Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Climate Change is Normal and Welcome in My Opinion

245

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 2,147 ✭✭✭TonyMaloney


    I didn't refuse to watch it. As far as I'm aware I'm the only person in this thread that gave it a go at all.

    It's an old shite documentary that uses well known paid charlatans. The director himself is apparently a former "revolutionary communist".

    Look man, you've been taken in by a bunch of people that were looking for people just like you. I feel sorry for you.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,597 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    Global average absolute temperature was about 13c, now it’s 14c

    the maximum daily temperature on one day in one location is not that important, that said, it’s going to be surpassed sooner rather than later, will you admit Climate change is real when this happens?



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,444 ✭✭✭dalyboy


    The OP doesn’t need any qualifications to disprove that believers in climate change are deluded.

    The only issue is it’s impossible to disprove human caused climate change for the same reason as it’s impossible to disprove the existence of unicorns . (Hint .. they’re only in fantastists imagination)

    These same fundamentalist ideologues would fail 1st year secondary school level basic science.

    The first thing I learnt in science class was that natural science was based 100% on the scientific method of testing a hypothesis , dependant and independent variables to determine your cause and effect. That is science. It’s the only science that ever has the merit to use the word “science” in a sentence.

    NOT ,, scientific consensus, NOT ,, observances,,, NOT ideological BS.

    im just waiting for these clowns to start doing rain dances in fields to control the weather next. I hope I get an invite (not likely ,boohoo) , it’d be a major belly laugher.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,597 ✭✭✭MrMusician18


    Even if you thought the whole lot of climate change was a load of nonsense, in the Irish context,the goal of energy independence is an extremely worthy one. Corrib gas hasn't long left and kinsale is almost gone so we'd find ourselves at the end of some very long gas pipes.

    I remember having a discussion about this with a friend. They weren't convinced about the merits of any of this so I put it to them asking how much they enjoyed paying €100 to fill their car with oil and knowing that at least half that money leaves the State. I put it to them would it not be better if it all stayed here...

    No answer.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,326 ✭✭✭Markus Antonius


    Wind turbines use up to 60 gallons of oil for lubrication not to mention the diesel trucks you need to build and maintain them. How would you cope with this issue if you close all the oil fields?

    Carbon credits have been around for years. In fact there were a number of scandals a few years back in relation to the carbon offset system where companies could offset their climate impact by building/funding "pro-climate" measures as a substitute for paying off the credits.

    One company (Total) built millions worth of wind farms in China, claimed that they generated XXMegawatts therefore impact is sufficiently offset. When investigated, it was found that the turbines were never connected to any grid, they were just sitting there doing nothing! (https://theconversation.com/outdated-carbon-credits-from-old-wind-and-solar-farms-are-threatening-climate-change-efforts-151456)

    Another company (Gold Standard Foundation) created these water purification straws for African countries claiming that use of the straws would negate the need for the tribal villages to burn fossil fuels to purify their water. When questioned about the straws, the tribes people said that the water tasted like crap so they never used them and continued to burn the fuel to purify their water! (https://ssir.org/articles/entry/thirty_million_dollars_a_little_bit_of_carbon_and_a_lot_of_hot_air)

    The measures have been brought in a decade ago, they did absolutely nothing...



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,147 ✭✭✭TonyMaloney


    You expect us to believe that you, dalyboy, have a better grasp of science than the actual scientists when you haven't yet figured out how to use a comma?

    I think I'll stick with the scientists, thanks



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,323 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    Just so you guys know, the OP has run away from a thread in Conspiracy Theories wherein he has claimed that all spaceflight is faked.

    Just to give you an idea of the level of science he's at.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,326 ✭✭✭Markus Antonius


    You feel sorry for me? I'm not the one crying over a sad melting globe:




  • Registered Users Posts: 2,147 ✭✭✭TonyMaloney


    Yikes

    Yes. I feel sorry for you. I'll leave you alone.

    Best of luck out there in the real world



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,597 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    There are lots and lots of ways to lubricate machines

    But even if oil based lubricants were required, how many minutes would those 60 gallons of oil last in an oil fired power station? And even if a sustainable lubricant was a hundred times more expensive, it would be a pittance over the operating lifetime of a wind turbine generating terawatts of useful electricity

    And crude oil doesn’t have to be outlawed, we just need to stop using it for fuel, and we need regulations to make refining more sustainable

    also, the long term solution is to not use diesel trucks to service those turbines. The trucks can be EV or hydrogen powered

    this is why governments need to be involved in transforming the infrastructure and we can’t just call for individuals to change their consumption

    you can but an EV and shop locally, and be vegan, but if you vote against action on climate change, you’re doing way more harm than good



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,363 ✭✭✭dePeatrick


    I went over and read the thread, that is a complete lie and not the only one in that thread about what the OP did or did not say. Must be the time of night but the level of debate here has dropped through the floor in the last few hours. Goodnight.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,184 ✭✭✭riclad


    I cycle every day I notice it doesn't seem to rain as much as it did 2 years ago and we can go 10 days or more with no rain. Ireland seems to be getting warmer in the summer

    Also see mega fires in Australia California , some American towns are running out of water droughts are more frequent and longer fires are lasting longer whole towns are being destroyed by fires

    Google rising sea levels Miami many coastal areas are threatened by rising sea levels and flooding

    Some parts of America are becoming close to unliveable due to rising heat levels

    Most people find it hard to work in 100 degrees and you can't go outside for more than a few minutes if you are rich and live in a mansion you can afford to ignore the world at least until you go outside

    There's probably some drug company's who might welcome covid as it means billions in profits from selling a vaccine

    If there was no wars no one would buy tanks or military guns

    Every crisis can benefit someone we see more extreme weather effects in most country's droughts floods fires Iran is running short of water there's fires in many parts of Turkey we live in an open economy global warming will effect Ireland it will cause wars and some areas of the world becoming impossible to live in

    Every human needs a reliable supply of water to drink and to cook and clean no matter where they live

    Why would tourists come to Ireland if you can't even swim at the beach



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,597 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    Climate change has already increased sea levels by 20cm on average

    thats an awful lot and we’re only just getting started. The rate of increase is accelerating



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 83,429 ✭✭✭✭Atlantic Dawn
    M


    But a lot of it is pure rubbish planning, take that pearl in RTE's Climate Change Department the town of Salthill in Galway for example, this is how it was originally, it was always going to flood building seaward from this unless the oceans started to drain of water...




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 981 ✭✭✭revelman


    I don’t know why everyone is getting so worked up. If you read history, you will see that there has always been a subsection of the population who seek to go against grain on scientific issues even when all of the evidence points in the opposite direction. No amount of arguing or reasoning with them will change their views. They are convinced that they see the light and that everyone is either deluded or has been fooled into accepting a narrative formed by powerful interests.

    What I find regrettable is that they misunderstand true contrarianism. Through history contrarianism has been hugely important. But just because contrarians have sometimes been right, it does not follow that they always are. This is one of those situations. There is a human-made element to climate change. Full stop.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 7,792 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Too true OP.... In an infinite universe, how everything on one tiny little orb is supposed to remain constant, and that the actions of our planet's inhabitants have much of an effect on the climate, is beyond me... It's pretty arrogant to think so, and anyway, the over-utilisation and excess waste didn't just happen in our, or our parents' generations.. It's being going on for 2 centuries, since the industrial revolution began.. Are we supposed to revert to living in mud-huts... ?? 😏

    And that's not withstanding the fact that absent the interference of humans, would the weather, or climate cycles be any different than they are now?... It's very complicated, and 'The Science' , and the scientists can pretty much put whatever spin they want out there.. Who is the average earthling to put up a logical argument against the propaganda (whether it's true or not)...? Doesn't matter really to must of us, cos we'll all be brown bread in the next 60/70 years 😃.... Humans die.. Species die... it's always been this way.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,329 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    What do we actually do though? Plenty of hand wringing over the last day about this report but not seeing any suggestions at all about what needs to be done beyond vague finger wagging at the agricultural industry and "big oil"?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,636 ✭✭✭prunudo


    Is the climate changing, yes, but it always has. Do we need to be mindful of how we proceed, yes. Does it warrant the level of hysteria in the media at present, no.

    There is a similar posting style to those that are jumping on this latest bandwagon as those in covid threads in Mar/Apr 2020, god forbid you question something in the media or what an 'expert' is telling us, you're obviously thick if you don't hang off their every word.

    I also find it amazing that its only the 'climate denying' experts that are accused of being bought!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,228 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    "Indisputable proof"? You think the changes from grounding flights and less traffic on the roads comes about so quickly?

    You haven't a notion what you're talking about. Your own posts are indisputable proof of that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,741 ✭✭✭Dr. Bre


    Australia are saying they are doing all they can and are not happy with the report



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,597 ✭✭✭MrMusician18


    The IPCC are clearly suggesting that as a priority, methane emissions should be drastically reduced and it appears that there are some relatively easy wins here: stopping outgassing of oil wells and stopping pipeline leaks. Since methane only lasts 10 years in the atmosphere, it a win that can buy time for the harder stuff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,329 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    And who is going to enforce and monitor the industry on a global level to get them to do that and force them to take on the expense of finding and sealing leaks etc?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,930 ✭✭✭Spudmonkey


    The IPCC ultimately release a report with suggestions and mitigation proposals, its their suggestions that'll have to be taken on board. They ultimately will point the bigger at big oil and the agricultural sector seen as they know they are one of the primary causes of GHGs.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,329 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    The problem being they release a report, everyone makes the right noises for a few days or weeks but then we'll all just go back to our normal lives looking up cheap flights on Ryanair for next year and buying the latest iPhone etc. Industry will also make the right noises but ultimately being in it for a profit will offer little beyond tokenism. Governments have no intention of doing very much again beyond tokenism.

    Cue the cycle goes on and in another 5 years time another IPCC report will be published with even more dire warnings and we'll do the same merry dance again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,597 ✭✭✭MrMusician18


    Who enforces and monitors the nuclear test ban treaty?


    Well there's the network of satellites monitoring and evaluating the problem. As for who enforces it, it will likely be the great powers through economic sanctions.

    Maybe it will prove impossible politically, but it is possible. It's much more possible than cutting carbon emissions drastically in the short term.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,329 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    I admire your optimism. Sanctions against the oil/gas industry? No chance.

    Australian government already coming to say they don't intend doing anything more due to this report and they are one of the biggest producers of emissions in the developed world per capita (double what we produce per capita).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,941 ✭✭✭growleaves


    I do think there is a problem with industrial scale pollution from the biggest corporations in the world.

    However micro-controlling the actions, behaviours, habits, ability to get from A to B, of the average person is an obvious con - laughable, and the same thing is attempted from other angles ('health', 'tolerance'). The hard-faced, glassy-eyed bureaucrats lining up to oversee this 'process' strike me as repulsive.

    The same corporations responsible for most of the actual pollution will line up behind this people-control as well.

    Are there records of temperatures in the medieval era? There used to be tobacco plantations in Warwickshire so it must have been fairly warm



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,597 ✭✭✭MrMusician18


    I am more of an optimist than a fatalist when it comes to solving this problem.

    Yes, Australia has dismissed the report, but that's hardly a surprise. It's 30 year run of economic growth has been on the back of natural resource extraction. What will be more interesting is the other great powers response to the Australian position, it looks like carbon sanctions may be on the table as a weapon.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,189 ✭✭✭Cilldara_2000




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,597 ✭✭✭MrMusician18


    Given that consumers consume what is produced for them, the only way to solve this is to go after the producers.

    As an example, when I look at my bin as it goes out, the vast majority of stuff in it I never wanted in the first place - its just packaging, and it's mostly for the convenience of the seller.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,329 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    Carbon sanctions sounds like a bit more tokenism. You think China and the US are going to start imposing carbon sanctions? I think you are beyond optimistic.

    On a local level there is absolutely zero interest in Irish society in doing anything drastic. Only this week where I am from in Cork, the city council have installed 4 fake tree "air purifiers" in the city centre as some sort of greenwashing. They cost €380,000 - we could plant thousands of 3 year old actual real trees for that price. They are doing this but refuse to enforce the daily car restrictions on Patrick Street from 3-6.30pm due to not wanting to upset the car lobby. Simply enforcing that restriction would do far more for air quality than installing these stupid robot trees - but that would take effort and dedication.

    Similarly this week the council have published a Part 8 application to build a new dual carriageway down the city docks to facilitate motorised traffic expansion, which will necessitate the removal of numerous mature trees. Tokenism is the order of the day - nobody wants to take serious action.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,597 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    This is why it’s important for people to vote for representatives who are serious about climate change and sustainable development . Your vote matters, and your voice matters.

    Politicians should not be re-elected if they are weak on these issues and we shouldn’t let climate change denial go unchallenged on any form of media. We have only a small number of election cycles to stop this from getting existential. There is no time to waste pandering to people who are completely out of touch with reality



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,329 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    Indeed but we all know that the person most likely to get elected in Ireland is the fella who can sort out your granny's medical card or get the road outside your house resurfaced or helps you get the grant for the kids to go to University etc. The Green Party are likely to get wiped out again in the next election because a lot of people equate the Green's version of climate action to ordinary punters just paying more tax - nobody is going to vote for that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,597 ✭✭✭MrMusician18


    Carbon sanctions will effectively be trade tariffs by another (possibly more acceptable) name, and given the more protectionist nature of the world today I can't see why they wouldn't be both likely and successful.

    Also, I agree, those city trees are an expensive gimmick



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,597 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    It’s probably true, but we need every party to put climate change on the agenda, not just the Green Party, and we need to challenge people repeating the shite they see on Facebook and this rubbish about greens wanting to tax us all to oblivion.

    we need our government hounding the EU to release funding to pay for the transition in a way similar to how they released zero interest finance to pay for Covid rescue packages

    there are a lot of echo chambers repeating misinformation that never hear the real story from a real person, we need to speak out and correct these when we hear them or at least ask them ‘how do you know’ or ‘are you sure?’



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,329 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    It isn't entirely rubbish. The budget in October is going to have an increase in the Carbon Tax almost certainly. How many other genuine climate action initiatives will be in the budget? Very few and any that are mooted usually require the average punter to put their hand in their own pocket. I mean anything to do with sustainability costs money and people just won't pay for something like that.

    You want to get insulation done? Great but you have to cough up the money first and then go through a convoluted applications process to get a modest portion of it back.

    Put some solar panels on your roof - sorry that's going to cost you €5k plus even after any available grants and all the various form filling and chasing you have to do.

    Something simple like a water butt? That's €50 whereas I can just turn on the tap at home for no extra charge.


    There's very little appetite from people to change when it costs them money and the only plan is to tax or charge people. We have no public transport project of any significance under construction in Ireland since the Luas Cross city opened in 2017 - 4 years ago. If our own government aren't showing a whole lot of urgency why should the average punter?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,349 ✭✭✭Padre_Pio


    True, based on the accurate measurement equipment 150 years ago.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,307 ✭✭✭✭gmisk


    I don't know the details of what they are doing, but they had serious wildfires not long ago? Plus the size and scale (and environmental impact) of their mining operations are insane. Quick Google.

    Australia is the world's largest exporter of coal (35% of international trade), iron ore, lead, diamonds, rutile, zinc and zirconium, second largest of gold and uranium, and third largest of aluminium.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,806 ✭✭✭Sunny Disposition


    Climate change is real, unfortunately.

    Also unfortunately, virtue signallers in organisations like the Green Party make people sick and less likely to engage. It is really off-putting to a huge amount of people. Another poster made a point about the media putting forward the views of kids who don't know what they're talking about. That doesn't help either. It's like getting Johnny from the Na Piarsaigh under 15s on to preview the All Ireland final.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 746 ✭✭✭Heraclius


    So who should be put forward to talk about climate change if people who are passionate about stopping it shouldn't be?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,329 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    None of these people have any concrete ideas other than being ideologically opposed to nuclear power and screaming about how bad consumerism is. They are devoid of actual real life ideas that people will engage with.

    They are ideologues and are not useful participants in any real actions that need to be discussed to move this forward. Just like climate deniers are not useful participants.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,613 ✭✭✭wassie


    Your view on Australia's contribution to global emissions:

    They are one of the biggest producers of emissions in the developed world per capita (double what we produce per capita).

    My view on Australia's contribution to global emissions:

    2018 Rank in Global emissions: 16th

    SOURCE: https://www.ucsusa.org/resources/each-countrys-share-co2-emissions


    Note: these are from 2018. My point is its easy to use stats to justify a position.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,329 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    I clearly said per capita and you are showing continents. Yes Australia is a continent but it is also just a single country of 25 million people.

    I think you've somewhat missed the point being made. Australia produces the most emissions per capita of any western country in the world - more than the USA. They are also the largest coal exporter in the world - 33% of the global coal exports come from Oz. Coal being an enormous contributor to emissions but because that coal isn't burned in Australia it won't show on your chart for Australia.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,613 ✭✭✭wassie


    So what is more important:

    Output per capita or total emissions output.

    Im in the latter camp.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,399 ✭✭✭✭ThunbergsAreGo


    Have we been using the same instruments to record the temperature the entire time?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,329 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    If you are in the latter then I'm sure you'll agree there's no need for us in Ireland to do a whole pile. We contribute a tiny negligible amount on a global scale - even if we all disappeared in the morning and emitted not one more gram of CO2 or Methane it would have precisely zero global impact. So we're either all in this together or we just site back and finger wag at the US and China?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,613 ✭✭✭wassie


    Last I looked Ireland was part of the EU. Whats your view on the EU?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,391 ✭✭✭olestoepoke


    Population of England in the 11th century approx 1.7m

    Population of England today approx 56m

    Just saying....



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,391 ✭✭✭olestoepoke


    What ever happened to Acid Rain? I remember being a child in the 80s scared shitless after watching tv and the endless warnings of the ozone layer and acid rain.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,329 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    According to your chart the EU has a much smaller emissions contribution than the US, China, Russia, India etc. In any case what we do in Ireland is absolutely irrelevant on a global scale. I have not seen any concrete ideas of what we need to do here anyway from anyone. Just an awful lot of finger wagging and hand wringing. Our government's ideas appear to be little more than raising the Carbon tax annually.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement