Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Covid 19 Part XXX-113,332 ROI(2,282 deaths) 81,251 NI (1,384 deaths) (05/01) Read OP

1249250252254255330

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,015 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    Ger Roe wrote: »
    Fear mongering or fact? If the stats are true, it's not fear mongering.

    At this stage if someone tries to call any numbers "fear mongering" you can be 99% sure its an actual fact.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,398 ✭✭✭SortingYouOut


    nj27 wrote: »
    Wonder if we'll ever hit the 1000 deaths a day stage. Cases are high so deaths will probably skyrocket soon.

    I can't see that happening. We're not that far off the situation earlier in the year, although the cases are being captured now so it looks like we're in a worse situation.

    Beverly Hills, California



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,052 ✭✭✭✭titan18


    Eod100 wrote: »
    "Every single Government source who spoke privately on Sunday did not expect schools to reopen on the week beginning January 11th." Seems inevitable schools will be delayed again. Government owe it to people to be upfront and give enough notice. Norma Foley meeting opposition today. Guess it could be announced on Wednesday or Thursday. https://www.irishtimes.com/news/politics/covid-19-government-fears-public-believes-it-has-lost-control-1.4449324?mode=amp

    They should close til the 18th at least and pull the February mid term to make the time back.


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 12,387 Mod ✭✭✭✭igCorcaigh


    nj27 wrote: »
    Wonder if we'll ever hit the 1000 deaths a day stage. Cases are high so deaths will probably skyrocket soon.

    Absolutely not.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,356 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    nj27 wrote: »
    Wonder if we'll ever hit the 1000 deaths a day stage. Cases are high so deaths will probably skyrocket soon.

    I know we are just back to work but that kind of gloulish speculation is excessively morbid and unnecessary.

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth House?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    nj27 wrote: »
    Wonder if we'll ever hit the 1000 deaths a day stage. Cases are high so deaths will probably skyrocket soon.
    That's half the full total of the entire pandemic, plus with nursing homes about to start today that cohort will be protected soon enough. Most cases are in the under 45s.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,193 ✭✭✭Ger Roe


    How does testing vulnerable groups help? Surely it's testing anyone and everyone to prevent the spread and protect the most vulnerable?

    There comes a tipping point where the virus is so prevelant, that testing to find out where it is, becomes a waste of time and resources - it's everywhere.

    At that point, treatment of serious cases is the main focus, the battle is lost, so look after people when they get it, as opposed to testing to prevent its spread.

    They said all along, test and trace can not be scaled up without limit and it is a method of control that only makes sense if there is a possibility of control.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,052 ✭✭✭✭titan18


    nj27 wrote: »
    Wonder if we'll ever hit the 1000 deaths a day stage. Cases are high so deaths will probably skyrocket soon.

    I'd say there's a better chance of me sleeping with a Victoria's Secret model than that happening tbh. I'd be shocked if we got to the stage where we were hitting 100 a day regularly never mind 1000


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 701 ✭✭✭kilkenny31


    nj27 wrote: »
    Wonder if we'll ever hit the 1000 deaths a day stage. Cases are high so deaths will probably skyrocket soon.

    We need to get a grip. We have to realise our population is small so cant compare ourselves to the UK or Italy etc It's highly unlikely that we would hit 100 deaths a day. I imagine it could peak around 50-70 like it did in March. But back then it was a sh1t show in nursing homes that caused that. I suspect that we will see a worse infection rate and hospital rate but a lower death rate.

    The first time around most of the deaths occurred outside hospitals. This time we may see them occurring in ICU.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 467 ✭✭nj27


    What will be the peak daily deaths we will reach then


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,248 ✭✭✭✭iamwhoiam


    Is the step down facility in City West still usuable and fully equipped do we know ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,580 ✭✭✭JDD


    Ger Roe wrote: »
    There comes a tipping point where the virus is so prevelant, that testing to find out where it is, becomes a waste of time and resources - it's everywhere.

    At that point, treatment of serious cases is the main focus, the battle is lost, so look after people when they get it, as opposed to testing to prevent its spread.

    They said all along, test and trace can not be scaled up without limit and it is a method of control that only makes sense if there is a possibility of control.

    I kind of understand this and I kind of don't.

    Say you restrict testing to over 55s and anyone high risk. So you are a 57 year old with asthma, get symptoms and get a test that comes back positive. What use is that you really? There's no early intervention treatment that prevents you from developing a severe case of the virus. The only point of testing to ensure that a positive case self isolates and does not infect others. If we are only testing a small section of a population, and letting the remainder go about their daily business while suffering from milder symptoms that they have convinced themselves is just a cold, perhaps there's no point in testing people with symptoms at all?

    Would we not be better just regularly testing HCW, nursing homes and residential institutions (jails, direct provision etc) to prevent massive breakouts?

    Then we could redeploy all the testing staff at the drive in centres to the vaccination centres?


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 12,387 Mod ✭✭✭✭igCorcaigh


    Paul Reid on radio 1.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,077 ✭✭✭KrustyUCC


    is_that_so wrote: »
    Big stuff like this tends to get out anyway. Given our current trajectory it would be no great surprise to see them pushed out another week.

    The issue will be that it won't just be pushed out one week


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,662 ✭✭✭Duke of Url


    Eod100 wrote: »
    Only 1 doctor from 1 practice and not sure how many were referred but if this scales up nationwide it's pretty bad https://twitter.com/amymorgangp/status/1346019562278551553?s=19

    That is meaningless stat.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,780 ✭✭✭✭ninebeanrows


    nj27 wrote: »
    What will be the peak daily deaths we will reach then

    i would estimate peak around 30-40 a day


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,473 ✭✭✭Mimon


    nj27 wrote: »
    What will be the peak daily deaths we will reach then

    FFS, will you stop.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    nj27 wrote: »
    Wonder if we'll ever hit the 1000 deaths a day stage. Cases are high so deaths will probably skyrocket soon.

    That would need 100,000+ cases a day


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,748 ✭✭✭✭lawred2


    nj27 wrote: »
    Wonder if we'll ever hit the 1000 deaths a day stage. Cases are high so deaths will probably skyrocket soon.

    get a hold of yourself


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,748 ✭✭✭✭lawred2


    titan18 wrote: »
    They should close til the 18th at least and pull the February mid term to make the time back.

    good luck getting teacher's unions onboard with that


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,193 ✭✭✭Ger Roe


    JDD wrote: »
    I kind of understand this and I kind of don't.

    Say you restrict testing to over 55s and anyone high risk. So you are a 57 year old with asthma, get symptoms and get a test that comes back positive. What use is that you really? There's no early intervention treatment that prevents you from developing a severe case of the virus. The only point of testing to ensure that a positive case self isolates and does not infect others. If we are only testing a small section of a population, and letting the remainder go about their daily business while suffering from milder symptoms that they have convinced themselves is just a cold, perhaps there's no point in testing people with symptoms at all?

    Would we not be better just regularly testing HCW, nursing homes and residential institutions (jails, direct provision etc) to prevent massive breakouts?

    Then we could redeploy all the testing staff at the drive in centres to the vaccination centres?

    You have answered your own question. The key to this is people taking responsibility. If anyone wants to blunder about their business until they are tested positive, then the battle is certainly lost.

    The current advice is - act as though you already have it. Test and trace will never counteract mass indifference to the disease.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,052 ✭✭✭Theboinkmaster


    lawred2 wrote: »
    good luck getting teacher's unions onboard with that

    I'd say they'll be closed until 1 Feb if we are lucky.

    Re-open after mid-term worst case scenario.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    KrustyUCC wrote: »
    The issue will be that it won't just be pushed out one week
    It's one that they can make rolling decisions on and week by week makes sense.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,150 ✭✭✭✭Eod100


    Public health doctors deferring their strike. Hard to believe government hasn't resolved this by now. https://twitter.com/ingridmileyRTE/status/1346036335300276225?s=19


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,748 ✭✭✭✭lawred2


    Eod100 wrote: »
    "Every single Government source who spoke privately on Sunday did not expect schools to reopen on the week beginning January 11th." Seems inevitable schools will be delayed again. Government owe it to people to be upfront and give enough notice. Norma Foley meeting opposition today. Guess it could be announced on Wednesday or Thursday. https://www.irishtimes.com/news/politics/covid-19-government-fears-public-believes-it-has-lost-control-1.4449324?mode=amp

    what a failure of governance... schools were open all the way to the week before Christmas with no surges in case numbers.. In fact they've been shut now for two weeks with no reductive impact on case numbers... but FF's determination to sell pints results in schools now being closed well into January.

    Fu(king di(kheads

    FF's populism is toxic to this country.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,790 ✭✭✭Benimar


    lawred2 wrote: »
    good luck getting teacher's unions onboard with that

    I’m 3rd Level. Member of TUI. We don’t have a mid term this year as we are trying to get the Academic Calendar back on track.

    Do you know how much the union (or its members) complained about that? They answer is zero. No complaints whatsoever. So take your union bashing BS somewhere else.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,247 ✭✭✭duffman13


    This is a great idea to keep the numbers down and mask the policy failures and absolute failures. We've been very inventive in keeping people guessing at numbers. "Maybe they know, maybe they don't know, who can say for sure"

    Go to work, don't go to work. Stay at home , have a great Christmas. Go to the pub/restaurant , don't go to the restaurant.
    It's mind numbing at this stage.



    https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/covid-testing-may-be-limited-to-vulnerable-groups-only-39928070.html

    https://twitter.com/caulmick/status/1346007331465781249?s=20

    I used to sub to the Indo for a few months but they have been absolutely atrocious with guess work on Covid, not sure if its just me but they literally try and seem to guess what is happening and are wrong about 80% of the time. Seems like clickbait from them.

    The trend however is awful. It is worrying now as I am hearing of multiple cases from my local area which hasnt happened previously. I knew one positive case up until December and that is now up to 7 now. The local GAA club have had 38 positive cases from 40 tests after they opened for the Dublin game a couple of weeks ago. Its a small bar that doesnt serve food but yet they were somehow open for that. Out to the shops and back, a few walks locally should be the plan for everyone for the next few weeks.

    I was not against the reduction in restrictions in December and probably over the month met about 10 people in total(My family and My OHs family). I didnt think people would go so gung ho and also didnt expect case numbers like this. At the end of the day, it shows that a large minority of people actually cant be trusted to restrain and police themselves at all.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,393 ✭✭✭ZX7R


    Ger Roe wrote: »
    Fear mongering or fact? If the stats are true, it's not fear mongering.

    No point posting on Twitter about positive rate ,without the numbers of referrals.
    With out her number of referrals it doesn't show any true stats.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 306 ✭✭Coolfresian


    Was it just said on radio interview that positivity rate of yesterday's tests hit 30%??!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    lawred2 wrote: »
    what a failure of governance... schools were open all the way to the week before Christmas with no surges in case numbers.. In fact they've been shut now for two weeks with no reductive impact on case numbers... but FFs determination to sell pints results in schools now being closed well into January.

    Fu(king di(kheads
    The issue is not the schools, it's what's in the community that would end up in schools.

    Roderick saying they don't want it to be long-term.

    https://www.rte.ie/news/2021/0104/1187510-schools-covid-health/


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement