Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Off Topic Chat. (MOD NOTE post# 3949 and post#5279)
Options
Comments
-
-
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
-
hiddenmongoose wrote: »100%, set of boxers and jeans cant hold in a good fart that can clear a room .........Farts are mainly gas, if not then 1mm of cloth will save you from embarrassment .If you have a real problem with this then brown jeans are recommended.
................ and there it is. We're actually talking sh*t.
Be careful, don't want a Fauci situation here:
Forum Charter - Useful Information - Photo thread: Hardware - Ranges by County - Hunting Laws/Important threads - Upcoming Events - RFDs by County
If you see a problem post use the report post function. Click on the three dots on the post, select "FLAG" & let a Moderator deal with it.
Moderators - Cass otmmyboy2 , CatMod - Shamboc , Admins - Beasty , mickeroo
0 -
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
-
-
-
Read that again, slowly.
They have the powers granted to them. I'm not arguing that you're wrong, nor am I saying there is rampant abuse, but you even said it, they are working within the powers granted to them.
Yes and its called "exceeding your authority" of powers vested to you by this "public safety" legislation. A Garda has no,none,zero,keine,non,nyet authority under the legislation to demand medical information off you,or anyone else for that matter either. Pity some of them missed the briefing on those points it seems."If you want to keep someone away from your house, Just fire the shotgun through the door."
Vice President [and former lawyer] Joe Biden Field& Stream Magazine interview Feb 2013 "
0 -
-
-
-
-
-
No you didn't...You posted a one sentence statement on a point from an articleI did explain it to you.
while dismissing the rest of it seems,as "Good to have more poorly researched takes on the new Bill."The Gardai already have the power to take fingerprints by force...this Bill isn't providing it as your link suggested.
Nobody is debating that point.What people are more concerned about is the possible misuse of power by AGS in this bill.That was what I was asking if you wanted to elaborate on?
Vicky Conway lol she has never had a good word to say about the Gardai on anything, she regularly retweets people praising George Nkencho...enough said.
A stopped clock is also right twice a day too.:p"If you want to keep someone away from your house, Just fire the shotgun through the door."
Vice President [and former lawyer] Joe Biden Field& Stream Magazine interview Feb 2013 "
0 -
Advertisement
-
Grizzly 45 wrote: »
No you didn't...You posted a one sentence statement on a point from an article
while dismissing the rest of it seems,as "Good to have more poorly researched takes on the new Bill."
Nobody is debating that point.What people are more concerned about is the possible misuse of power by AGS in this bill.That was what I was asking if you wanted to elaborate on?
A stopped clock is also right twice a day too.:pGood to have more poorly researched takes on the new Bill.As the same legislation intends to give Gardaí the power to forcefully take a finger-print
'How dare the Gardai get this power that they already have'
My point was obvious.
As per the quote from the article, it implied the Gardai were being granted the power to take fingerprints by force with the new bill. They already have this power as I stated; 'How dare the Gardai get this power that they already have'0 -
-
-
-
-
-
Grizzly 45 wrote: »It does...But if you can't see it that's your problem.... try using a thing called your imagination..It's where hypothetical situations are discussed.And where some who think they are and always will be guiltless seem to live too.
Hypothetical. Imagination. We were talking about a real bill in the real world. It's not exactly health to retreat to a fantasy world when somebody points incorrect statementments.
I read the post here last month. He wasn't jailed for just possessing books.Might be a good idea to go read it then and then comment?
Be the second time you have fallen into the same trap in the last month by being thoroughly uninformed and commenting:D
I hadn't read the judicial summary, I doubt most here did. That's allowed.
Also, reference to last month is rich. is rich. By being "thoroughly uninformed" you mean calling you out the lies you made up? And pointing out that the "evidence" you use to prove it did back up you claims.
Did you miss the part where the Mod (Cass) removed your post for being disinformation and untrue?
They are different. They are not completely different. They are also not in the slight bit mutually exclusive.You do realise Fascism and Nazism are two completely different ideals. So please define which one you think is a problem and don't be lazy by throwing the two of them together?
Asking which of them is the problem sounds like you are implying it's only one of them.
Just like the way people throw out communist to describe anything left wing. The word lose meaning, and I'd question if they even understood it.And the way you can be called a "fascist" these days on Social media or wherever for having a different viewpoint, makes the term as non-insulting and irrelevant.
But we're not talking about random snowflakes on twitter. we're talking about a person with a obsession with nazi, white supremacy, wight-wing terrorism etc.
Not sure if you are saying he isn't a fascist or if that fascist is not a pejorative Term?
No law agaisnt being an idiot.ASFIK there is no law on being an idiot in the World? Or an idiot who espouses a dead and debunkedpolitical ideal,who reads outdated technical manuals on hand to hand fighting and a manual full of dangerously inaccurate chemical formulas on making explosives and narcotics?But obviously not idiotic enough to try them out and reduce the global population of idiots by one.
Sometimes idiotic opinions and interest lead them to do idiotic and criminal action.
I've zero sympathy for the guy. I think the his actions are not that of simple historic interest.
Some U-Turn. Last week you were questioning the innocence of victims are at NZ mosque due to what may have been preached inside.They can do and read and preach whatever they want,so long as they don't put their warped beliefs which are just as totalitarian as Communism or Nazism into practise and start bombing, shooting to knifing in the name of their imaginary sky pal ,Allah.
You seem to be a proponent of freedom of speech but only when it suits you or aligns with your ideals.
But what we do not do is arrest and imprison them because they "might" commit a crime or do something with their knowledge to harm others.
It's supposition of a crime and more than the rest a sure sign of a totalitarian society. Yes,you can yell fire in a crowded cinema,but you then must accept the total personal consequences for your action.Go preach jihad in your mosque,but don't be surprised if you are doing a long stretch inside,or some other nutter arrives and uses your followers as target practice.
If some guy who preaches jihad, buys bomb making manuals, idolises islamic terror attacks, wacks off over the videos - I'm ok with him doing time. I'm completely ok with that.
Using his actions to justify murder of different people who didn't do those thing. What moral and sane person thinks that's ok?0 -
-
-
Advertisement
-
Advertisement