Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

US and Nato withdrawal from Afghanistan...- threadbanned users in OP

  • 04-07-2021 11:03pm
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 1,129 ✭✭✭Sandor Clegane


    Incredible to think that after being in Afghanistan for 20 years that we are possibly on the verge of having the Taliban back in power, by all accounts the government is on the brink of collapse in a matter of months or even weeks...

    How is it possible that after a 20 year occupation by Nato/US that the Afghan government/military was so ill equipped?

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/jul/04/afghanistan-americas-longest-war-ends-amid-accusations-of-betrayal

    Threadbanned users
    jmreire
    Timberrrrrrrr
    Post edited by Beasty on


«13456745

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,700 ✭✭✭Montage of Feck


    Corruption and tribalism.

    🙈🙉🙊



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    The Taliban or those fighting under their banner have decades of experience and are hardened fighters. Afghanistan isn't getting better anytime soon unfortunately.


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,137 ✭✭✭Odhinn


    Incredible to think that after being in Afghanistan for 20 years that we are possibly on the verge of having the Taliban back in power, by all accounts the government is on the brink of collapse in a matter of months or even weeks...

    How is it possible that after a 20 year occupation by Nato/US that the Afghan government/military was so ill equipped?

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/jul/04/afghanistan-americas-longest-war-ends-amid-accusations-of-betrayal




    Due to the invasion of Iraq they took the Americans took their eye off the ball in Afghanistan, allowing the taleban to regroup and reestablish themselves.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,550 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    Incredible to think that after being in Afghanistan for 20 years that we are possibly on the verge of having the Taliban back in power, by all accounts the government is on the brink of collapse in a matter of months or even weeks...

    How is it possible that after a 20 year occupation by Nato/US that the Afghan government/military was so ill equipped?

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/jul/04/afghanistan-americas-longest-war-ends-amid-accusations-of-betrayal

    The inherent inability of the Afghans to organise themselves into any semblance of a functional state.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,220 ✭✭✭✭biko


    Hopefully Biden will finish what Trump started.
    US can't keep policing the rest of the world.
    It should never have been invaded in the first place.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,129 ✭✭✭Sandor Clegane


    The Taliban or those fighting under their banner have decades of experience and are hardened fighters. Afghanistan isn't getting better anytime soon unfortunately.
    Odhinn wrote: »
    Due to the invasion of Iraq they took the Americans took their eye off the ball in Afghanistan, allowing the taleban to regroup and reestablish themselves.

    Still, it's incredible to think that after being there for so long the the Afghan government military are so lacking, 20 years is a long time, you'd think they could of trained the Afghans better, surely they had a plan for when/after they withdrew?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,741 ✭✭✭Dr. Bre


    That’s why the Russians left - you can’t win in Afghan


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 11,647 Mod ✭✭✭✭igCorcaigh


    Must the Taliban have some significant level of domestic support in order for them to still exist?

    Where do they get their weapons from?


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Still, it's incredible to think that after being there for so long the the Afghan government military are so lacking, 20 years is a long time, you'd think they could of trained the Afghans better, surely they had a plan for when/after they withdrew?

    Ya, it's strange and the real answer is probably very complex. Maybe the Taliban have a real belief in what they are fighting for and the Afghan government/military are there to earn a wage and aren't as committed.

    The plan for after the withdrawal is already falling apart and the Taliban are currently making more gains.


  • Posts: 1,263 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Are they not leaving a few hundred behind to guard diplomatic offices and to provide security for the international opium trade at the airport? :D


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,220 ✭✭✭✭biko


    igCorcaigh wrote: »
    Where do they get their weapons from?
    US and Russia.
    And possibly Pakistan (Khyber Pass).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,357 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Within one year (or more likely, a lot sooner) Afghanistan will be as if the last 20 years never happened.

    Seems more than a little wasteful of 200,000 lives (combatants and civilians on both sides) and >$1 trillion dollars (foreign coalition military commitment costs only).

    The only thing to be done with Afghanistan, is to cut it off, and put as best a lid on it as possible with remote signal intelligence and weapons strikes when deemed necessary.

    Hopefully some day, the Afghan people will as a large majority choose a path that doesn't involve self-destruction and medieval thinking.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,004 ✭✭✭FileNotFound


    Tribalism and a lack of progress.

    You have to show people something if you want their support.

    Hopefully they don't just capitulate.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    biko wrote: »
    .
    It should never have been invaded in the first place.

    They absolutely should have , Iraq was the biggest mistake the issue with Afghanistan was too many chiefs and not enough Indians and an actual end goal , they built schools hospitals and infrastructure and essentially walked away ,
    After what happened with the Russians the country completely went back several centuries to as pointed out to nothing tribalism and corruption ,most of the big names in government have ties to Taliban forces controling the opium trade ,
    The US forces hands tied and blindfolded and expected to win against an ideological belief and heroine


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,247 ✭✭✭✭Guy:Incognito


    Odhinn wrote: »
    Due to the invasion of Iraq they took the Americans took their eye off the ball in Afghanistan, allowing the taleban to regroup and reestablish themselves.

    Or maybe they're just not very good at invading and occupying places and should concentrate on getting their own house in order instead?


  • Registered Users Posts: 710 ✭✭✭TefalBrain


    Taliban commander to US journalist about a year after the invasion in 2002. "You have the clock and we have forever"


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,129 ✭✭✭Sandor Clegane


    TefalBrain wrote: »
    Taliban commander to US journalist about a year after the invasion in 2002. "You have the clock and we have forever"

    Thing about these kinds of people is you'll always have some replacement ready when one gets killed, it's a never ending cycle, the only hope they had was training the Afghan government/military to defend themselves which obviously didn't work.

    If they couldn't get there **** together in 20 years then it's a hopeless cause.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,078 ✭✭✭joseywhales


    Remind me, what was the last country to be invaded, successfully converted to the invader's culture and then thrived independently?

    India maybe? Australia for sure but that was utter domination.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,078 ✭✭✭joseywhales


    Thing about these kinds of people is you'll always have some replacement ready when one gets killed, it's a never ending cycle, the only hope they had was training the Afghan government/military to defend themselves which obviously didn't work.

    If they couldn't get there **** together in 20 years then it's a hopeless cause.

    I mean why train people who will inevitably become your enemy?


  • Posts: 1,263 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    The graveyard of empires.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,473 ✭✭✭Mimon


    Remind me, what was the last country to be invaded, successfully converted to the invader's culture and then thrived independently?

    India maybe? Australia for sure but that was utter domination.

    Ourselves?


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,004 ✭✭✭FileNotFound


    The graveyard of empires.

    Should be the new name to be fair.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Their rapidly expanding population isn't going to help the situation either


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,078 ✭✭✭joseywhales


    Mimon wrote: »
    Ourselves?

    Sure it only took a millennium and the still have to deal with the RA


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Still, it's incredible to think that after being there for so long the the Afghan government military are so lacking, 20 years is a long time, you'd think they could of trained the Afghans better, surely they had a plan for when/after they withdrew?

    Their casualty rates were very high
    https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/21/world/asia/afghanistan-security-casualties-taliban.html

    Good read, may explain alot


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,275 ✭✭✭fash


    igCorcaigh wrote: »
    Must the Taliban have some significant level of domestic support in order for them to still exist?

    Where do they get their weapons from?
    Some domestic support, some support from Pakistan/ISI.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,418 ✭✭✭BluePlanet


    I read an interesting book by this guy Ahmed Rashid, on the rise of the Taliban (before Sept 11).
    In a recent interview he said the US had no actual plan in Afghanistan.
    Says the Taliban are a little more cultured today and using digital media to their advantage (whereas before they had tried to ban media).
    Sounds like they've evolved a little.
    But he makes the point that we still don't know what they actually want; just what they don't want.

    https://en.qantara.de/content/interview-with-afghanistan-expert-ahmed-rashid-the-americans-were-completely-devoid-of-any


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,729 ✭✭✭✭TheValeyard


    Remind me, what was the last country to be invaded, successfully converted to the invader's culture and then thrived independently?

    India maybe? Australia for sure but that was utter domination.

    While not converted to the invaders culture. South Korea would be a success in holding back an aggressive and oppressive northern State. But definitely a huge US impact on Korean culture and tastes.

    I'd also argue that West Germany to some extent had similar conditions post WW2.

    But unless USA was willing to commit to a total war situation for Afghanistan, I do not see how they were going to win. And you're probably right, some US values do not travel well to that part of the world, for better or worse.

    All eyes on Kursk. Slava Ukraini.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,729 ✭✭✭✭TheValeyard


    The graveyard of empires.

    Good title.

    Although pretty sure Alexander the Great and Genghis Khan were very successful there.

    Unless I'm mistaken I think it's the British interventions in Afghanistan while trying to control their Indian Frontier is what gave rise to the stories that you cannot conquer that region. Took three wars to realise that.

    All eyes on Kursk. Slava Ukraini.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Current reports are saying the Afghan army are fleeing to other countries in the north rather than actually putting up a fight ,it seems many army outposts are poorly equipped and supplied ,most places the Taliban have taken without firing a single shot
    With the latest push the Taliban now control 130 + districts out of 412


  • Registered Users Posts: 443 ✭✭TP_CM


    Dr. Bre wrote: »
    That’s why the Russians left - you can’t win in Afghan

    +1 Even Alexander the Great failed there. It's practically impossible.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    They're going to have a population equal to or surpassing Germany in about two/three decades. The whole area is a tinderbox but it's up to the locals and the regional players to sort things out now. It's in all their interests.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,777 ✭✭✭Beta Ray Bill


    How is it possible that after a 20 year occupation by Nato/US that the Afghan government/military was so ill equipped?

    there are a huge number of contributing factors which make winning a war in Afghanistan is so difficult.

    There is no "Real" Government in the true sense of the word, it's all local administration.
    There is no money, its one of the poorest countries in the world.
    There is little of no Infrastructure (No Canals, No Railroads up until very recently, Not many large airports, No Sea Ports, Poor Road Network).
    The Terrain make it extremely difficult to for a large army to leverage their heavy weapons, and on top of that the locals know exactly how to fight in this type of Terrain.
    In terms of Geography they are surrounded by other countries that will help them "off the record" if required.
    The Climate also make is difficult to fight there, hot in the day, freezing at night.

    The only way to win, is to win the hearts and minds of the people there. And that just isn't going to happen.
    The US would have been better off with a softy softy approach to try an get them or at least some of the onside after 911 but the American public were calling for an aggressive response.

    I think if it were to ever happen again and the US had to invade/do something, they'd just do something awful to them (Off the books like)


  • Administrators Posts: 54,091 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    there are a huge number of contributing factors which make winning a war in Afghanistan is so difficult.

    There is no "Real" Government in the true sense of the word, it's all local administration.
    There is no money, its one of the poorest countries in the world.
    There is little of no Infrastructure (No Canals, No Railroads up until very recently, Not many large airports, No Sea Ports, Poor Road Network).
    The Terrain make it extremely difficult to for a large army to leverage their heavy weapons, and on top of that the locals know exactly how to fight in this type of Terrain.
    In terms of Geography they are surrounded by other countries that will help them "off the record" if required.
    The Climate also make is difficult to fight there, hot in the day, freezing at night.

    The only way to win, is to win the hearts and minds of the people there. And that just isn't going to happen.
    The US would have been better off with a softy softy approach to try an get them or at least some of the onside after 911 but the American public were calling for an aggressive response.

    I think if it were to ever happen again and the US had to invade/do something, they'd just do something awful to them (Off the books like)
    I think, unlike Iraq, there was compelling reasons to invade Afghanistan. They went in to hunt for Bin Laden and Al-Qaeda, and they should have killed Bin Laden in 2001, they had him holed up in Tora Bora but managed to let him escape into Pakistan.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,004 ✭✭✭FileNotFound


    awec wrote: »
    I think, unlike Iraq, there was compelling reasons to invade Afghanistan. They went in to hunt for Bin Laden and Al-Qaeda, and they should have killed Bin Laden in 2001, they had him holed up in Tora Bora but managed to let him escape into Pakistan.


    Actually given the fall of Bin Laden and the seeming demise of Al Queda (at least as the major player, no doubt remnants exist).

    What are the Taliban these days - are they essentially just the standard Afghans fighting foreign invaders (in the eyes of the people over there)?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,791 ✭✭✭Hande hoche!


    Gatling wrote: »
    Current reports are saying the Afghan army are fleeing to other countries in the north rather than actually putting up a fight ,it seems many army outposts are poorly equipped and supplied ,most places the Taliban have taken without firing a single shot
    With the latest push the Taliban now control 130 + districts out of 412

    The Taliban are also capturing a tremendous amount of equipment from the Afghan government. A blog crunched numbers, with the group capturing over 700 jeeps and trucks recently.

    https://www.oryxspioenkop.com/2021/06/disaster-at-hand-documenting-afghan.html


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Will China step in? Maybe not militarily but economically?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    The Taliban are also capturing a tremendous amount of equipment from the Afghan government. A blog crunched numbers, with the group capturing over 700 jeeps and trucks recently.

    https://www.oryxspioenkop.com/2021/06/disaster-at-hand-documenting-afghan.html

    That's mad ,the had the biggest military re-equipping drive seen since WW2 to build and train a standing army' and aircraft and Intelligence gathering and it's already collapsing before coming under any real pressure ,

    The biggest issue now will the Taliban be replaced with Isis ,can you imagine that situation choose one extremist group over another extremist group


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Gatling wrote: »

    The biggest issue now will the Taliban be replaced with Isis ,can you imagine that situation choose one extremist group over another extremist group

    I think everyone has accepted that the Taliban are going to be running the country in some form or another but maybe everyone is hoping they have softened their positions somewhat. Seems mad to be saying that. Who knows what's going to happen over the next few years.


  • Registered Users Posts: 273 ✭✭Labaik


    Defeats of the Soviet Union and The U.S with outdated weapons will only strengthen the resolve of the Afghans and the Taliban. A shambolic decision by the US to invade and it cost the lives blood of many of there servicemen for absolutely nothing.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,004 ✭✭✭FileNotFound


    Labaik wrote: »
    Defeats of the Soviet Union and The U.S with outdated weapons will only strengthen the resolve of the Afghans and the Taliban. A shambolic decision by the US to invade and it cost the lives blood of many of there servicemen for absolutely nothing.

    In fairness to Afghanistan the US invaded to hunt the orchestrators of the twin towers.

    They succeeded in killing the man they hunted so have no interest in the nation now.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,777 ✭✭✭Beta Ray Bill


    Will China step in? Maybe not militarily but economically?

    China already has an ally in the region, Pakistan
    Afghanistan has literally nothing to offer them.
    No Technology
    No Army
    No Natural Resources
    No Arable land
    No Major Strategic Advantage
    No Skilled Workforce

    It's hassle, and to be avoided.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,010 ✭✭✭kildare lad


    igCorcaigh wrote: »
    Must the Taliban have some significant level of domestic support in order for them to still exist?

    Where do they get their weapons from?

    Pakistan I'd say , it's kind of ironic that the yanks gave the mujahedeen stingers which played a big part in the defeat of the Russians , look how that came back to bite them .


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,010 ✭✭✭kildare lad


    In fairness to Afghanistan the US invaded to hunt the orchestrators of the twin towers.

    They succeeded in killing the man they hunted so have no interest in the nation now.

    They killed him 10 years ago


  • Posts: 13,688 ✭✭✭✭ Arjun Repulsive Shin


    Will China step in? Maybe not militarily but economically?

    They've already started negotiating their Belt and Road Initiative.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,010 ✭✭✭kildare lad


    The Taliban are also capturing a tremendous amount of equipment from the Afghan government. A blog crunched numbers, with the group capturing over 700 jeeps and trucks recently.

    https://www.oryxspioenkop.com/2021/06/disaster-at-hand-documenting-afghan.html

    I've seen twitter posts where scores of ANA soldiers are surrendering to the Taliban . I also seen another where the Taliban are in a warehouse full of American weapons . Sure a lot of arms Isis ended up with were American also .


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,010 ✭✭✭kildare lad


    Will China step in? Maybe not militarily but economically?

    If they have natural resources I'm sure they might , the Chinese and Russians are buying up a lot of Africa at the minute , America's really taken their eye of the ball on the global stage. I'm not a fan of American foriegn policy but I wonder how far China are willing to push it in their quest for global power , they're already devastating on the enviorment , never mind they've already pushing a lot of animals to extinction.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,791 ✭✭✭Hande hoche!


    I've seen twitter posts where scores of ANA soldiers are surrendering to the Taliban . I also seen another where the Taliban are in a warehouse full of American weapons . Sure a lot of arms Isis ended up with were American also .

    It does raise an interesting question. In time for the twentieth anniversary of 9/11, will the Taliban be in control of the majority of the country or even at the outskirts of Kabul?


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 12,812 Mod ✭✭✭✭riffmongous


    Pakistan I'd say , it's kind of ironic that the yanks gave the mujahedeen stingers which played a big part in the defeat of the Russians , look how that came back to bite them .

    Exactly, the role of Pakistan in all of this can't be ignored. Unless they are dealt with the Taliban will never be stopped. It's also worth bearing in mind that during the time when the Taliban were in charge they never actually controlled the entire country, the northern regions with their different ethnic mix and distance from Pakistan were controlled by different 'warlords' and managed to resistance the Taliban without much foreign support, at least up until shortly before 9/11


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,010 ✭✭✭kildare lad


    It does raise an interesting question. In time for the twentieth anniversary of 9/11, will the Taliban be in control of the majority of the country or even at the outskirts of Kabul?

    It looks like they're working their way there . I'm sure there'll be a lot more fighting as they get nearer . I'm sure there's plenty of people that don't wanna end up in the talibans hand . We'll probably see a mass migrantion again into Europe . Will the Americans help out the afghan government with drone and airstrikes if they do come near kabul ?? Whatever happens it look likes it'll be back to square one after tens of thousands of deaths and trillions down the drain. I think a few in the white house wanted bin laden to escape so the neocons could push the axis of evil crap in the middle east but iraq didn't turn out as easy as they thought. How George bush , Blair and Co have gotten away with the crap they've caused is beyond me


  • Advertisement
Advertisement