Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Brexit discussion thread XIV (Please read OP before posting)

1150151153155156334

Comments

  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 20,015 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    For a Gov obsessed with spin, of course they would appoint a cricketer - especially an all-rounder. It would be no good if he could just bat.

    I think his absence of any trade qualifications or any experience of business will stand in good stead. At least he is not proven to be useless. (Yet).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,980 ✭✭✭dogbert27


    And she just pissed off the people of Liverpool by linking a Sun article. Tone deaf Tories.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,106 ✭✭✭Christy42


    Botham on being a lord:


    "Anyway I’m enjoying it and will be at Westminster more often when we get back to normal, especially when they are debating something I know about – like sport or the countryside. Not much point if it’s a trade deal with Japan."


    Unsure what he has learned in the last 10 months or so to make him suddenly qualified for the role. This government is really trying to end the satire business by being dumber than the satire.

    https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2020/nov/24/ian-botham-covid-19-brexit-headingley-vic-marks



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,809 ✭✭✭roosterman71


    The funniest thing about this is that she linked a tabloid, gutter paper's story on the appointment, and not an official government announcement on an official government site



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,846 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    He won't actually be doing any negotiations. His role is to be the 'star'. TO be the draw to the event. Many CEO's would be of similar age, would certainly know of Botham and would hold him in high regard (cricket wise). So him showing up would, I assume, lead to people attending and then the work begins when he has finished his speech filled with anecdotes about cricket.


    Given the cricket links between UK and Australia, I actually think it is quite a shrewd move. Of course, even if he helps delivery massive increase in trade, it does almost nothing to deal with the damage of Brexit.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,093 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    Didn't they recently announce a deal with Australia that bent UK farmers over a table? Did that one eventually fall apart?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,465 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    I see this much more as a cynical gimmicky PR stunt to appeal to the Brexit disciples back in England, rather than an actual thought out appointment.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,177 ✭✭✭✭listermint


    This exactly.


    Isn't subterfuge. Nothing more. Distract away from Afghanistan, get people miffed off about it. Even the method of the announcement shows that.

    You can't really believe this is a shrewd move. It's shrewd in a sense that is more in a litany of wind up attempts .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,815 ✭✭✭Enzokk


    I don't think there is much to get upset about with Botham. He will not make the deals, he will only get people to the meeting to get in touch with people who will then take over. It is more the way this has been touted as some sort of win for the UK, they have Sir Ian Botham who will lead the Global Britain charge in Australia that makes you shake your head. Then again with the way they handled the pandemic and Brexit and now Afghanistan, you take your victories where you can, whether they are victories or not.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,465 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    It just seems a cheap gimmick - they may as well have appointed some TV personality off the BBC or ITV, like Jeremy Clarkson or Anne Robinson. The Brexiteer crowd are not very serious people.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,226 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog



    Don't think anyone can deny this is utterly surreal, embarrassing and is just mindless political favoritism.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,385 ✭✭✭✭Professor Moriarty


    Just to note. If Catherine Hoey is Kate Hoey, she is 75.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,093 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    Indeed the one and only. Baroness Hoey is now trade envoy to Ghana. Perhaps she can visit and be eaten by a lion.

    Jeffrey Donaldson will lead the DUP and be trade envoy to Cameroon and Egypt, too.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,465 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    I guess an interesting aspect is how the extreme end of hardcore Tory Euroscepticism became much bigger over the years. John Major faced up to about 20 or so Maastricht Rebels in the early 1990s. Their numbers had grown to at least 60 in recent years (around a fifth of the party's MPs when May was in charge......that's a lot).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,716 ✭✭✭54and56


    The UKCA quality mark, a flag bearer of the Brexit desire to take back control and reduce bureaucracy (not) is postponed and likely to never come into effect as it's just too much hassle. Instead of companies incurring the cost to comply with UKCA as well as the EU CE mark they'll just stick with the CE mark and pull their products from the GB market if the UKCA mark is insisted upon.

    https://twitter.com/pmdfoster/status/1429844646088282120



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,846 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    But doesn't that mean that they are effectively adhering to EU standards, for that is what would be a key driver for the CE mark? Or is it different?



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    First Nandos, now McDonalds are having to respond to the supply chain collapse: milkshakes have been pulled from their menu, with bottled drinks previously removed. Same reason given; you'd wonder at what point genuine realisation might dawn, if ever, that this is the price of the form of Brexit chosen.




  • Registered Users Posts: 303 ✭✭cantwbr1


    This will be blamed on COVID or migrants in the channel or anything but Brexit and the media will push whatever narrative is required



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,339 ✭✭✭Widdensushi


    If that doesn't cause civil unrest then there won't be any.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,846 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    There is no doubt that Brexit is playing a part, but it must be more than that. There are no customs checks on inbound goods at present into the Uk, given that they have yet to actually control their borders, so it isn't supply of the produce.

    Is is really simply due to lack of workers (hauliers etc) and how much is that down to the 'pingdemic'? Given that Brexit hasn't fully happened, surely we cannot be seeing such big effects of it at this stage?



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Such has been the perversion of the British political conversations, I'd go one further and semi seriously suggest there will be those that claim it's really a good thing - saving the great unwashed from a little bit of junk food in their diet.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,177 ✭✭✭✭listermint


    No idea. Some polls yesterday had the Tories up 3 points to 42 percent.

    It's off the wall. Evidently people are simply not reading anything or just simply don't care.

    The Tories pretty much have free reign to do absolutely anything they like.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,465 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    It's a tricky one as the right wing press campaigned for Brexit and hated on the EEC / EU for decades. To say they are compromised in reporting on this story would be putting it mildly.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Trump showed there's a successful path in running a political movement as eternal campaign mode.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,465 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Yes, their entire political and media landscape leaves them wide open to a corrupt takeover. No constitution, a failed FPTP system, a corrupt press owned by right wing offshore billionaires, BBC terrified of the Tories. There are very few safeguards built in to protect the country.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,716 ✭✭✭54and56


    Yes, that's the uncomfortable irony. Products for sale or use in the GB market (not UK as NI will still operate under the CE mark as part of the TCA/WA) will have to adhere the the EU CE mark and any amendments to same made by the EU which Westminster will have absolutely zero influence over. They'll just have to grin (or more likely shout their frustration at the EU imposing more pointless bureaucracy on Brexit Britain via headlines in the Daily Express and fight them on the beaches type orations by Mark Francois and the like.

    Delicious.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,015 ✭✭✭Jizique




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,994 ✭✭✭ambro25


    It’s a combination of factors, but ultimately they all link back to Brexit, with Covid supercharging (fast-tracking, really) the issue since last year.

    The main factors are-

    1.UK drivers too few/too old

    2.EU27 drivers moving back to better-paying / -perk’d jobs in the EU27 post-Brexit (never more so than since Covid started Mar-Apr 2020, but earlier changes to UK tax also played a big role)

    3.EU27 drivers without a UK-EU27 return load, not able to make an EU27-UK trip profitable through cabotage whilst in the UK (since 01/01/21)

    4.HGV pay/skill levels well short of post-Brexit UK PBS/work visa thresholds (and the UK gvt’s complete ideological opposition to doing anything about it)

    I read somewhere that 35,000 Romanian HGV drivers went back to the Continent since Brexit (not sure if that means 2016 or 2019 or…).

    Most observers without an ‘in’, are also very far from seeing the full picture: for every headlining story about empty supermarket shelf, Nando, McD, etc., there’s umpteen SMEs in the British economy background with *worse* logistics (and therefore productivity, sales and profitability-) problems, because they haven’t got the Sainsbury’s, Nando or McD chequebook and logistics industry/volume pull factor.

    Full-fat Brexit hasn’t happened yet, as you rightly note. This problem will get far worse then.



  • Registered Users Posts: 304 ✭✭ltd440


    Maybe covered by point number 3 in ambro25 post, but the drop off in trucks heading to/from Ireland using the uk landbrige that would also move uk goods around the uk has decreased massively.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,441 ✭✭✭dublin49




  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 93,216 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight



    5 - IR35 , new tax rules on self employed / contractors means the old days of working long term for one client are gone.

    6 - Home Office. Polish driver who had followed the rules was deported when he arrived for an interview in the UK.

    7 - Drivers to / from the EU don't get paid for empty loads and since you can't pick up stuff on the return or en-route like you used to do ...

    8 - Pay isn't much different from Aldi, hours are better and you don't have the responsibility for 20 plus tonnes of consumer goods or whatnot.

    9 - UK govt have added an extra hour to how long drivers can drive per day. Reputable companies are protesting on safety ground. Dis reputable ones may be tempted to 'encourage' workers to keep going.

    Anecdotal - but one Romanian driver said he'd make more money back in Romania and wouldn't have to jump through all the hoops.


    Best comment was on the lines of - Brexit was engineered by Nigel Farage to prevent more milkshakes being thrown on him. :pac:



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 93,216 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    Did someone mention turkeys yet ?

    Not enough turkeys for Christmas due to Brexit, also if there were enough HGV drivers there'd still be a shortage of chickens.

    The poultry industry employs more than 40,000 people but there are nearly 7,000 vacancies, the BPC said. The shortage means some chicken producers have reduced the size of their product ranges and cut weekly output by up to 10%, the letter said. The supply of turkey is down by a similar amount but could decline by as much as 20% at Christmas as firms fear they will not be able to draft in the usual number of seasonal workers.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,339 ✭✭✭Widdensushi


    I didn't realise the driver would not get paid if they didn't have a back load, drawback of being self employed, the hours allowed to drive are fairly miserable, not nice getting stuck 50 or 60 km from your destination having to watch TV rather than going home to your family etc,if you can't stay alert those hours there is something else going on.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,725 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    This is a major admission that the British empire is well and truly over and that the UK will forever be rule takers from bigger international blocks like the EU. It would be funny if it wasn't so pathetic that they even thought that they could force every supplier to pay extra to certify against the new UK standards rather than simply deciding not to bother exporting their goods to the UK anymore

    This wasn't so bad when the UK were at the top table helping to draft those rules. But Brexit means Brexit after all...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,725 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    For a lot of brexiteers, they could turn up at McDonalds and be told the only thing on the menu is raw gherkins, and they'd think this is fine because at least the menu isn't completely empty

    But the general public will grow weary of these inconveniences sooner rather than later. Hopefully they react in a positive way rather than over-react or doubling down on anti EU sentiment



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,437 ✭✭✭✭VinLieger


    Was anybody bar the brexit fanatics ever in any doubt this would be the situation?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,312 ✭✭✭druss


    The fanatics have had a lot of control over the situation though.

    See also chemical authorisations. Opening assumption from UK industry (and indeed UK public sector) was that Brexit would unfortunately reduce UK direct influence, but obviously the UK would continue to use the REACH chemical database. To do otherwise would be superflous, ridiculously expensive etc etc.

    Except it quickly became clear that UK politicians disagreed. And wanted to set up a completely new authorisation system and have a beefed up national agency replace the functions carried out by the European Chemical Agency. All attempts to persuade on economic or rational grounds completely failed.

    And then you had the approach advocated by Brexit purists like Daniel Hannon, who wanted to scrap regulation entirely so that workers could go back to working with raw carcinogenic substances like in the glory days of Empire.

    For now, the approach is this.

    "The key principles of the EU REACH Regulation have been retained. The new domestic regime is known as UK REACH.

    As of 1 January 2021 the UK REACH and the EU REACH regulations operate independently from each other. Companies that supply and purchase substances, mixtures or articles to and from the EU/EEA/Northern Ireland and Great Britain (England, Scotland and Wales) will need to ensure that the relevant duties are met under both pieces of legislation."

    So , basically the same principles, but loads of extra paperwork. And all the costs associated with establishing a domestic regime to do much the same thing.

    Even where the fanatics don't entirely get their way, they must be placated. So UKCA is only postponed, not cancelled. UK REACH is established, but isn't really substantive. Neither is seen as a positive by industry and (whether the political ideals ultimately proceed or not), all of has cost money.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,465 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    It's obvious from much of the commentary on social media that the majority of Leave voters hadn't a clue what they were voting. Fell for a load of cheap populist slogans, without understanding the consequences of them or what Brexit would actually entail.

    Cameron was some optimist - failing to understand the English public's capacity to mess up. He was probably thinking to himself 'they couldn't possibly be so stupid as to actually vote for all this nonsense'.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 303 ✭✭.42.


    English people can step up to fill the HGV driver roles. Wasn’t that a Brexit goal . English Jobs for English people.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 303 ✭✭.42.


    Fcuk them… They were told like the rest of the EU population what Brexit would mean. Access to the same info.


    They chose their path based on their opinion that they know better.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    The CE marking thing is an enormous issue and I really don't think they had a clue what they were dealing with. It's not just some overall certification for individual finished consumer products, but rather every component in supply chains.

    So, you can't feasibly just replace CE with UKCA. It's just mind bogglingly complex to even begin to contemplate how messy that would be.

    If you don't have CE approved supply chain components you also won't be able to export anything to the EU and the EU is basically a world reference for standards development, so it's not like they're going to be rushing off to recognise some medium sized 3rd country's weird setup.

    It shows that they did zero consultation with business and just want to differentiate for the sake of differentiation.

    They're likely going to end up having, for pragmatic reasons, to accept CE marking and European standards as applicable in the UK and having domestic standards that are largely irrelevant beyond their own borders.

    The whole point of EU standards is to achieve efficiency, more competition and economies of scale.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,994 ✭✭✭ambro25


    I know for a fact that the British government did consult businesses, as I took part in it at the time and posted about it in an earlier instance of the ‘Brexit’ thread in here. It was a long time back, 2017 IIRC.

    I also know for a fact that ours wasn’t the only business consulted in our game and, as a pretty niche legal services provider, logic strongly suggests that we can’t have been the only line of business consulted - rather the tail end of it, if anything.

    But the evidence, pretty much incontrovertible at this stage, is that so far, successive British government have chosen not to let such consultations impinge their policies.

    The more cynical in me continues to believe that this was, and continues to be, by design rather than ignorance. UK plc is on its arse and going ever more for a song every passing day, and overseas (esp.US) asset and venture groups are hoovering them up at a rate of knots (for headline acts, see Morrison’s, Sainsbury’s is likely next).



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Well, yeah you can consult with business, not like what you hear because it conflicts with your jingoistic dogma, and then completely ignore the report, which would seem to be quite likely.

    The Tories are very good at making the right noises and getting the PR and spin polished. Levelling up, Northern Powerhouse, Global Britain, build Tunnel to Northern Ireland ...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,465 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    It does seem like they could have been persuaded to do just about anything in a referendum by Farage, Vote Leave and the right wing press. Scrap the House of Commons, ditch the monarchy, ditch the legal system (and all the time assuming there would be no real world consequences to their vote, none that would affect them anyway).



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 40,226 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    Cameron wasn't anything except too weak to enact any sort of meaningful reform. Instead, he opted to gamble the future of the United Kingdom, first in 2014 and again in 2016.

    Brexit was never about anything more than placating the Tory right and keeping Cameron in power. It was never about trade, jobs, sovereignty or even immigration. The Ultras want to turn the UK into a hollowed out vassal of the US while the centrists just wanted to cling to power because it's all they know how to do.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,987 ✭✭✭PeadarCo


    Is there a possibility that the UK will more or less keep all the EU regulations and updates? In some cases just rebadging the regulations and in others just accepting EU regulations as the UK regulations. The UK would end up in Brexit in name only situation except with all the costs from not officially signing up the relevant regulations with the EU.

    The situation with the CE mark was warned about by a lot of people. The UK would be forced by economic realities to accept EU regulations.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    The question is what is the point of moving away from it? It serves no purpose. It’s not even protectionism. It quite literally damages their own consumers and businesses. It’s just sheer flag waving nonsense.

    You might as well just declare that you’ll require all washing machines come come with a jaunty hat and a big Union Flag on the on/off button that plays Rule Britannia when the wash ends, but it’ll still be made in Italy or Korea. You’ll have very reduced range of models & a much higher price than your neighbours.

    Post edited by [Deleted User] on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 690 ✭✭✭farmerval


    I think a major problem has been as a united group with a very narrow focus, ambitious people in the Tories saw bowing and scraping to the ERG as a necessary way to climb the greasy pole.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,695 ✭✭✭storker


    A possible fish shortage for Christmas was the subject of a Channel 4 News story this evening. The fish factories can't get the staff now because many of them used to come from Europe. They're looking to the government for an exemption for their industry. I was sympathetic to their plight until it was mentioned that the Scottish Seafood Association spokesman interviewed had been...yes, a proud supporter of Brexit. This was the point at which my sympathy turned instantly to derision.

    "We need to be able to take workers in without all the ridiculous red tape," he complained...about the situation he voted for.




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,465 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Another factor is that under the FPTP system, the Tories had no choice but to accommodate these extremists. The ERG should really have been in a right wing / far right English nationalist party of their own, not in a mainstream party of government. To make things worse, the entire parliamentary party has been taken over by these guys, with moderates and centrists forced aside.



Advertisement