Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Covid 19 Part XXX-113,332 ROI(2,282 deaths) 81,251 NI (1,384 deaths) (05/01) Read OP

1175176178180181330

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,193 ✭✭✭Ger Roe


    What about the covid app, did it ever do anything for us? You would think that now is its chance to shine and yet from looking at the daily check in notifications, interaction with it has probably never been lower.

    Right now is when it should be at its most useful, but interaction with it dropped off a cliff with the early battery draining issue and very little attempt was made to restore confidence, even now as the virus rages and the tracing system fails, there is no mention of getting people to use it.

    Is that because it's useless, because the powers that be have forgotten about it, or because they couldn't handle any more data from it, even if they wanted to?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,599 ✭✭✭✭CIARAN_BOYLE


    Ger Roe wrote: »
    What about the covid app, did it ever do anything for us? You would think that now is its chance to shine and yet from looking at the daily check in notifications, interaction with it has probably never been lower.

    Right now is when it should be at its most useful, but interaction with it dropped off a cliff with the early battery draining issue and very little attempt was made to restore confidence, even now as the virus rages and the tracing system fails, there is no mention of getting people to use it.

    Is that because it's useless, because the powers that be have forgotten about it, or because they couldn't handle any more data from it, even if they wanted to?

    Biggest problems in my opinion is that Bluetooth doesn't understand walls or ceilings.

    Someone in my office was identified as a close contact despite not seeing the other person. Their offices are above each other.

    Second problem is that people aren't engaging.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 872 ✭✭✭Sofa King Great


    GreeBo wrote: »
    What's it actually impacting though?
    Sure it's annoying, but they are still testing and treating every positive case, the fact that some posters doing get to wallow it larger numbers is kinda irrelevant really...
    I have had two people tell me since last night that cases are levelling off. If you look back on this thread you will see people saying similar

    Not everybody reads the detail and lots just read the headline


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,677 ✭✭✭Happydays2020


    lawred2 wrote: »
    Seniority based on time served will do that to any organization

    Seniority is gone from the public service for decades. The HSE has a system failure but there are complicated reasons for this. And the vast majority of people who work in the HSE are dedicated and do actually save lives. Nurses and doctors have died of Covid 19 which they have caught in the line of duty. We owe them a lot.

    Not aimed at you but Revenue and Social Protection IT systems facilitated the payments to business and individuals to keep livelihoods on life support for the last 10 months. That is the same public service people are criticising.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,190 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    Clear rift opening up between govt and NPHET at the moment.

    Martin went heavy on, "Our strategy failed because the new UK variant is harder to contain".

    De Gascún has been at pains over the last few days to tell us that less than 10% of new cases are the new variant.

    Which means the current surge is down to rampant socialising over December, and nothing else.

    Don't let the panic merchants wind you up. Nothing has really changed here; the virus is spreading exactly as it would be expected to, and will be suppressed by restrictions, just like we expect it to.

    Children are not suddenly more at risk. We're not going to be locked down till April struggling to get numbers down.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,886 ✭✭✭✭Roger_007


    Ger Roe wrote: »
    What about the covid app, did it ever do anything for us? You would think that now is its chance to shine and yet from looking at the daily check in notifications, interaction with it has probably never been lower.

    Right now is when it should be at its most useful, but interaction with it dropped off a cliff with the early battery draining issue and very little attempt was made to restore confidence, even now as the virus rages and the tracing system fails, there is no mention of getting people to use it.

    Is that because it's useless, because the powers that be have forgotten about it, or because they couldn't handle any more data from it, even if they wanted to?

    The much heralded ‘app’ has turned out to be pretty much useless imo.
    All the advertising being done by the HSE about what we should all be doing never mentions the app.
    It appears to be the same in the UK. It’s never mentioned in any of the news reporting or public advice as far as I can see.
    I suppose it was worth trying but has turned out to be a waste of time and money.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,216 ✭✭✭khalessi


    Roger_007 wrote: »
    The much heralded ‘app’ has turned out to be pretty much useless imo.
    All the advertising being done by the HSE about what we should all be doing never mentions the app.
    It appears to be the same in the UK. It’s never mentioned in any of the news reporting or public advice as far as I can see.
    I suppose it was worth trying but has turned out to be a waste of time and money.

    It will go where the time in the slime went.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,767 ✭✭✭✭blade1


    I blame the virus, humans are social creatures well most are.

    Virus is only being social as well.
    It's up to humans to fix the issue.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,977 ✭✭✭Russman


    Zero Covid is not possible, close to Zero Covid you’ll have to explain? It’s like saying almost pregnant.

    I don’t disagree that zero covid probably isn’t possible, for all the reasons given a thousand times.

    WRT close to zero, isn’t that just another way to describe “living with covid” though ? I’m beginning to wonder if keeping cases at a given level is even possible with covid, whether that level be 50 a day or 1,000 a day. It sees to me that the nature of it is that we’re either in restrictions suppressing it, or relaxing the restrictions and watching it explode. So far we haven’t found a middle ground - has any country ? I don’t know.

    We’re probably past it with the vaccines on the horizon anyway, but does there come a point where we give zero covid a try at least, insofar as we can ? I dont know.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,045 ✭✭✭✭fits


    *My worry is that with virus circulating at high levels in many countries it will be given every opportunity to evolve into a vaccine resistant strain. It really needs to be suppressed alongside vaccination program to give us the best chance of moving on. .

    * completely unscientific opinion.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,653 ✭✭✭✭Plumbthedepths


    blade1 wrote: »
    Virus is only being social as well.
    It's up to humans to fix the issue.

    So any suggestions how you will make young people who for the most part are fit and healthy live like hermits?
    Although just as an aside the first baby born of the new year was to a young mum who looked happy and healthy also positive for Covid 19 on RTE yesterday.Despite everything said here as far as young people are concerned the virus is of little consequence to them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,748 ✭✭✭✭lawred2


    Seniority is gone from the public service for decades. The HSE has a system failure but there are complicated reasons for this. And the vast majority of people who work in the HSE are dedicated and do actually save lives. Nurses and doctors have died of Covid 19 which they have caught in the line of duty. We owe them a lot.

    Not aimed at you but Revenue and Social Protection IT systems facilitated the payments to business and individuals to keep livelihoods on life support for the last 10 months. That is the same public service people are criticising.

    It's quite clearly not the same public service...

    And throwing up nurses and doctors as cover for the administrative, technical and fiduciary failings of the HSE is all too overdone.

    When the HSE is subject to criticism; near zero of that is aimed at doctors or nurses.

    Nobody is expecting a nurse to head up HSE IT projects.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,977 ✭✭✭Russman


    seamus wrote: »
    Clear rift opening up between govt and NPHET at the moment.

    Martin went heavy on, "Our strategy failed because the new UK variant is harder to contain".

    De Gascún has been at pains over the last few days to tell us that less than 10% of new cases are the new variant.

    Which means the current surge is down to rampant socialising over December, and nothing else.

    Don't let the panic merchants wind you up. Nothing has really changed here; the virus is spreading exactly as it would be expected to, and will be suppressed by restrictions, just like we expect it to.

    Children are not suddenly more at risk. We're not going to be locked down till April struggling to get numbers down.

    I agree with most of this, but will the restrictions do enough quick enough ? I mean, it’s not really a lockdown at all is it ? Bar hospitality, pretty much everything will be open. Almost everywhere is classified as essential and every dog and its mother is an essential worker. Time will tell I guess.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,653 ✭✭✭✭Plumbthedepths


    Russman wrote: »
    I don’t disagree that zero covid probably isn’t possible, for all the reasons given a thousand times.

    WRT close to zero, isn’t that just another way to describe “living with covid” though ? I’m beginning to wonder if keeping cases at a given level is even possible with covid, whether that level be 50 a day or 1,000 a day. It sees to me that the nature of it is that we’re either in restrictions suppressing it, or relaxing the restrictions and watching it explode. So far we haven’t found a middle ground - has any country ? I don’t know.

    We’re probably past it with the vaccines on the horizon anyway, but does there come a point where we give zero covid a try at least, insofar as we can ? I dont know.

    I don’t wish to sound dismissive but I have no interest in discussing something which has been thrashed on this thread and several others on multiple occasions . One suggestion though look at the makeup of ISAG, some genuine people but a few utter loons as well.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 105 ✭✭Jaded Walker


    So I see we are stuck on below 1800 announced cases per day. Is this a situation where that's the most they can notify in a day?
    Why can they not bring in people who are unemployed on temporary contracts to help out.
    We have no hope of getting this thing under control if we are unable to track, trace and notify.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,027 ✭✭✭St.Spodo


    seamus wrote: »
    Clear rift opening up between govt and NPHET at the moment.

    Martin went heavy on, "Our strategy failed because the new UK variant is harder to contain".

    De Gascún has been at pains over the last few days to tell us that less than 10% of new cases are the new variant.

    Which means the current surge is down to rampant socialising over December, and nothing else.

    Don't let the panic merchants wind you up. Nothing has really changed here; the virus is spreading exactly as it would be expected to, and will be suppressed by restrictions, just like we expect it to.

    Children are not suddenly more at risk. We're not going to be locked down till April struggling to get numbers down.

    Studies from the UK suggest that children may be more susceptible to this new variant. There are also early reports of more children in hospital with covid than in previous waves. We simply don't know if children are suddenly more at risk or not.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,813 ✭✭✭the corpo


    .Despite everything said here as far as young people are concerned the virus is of little consequence to them.

    If we don't have a society where people care about saving other people, then we don't have a society worth saving.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,653 ✭✭✭✭Plumbthedepths


    the corpo wrote: »
    If we don't have a society where people care about saving other people, then we don't have a society worth saving.
    Yes all well and good and nice on the emotive side.....
    So how do you convince a section of society to live like hermits when the virus is of little harm to them?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,224 ✭✭✭Longing




  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,684 ✭✭✭✭antodeco


    fits wrote: »
    *My worry is that with virus circulating at high levels in many countries it will be given every opportunity to evolve into a vaccine resistant strain. It really needs to be suppressed alongside vaccination program to give us the best chance of moving on. .

    * completely unscientific opinion.

    It will only mutate to survive. As long it's able to spread etc, it will be happy to stay as it is. You're better off letting it spread (with low symptoms) to delay it's mutation as long as possible. When vaccines, more cases come along, that's when there's a likelihood of mutation. Let's just hope it's so busy spreading it doesn't realise we are creeping up behind it with a vaccine!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,444 ✭✭✭✭Sardonicat


    So I see we are stuck on below 1800 announced cases per day. Is this a situation where that's the most they can notify in a day?
    Why can they not bring in people who are unemployed on temporary contracts to help out.
    We have no hope of getting this thing under control if we are unable to track, trace and notify.

    Because the IT system they are using is not designed to process the numbers it currently needs to. It's an exhisting public health notification system used to follow the outbreaks of things like measles, glandular fever, bacterial meningitis. It's not fit for it's current purpose. Putting more people on it won't make it fit. They have the people, the system is at fault.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,886 ✭✭✭✭Roger_007


    So I see we are stuck on below 1800 announced cases per day. Is this a situation where that's the most they can notify in a day?
    Why can they not bring in people who are unemployed on temporary contracts to help out.
    We have no hope of getting this thing under control if we are unable to track, trace and notify.

    I think that we have reached the point where tracing is neither possible or useful. It only works where the numbers are small. If the virus is popping up all over the country and in all sorts of settings, (as it seems to be), then we have no hope of containing it by testing and tracing.
    We can slow the spread a bit by reducing social contacts but with the increasing rate of infection it will probably get to most of the population before the vaccine does.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,099 ✭✭✭✭Jim_Hodge


    antodeco wrote: »
    It will only mutate to survive. As long it's able to spread etc, it will be happy to stay as it is. You're better off letting it spread (with low symptoms) to delay it's mutation as long as possible. When vaccines, more cases come along, that's when there's a likelihood of mutation. Let's just hope it's so busy spreading it doesn't realise we are creeping up behind it with a vaccine!

    Mutations happen regardless of vaccines or not. Some prosper while others don't. Mutations among viruses are constantly occurring: they are not as responses to vaccines or other third party factors.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,444 ✭✭✭✭Sardonicat


    Yes all well and good and nice on the emotive side.....
    So how do you convince a section of society to live like hermits when the virus is of little harm to them?

    Might be a bit late in their early 20s to try and foster empathy for others. Do these people genuinely not give a sh1t about their grandparents or other vulnerable relatives?


  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,684 ✭✭✭✭antodeco


    Sardonicat wrote: »
    Because the IT system they are using is not designed to process the numbers it currently needs to. It's an exhisting public health notification system used to follow the outbreaks of things like measles, glandular fever, bacterial meningitis. It's not fit for it's current purpose. Putting more people on it won't make it fit. They have the people, the system is at fault.

    But I still don't understand why they can't go "we have 8750 additional cases to report. Why don't we just take 1000 of this number and add it to our "max reporting figure"?" And then keep adding each day until the swabs are gone.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 519 ✭✭✭splashuum


    The path of Covid19 moving through the population is the same as every other seasonal illness that passes through the population every year.
    The 2nd peak of a new virus is never as large as the first.
    The hospitals were not overwhelmed in April as the majority of people died in care homes. 90 % of the people that died were not even offered ICU as ethically they were too old or too sick to try to save.
    There is no evidence any meger steps by us humans to change the course of a virus have worked in any country in the world over the last year.
    Viral respiratory illnesses move through very low population densitys and have done yearly since humans have walked on 2 legs.
    PCR testing gives too many false positives and does not provide us with a realistic picture of the virus. The WHO stated last month that due to feedback from countries around reporting too many false positives a PCR positive test should only count as a case if it is accompanied with symptoms. NEPHET are not doing this and do they are misleading the irish people
    There is no evidence that asymptomatic people are driving transmission.
    In January 2018 more people died due to seasonal illness than at the height of the peak in April.
    So far this winter hospitals and ICU have been at record lows. Our deaths this winter have been unusually low and there are no excess deaths.
    2020 on paper in terms of health has been no different than any other year.
    The average age of a Covid19 death in Ireland is 84. The average age of death in Ireland is 82.
    Our response to Covid19 is not evidence based. Its is politically and ideologically driven.
    NEPHET are not experts in infectious diseases they are mostly bureaucrats who have been involved in scandal after scandal. They have been part of a corrupt and incompetent system milking the irish people for decades.
    The Irish people have over indulged in fear porn and no longer possess the cognitive abilty to look objectively at the crises we have created for ourselves.
    Next time you think of patting these clowns on the back for a job well done remember they locked you into your home and shut down businesses for almost a year. They have kept their voter base in the public sector fullly paid. Spent billions but did not create one additional hospital bed.

    Seen this online but it sums it up very well .


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,367 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com


    The ridiculous situation of not publishing figures because of a backlog shows that the real numbers are the hospital figures.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,029 ✭✭✭StevenToast


    Dont worry everyone....Ryan Tubridy will come back from his well deserved Christmas break soon.....

    He will soothe the nation with his wise words and assure us that everything will be fine...

    Doesnt matter if its true or not...everything will be fine.....because Tubridy is the king of kindness...we dont deserve him....he should be paid €1million a year for his role as a national treasure during this pandemic...

    "Don't piss down my back and tell me it's raining." - Fletcher



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,139 ✭✭✭What Username Guidelines


    Ger Roe wrote: »
    What about the covid app, did it ever do anything for us? You would think that now is its chance to shine and yet from looking at the daily check in notifications, interaction with it has probably never been lower.

    Right now is when it should be at its most useful, but interaction with it dropped off a cliff with the early battery draining issue and very little attempt was made to restore confidence, even now as the virus rages and the tracing system fails, there is no mention of getting people to use it.

    Is that because it's useless, because the powers that be have forgotten about it, or because they couldn't handle any more data from it, even if they wanted to?

    I'd love to see an update to the app where you input a unique code upon vaccination. It may treat close contact alerts differently then. But it could also show you number of vaccinated people as a total, like it does with check-ins.

    Without it, people will likely get the jab and then just delete the app maybe. But it would drive more engagement and be a great place to track % vaccinated. Given the level of care that was put into the app in terms of privacy, it would be a great way to identify those vaccinated.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,444 ✭✭✭✭Sardonicat


    antodeco wrote: »
    But I still don't understand why they can't go "we have 8750 additional cases to report. Why don't we just take 1000 of this number and add it to our "max reporting figure"?" And then keep adding each day until the swabs are gone.

    I think its because they need to be inputted into the system to check for duplicates and errors. The figures arent accurate and reliable until this is done. And if you go outside the system and do it manually until the backlog is cleared you are running a massive risk of further cock-ups when the data us finally imputed alongside current data coming in. The big question is, why wasn't the system upgraded/replaced to cope with this eventuality?


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement