Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Shops/Businesses opening/closing

Options
13940424445100

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 10,208 ✭✭✭✭JohnCleary


    Re. Zambrero Newcastle.... looks legit

    zTxcSih.png


  • Registered Users Posts: 18,134 ✭✭✭✭JCX BXC


    JohnCleary wrote: »
    Re. Zambrero Newcastle.... looks legit

    There seems to be a spate of fake online reviews lately. Rdent at GSC for example have put up a post this evening showing how many false 1 star reviews have been posted lately.

    It's difficult to know if Zambrero or management of are the ones doing the bidding here (would make sense considering their abysmal opening), or if it is some unrelated troll like the ones posting 1 star reviews for dentists.

    It's a very strange one, and it shows how much of the newer technology we use can lack regulation and cause issues.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,544 ✭✭✭Ardillaun


    I wish Myles na gCopaleen was around to mock the outbreak of fake online reviews. It’s a pandemic at this stage. Sometimes you can spot similar expressions and grammatical errors/idiosyncrasies in them.


  • Registered Users Posts: 81,223 ✭✭✭✭biko


    Please leave the speculations in the virtual pub. Back to Openings and Closings.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,322 ✭✭✭m17


    New nct Centre in tuam
    O2X3Zsq.jpg


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    They do at least pay rates. So I'd be sympathetic to their case.

    It turns out the City Council aren't just being difficult with non rate payers...

    The lads that were shut down by the Council at Blackrock were facilitated here by Ground & Co.

    https://twitter.com/MrWaffleGalway/status/1377659225481023488?s=19

    We're meant to be supporting businesses to provide outdoor facilities, ridiculous.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,584 ✭✭✭Laviski


    considering barista bus, lad down by blackrock - it wasn't going to end well.

    To think otherwise is completly stupid. Council get complaints, they act on it, simple as.


  • Registered Users Posts: 12,014 ✭✭✭✭ben.schlomo


    Laviski wrote: »
    considering barista bus, lad down by blackrock - it wasn't going to end well.

    To think otherwise is completly stupid. Council get complaints, they act on it, simple as.

    Did you read what the owners of Ground have said?


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,584 ✭✭✭Laviski


    Did you read what the owners of Ground have said?

    what do i need to read other than a lot of whinging and gov bashing, very much the norm these days.

    Them like the rest, could have asked for permission first but went ahead hope for it to be ignored. Guess its better to do things as you see fit and seek forgiveness after. Covid or no covid, can't do as you want with respect to putting a structure in place and expect no reaction after.

    Bottom line council are likely to be acting on foot of a compliant, its how barista bus was shafted.


  • Registered Users Posts: 798 ✭✭✭Yyhhuuu


    Laviski wrote: »
    what do i need to read other than a lot of whinging and gov bashing, very much the norm these days.

    Them like the rest, could have asked for permission first but went ahead hope for it to be ignored. Guess its better to do things as you see fit and seek forgiveness after. Covid or no covid, can't do as you want with respect to putting a structure in place and expect no reaction after.

    Bottom line council are likely to be acting on foot of a compliant, its how barista bus was shafted.

    It was an unauthorised development under the Planning Legislation.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 25,768 ✭✭✭✭Mrs OBumble


    Laviski wrote: »

    Bottom line council are likely to be acting on foot of a compliant, its how barista bus was shafted.

    Agreed. The council have (rightly IMHO) turned a blind eye to all manner of planning breaches over the last 12 months. But if someone actually complains, they are expected to enforce the law.

    Likely complainants are competitor business in the area who don't have a whacking big space outside.


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,042 ✭✭✭Guffy


    Laviski wrote: »
    considering barista bus, lad down by blackrock - it wasn't going to end well.

    To think otherwise is completly stupid. Council get complaints, they act on it, simple as.

    Any idea where he is now. Savage coffee and the brownies were deadly too. Seems to be gone from bottom of Taylors hill


  • Registered Users Posts: 12,014 ✭✭✭✭ben.schlomo


    Laviski wrote: »
    what do i need to read other than a lot of whinging and gov bashing, very much the norm these days.

    Them like the rest, could have asked for permission first but went ahead hope for it to be ignored. Guess its better to do things as you see fit and seek forgiveness after. Covid or no covid, can't do as you want with respect to putting a structure in place and expect no reaction after.

    Bottom line council are likely to be acting on foot of a compliant, its how barista bus was shafted.

    Thought not.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,372 ✭✭✭Homelander


    Thought not.

    What difference is reading what they said supposed to make? An unauthorised structure is an unauthourised structure. Doesn't really matter what it is or why it was put there.

    What are people suggesting, that we have a brown envelope or a wink and a nod system? If they start turning a blind eye or favoring certain businesses, it opens the floodgates.

    You can't erect buildings or structures without permission and then cry about it when you're asked to remove it. Making it a "City Council isn't supporting businesses" thing is incredibly disingenuous.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,900 ✭✭✭what_traffic


    We're meant to be supporting businesses to provide outdoor facilities, ridiculous.

    Agree.
    Owen Hanley Soc Dem has a good piece in Advertiser about this yesterday.
    Waiving fees for tables and chairs licences ‘meaningless’ with additional space, says Hanley

    City Council Executive(the non elected) been sitting on there hands here, money is available from Central Gov.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Homelander wrote: »
    W hat difference is reading what they said supposed to make? An unauthorised structure is an unauthourised structure. Doesn't really matter what it is or why it was put there.

    What are people suggesting, that we have a brown envelope or a wink and a nod system? If they start turning a blind eye or favoring certain businesses, it opens the floodgates.

    you can't erect buildings or structures without permission and then cry about it when you're asked to remove it. Making it a "City Council isn't supporting businesses" thing is incredibly disingenuous.

    They should be creating local exemptions to certain planning regulations for this year to allow businesses to open up outside with temporary structures. They should also be making street space available for businesses that don't have a large outdoor footprint.

    They make exemptions to public signage for election time, I'm sure they can do the same here.


  • Registered Users Posts: 12,014 ✭✭✭✭ben.schlomo


    Homelander wrote: »
    What difference is reading what they said supposed to make? An unauthorised structure is an unauthourised structure. Doesn't really matter what it is or why it was put there.

    What are people suggesting, that we have a brown envelope or a wink and a nod system? If they start turning a blind eye or favoring certain businesses, it opens the floodgates.

    You can't erect buildings or structures without permission and then cry about it when you're asked to remove it. Making it a "City Council isn't supporting businesses" thing is incredibly disingenuous.

    As it will give you some insight into their communication with authorities regarding the issue. But sure not to worry as long as all the rules were followed in this completely normal time for all businesses.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,354 ✭✭✭xckjoo


    Laviski wrote: »
    what do i need to read other than a lot of whinging and gov bashing, very much the norm these days.

    Them like the rest, could have asked for permission first but went ahead hope for it to be ignored. Guess its better to do things as you see fit and seek forgiveness after. Covid or no covid, can't do as you want with respect to putting a structure in place and expect no reaction after.

    Bottom line council are likely to be acting on foot of a compliant, its how barista bus was shafted.

    If your read the thread on twitter you'll see that they discussed it with the council, explained it was only ever to be temporary during covid and were praised by council members for their ingenuity. It wasn't just a "do what you want" situation. They should had been told it wasn't acceptable then so they wouldn't have sank money and plans into it


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,584 ✭✭✭Laviski


    xckjoo wrote: »
    If your read the thread on twitter you'll see that they discussed it with the council, explained it was only ever to be temporary during covid and were praised by council members for their ingenuity. It wasn't just a "do what you want" situation. They should had been told it wasn't acceptable then so they wouldn't have sank money and plans into it

    "temporary" its very subjective to each individual. what is a limited time frame? few days, few weeks few months few years? just through covid? cause if thats the case it will be here for a very long time, covid isn't going away any time soon.

    very naive of them to think this wasn't going to happen. Council "giving credit" doesn't mean giving permission.... unless they had something in writting that they could have it there between x date to x date where it can stand up in court.

    its likely the person giving credit were speaking on their own behalf which has no authority on the matter. council staff are rotated around but still stand that they are acting on foot of a compliant.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    xckjoo wrote: »
    If your read the thread on twitter you'll see that they discussed it with the council, explained it was only ever to be temporary during covid and were praised by council members for their ingenuity. It wasn't just a "do what you want" situation. They should had been told it wasn't acceptable then so they wouldn't have sank money and plans into it

    Just to be clear, the "City Council" and "Council members" are 2 completely different branches of the same entity, each with their own priorities.

    City Council - enforces planning regs, responsible for the running of the city services

    Council members - must get re-elected to remain relevant so all activities and actions will be governed by this goal without shame

    So, Council members saying "well done, fair play" means literally nothing in the context of breaches of planning regulations. It is only being done to curry favour and possibly get exposure


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,354 ✭✭✭xckjoo


    Just to be clear, the "City Council" and "Council members" are 2 completely different branches of the same entity, each with their own priorities.

    City Council - enforces planning regs, responsible for the running of the city services

    Council members - must get re-elected to remain relevant so all activities and actions will be governed by this goal without shame

    So, Council members saying "well done, fair play" means literally nothing in the context of breaches of planning regulations. It is only being done to curry favour and possibly get exposure

    He said "member of the council" so not sure what side that falls into.
    They Council are happy enough to ignore regulations from time to time (I believe all those branding facades on buildings in the city centre are in breach) but I'll leave it to others with more interest to argue that kind of thing. A local guy trying to run a successful business employing a fair chunk of people in extraordinary times. The Council should be doing whatever they can to support. Particularly when the national government is encouraging just such endeavors.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    xckjoo wrote: »
    He said "member of the council" so not sure what side that falls into.
    They Council are happy enough to ignore regulations from time to time (I believe all those branding facades on buildings in the city centre are in breach) but I'll leave it to others with more interest to argue that kind of thing. A local guy trying to run a successful business employing a fair chunk of people in extraordinary times. The Council should be doing whatever they can to support. Particularly when the national government is encouraging just such endeavors.

    I'm all for trying to make the best of a bad situation, however breaking the rules is not the way to go about it, unless of course, you want businesses breaking planning regs like Pat McDonagh & Supermacs who have been taken to task by councils all over the country for flouting of rules and erecting signage all over the shop


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,922 ✭✭✭beardybrewer


    Blackrock coffee van operating in regular spot today. Maybe they got something sorted or just said feck it with the sun out? Also coffee dock at Galway Bay Hotel looked like a nice spot, front garden of hotel connected to Circle of Life by a walkway, plenty of standing only tables, menu clearly posted, looked to be doing a fair trade.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    They're appealing that decision so maybe they can stay open during the appeal process.

    That Galway Bay coffee place opens at 7.30am - great for an early morning coffee on the prom.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,354 ✭✭✭xckjoo


    I'm all for trying to make the best of a bad situation, however breaking the rules is not the way to go about it, unless of course, you want businesses breaking planning regs like Pat McDonagh & Supermacs who have been taken to task by councils all over the country for flouting of rules and erecting signage all over the shop

    Hardly the same thing. One is a good faith effort to keep a business profitable in crazy times and the other is a flaunting of regulations to squeeze out some extra advertising.
    It would be good to see the council making the effort to support local businesses through this even if it involves temporarily ignoring regulations.


  • Registered Users Posts: 25,768 ✭✭✭✭Mrs OBumble


    xckjoo wrote: »
    Hardly the same thing. One is a good faith effort to keep a business profitable in crazy times and the other is a flaunting of regulations to squeeze out some extra advertising.
    It would be good to see the council making the effort to support local businesses through this even if it involves temporarily ignoring regulations.

    Why do you think that Pat McObesity wants to squeeze out extra advertising? Could it be that his local businesses are competing for custom against multi-national chains with huge advertising budgets.


    Many many businesses have "no takeaway sales" clauses in their planning permissions. The council is (rightly) ignoring all of these breaches.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    xckjoo wrote: »
    Hardly the same thing. One is a good faith effort to keep a business profitable in crazy times and the other is a flaunting of regulations to squeeze out some extra advertising.
    It would be good to see the council making the effort to support local businesses through this even if it involves temporarily ignoring regulations.

    Semantics


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,354 ✭✭✭xckjoo


    Semantics

    Intent would be a better word


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,028 ✭✭✭Bredabe


    Sign on the window in the ex Full Duck on Salthill prom, saying spar opening soon.

    "Have you ever wagged your tail so hard you fell over"?-Brod Higgins.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 896 ✭✭✭shenanagans


    Le petit delice cafe have a new shop opening in town .....Truffle.


Advertisement