Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Covid 19 Part XXXII-215,743 ROI (4,137 deaths)111,166 NI (2,036 deaths)(22/02)Read OP

1225226228230231333

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,119 ✭✭✭manofwisdom


    paulie21 wrote: »
    744 cases 33 deaths


    Good drop on reported deaths from the previous 4 Tuesdays. 68,101,90 and 93

    7-day average in cases 889 compared to last Tuesday 945.

    Tomorrow could be the first Wednesday to not have over 1000 cases since December 23rd?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,595 ✭✭✭✭CIARAN_BOYLE


    BlowHard wrote: »
    Very high deaths again and overall numbers not going down fast enough.

    Half the deaths of the previous Tuesday shows the massive progress that is being made.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,174 ✭✭✭Jinglejangle69


    BlowHard wrote: »
    Very high deaths again and overall numbers not going down fast enough.

    Numbers are going down fast enough.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,980 ✭✭✭TheDoctor


    Good drop on reported deaths from the previous 4 Tuesdays. 68,101,90 and 93

    7-day average in cases 889 compared to last Tuesday 945.

    Tomorrow could be the first Wednesday to not have over 1000 cases since December 23rd?

    Well thats a jinx if ever I heard one.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,353 ✭✭✭✭hynesie08


    I mean on the one hand those are terrible numbers, but I'm very happy to see them......


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,463 ✭✭✭shinzon


    Bananaleaf wrote: »
    Hi all

    Can anyone tell me what the rule is regarding 'bubbles'?

    My dad lives 20km away and lives alone. I've not formed a bubble with anyone else and would like to go and see him.

    Is this allowed? Can't believe I am typing this :(

    Travel restrictions

    Domestic

    People are required to stay at home except for travel for work, education or other essential purposes, and will be permitted to take exercise within 5km of home.

    You can travel for the following reasons:

    travel to and from work, where work involves providing an essential service
    teachers, SNAs and other school staff will be allowed to travel to school to facilitate distance learning
    to attend medical appointments and collect medicines and other health products
    travel to attend disability day services
    travel to attend a court
    for vital family reasons, such as providing care to children, elderly or vulnerable people, and in particular for those who live alone, but excluding social family visits
    for food shopping
    for farming purposes (food production or care of animals)
    to attend a wedding or funeral
    to visit a grave


    What a support bubble is

    To support those who risk isolation, you can form a bubble with 1 other household (of any size) in certain situations.

    You can then act as one extended household.

    You must still keep physical distance from people outside your support bubble.

    Who can form a support bubble

    You can form a support bubble with another household if you:
    are living alone with children under the age of 18
    live alone
    share parenting or custody arrangements
    live with an adult you provide care for (for example a dependent adult relation or a partner with dementia)
    live by yourself and have a carer or carers who support you, including a live-in carer

    Wherever possible, you should choose a household in your locality to form your support bubble. The reason for this is to prevent the spread of COVID-19 between areas that might have lots of cases and areas that have low numbers of cases.


    Thats the guidance from the government up to yourself if you want to follow it.



    Shin


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,811 ✭✭✭snotboogie


    Good drop on reported deaths from the previous 4 Tuesdays. 68,101,90 and 93

    7-day average in cases 889 compared to last Tuesday 945.

    Tomorrow could be the first Wednesday to not have over 1000 cases since December 23rd?

    Not great really. At a decline of 55 per week (assuming we can keep that up as cases lower) it would take us over 14 weeks more to get under 100 cases per day...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,850 ✭✭✭robbiezero


    Lovely afternoon in St Annes park here in D5.
    Great to see kids playing on the pitches again and enjoying themselves. Hurling, soccer and in the distance some lad with a rugby ball.
    Think he might have been an Irish international as he was practising all of Irelands preplanned attack moves .... kicking the ball in the air and running after it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,524 ✭✭✭sonofenoch


    robbiezero wrote: »
    Lovely afternoon in St Annes park here in D5.
    Great to see kids playing on the pitches again and enjoying themselves. Hurling, soccer and in the distance some lad with a rugby ball.
    Think he might have been an Irish international as he was practising all of Irelands preplanned attack moves .... kicking the ball in the air and running after it.

    Distancing rugby will never catch on..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,677 ✭✭✭Happydays2020


    gozunda wrote: »
    Poster is not wrong. Hospital figures have been averaging 50% of all of covid related hospitalisations being under 64 and approx 50% over 65 wth some small variations

    From most recent report on Hospitalisation by age current figures show:

    51.29% over 65

    48.62 under 64

    So yeah pretty much what the poster detailed

    https://i.imgflip.com/4y7wwc.jpg

    See column on cases hospitalised (%)

    Source

    Full data since last March is 55% over 65 and 45% under 65. That is not 50%. If it was 50% then the UK would still be in the EU. In better weather with risks reduced by 90% (older and vulnerable vaccinated) then the health service will manage and that is with indoor hospitality closed.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,076 ✭✭✭✭vienne86


    Bananaleaf wrote: »
    Hi all

    Can anyone tell me what the rule is regarding 'bubbles'?

    My dad lives 20km away and lives alone. I've not formed a bubble with anyone else and would like to go and see him.

    Is this allowed? Can't believe I am typing this :(

    Yes, I'm bubbled with someone 15km away. We checked it out and it's all fine.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,544 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    Full data since last March is 55% over 65 and 45% under 65. That is not 50%. If it was 50% then the UK would still be in the EU. In better weather with risks reduced by 90% (older and vulnerable vaccinated) then the health service will manage and that is with indoor hospitality closed.

    ~50% is the most recent report (past 2 weeks), you can pick and choose what ever figure you like, but you stated once all 65+ are vaccinated the hospitals would cope. Now you're changing the goal posts and saying 65+ and vulnerable (18-64) vaccinated.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,105 ✭✭✭Kivaro


    BlowHard wrote: »
    Absolutely disgusting comment about the deaths. This place is as bad as Twitter

    Did you report it?
    And no, it is definitely not as bad as Twitter.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,105 ✭✭✭Kivaro


    And in other news, the Johnson & Johnson single dose vaccine in their trial provided 85% protection against severe illness and 100% protection against hospitalization and death from Covid. That's something to cheer.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,340 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    Steve012 wrote: »
    Gleefully, about Deaths? you for real man?!? ... 🙄

    Probably. Some really nasty people about.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,653 ✭✭✭✭Plumbthedepths


    Kivaro wrote: »
    And in other news, the Johnson & Johnson single dose vaccine in their trial provided 85% protection against severe illness and 100% protection against hospitalization and death from Covid. That's something to cheer.

    Possible approval mid March according to the EMA.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,071 ✭✭✭Sweet.Science


    If J and J was a rolling review and all the data is now submitted why mid March for approval ? Seems a long time compared to other approvals


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,654 ✭✭✭boardise


    Jim_Hodge wrote: »
    Come off it! That's a bizarre comment.

    I took it as a thrust of black humour- I think we can safely take it that no one rejoices in hearing about C19 deaths or thinks anyone else does. Surely that's a bedrock assumption.
    I'm not averse to a blast of BH myself- strangely I find it can work when one is confronted by a dire situation.
    I fully appreciate though that it's not everyone's cup of cocoa.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,040 ✭✭✭Ficheall


    boardise wrote: »
    I took it as a thrust of black humour- I think we can safely take it that no one rejoices in hearing about C19 deaths or thinks anyone else does. Surely that's a bedrock assumption.
    I'm not averse to a blast of BH myself- strangely I find it can work when one is confronted by a dire situation.
    I fully appreciate though that it's not everyone's cup of cocoa.
    Like when Trump was just being sarcastic when he said maybe people should inject bleach.


  • Posts: 232 ✭✭ [Deleted User]


    According to The Irish Times, Micheál Martin said that the UK variant of the virus meant that it's not safe enough to let hairdressers resume business.

    If the customer wears a mask and the hairdresser wears a mask and a visor then how can infection occur? The precautionary measures either work or they don't.

    Don't forget that we're trying to understand the thought processes of a man who thinks that a solo jog 5001 metres from one's front door is a despicable crime against the peoples' health which must be punished by potential imprisonment, whilst simultaneously demanding to be allowed to go on a 10,878 km round trip to visit an elderly stranger who will move into his eighth decade later this year (to the extent he was prepared to take a scarce jab from an old or vulnerable person to facilitate his trip), and was only stopped by a firm withdrawal of his invitation.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,789 ✭✭✭✭peasant


    I haven't had time to read back on this thread to see if this has already been mentioned, so forgive if I'm re-hashing an old hat.

    Three numbers that are quite significant:
    75, 65 and 56

    The latest ECDC (European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control) report states these numbers in a rather worrying context.

    75
    % of all Irish cases are now related to the so called "British variant"

    65
    % is the factor by which this variant may be more deadly than the original virus

    56
    % is the factor by which this variant is more transmissible than the original virus

    These figures might explain why our numbers aren't really going down all that much and why there is little official momentum for any easing of restrictions.
    The good news is that these figures aren't exact and cast in stone yet, the bad news is that they aren't completely made up either.

    read up on the report in lower section of this article:

    independent.ie/irish-news/coronavirus-ireland-821-new-cases-and-no-further-deaths-as-dominant-uk-variant-may-have-higher-death-rate-ecdc-report-suggests-40094787.html


    EDITed to ad a link to the actual report:
    https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/RRA-covid-19-14th-update-15-feb-2021.pdf


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,677 ✭✭✭Happydays2020


    Wolf359f wrote: »
    ~50% is the most recent report (past 2 weeks), you can pick and choose what ever figure you like, but you stated once all 65+ are vaccinated the hospitals would cope. Now you're changing the goal posts and saying 65+ and vulnerable (18-64) vaccinated.

    I think a figure that dates back to last March (11 months) is fairly robust. I have a series of posts here in which I have supported the current restrictions and think they are needed for some time to come, but also think we need to gradually re open and we will be ok as most vulnerable will be protected.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,677 ✭✭✭Happydays2020


    That is not true. The under 65’s do not account for 50% of hospitalisations.

    This is what I said. And I am right.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,219 ✭✭✭prunudo


    Bananaleaf wrote: »
    I just wasn't sure if it was allowed and I didn't want to get a fine and turned back for my troubles if it's not allowed. People were going running in a park that is located 1km outside of our 5k radius and they were fined and sent home. I know that's not the same as going to see my dad, but I'm just not sure what you can and can't do anymore. I was very good at keeping on top of the restrictions at the beginning, but I genuinely can't keep track anymore.

    Glad to see you're going to visit him. It would want to be a bad cop to argue with you once you explained the situation.

    But have to say its a terrible indictment of the government that we have citizens who are so unsure and flustered by the rules that they are terrified of being fined, so much so that they won't visit one of their parents who lives alone a mere 20km away.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,059 ✭✭✭✭spookwoman


    Sorry wrong date was uploaded before

    Slide1.jpg
    Slide2.jpg
    Slide3.jpg
    Slide4.jpg
    Slide5.jpg
    Slide6.jpg
    Slide7.jpg
    Slide8.jpg
    Slide9.jpg
    Slide10.jpg


  • Posts: 3,270 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Kivaro wrote: »
    And in other news, the Johnson & Johnson single dose vaccine in their trial provided 85% protection against severe illness and 100% protection against hospitalization and death from Covid. That's something to cheer.

    Yea from the people that brought you the opioid crisis and cancerous baby powder.....https://www.drugwatch.com/manufacturers/johnson-and-johnson/


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,677 ✭✭✭Happydays2020


    Thanks Spook. That data is very useful and a wealth of relevant information.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,789 ✭✭✭✭peasant


    Has the british varient made much impact on the continent

    European countries indicate the following proportions of B.1.1.7
    among all cases sequenced in recent weeks:
    Denmark 27% [13], France 13.2% (based on ThermoFisher scientific screening, before sequencing confirmation) [14], Germany 5.6% [15], Ireland 75%, Italy 17.8% [16], the Netherlands >30% [17], Poland 9%, Portugal 45%, Spain 0.453% (depending on the region) [18], Sweden 11%[19].
    These figures vary in terms of sampling strategy used, time-period covered and screening method and, therefore, cannot be directly compared. In countries carrying out sequencing during recent weeks, the proportion of B.1.1.7 cases among all sequenced cases appears to be almost doubling each week, strongly suggesting that the variant is on course to become more dominant than the strains previously circulating in the EU.

    source:
    https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/RRA-covid-19-14th-update-15-feb-2021.pdf

    highlight be me


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 969 ✭✭✭alentejo


    Are the UK covid figures dropping like a stone over the past week or so? I think UK covid figures are less than Ireland at the moment.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,300 ✭✭✭✭Jim_Hodge


    alentejo wrote: »
    Are the UK covid figures dropping like a stone over the past week or so? I think UK covid figures are less than Ireland at the moment.

    I haven't 7 or 5 day averages to hand but they had more new cases per 1M than us today.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement