Sterling video last night. It's a great video about how pre-order bonuses can break a game. Steph's, as they go by now, comment about "narrative justification" is, once again, Steph's interpretation but Steph, much like James Troughton, much like Eurogamer, much like the "people you follow on twitter" does not work for Arkane studios. You said Arkane Studios said that the A.I. is dumbed down due to lore reasons/eternalist behaviour and that this was their lie to mask A.I. coding errors and yet, once again, you were not able to produce a quote from Arkane Studios actually saying this, and you've still not been able to produce a quote from Arkane Studios saying this.🤔



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Computer Games Moderators Posts: 53,284 CMod ✭✭✭✭Retr0gamer


    Well you can choose not to believe that I haven't played it if you want as it's suiting your confirmation bias. I remember getting killed by someone that locked me in a gas chamber. I know I did.

    As for what a writer does as part of a game dev team, they do a lot but they aren't coding and definitely not coding AI systems.

    I've also answers your last question already but you keep at it. I already said I'm making assumptions based on the evidence I saw. Same as Alanah. I won't find a quote from Arkane, I explained that but I also don't need one for analysis.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,307 ✭✭✭The Phantom Pain


    Interesting. Let me pick your brain for a moment: would you believe one who contradicts oneself from post to post with inconsistencies in one's stories about how much one has played or how much the proverbial "friend" has played while evading questions about what one has played before finally answering said questions only to respond with, "I don't know."?🤔

    Interesting. You have only now, after several posts of me asking for specifics, mentioned the gas chamber puzzle which is one of the game's many secrets that, again, like anything from Deathloop can be viewed on YouTube. The curious thing is, Retro, you who claims to have played 2 hours of this game that your friend wasn't very far in, that in order to encounter this secret gas chamber you would have to be far in the game and know the map very well seeing as it's a secret so hidden that it looks like it's out of the bounds of the map to the point where many people won't actually discover it. 🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔

    Indeed, the writer may not be coding. But that's not what you said. You said that game writers are not devs. You said, "As for Alanah, I dont want to belittle the point she is making making because it's equally valid but I'd you want to bring up credentials Alanah isn't a dev. She is a writer for Santa Monica. " 🤔 And yet it is obvious to anyone who has worked in game development or done game design courses that game writers are developers since they are involved in the development of the game🤔

    Interesting. Originally in post 190 of this thread you said that you can't find evidence of Arkane saying this. Now you're saying you won't find evidence of Arkane saying this. Would you like me to remind you of your exact words? Here ya go: "As for the second point I said I couldn't find anything from Arkane when I went back to look."  🤔



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,626 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    Starting to feel like Colt in the loop reading this thread...



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Computer Games Moderators Posts: 53,284 CMod ✭✭✭✭Retr0gamer


    I'm bored of it as well. Phantom pain, you've obviously made up your own mind about the whole thing and it's boring since you aren't even willing to even discuss it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,307 ✭✭✭The Phantom Pain


    Oh, I disagree. I feel we've totally discussed it. Whether or not the discussion is going the way you hoped with someone who can tell when one has played this game or not is a different matter. How unfortunate that you are now bored. ☹️ I have been thoroughly entertained and could have easily kept this going. But thank you very much for the entertainment and, as Julianna would say, have an eventful day! 



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Computer Games Moderators Posts: 53,284 CMod ✭✭✭✭Retr0gamer


    Whoever said this game couldnt be Speedrun, there's a Speedrun of this already down to less than 20 minutes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,307 ✭✭✭The Phantom Pain


    Oh, I see you're back and still watching more Deathloop videos on YouTube. Just to caution you though you may want to avoid spoilers until you, you know, actually play the game.

    Indeed, if it's the same speedrun we're thinking of the person uses wall glitches to avoid going to The Complex and diverting power to different districts which would have extended the playtime. The glitchless "speedrun" is done in 49 minutes which is significantly longer and even longer than the glitchless run in Dishonoured 2.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Computer Games Moderators Posts: 53,284 CMod ✭✭✭✭Retr0gamer


    I didnt watch it. But if it's at a gdq I'll catch it as the arkane games make great speed runs.

    As for spoilers, Im not as sensitive as most people.

    Also, let it go.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,307 ✭✭✭The Phantom Pain


    Indeed, you made the right call to not to watch the speedrun - wouldn't want to spoil a game you haven't played now, would we? I mean, you already peaked at the gas chamber secret on YouTube. Gotta leave some mystery for yourself to uncover when you eventually play the game, I suppose.



  • Posts: 15,661 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    There was a time here when a mod would have stepped in long ago and told the pair of yee clowns to take it to PM.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,608 ✭✭✭recyclops


    Had the day off work so really got into this today and played a fair few loops before the controller battery died.


    It's still good, way to much hand holding for my liking and it completely removes the discovery aspect for me, I suppose I could not follow any leads etc but I am enjoying it.

    As for the AI argument I have yet to watch the video above but if it was designed to be this oblivious to what's going on far play to them as it's so bad it would have to be designed that poorly. You pretty much can run around with a knife and a hackamajig until you see a visionary.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,307 ✭✭✭The Phantom Pain


    I'm confused...didn't you say that the game is not grabbing you and then later updated with how it's not compelling you to come back? Where is the sudden, "it's still good" coming from? Then you said in another thread that it was your wife who got you to turn it off as  "Cole" annoyed her so much (the lead character's name is Colt by the way)? 🤔



Advertisement