Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Boosters

Options
145791076

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,681 ✭✭✭brickster69


    Back to boosters. Israel opens them up to all ages if they had the second dose 5 months ago. Also sounds like you wont get a vaccine passport if you only have had 2 doses in certain circumstances. Something going on over there !



    Niccolò Machiavelli :

    "To ally with great powers to defeat your neighbour is a strategic trap; if you win, you become the slave of the greater power; if the allied power is defeated, you remain alone and defenceless against the angry neighbour, and you are destroyed." - Niccolò Machiavelli



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,897 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    That's not admissions, that's total cases detected in hospital in a 24 hour period, which includes those pretty much everyone testing positive for various reasons (admitted due to covid, tested positive while being admitted for some other issues and those contracting covid in hospital)

    That's the source data, under new admissions is those admitted who tested positive, 7 day average is 30.

    "Half in hospital are fully vaccinated" that does not mean half of those admitted to hospital are fully vaccinated.

    Last Epi report lists 119 patients contracting covid from 12/08 to the 25/05.

    The same time from the dashboard data we have 381 admissions and a total of 539 cases detected in hospital.

    So the key figure is how many of those 381 admissions due to covid were fully vaccinated.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 217 ✭✭ohnohedidnt


    The request was to provide two studies, the 1st two are specific to SARS-COV2 and both conclude that masks aren't particularly effective. Admittedly they're not all specific to SARS-COV2. But do provide some overall context as to the general effectiveness of wearing an unsealed piece of cloth over your face when dealing with an airborne virus. I didn't write the studies or the conclusions.

    1. medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.05.18.21257385v1.full-text

    "Conclusions Mask mandates and use are not associated with slower state-level COVID-19 spread during COVID-19 growth surges. Containment requires future research and implementation of existing efficacious strategies."

    2. swprs.org/face-masks-evidence/

    "Conclusion

    Face masks in the general population might be effective, at least in some circumstances, but there is currently little to no evidence supporting this proposition. If the coronavirus is indeed transmitted via indoor aerosols, face masks are unlikely to be protective. Health authorities should therefore not assume or suggest that face masks will reduce the rate or risk of infection."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 18,109 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    SPR is a swiss (probably German editor) conspiracy theorist site (though claims it isn't). There's a pretty long debunking of multiple of it's claims here:

    Listicle of “facts” about COVID-19 contains numerous inaccurate and misleading claims - Health Feedback



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 383 ✭✭Unicorn Milk Latte


    First one - there's a link to an updated version:

    COVID-19 mitigation requires further research and use of existing efficacious strategies, most notably vaccination.

    It's a pre-print, feel free to look at the absolute sh*tstorm in the comments section, where scientists question the validity of methods and results.

    ---------


    Second one:

    this is not a study, it's a link collection. The site, 'Swiss Policy Research' is a conspiracy website, that has claimed that Qanon was an FBI operation, promoted Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin, etc.



    First link in the list:

    "Nonpharmaceutical Measures for Pandemic Influenza in Nonhealthcare Settings"

    -> nothing to do with Covid, a deliberate attempt to confuse and mislead


    Second link from the list:

    Danish study - incidentally, the methodology and validity was questioned in the first study you linked to.

    Quote from the Danish study:

    Limitation: Inconclusive results, missing data, variable adherence, patient-reported findings on home tests, no blinding, and no assessment of whether masks could decrease disease transmission from mask wearers to others.


    Third link:

    Facemask against viral respiratory infections among Hajj pilgrims: A challenging cluster-randomized trial

    This did not look into Covid, but into rhinovirus, parainfluenza and influenza.


    Fourth link:

    Not a study. Quote: Additional high-quality studies are needed to assess the relevance of the use of medical face masks in the COVID-19 pandemic


    Fifth link:

    An opinion piece, not a study, that tries to draw conclusions from pre-covid research, like the unrelated other studies you linked to above.


    6 - Flu again

    7 - Opinion piece - not a study - from the earliest days of Covid, before more data about mask effectiveness was available

    8 - about masking in hospitals

    9 - from 2015, about masks for health care workers (third time this study is brought up...)

    10 - a conspiracy minded hygienist tries to discredit virologist and epidemiologist recommendations from the Robert Koch Institute, the hospital she works in discredits her statements. Not a study, no research.




    So, in summary - one contested pre-print, and lots of deliberate misinformation and obfuscation.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 217 ✭✭ohnohedidnt


    What would be the difference between influenza, why do you feel what applies to influenza won't apply to SARS-COV2.

    Can you share some of the studies you have seen which prove masks do work?



  • Posts: 949 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    We cannot use anything we know about any other existing virus to make any predictions about Covid.

    Which is why it is very important to listen to the expert virologists and epidemiologists, whose expertise is entirely based on their study of existing viruses.

    I hope that clears it up for you.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 217 ✭✭ohnohedidnt


    Just reading the first paper, the conclusion is that masks stops the jet of droplets from propagating forward, the masks leak and only stop large droplets. No data to say it prevents the spread of covid that I could see.



  • Posts: 8,874 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Keep going. You can read only the Covid specific ones if you wish.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 10,049 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    You are excluding the cases prevented from your calculations. 80% effective at preventing infection.

    So 2,000 cases results in 40 hospitalisations. You are assuming it would have been 90 without vaccination. But without vaccination it would have been 6000 cases and 270 hospitalisations.

    This assumes 50% of current hospitalisation are vaccinated, in which case it is a greater than 90% reduction in that population



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,338 ✭✭✭jackboy


    Something going on everywhere. Any country that doesn’t quickly follow their lead is directly responsible for any potential consequences. Does any doubt that Israel are doing this for good reason.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 383 ✭✭Unicorn Milk Latte


    What would be the difference between influenza, why do you feel what applies to influenza won't apply to SARS-COV2.

    Assuming that you're not just trolling and really don't know: completely different viruses, completely different mechanism of spreading (clusters and super spreaders for Covid), Covid is 16x as lethal, different seasonality, ...


    Can you share some of the studies you have seen which prove masks do work?

    Here's one in addition to the long list that @[Deleted User] posted above:




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,681 ✭✭✭brickster69


    Nope they are like a giant air raid siren, just everyone is deaf or dumb. Even sleepy Joe woke up yesterday that tell's you everything.

    Niccolò Machiavelli :

    "To ally with great powers to defeat your neighbour is a strategic trap; if you win, you become the slave of the greater power; if the allied power is defeated, you remain alone and defenceless against the angry neighbour, and you are destroyed." - Niccolò Machiavelli



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 217 ✭✭ohnohedidnt


    I mean in terms of masks, covid is more difficult to contain than influenza, so if a mask doesnt work for influenza, why would it work for SARS-COV2?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,532 ✭✭✭✭Lumen


    There's a dedicated thread about masks.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 435 ✭✭godzilla1989


    All I want to know is what happens after infection for both groups, vaccinated vs placebo

    Dont care about prevented and what ifs.

    I got my answer though, I’m happy with that answer

    A 24 year old unvaccinated is more likely to end up in hospital than a 84 year old vaccinated once infected

    I can tell my great gran aunt ditch the masks, she’s less likely to be hospitalised than Novak Djokovic who’s unvaccinated



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 601 ✭✭✭puzl


    You've made the mistake of applying general stats to two specific people.

    Novac is not average for his age.

    Tell your gran to keep the masks.

    Also, tell Novak to get vaccinated.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,809 ✭✭✭Hector Savage


    Novak doesn't need to get vaccinated cos Novak has had it and recovered ...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 217 ✭✭ohnohedidnt


    It begins:

    "Israel’s government has expanded availability of controversial Covid-19 vaccine booster shots to all inoculated residents 12 and older and decreed that those who decline the third jab will soon lose their “green pass” privileges."



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 949 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    If you have already been vaccinated against Covid-19, will you take a booster shot if/when offered?

    (Poll is anonymous)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,809 ✭✭✭Hector Savage




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,372 ✭✭✭✭jimmycrackcorm


    As they say, in for a penny, in for a pound.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,746 ✭✭✭Economics101


    If you've already had 2 shots, and if there is clear evidence that effectiveness diminishes significantly after x months, then not taking a booster is inconsistent with your original decision.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,605 ✭✭✭2ndcoming


    Exactly. We've had what, 95% uptake in the adult population? Not sure why any of them would be of a different opinion about a top up.



  • Posts: 265 ✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Taking more of any drug increases risk. Especially when we are not sure of the vaccines safety going forward.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,179 ✭✭✭✭Gael23


    Wouldn’t jump for it but will take my doctors advice



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,746 ✭✭✭Economics101


    So if I get an annual flu jab, does that increase my risk as I accumulate more of the drug over the years?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,802 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Yes.

    Presuming it will be suggested on the advice of medically competent people, then absolutely.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 445 ✭✭Aph2016


    Took the first two doses, terrible reaction to both doses, no chance I will be taking a booster.



Advertisement
Advertisement