Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Munster vs Connacht, Fri 14th May 6pm; Eir Sport

179111213

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,790 ✭✭✭✭Burkie1203


    leakyboots wrote: »
    Absolute nonsense. Dived for the ball.

    "Sliding tackle", give over

    Dived for the ball knee first you mean


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,790 ✭✭✭✭Burkie1203


    Jesus I think that's harsh. Can't see how it's clear that it was DeAllende that knocked it on and it wasn't kicked by one of the players clearing out.

    Beirne knocked it on. He went to pick it up with one hand and dropped it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,063 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    Burkie1203 wrote: »
    Wooton was perfectly within his rights to delay touching the ball down

    And JOD was perfectly within his rights to go for that ball until it was touched down.

    Ban billionaires



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,790 ✭✭✭✭Burkie1203


    Akrasia wrote: »
    And JOD was perfectly within his rights to go for that ball until it was touched down.

    Never said he wasn't within his rights to go for it. Just the whole Wooton was acting the maggot line is utter BS.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,085 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    Akrasia wrote: »
    And JOD was perfectly within his rights to go for that ball until it was touched down.

    But not by sliding in with his knees first. There's no spin that makes that a legal challenge.

    Like, he never had any hope of getting to the ball first, but he was so wound up that he went on a 50 metre sprint just to put himself about.

    It was dangerous play, he was very lucky not to have been pulled up for it and if Wootton had been more cynical and stayed down, the TMO would have looked at it.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,063 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    On the 29th minute there should have been a penalty try and a yellow card. Tom Daley tripped Craig Casey while off his feet. That is not a legitimate rugby tackle and Casey was going to score if he wasn’t stopped

    Law 14.
    “ Other players must: Not play the ball or attempt to tackle an opponent while on the ground near the tackle.”

    Tom Daley had just tackled a Munster player and before getting back to his feet he deliberately moved to get in the way of Craig Casey and ended up tripping him

    Ban billionaires



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,920 ✭✭✭✭stephen_n


    Akrasia wrote: »

    Law 14.
    “ Other players must: Not play the ball or attempt to tackle an opponent while on the ground near the tackle.”

    Tom Daley had just tackled a Munster player and before getting back to his feet he deliberately moved to get in the way of Craig Casey and ended up tripping him

    You are contradicting yourself in your own post. If he was getting back to his feet, then he’s not on the ground.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,063 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    stephen_n wrote: »
    You are contradicting yourself in your own post. If he was getting back to his feet, then he’s not on the ground.

    It was before getting back to his feet, how is that a contradiction?
    In rugby you’re off your feet if any body part other than your feet are on the ground. Daley moved to trip Casey in a deliberate movement while off his feet. If the TMO reviewed that it would have been a YC and a penalty try

    Ban billionaires



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 373 ✭✭VayNiice


    Akrasia wrote: »
    On the 29th minute there should have been a penalty try and a yellow card. Tom Daley tripped Craig Casey while off his feet. That is not a legitimate rugby tackle and Casey was going to score if he wasn’t stopped

    Law 14.
    “ Other players must: Not play the ball or attempt to tackle an opponent while on the ground near the tackle.”

    Tom Daley had just tackled a Munster player and before getting back to his feet he deliberately moved to get in the way of Craig Casey and ended up tripping him


    Not a chance. There were two connacht players ahead of Casey even if he had of got through. In no world is that a penalty try. Also Daly didn't go for him at all, he was standing up and Casey ran over him.

    Added to that, the offload before went about a metre forward and wasn't called.

    You're grasping at straws here.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,592 ✭✭✭OldRio


    Akrasia wrote: »
    Wooten was anting the maggot too, he deliberately relayed touching the ball down until the last second

    When JOD went for that ball lit was in play

    Are you being serious?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,085 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    Akrasia wrote: »
    On the 29th minute there should have been a penalty try and a yellow card. Tom Daley tripped Craig Casey while off his feet. That is not a legitimate rugby tackle and Casey was going to score if he wasn’t stopped

    Law 14.
    “ Other players must: Not play the ball or attempt to tackle an opponent while on the ground near the tackle.”

    Tom Daley had just tackled a Munster player and before getting back to his feet he deliberately moved to get in the way of Craig Casey and ended up tripping him

    I'm not sure he's still "near the tackle" when he follows up on Casey. There's a good two or three metres of a gap from the first tackle area.

    If he's moved away from the tackle then it's play on.

    553215.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,854 ✭✭✭theVersatile


    I'm not sure he's still "near the tackle" when he follows up on Casey. There's a good two or three metres of a gap from the first tackle area.

    If he's moved away from the tackle then it's play on.

    553215.jpg

    That's a very literal interpretation of the laws. It's also interesting now that you point it out considering Law 13.3 provides that

    A player on the ground without the ball is out of the game and must:
    a. Allow opponents who are not on the ground to play or gain possession of
    the ball.
    b. Not play the ball.
    c. Not tackle or attempt to tackle an opponent.

    No mention of being near the tackle area. Interesting quirk.

    That being said, I'm not quite sure Casey didn't just run into Daly and collide with him. If you look at it in real time it'd be very hard to conclude that Daly purposefully went to tackle Casey having just spun out of the previous tackle and been flung backwards.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 486 ✭✭Shaka Hislop


    There has to be a coming together of clubs and referee's to sit down and watch games together...to have clear and open dialogue between both sides and for input from players taken on-board..and for the reasons behind decisions to be acknowledged by players.
    It'll benefit both sides immensely imo


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,592 ✭✭✭OldRio


    There has to be a coming together of clubs and referee's to sit down and watch games together...to have clear and open dialogue between both sides and for input from players taken on-board..and for the reasons behind decisions to be acknowledged by players.
    It'll benefit both sides immensely imo

    I take it Munster lost?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 486 ✭✭Shaka Hislop


    OldRio wrote: »
    I take it Munster lost?

    Yes, does that lessen the point in some way?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,592 ✭✭✭OldRio


    Yes, does that lessen the point in some way?

    It makes my point


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,854 ✭✭✭theVersatile


    OldRio wrote: »
    It makes my point

    And what exactly is your point, Mr Cryptic?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 486 ✭✭Shaka Hislop


    OldRio wrote: »
    It makes my point

    You didn't make a point, you just went for a glib shot....no bother about that but ....we have seen an overall deterioration of refereeing standards in the Pro 14...there has to be something done about it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,790 ✭✭✭✭Burkie1203


    Yes, does that lessen the point in some way?

    Yes because the narrative is always to micro analyse ref decisions that didn't go Munster's way.

    Even a senior Munster player is now pushing that narrative in the media.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 486 ✭✭Shaka Hislop


    Burkie1203 wrote: »
    Yes because the narrative is always to micro analyse ref decisions that didn't go Munster's way.

    Even a senior Munster player is now pushing that narrative in the media.

    It's not about micro analysis...it's about trying to raise standards.....and if an international player is thinking there is an issue, then you should probably listen, for a change :D


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 13,627 Mod ✭✭✭✭Cookiemunster


    The poor standard of refereeing in the Pro14 is well known about and discussed regularly across many threads. Yet when a Munster fan mentions it they're accused of only bringing up to as an excuse for the loss. Pathetic really from the usuals.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,096 ✭✭✭Shelflife


    It's not about micro analysis...it's about trying to raise standards.....and if an international player is thinking there is an issue, then you should probably listen, for a change :D

    You're making the very dangerous assumption that the International player knows the laws better than a professional referee.

    Just because he doesn't like the decisions doesn't make them wrong !


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 373 ✭✭VayNiice


    Casey is being made out to be the new saviour but I felt he was poor at times. Got bounced like a rag doll a couple of times, particularly with his attempted tackle on Arnold who is no man-mountain.

    Also seemed slower getting the ball away, similar to Murray.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,063 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    That's a very literal interpretation of the laws. It's also interesting now that you point it out considering Law 13.3 provides that

    A player on the ground without the ball is out of the game and must:
    a. Allow opponents who are not on the ground to play or gain possession of
    the ball.
    b. Not play the ball.
    c. Not tackle or attempt to tackle an opponent.

    No mention of being near the tackle area. Interesting quirk.

    That being said, I'm not quite sure Casey didn't just run into Daly and collide with him. If you look at it in real time it'd be very hard to conclude that Daly purposefully went to tackle Casey having just spun out of the previous tackle and been flung backwards.
    If you watch it back Daly had his eyes on Casey while making the tackle and moved deliberately towards Casey after the tackle and tripped him while off his feet.

    Ban billionaires



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,790 ✭✭✭✭Burkie1203


    It's not about micro analysis...it's about trying to raise standards.....and if an international player is thinking there is an issue, then you should probably listen, for a change :D

    but the narrative from Stander is the ref is biased.


    Neither did 23 penalties shared almost evenly but CJ Stander fumed at the performance of the referee Dan Jones afterwards when he told eir Sport that it had felt like “playing against more than 15 men”, adding “I can say it now I’m done but it’s difficult for both sides.”



    Plenty of calls went Munsters way too.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,790 ✭✭✭✭Burkie1203


    Akrasia wrote: »
    If you watch it back Daly had his eyes on Casey while making the tackle and moved deliberately towards Casey after the tackle and tripped him while off his feet.

    thats the sort of dark arts we are told POM is great at.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,854 ✭✭✭theVersatile


    Burkie1203 wrote: »
    but the narrative from Stander is the ref is biased.

    This was the point raised by Shaka Hislop.
    There has to be a coming together of clubs and referee's to sit down and watch games together...to have clear and open dialogue between both sides and for input from players taken on-board..and for the reasons behind decisions to be acknowledged by players.
    It'll benefit both sides immensely imo

    Where does "bias against Munster" come into it? All you're doing is trying to drag down the conversation and rope a few lads into an argument. Maybe address the point made instead of peddling nonsense?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 373 ✭✭VayNiice


    Akrasia wrote: »
    If you watch it back Daly had his eyes on Casey while making the tackle and moved deliberately towards Casey after the tackle and tripped him while off his feet.

    Get over it mate, there was a forward pass before that incident anyway and two connacht players ahead of him.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,790 ✭✭✭✭Burkie1203


    This was the point raised by Shaka Hislop.


    Where does "bias against Munster" come into it? All you're doing is trying to drag down the conversation and rope a few lads into an argument. Maybe address the point made instead of peddling nonsense?

    the international player in question - his issue is he believes the ref is biased against his team with his "we are playing against more then 15" comment, they arent.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,854 ✭✭✭theVersatile


    Burkie1203 wrote: »
    the international player in question - his issue is he believes the ref is biased against his team with his "we are playing against more then 15" comment, they arent.

    And in what way is that related to Shaka's proposal for an open dialogue between refs and squads for greater understanding of rules? Exactly, none. Stop changing the goalposts. We know you don't like Munster.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement
Advertisement