Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

How hard is it to get the rolex you want

1678911

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,656 ✭✭✭CalamariFritti


    I understand my comment might smell of envy. And while I wouldnt call it envy, yes, I would like to be in a situation where I can drop 100k on a watch. Sadly I'm not or anywhere near. and most likely never will be.

    But besides that those watches really wouldnt do it for me at all.

    So what would be my 'grail watch' if I had 100k, unlimited funds basically? The answer is I dont know. Sadly I dont really have a target atm. Terrible position to be in, I know. Currently I'm looking for inspiration. On reddit r/watches and the likes.

    So my ideal watch doesnt exist atm but I'm after falling in love with Nomos to some degree. I like clear lines and form follows function and not very busy dials.

    If there was a 39mm hybrid between Tangente Neomatik update and Tangente Sport with a font closer to Club Neomatik (as in not as slim but no Roman numbers) on a plain sailcloth strap with a clasp... With a midnight blue or grey or maybe ruthenium dial.

    That would be fairly close. I'm a man of simple tastes and limited funds.

    P.S. I woke up early and couldnt sleep again and was just browsing... and thought I was fairly safe not stepping on any owners toes criticising those. Sorry if I offended any owners. Its all so subjective anyway.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,193 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus


    sorry implying envy wasnt my intention at all, was just curious really, we can all do with inspiration :)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,656 ✭✭✭CalamariFritti


    You weren't. It was mostly me being conscious of my post coming across like that.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,599 ✭✭✭Cyclingtourist


    100k watches are for multi-millionairs. If say I won 100k on the lottery tomorrow the last thing I'd do is blow it all on a watch. Probably use it for lots of different things, like holidays and helping the next generation with home ownership.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,656 ✭✭✭CalamariFritti


    Yes, of course, having a spare 100k and having 100k to spare on a watch are not the same thing at all. Its just an academical debate. For me anyway.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,553 ✭✭✭Fitz II


    Tastes change as your level changes. When you start to consider things at that level you do it with the tastes of somebody with that sort of dosh to drop on a watch. Seeing as we all love a car analogy, its like comparing a 20k car to a 2 million euro hyper car. Totally different buyers, in totally different segments and vastly different requirements and tastes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,796 ✭✭✭mailforkev


    In my head a 100k watch is generally one of three things:

    1. New watch that actually retails at 100k - these are commonly awful looking footballer-style pieces;
    2. New watch on the grey market - something like a Patek 5711, I wouldn't be able to justify the 300% grey premium;
    3. Something vintagey - classic Daytona etc.

    Luckily, I don't have a spare 100k floating about for watches but I think I'd struggle with option 3 the least.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,599 ✭✭✭Cyclingtourist


    FitzII quote:

    "Seeing as we all love a car analogy, its like comparing a 20k car to a 2 million euro hyper car."

    I hate car analogies.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,553 ✭✭✭Fitz II




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,656 ✭✭✭CalamariFritti


    Being a cyclist that doesnt surprise me. ;)

    ...

    I think the issue that I have with those watches isn't that they cost 100k. I just find them ugly. If they cost 20k or 2k I'd still find them ugly. Except for the PP top right corner which I dont find ugly, just not my thing.

    The fact they are 100k is just... remarkable. If they weren't 100k I would never have commented on ti.

    Not the type of watch I'm into at the moment (or that I could ever afford one) but a Rolex Daytona is a different fish altogether. To go back to the (not liked) car analogy. If I was in that league financially I still wouldnt buy that Silver Shadow II with the chintz dash, but that 1964 SL 280 or DB5.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,599 ✭✭✭Cyclingtourist


    I suspect CF and I have somewhat similar taste in watch dials.

    For me legibility is essential and complications that get in the way are a negative. Then there's accuracy, reliability and comfort. I'm on holiday in Portugal at the moment and brought two watches, a Casio Wave Ceptor on rubber for daily wear and my Omega quartz for evenings.

    I'm coming round to the conclusion that quartz is best.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,553 ✭✭✭Fitz II


    Corinthians 13:11

    For the 100k collector the watch doesn't tell the time, its tells the value of his (her) time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,932 ✭✭✭✭banie01


    I don't have a 100k watch yearning but I do quite like the AL&S in the selection above.

    What I do like is the new VC Overseas Everest dualtime but at 30k that's still out of my reach even if it was available at retail.

    Currently, I'm not a Rolex buyer and I think it's solely to be contrarian. I have nothing against the other than the price available to me. At retail? I'd hoover up any of their steel sports tbh.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,149 ✭✭✭893bet




  • Registered Users Posts: 1,599 ✭✭✭Cyclingtourist


    Corinthians sound a bit like that PP line "you never really own a ...." , IOW marketing BS.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,656 ✭✭✭CalamariFritti


    @banie01

    What I do like is the new VC Overseas Everest dualtime but at 30k that's still out of my reach even if it was available

    Typically not a fan of elaborate and unusual complications (as one might gather) but this is rather pretty.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,553 ✭✭✭Fitz II


    Corinthians 13:11 says : "When I was a child, I spoke like a child, I thought like a child, I reasoned like a child. When I became a man, I gave up childish ways." my point being that when it come to high end collecting, things like legibility ,accuracy and reliability are seen as the childish nonsense of people who buy quartz. The fact people cannot even dream big amazes me. I will never have a 2mil supercar, but by god I would love one, and wont go on about how I cannot fit the shopping in the boot or its hard to get into.

    The other bit is my own.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,599 ✭✭✭Cyclingtourist


    We have different outlooks, I've accepted this. Why get all superior? What's with the childish theme?

    you dream your dreams and I'll dream mine.

    Excuse me, I've just drank a half bottle of very reasonably priced Portuguese red wine with my dinner so probably won't continue this discussion, for now at least.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,553 ✭✭✭Fitz II


    Been a long time since I dreamed your dreams CT so maybe thats best.

    Post edited by Fitz II on


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,170 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    Corinthians 13:11 says : "When I was a child, I spoke like a child, I thought like a child, I reasoned like a child. When I became a man, I gave up childish ways.

    Indeed and there's a pair of you in it who aren't taking it as good advice. TBH I've had just about enough of this schoolyard nonsense and that's what it is and on both sides. Why neither of you can't simply keep out of each other's way like grown men is beyond me. No more.

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 65,708 ✭✭✭✭unkel
    Chauffe, Marcel, chauffe!


    Hulk for €16k on TZ, that's €500 below the lowest price one in the EU on chrono, so if you got it for another €500-€600 or so off, it would be a fairly low risk purchase (provided the market doesn't collapse)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,720 ✭✭✭scwazrh


    Grey market values have to level out soon.Rolex stock is starting to move ,there’s a lot of new watches floating around through adverts and other Irish sellers at the moment.I’m glad the couple of Rolex I have cost me their retail price only .Far too risky to be buying at grey prices at the moment



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,599 ✭✭✭Cyclingtourist


    God you're hyper-sensitive to a bit of light banter. Because of this I'm going to say goodbye to you all.

    Cheerio.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,170 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    Snide childish digs going back and forth more like and if it were light banter you wouldn't be flouncing off in an ego droven huff. It's been long going on, leaves a bad smell about the place and I'm not alone in thinking that. So cheerio.

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,553 ✭✭✭Fitz II


    This Kermit for 12k on TZ good value thats just over 14k euro looks clean too...albeit with a ding on the case would need welding.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,149 ✭✭✭893bet



    i don’t there there is much risk to be honest for buyers. Maybe in some of the 100k ones but even at that. Numbers are too small relative to demand.


    Rolex with the brand recognition, a million watches a year made and the growing wealthy middle classes. Steel sports demand means you can’t buy a solid gold Daytona as an example. There is a que for a 30k watch. I tried to buy one last month in the local AD and the line of existing business was trotted. Ye can **** off so. Didn’t really want it anyway but seemed like a safe store of money that is more enjoyable on the wrist than in the pocket.

    Best case (or worse case depending on your perspective is a stagnation of prices I think.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,720 ✭✭✭scwazrh


    There’s no risk at rrp but at €20k for a pepsi or €36k for a steel Daytona there’s a good margin of risk .The hulk @unkel mentioned at €16k was easily making €17k a month or so ago .

    These two below are from one of the cheapest dealers around only a few months ago.




  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,170 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    I'd say if anything it's the demand that will drop or stagnate. By how much is the thing. It's a consistent trend in any heated market and watches are very much in that category over the last ten years, but especially in the last five. It's also quite a narrow "investment" area too. Basically steel sports Rolex, rather than watches of that tier in general. Plus they're not actually rare, just perceived to be and the market reflects that. It's not that they're rare at all. If you want a [insert steel Rolex model here] you can easily find one, but it'll cost you. Well it's hard to set a mainstream value trend with actually rare things. There's also a sniff of some jadedness creeping in coming across forums, social media and insta/Tube with so many on the back of this thing, many of them dealers whose interest is of course to keep interest up.

    I hadn't been on Hodinkee in ages and a few weeks back I dropped in and what struck me compared to two or three years ago were the number of comments under articles. The numbers have noticeably tapered off and there are fewer names commenting. There's also quite a lot of new people who came into this pretty recently and many of whom went from zero to no date Sub out of the gate after a few insta posts, youtube vids and men's magazine articles. Unlike guys who've been in it for longer and have gone from 200 quid Seikos and the like and moved into more pricey levels over time as they gained experience, the newbs are more likely to be as quick to drop same as quickly. Like those who profess love for you in a week, they're near guaranteed to drop you just as rapidly. 😁

    The Woo Flu added some coals to the fire that's for sure. As the world and people get back to "normal" I suspect interests like watches could well drop off. They're kinda the ideal lockdown interest in many ways, allied to many people having extra cash they might have otherwise spent on hoildays, new cars, home improvements and the like.

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,149 ✭✭✭893bet


    1k on 17k is like a 6 percent “drop”.

    The 16k is a private sale on TZ the above is a dealer (I think) who needs a margin.

    Maybe there was wiggle room in the 17k vs the 16 being by firm etc.

    C24 graph shows no tail off (ignoring prices and using it just as a trending tool).


    I was often thinking the bubble is about to burst but I am convinced it will not “pop” at this point. Inflation may prevent it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,720 ✭✭✭scwazrh


    @893bet


    A grand loss is still a loss or depreciation as it was called earlier in the thread. 6% is still a grand gone and I’m not interested in buying watches that lose money. €12k was the going rate for a New 124060 when I started looking a couple of months ago , there’s a good few under that now on chrono.

    im not saying it’s a bubble or that it’s going to pop but there is more stock available now than 6 or 12 months ago.My 1st hand experience over the last month is a sub at retail , datejust Wimbledon at 250stg discount , two tone sea dweller available to buy in the window at Keanes and I’ve been told Rhodium dial yachtmaster within 3 months .

    Paying grey market prices for a Rolex now would be like buying crypto last April.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,149 ✭✭✭893bet


    124060 again is very stable on c24. Once the initial panic when they were first released settled they have stayed solid since then. This time of year is usually slow in either case with a pick up from now till Xmas.


    I can agree though that buying grey, especially for models on current production is poor sense. And I can’t see much space for upward price gain (if that’s your thing). At the same time I don’t see massive losses. A 5 percent move each way doesn’t count in my head. And I see no evidence of any price drop based on just them two asking prices.

    I think prices will settle a little and stay on a gentle upward trajectory for most popular models.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,720 ✭✭✭scwazrh


    You seem to think those graphs are accurate .Look on chrono now for the price of a 124060 as if you were trying to buy one tonight.You’ll have a choice of watches under €12k.Now put a mark on the graph for tonight’s price .is the graph still going up?

    If you’re happy losing 5% that’s up to you but I’m not prepared to buy a watch today that’s worth less tomorrow when it’s in the thousands.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,149 ✭✭✭893bet


    The graph doesn’t show every watch or price. Just an indication of trend really is all I take from it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 65,708 ✭✭✭✭unkel
    Chauffe, Marcel, chauffe!


    @scwazrh - maybe you missed the point about dealer margin? The €1k can easily be attributed to that. Also the hulk is still settling after the initial silly hike when it was discontinued

    I'm pretty cautious / prudent and I would buy a hulk at the moment for €15-15.5k. I doubt very much I would lose more than €2k on it at any point in the next year or two, more likely it will go up

    This is not financial advice, blah-de-blah, only spend what you can afford to lose, etc., etc. 🤣



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,720 ✭✭✭scwazrh


    are yous deliberately trying to be pedantic?

    real world facts from my experience over the last month with Rolex.A sub at retail , a Wimbledon dial fluted bezel jubilee bracelet datejust at discount and a sea dweller at retail sitting in a window waiting to be bought.

    How does that not show that stock is becoming more available ?If stock is starting to become more available the obvious grey market reaction will be that prices will level out .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,149 ✭✭✭893bet


    Two swallows don’t make a summer……I am Rolex free so no skin in the game. But an interested hurler on the ditch.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 65,708 ✭✭✭✭unkel
    Chauffe, Marcel, chauffe!



    I'll gladly take that sub at what you paid plus €500


    You don't accept my offer? QED ;-)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,720 ✭✭✭scwazrh


    dont know what point you think your proving.

    last month a Hulk was €17k .would you prefer to pay last months price for a hulk or this months ? QED



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,149 ✭✭✭893bet


    I have looked at the last 4 hulk sales on TZ over the last 12 months. In order below from most recent to oldest.

    14000

    14250

    13900

    14350


    Seems pretty stable from a private sale point of view.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,720 ✭✭✭scwazrh


    Did you forget those prices are all in pounds ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,149 ✭✭✭893bet


    No? What relevance?


    Top one is the one at 14k Sterling that Unk referenced to be 16k (16350 to be exact based on the currency converter) is the one that you are argueing shows the market dropping.


    Then I took the last 4 from that market place and showed it to be stable.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 65,708 ✭✭✭✭unkel
    Chauffe, Marcel, chauffe!


    Apples and oranges. A hulk from a dealer will sell for about a grand more than one from a private sale. So last months one would have sold for €16k privately.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,720 ✭✭✭scwazrh



    If prices are so stable why haven’t you bought Rolex? You’ve avoided Rolex cause You know Grey market is overpriced and will correct , why you’re now trying to argue it’s stable is beyond me .The proof is out there - there is more stock available and more stock means prices will level out .Believe it or don’t but it’s simple basic economics.

    I haven’t said it will crash ,but if you spend enough time looking at prices it is obvious they are slowing.I’ve been looking for a hulk and there is now better prices available than there was last month.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,720 ✭✭✭scwazrh


    Would have , could have , should have - all irrelevant.I’m basing my views on prices I see as someone in the market to buy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,149 ✭✭✭893bet


    We are almost arguing the same thing. All I am saying is there doesn’t seem to be any downward trend. Prices stable enough for the likes of the hulk. There are very few private sales in Ireland of the hulk. Mostly dealer ones you see.


    That 16k hulk on TZ that you have used as evidence of prices on the way down as you seen one for 17k last month from a dealer in Ireland. I have shown that that 16k is typical of the stable asking price on tz. To quote yourself above….believe it or don’t but that is simple basic math. 4 watches in the last year on the same market at the same price.


    I am not sure why me not buying Rolex is a factor here? I am fairly open that I general I don’t like their designs and sizes. All my watches are sub 10mm thick which is not something Rolex do and is where I start when considering a watch. It’s the first thing I check.

    I also don’t like the gaudy recognisable nature of Rolex. Preference for more stealthy brands.

    And I buy watches to wear them which means they need to be special. And Rolex are not special, at least horologically. Amazing brand and the market leader etc but if I am spending 16k on a watch I want precious metal and an array of watch finishing techniques front and back for my money personally. Not a plain uniform dial and a flat caseback. I just find that a little boring.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,170 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    This isn't a criticism. I've zero skin in the game in this end of things and it's more a general observation: While watch values have always been discussed to some degree, particularly and for more obvious reasons in the vintage end of the hobby where the very nature of an actually finite supply and increasing interest since the turn of the century has driven the market, discussion in the brand new watch market of investments, flipping, value trends and graphs like we were talking about stocks or currency is very much a recent thing. And it comes across as much more about the market than the watches themselves, if you know what I mean? Or is that just me? It also adds to my strong suspicion that this is a current trend that is vulnerable to going off trend when the perception of currency substitute shifts.

    Now don't get me wrong I get the idea of values and certainly don't like the idea of throwing money away 😁 and in my vintage neck of the woods I'm certainly happier that I bought much of my collection before things went a bit nuts in that market and I could build a collection like mine for a lot less and I haven't lost money, but even if the values tanked or stayed the same I'd still have the watches and the interest in them.

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,553 ✭✭✭Fitz II


    This is always an interesting debate and sometimes I think people deduce trends from fluctuation over small amounts of time. Its coming into Christmas season soon and that watch selling time, so there is a lull before. If you want to see market trends its not the super hot models I would judge they will be the last to fall...especially the hulk as its discontinued. Look at the watches people buy instead of them....the new cermit, the black sub, the batman/girl...those watches are going to be the first against the wall when the revolution comes. Personally I feel the hulk is safe as houses, as its one of the nicest Rolex sports watches and its properly discontinued. For the last 20 year of so, Rolex has generally gone up in value. That's through global recessions, global pandemics, Trump, threats of WW3, natural disasters, dot com crashes etc....quite stable over LONG periods of time. Its only the short hold flipper need worry really.

    Of course there is the chicken littles out there. Bark and Jack called the crash about 18 months ago. Our own 836bet called it, Wibbs feels its around the corner. Thorpe called it when a few people were offered a few watches at the end of the first UK lockdown. And I suppose at some point if you call it ever week somebody is going to be right at some point.

    You only know the value of a watch when you go to sell it. Usually I put in a buy request for the watch I want to watchfinder and see what they are giving on them. You will always find it considerably less than private sale values. I would say 13-14k euro on a hulk. Forget Chrono24 thats a load of bluster, bs and massively inflated prices. Dealers usually try and have at least 15-20% margin as is only right to run a business, so that means 3k on a 20k watch.

    My own gut feeling is a period of relative stagnation, but the hulk will be a 20k watch and stay there.

    Wibbs the answer is yes, a big part of the hobby now is financial, because its a nice lubricant for the man maths machine.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,149 ✭✭✭893bet


    When WF had a sale and have 2-3k off blnrs I declared the end was nigh ( it’s in this thread 10 pages back and two years ago). Wrong.


    During lockdown ADs were openly selling omega online to survive at 20 percent discount and I said the market was going to dive on second hand prices following that. Wrong.


    Watch market is very strong and growing. Us WIS are a small percentage. The other 95 percent want Rolex and Omega etc and will stay wanting them. While I am not staying rush to buy, prices are gonna jump 20 percent again this year. But if you are expecting a reduction of 20 percent then forget it. Best out luck for buyers is a small drop and a stagnation while inflation catches up to the rapid price rises that have been seen.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,170 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    Us WIS are a small percentage.

    That would be more my concern for the market in general. Enthusiasts tend to stay enthusiastic, the mainstream is much more open to a change of trend. Now these are longterm periods but 20 years ago the other 95 percent wanted TAG Heuer. IWC were mad popular soon after(if you look at the Timezone forums from the early 00's you'd see "IWC or Rolex, what should I buy" and IWC was ahead for most respondents. And Rolex have not generally gone up in value over the last 20 years. To be precise; Vintage Rolex have climbed alright(I'd agree the discontinued Hulk would be a safer bet because of that), but there's a rising tide there with a few brands, but certainly not new currently available Rolex models and not currently available models grey marketed out at premiums with flippers and speculators abounding. That's in the last five years, not twenty. This forum is only in existence for ten years and go back to the early days. It's a fair few pages in before Rolex is even mentioned and when it is it's about buying new Subs at discount off RRP and links to where you can. Nothing like today. The through pandemics, trump, corona and global crashes etc is not surprising at all. Indeed I'd be far more surprised if agreed upon non cash wealth stores would drop because of those external factors.

    But the "always rising values" stuff is very of the moment and pushed by both dealers and the heavily invested. The P&P guys up the North(and they wouldn't be the only ones as a lot of their copy is copy pasted from elsewhere) say on their website that Rolex have never lost value since the 70's, which is total and utter bull. There's a reason why pre 90's non auto vintage Daytonas are rare enough, they couldn't give them away and they were reguarly and heavily discounted and secondhand steel Rolex were always cheaper than brand new. Until crowds like Hodinkee started promoting two tone as The Next Big Thing(because dealers are always looking for the next big thing), two tone Rollies were deeply unfashionable and less valuable and that's in the last 18 months.

    I noticed this Enthusiast/Mainstream diff in of all things vintage film posters. I was never a collector as such, I just bought a few down the years, but I figured more knowledge over what I had was always a good thing. They were a big thing 15 years ago and had been really climbing since the 90's, then they went from a small bunch of nerds to the mainstream and prices went nuts. Then after around five years of rapid climb the heat went out of them. As an example one of the big ticket ones are anything to do with Star Wars, the first flics anyway. When I was a kid I got a present of a Star Wars Poster(first UK edition no Oscars listed) from a mate's dad who worked in the Savoy IIRC. Anyway it kinda went into a drawer because to me it wasn't a "real poster" and I bought an "official" one in Easons. I kid thee not... 😁In the late 90's that was about 500 quid, at the peak it was more like 2000 quid, 2500 to the desperate. 😁 Now? Around 800. Now an original King Kong poster is still going to be worth a metric shít tonne of cash(though lower than at the peak), but that's the equivalent of a 1940's Patek in steel. Not relevant to 99% of the market

    Another aspect to the other 95% is that of that percentage the vast majority of luxury watch buyers are generally one and done guys. They buy the "Good Watch" of the day and keep it. That's in a normal market anyway and that's what the Swiss industry relies upon(over half of Longines profits in Asia come from women's watches which aren't even on our radar). This current market has way more of the market speculators and investors to it. 18 months or so ago I mused that next up would be the entry of finance into the market and that's in play now. Small beans at the moment, but if that becomes more a thing, that's another concern.

    TL:DR? (too late...) Do I think the market will crash? No. Do I see stagnation? Yes(the vintage market has already stagnated in a big way and behind closed doors discounting is happening). Do I see vintage or discontinued popular models take a dive? No. Less upward movement, but still fairly solid. Do I see the feeding frenzy for well over RRP for new steel Rolex driven by speculators and dealers lose steam? Yep. Now prices will stay firm at first because the market is too invested and both dealers and owners won't want to lose out, but it wouldn't take much for that to start to slip too. EG stressed "stockholders" in need of liquidity yesterday.

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,720 ✭✭✭scwazrh


    I’m quoting myself above as it appears we all seem to effectively agree on the general sentiment that was in that post.

    Despite @893bet & @unkel rebuke for whatever reason it is safe to say that anyone paying attention to the Rolex market is expecting stagnation or levelling out or the heat coming out of the market , whichever way we want to phrase it but the result is the same , grey market values will level out soon.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement