Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Schools closed until March/April? (part 4) **Mod warning in OP 22/01**

1234235237239240331

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,275 ✭✭✭C__MC


    I didn't make any mention of TYS. They weren't even mentioned on the piece on CB.

    1st
    2nd
    3rd
    TY
    Won’t see a classroom until after Easter


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,440 ✭✭✭✭km79


    I didn't make any mention of TYS. They weren't even mentioned on the piece on CB.

    3rd to 6th I assumed meant TYS .
    I don’t think they will be back at all this year now tbh


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,432 ✭✭✭SusanC10


    If 2nd Year in Secondary are not back in-person before Easter, then we won't be sending our daughter (5th Primary) back in-person either.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,695 ✭✭✭Acosta


    SusanC10 wrote: »
    If he is able to go on CB today and say all that, then why not announce that today properly then ?

    He might be in trouble for that. The Irish Independent were probably due to announce all that later.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,441 ✭✭✭wirelessdude01


    km79 wrote: »
    3rd to 6th I assumed meant TYS .
    I don’t think they will be back at all this year now tbh

    Primary level!!!!!!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,440 ✭✭✭✭km79


    Primary level!!!!!!

    Ah right LOL my bad


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,431 ✭✭✭combat14


    Glynn urges caution as Covid levels remain high

    Dr Glynn warned that people need to remain very cautious over the coming weeks

    https://www.rte.ie/news/coronavirus/2021/0219/1198040-coronavirus-ireland/


    significant differences in messaging between nphet and govt still remain...


    looks like govt want to do a norma and open up all the schools .. nphet still far from sure on the matter ..


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,431 ✭✭✭Stateofyou


    Locotastic wrote: »
    Around 18,000 children under 15 have been confirmed with Covid since the start. Approx 300 of those required hospitalisation.

    With the increase in community transmission over the past couple of months there has been increase in cases (and resulting hospitalisations) across every age group.

    The risk that the disease poses has not changed dramatically, just the sheer levels of transmission, which thankfully is improving all of the time.

    That's not exactly bearing out with what's happening. It seems it is also causing more severe illness. Even the RTE article posted here this morning states it:
    https://www.rte.ie/news/coronavirus/2021/0219/1198040-coronavirus-ireland/

    "Health Service Executive Chief Executive Paul Reid said hospitalised Covid-19 patients are becoming sicker and are having to stay longer in hospital because of the variant."

    So we don't really know what the full impact is going to be yet on children and the community when the school sector goes back. Especially considering we're not very far on vaccinations. It's not the sick volume of children here that matters-it's the fact that we're sending them into a known problematic situation in which case levels are still too high and the new variant is causing more severe sickness. Children being the least likely to be the most sick out of all the age groups is no comfort to parents with children in the hospital now, and without a doubt the increased numbers that will be in hospital afterward.

    So I think that's a problem for our kids, with community transmission still so high. And it's a problem for our battered health care system too.

    I for one am sick of all this "when are they going back" and "who is going back first" debate / leaks. What about the additional safety measures that need to be in place, especially if they stubbornly push ahead with March 1 and cases are no lower?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,318 ✭✭✭Sammy2012


    Stateofyou wrote: »
    That's not exactly bearing out with what's happening. It seems it is also causing more severe illness. Even the RTE article posted here this morning states it:
    https://www.rte.ie/news/coronavirus/2021/0219/1198040-coronavirus-ireland/

    "Health Service Executive Chief Executive Paul Reid said hospitalised Covid-19 patients are becoming sicker and are having to stay longer in hospital because of the variant."

    So we don't really know what the full impact is going to be yet on children and the community when the school sector goes back. Especially considering we're not very far on vaccinations. It's not the sick volume of children here that matters-it's the fact that we're sending them into a known problematic situation in which case levels are still too high and the new variant is causing more severe sickness. Children being the least likely to be the most sick out of all the age groups is no comfort to parents with children in the hospital now, and without a doubt the increased numbers that will be in hospital afterward.

    So I think that's a problem for our kids, with community transmission still so high. And it's a problem for our battered health care system too.

    I for one am sick of all this "when are they going back" and "who is going back first" debate / leaks. What about the additional safety measures that need to be in place, especially if they stubbornly push ahead with March 1 and cases are no lower?

    There wont be any additional safety measures put in place. If they are announcing reopen next Tuesday it gives schools 3 days notice. What additional safety measures are in place for special classes in primary opening on Monday? AFAIK in my school there are none.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,630 ✭✭✭jrosen


    These blubbering idiots infuriate me. Either make an announcement or SHUT THE FU*K UP.

    All this back and forth and worrying people is unnecessary. I’d get more sense out of a bunch of pre school children.

    Also March has easter holidays for 2 weeks. Are we really going to stop remote teaching to go back to school for a short period to then be off again and risk a repeat of December?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 97 ✭✭PeterPan92


    March 1st for half of the school seems unlikely at this point. One of the core things the INTO are looking for is enough time for schools to put in place any new necessary measures and make any necessary changes to their COVID response plan. Next Tuesday for an official decision gives schools 5 days to prepare for JI-2nd to come back. In my school, this is over 300 child (3 of each class, roughly 28 per class - some more, some less). This is despite the fact that only 12 children in our special classes are permitted to return next Monday. 12 to 300+ is 7 days seems like a big decision.

    I would see 2 ways that this could happen.

    Possibility 1:

    March 1st - Infant classes only.
    March 15th - 1st-3rd
    After Easter - 4th-6th

    Possibility 2:

    March 8th - Infants - 2nd
    March 22nd - 3rd - 6th (Giving them one week before Easter)

    With the complete farce that this government have made of every school decision and situation so far, anything is possible. The above two just seem most logical for everyone to get on board with.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,440 ✭✭✭✭km79


    “ Minister for Children Roderic O’Gorman has said he understands all primary school students will return to the classroom by March 15.
    But he said that secondary school students who are not sitting the Leaving Cert are likely to be waiting until after Easter to return to school under the Government’s most recent plans to reopen the education sector.

    Third to sixth class pupils in primary school may return on March 15 while Leaving Cert students and primary school pupils up to second class are slated to return to classrooms on March 1.”


    So just leaving certs then .......round and round in circles we go with one minister contradicting the one before them


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,053 ✭✭✭Theboinkmaster


    jrosen wrote: »
    Also March has easter holidays for 2 weeks. Are we really going to stop remote teaching to go back to school for a short period to then be off again and risk a repeat of December?

    There won't be a repeat of December - December was caused by indoor socialising not schools.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,441 ✭✭✭wirelessdude01


    jrosen wrote: »
    These blubbering idiots infuriate me. Either make an announcement or SHUT THE FU*K UP.

    All this back and forth and worrying people is unnecessary. I’d get more sense out of a bunch of pre school children.

    Also March has easter holidays for 2 weeks. Are we really going to stop remote teaching to go back to school for a short period to then be off again and risk a repeat of December?

    Technically only 3 days of the Easter break are in March!!

    Nothing will be open for Easter anyway, restaurants and pubs will be shut. We do run the risk of families totally letting their guards down though.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,318 ✭✭✭Sammy2012


    Technically only 3 days of the Easter break are in March!!

    Nothing will be open for Easter anyway, restaurants and pubs will be shut. We do run the risk of families totally letting their guards down though.

    Well can you blame them really? Like I totally understand the line they are peddling about keeping other things closed so schools can reopen but if its safe for my kids to go back into the classroom why is it not safe for them to have playdates and all that?

    Now we haven't been doing that and we won't be in the coming weeks but I can see why people would think this.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,441 ✭✭✭wirelessdude01


    Sammy2012 wrote: »
    Well can you blame them really? Like I totally understand the line they are peddling about keeping other things closed so schools can reopen but if its safe for my kids to go back into the classroom why is it not safe for them to have playdates and all that?

    Now we haven't been doing that and we won't be in the coming weeks but I can see why people would think this.

    Lots of people do think this. Playgrounds in my area have been packed the past two days.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,649 ✭✭✭downthemiddle


    At the moment what is being proposed at primary level is JI-2nd return on March 1st along with children with additional needs from 3rd-6th. Full reopening two weeks later. Most of the discussions today are around second level.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,318 ✭✭✭Sammy2012


    Lots of people do think this. Playgrounds in my area have been packed the past two days.

    Yea any I drive by in town are the same. We live rurally and my own kids are happy at home. We have lots of outdoor toys and space for them and they get on great so are very happy at home. They do miss their friends but all grand other than that...

    But I can understand the logic behind the thinking. And to be honest I would think my kids would be safer playing in the playground than in school. It's outdoors and once they sanitize when they are finished I highly doubt they would be at much of a risk.

    All the above is my opinion as a parent. I'm happy enough to go back to school as luckily in the area I teach in the virus is at low levels and I totally get that there are lots of children who are struggling for one reason or another. It's hard for the government to please everyone, actually it's impossible but they have to do something. I suppose it'll be up to parents if they want to keep their children out for another few weeks but we do have to try do something.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,318 ✭✭✭Sammy2012


    At the moment what is being proposed at primary level is JI-2nd return on March 1st along with children with additional needs from 3rd-6th. Full reopening two weeks later. Most of the discussions today are around second level.

    There was no mention of children with additional needs in the discussion on CB this morning.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,630 ✭✭✭jrosen


    Technically only 3 days of the Easter break are in March!!

    Nothing will be open for Easter anyway, restaurants and pubs will be shut. We do run the risk of families totally letting their guards down though.

    Which I think it’s quite likely


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,432 ✭✭✭SusanC10


    At the moment what is being proposed at primary level is JI-2nd return on March 1st along with children with additional needs from 3rd-6th. Full reopening two weeks later. Most of the discussions today are around second level.

    Where are you seeing this?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,649 ✭✭✭downthemiddle


    Sammy2012 wrote: »
    There was no mention of children with additional needs in the discussion on CB this morning.

    I was talking to someone involved in the process this morning. They are examining the practicalities of a full return of children with additional needs.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    JP100 wrote: »
    Going by the dismissive tone of your post, I can take it you are not a parent of one of the 37 children under 12 hospitalised with Covid in the past fortnight. As long as you're ok, you're grand so, go you!!!

    As a parent who had a child in hospital with a respiratory virus I know full well what the risks are.

    Still not a place for reasoned debate I see


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,318 ✭✭✭Sammy2012


    I was talking to someone involved in the process this morning. They are examining the practicalities of a full return of children with additional needs.

    Ah. Well it would make sense. But how would that work in reality? Would the SEN teacher be taking those kids and their class teachers keep teaching online?


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    combat14 wrote: »
    Glynn urges caution as Covid levels remain high

    Dr Glynn warned that people need to remain very cautious over the coming weeks

    https://www.rte.ie/news/coronavirus/2021/0219/1198040-coronavirus-ireland/


    significant differences in messaging between nphet and govt still remain...


    looks like govt want to do a norma and open up all the schools .. nphet still far from sure on the matter ..

    https://www.rte.ie/news/coronavirus/2021/0218/1197991-cabinet-schools/
    NPHET is understood to have advised that phased reopening of schools was possible from early March.

    Deputy Chief Medical Officer Dr Ronan Glynn also attended the meeting.
    .


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,216 ✭✭✭khalessi


    Sammy2012 wrote: »
    Ah. Well it would make sense. But how would that work in reality? Would the SEN teacher be taking those kids and their class teachers keep teaching online?

    What was suggested to us was all SET in school to share teaching of resource children. We have 2 resource teachers and rest learning support and learning support students go back to classes for "extra" online teaching. But in reality the learning support students would receive no support.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,431 ✭✭✭combat14




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,318 ✭✭✭Sammy2012


    khalessi wrote: »
    What was suggested to us was all SET in school to share teaching of resource children. We have 2 resource teachers and rest learning support and learning support students go back to classes for "extra" online teaching. But in reality the learning support students would receive no support.

    We only have one SET and a resource teacher that comes in 1 day a week. So not sure how it would work in our school but not for me to worry about!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 498 ✭✭JP100


    As a parent who had a child in hospital with a respiratory virus I know full well what the risks are.

    Still not a place for reasoned debate I see

    So that's a no to the question then, you're not a parent of a child with Covid in hospital. It's very easy for you to be so dismissive on here when you are not the parent of one of the 37 children under the age of 12 who have been hospitalised with Covid in the past fortnight. Whataboutery doesn't cut it and saying 'ah well, less children will get sick from this than other groups' is no comfort to parents with children hospitalised with Covid presently or indeed unfortunately in the future.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 149 ✭✭daretodream


    When will 5th years be back, anyone any idea?


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement