Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

COVID-19: Vaccine and testing procedures Megathread Part 2 [Mod Warning - Post #1]

1294295297299300331

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 877 ✭✭✭eoinbn


    I'm not an expert on the matter, far from it actually. But im fairly sure the CureVac has been funded massively by the EU, so any orders from them, be it 1st or 2nd generation, you would imagine we'll have good access to.

    The EU has put in some money but most of it came directly from Germany. We will have to give them billions for a vaccine that we won't use as it will be delivered too late.
    Curevac have signed over the rights to GSK for their second gen vaccines - except for in Germany, Austria and Switzerland. The rest of the EU will have to deal with GSK which will very likely take a UK first approach.


  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 51,690 Mod ✭✭✭✭Stheno


    I think the Government (the CMO) were right. It would be a mess otherwise. Best to have certainty than people having ‘options’ - and all the issues that would go with that in terms of which vaccines go where. Plus Pfizer and Moderna will give greater efficacy at an earlier date (AZ is 12 weeks between shots) so there are benefits there also.

    But they also need to see how they use this as an opportunity for getting AZ to less vulnerable.

    What gets me is the poor communications. There should really be an effort to ensure the messaging is consistent


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 21 KlArmy


    Stheno wrote: »
    What gets me is the poor communications. There should really be an effort to ensure the messaging is consistent

    It's been very poor

    We literally have our leaders leaking and talking soundbytes and flying kites here and there

    Awful stuff


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,065 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    eoinbn wrote: »
    The EU has put in some money but most of it came directly from Germany. We will have to give them billions for a vaccine that we won't use as it will be delivered too late.
    Curevac have signed over the rights to GSK for their second gen vaccines - except for in Germany, Austria and Switzerland. The rest of the EU will have to deal with GSK which will very likely take a UK first approach.

    Britain will be largely done by the time GSK is approved. So it will probably all be for the EU then.

    As you say, it will be late, end of year.

    It may be a boon to the EU as it looks like it will still be vaccinating significantly for s year to come.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,677 ✭✭✭Happydays2020


    Stheno wrote: »
    What gets me is the poor communications. There should really be an effort to ensure the messaging is consistent

    The problem is that too many people are talking. There is a reason why there needs to be an element of secrecy in policy making until the final decision is made.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 21 KlArmy


    Danzy wrote: »
    Britain will be largely done by the time GSK is approved. So it will probably all be for the EU then.

    As you say, it will be late, end of year.

    It may be a boon to the EU as it looks like it will still be vaccinating significantly for s year to come.
    Will it though?

    The UK and Israel will have moved onto the next-gen vaccines well before the rest


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,750 ✭✭✭✭ACitizenErased


    Not sure why there’s previous posts suggesting NIAC were overruled, that is simply not true.

    NIAC recommended that if possible people over 70 should get an RNA vaccine. The HSE decided this is possible, so it’s happening.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,576 ✭✭✭JTMan


    The Times reports here (paywall) on the leaked real timetable for vaccinations in the UK. Vaccinations might be largely finished by the end of May. Although some say it might be June.

    - All the over-50s will be inoculated by the end of April.
    - The great majority of adults will have received a coronavirus jab by the end of May.
    - Pressure to remove all restrictions by the end of April.

    Again, hopefully the UK will start sending excess supply here in May, in part to help protect Northern Ireland.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 21 KlArmy


    Not sure why there’s previous posts suggesting NIAC were overruled, that is simply not true.

    NIAC recommended that if possible people over 70 should get an RNA vaccine. The HSE decided this is possible, so it’s happening.

    Not fully accurate

    NIAC said vaccination of over 70s shouldn't be delayed

    Dr Holohans advice means it will be delayed


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,750 ✭✭✭✭ACitizenErased


    KlArmy wrote: »
    Not fully accurate

    NIAC said vaccination of over 70s shouldn't be delayed

    Dr Holohans advice means it will be delayed

    ?
    The only thing delaying it is the delivery of the RNA vaccines and as time passes due to the reduced two dose schedule it’ll all work out the same anyway?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,950 ✭✭✭polesheep




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,156 ✭✭✭Doc07


    KlArmy wrote: »
    Not fully accurate

    NIAC said vaccination of over 70s shouldn't be delayed

    Dr Holohans advice means it will be delayed

    That’s not fully accurate either but I appreciate various sound bites and articles have not always been as clear as they could have.

    If there were half a million doses of AZ ready to go across GPs and community pharmacies then yes, the preferences for mRNA vaccines would be a delay. But in the grand scheme of things there are feck all doses of AZ coming next couple weeks.

    CMO request to HSE is to get on and vaccinate using the preferred vaccines WITHOUT delaying.
    It will be a challenge but it is not an automatic acceptance of any major delay for that age/priority group. The HSE and GP partners etc now have the challenge to deliver and they will aim to do that without any significant delay.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,750 ✭✭✭✭ACitizenErased


    Doc07 wrote: »
    That’s not fully accurate either but I appreciate various sound bites and articles have not always been as clear as they could have.

    If there were half a million doses of AZ ready to go across GPs and community pharmacies then yes, the preferences for mRNA vaccines would be a delay. But in the grand scheme of things there are feck all doses of AZ coming next couple weeks.

    CMO request to HSE is to get on and vaccinate using the preferred vaccines WITHOUT delaying.
    It will be a challenge but it is not an automatic acceptance of any major delay for that age/priority group. The HSE and GP partners etc now have the challenge to deliver and they will aim to do that without any significant delay.

    This, exactly.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,156 ✭✭✭Doc07


    polesheep wrote: »
    Why would anyone continue to serve on the NIAC?

    NIAC have no problem with the CMO. It might suit newspapers to pit NIAC versus Tony or Tony versus Government or NPHET versus Rocky IV or whatever but it doesn’t mean that they are not all actually trying to work together in best interest of us most of the time anyway.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,443 ✭✭✭✭stephenjmcd


    JTMan wrote: »
    The Times reports here (paywall) on the leaked real timetable for vaccinations in the UK. Vaccinations might be largely finished by the end of May. Although some say it might be June.

    - All the over-50s will be inoculated by the end of April.
    - The great majority of adults will have received a coronavirus jab by the end of May.
    - Pressure to remove all restrictions by the end of April.

    Again, hopefully the UK will start sending excess supply here in May, in part to help protect Northern Ireland.

    "A coronavirus jab" in other words first dose. They won't be finished by then, they need the 2nd dose.

    So they might have partial protection but to declare the vacinations complete/finished wouldn't be accurate.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,156 ✭✭✭Doc07


    JTMan wrote: »
    The Times reports here (paywall) on the leaked real timetable for vaccinations in the UK. Vaccinations might be largely finished by the end of May. Although some say it might be June.

    - All the over-50s will be inoculated by the end of April.
    - The great majority of adults will have received a coronavirus jab by the end of May.
    - Pressure to remove all restrictions by the end of April.

    Again, hopefully the UK will start sending excess supply here in May, in part to help protect Northern Ireland.

    I presume that means first doses given, very admirable but remember you got to add on another
    3 months before you can say those groups have been vaccinated.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,065 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    "A coronavirus jab" in other words first dose. They won't be finished by then, they need the 2nd dose.

    So they might have partial protection but to declare the vacinations complete/finished wouldn't be accurate.

    No, but there over 50s ,at least, will be done fully by then.

    It's very impressive either way.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,027 ✭✭✭lbj666


    https://www.irishtimes.com/news/health/covid-19-what-are-the-vaccination-timelines-for-the-months-ahead-1.4477288

    Think it is a repost but sums up the situation quiet well at the minute.

    9 big MCVs, 25 Medium MCVs which is good to see.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12 Breege_M


    Has any EU country decided to vaccinate over 70s with AstraZenica?
    Most of the larger EU countries are not going to give it to over 65s.

    If we had taken a different approach and followed the UK, I can just imagine the media’s response, with a consequential undermining of the vaccine program.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,677 ✭✭✭Happydays2020


    Not sure why there’s previous posts suggesting NIAC were overruled, that is simply not true.

    NIAC recommended that if possible people over 70 should get an RNA vaccine. The HSE decided this is possible, so it’s happening.

    I have switched off RTÉ at this point and I am close to cancelling my IT subscription. The media here are a joke and a disgrace.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,750 ✭✭✭✭ACitizenErased




  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,220 ✭✭✭cameramonkey


    https://twitter.com/redouad/status/1358053423158075395

    malta paying double price to get vaccines quickly.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,417 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    https://twitter.com/redouad/status/1358053423158075395

    malta paying double price to get vaccines quickly.

    Here's the important thing.

    Malta is small enough that it can do that without really effecting rollout elsewhere.

    If everyone were to do that, Ireland would lose out because we would be outbid by multiple other countries.

    Which is the point of buying things as the EU.

    3.2.1. to an idiot suggesting otherwise.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    Stheno wrote: »
    Yeah, the IT, for some reason, have really had it in for the CMO since March. It bemuses me to see they can still put all of this down to a single solitary person, despite the 50 odd people on NPHET and the NIAC and HSE input on all of this. You can now add Spain to the growing list of countries who've done the same on AZ. It really is all about the low numbers of older people in their trial.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 547 ✭✭✭RugbyLad11


    https://twitter.com/redouad/status/1358053423158075395

    malta paying double price to get vaccines quickly.

    So much for European solidarity. I'm just hoping that the UK send us some doses when they are finished because the EU is doing a sh*t job and people are going to lose their lives over it.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    RugbyLad11 wrote: »
    So much for European solidarity. I'm just hoping that the UK send us some doses when they are finished because the EU is doing a sh*t job and people are going to lose their lives over it.

    Outside a handful of countries, which happen to include 2 that we consume as lot of media from, nearly all the countries near the top of the vaccine rollout list are EU countries. What the EU have done is ensure the entire bloc has equal access. In the absence of this type of deal it would be an ugly free for all with some places with no access as prices get pushed higher and higher.

    For context look at how the likes of Canada, Australia and Japan are doing


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,832 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    People would be really upset if they were in the US, where something over half the vaccines distributed are actually administered at this point.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,750 ✭✭✭✭ACitizenErased




  • Closed Accounts Posts: 727 ✭✭✭NeuralNetwork


    That Maltese situation is a bit ridiculous. If it's going to be a case that we all invested money in buying vaccines together and then some countries are just going to slip the companies extra money to skip the queue the whole thing will fall apart.

    Whatever about buying vaccines outside the programme, that sounds like they've been paying companies off to speed up delivery of the EU vaccines and it needs to be clarified.

    Being small is one thing, but if that were done by a larger country the whole programme could be screwed up.

    What's the point of the European joint-purchase programme if that's going to be the way things operate.

    It is supposed to be completely proportionate allocation based on population.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,247 ✭✭✭✭hynesie08


    WRT Malta, what the hell does this bit mean?
    Deputy Prime Minister and Health Minister Chris Fearne said Malta will be buying more vaccine doses than it needs. He explained that while some doses from those ordered might not arrive, any doses in excess will be given to other countries in need.

    Who are they buying from?


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement