Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Covid 19 Part XXX-113,332 ROI(2,282 deaths) 81,251 NI (1,384 deaths) (05/01) Read OP

17172747677330

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,653 ✭✭✭✭Plumbthedepths


    awec wrote: »
    You have genuinely jumped the shark if you are now implying that the unemployed be given powers to enforce a lockdown.

    He makes Paddygreen seem like a bastion of sensibility .


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,059 ✭✭✭✭spookwoman


    Turtwig wrote: »
    Given current rise in hospitalisation I can't see how non Covid care will be able function effectively if the rate continues. This is no longer just about covid cases in hospital it's also about maintaining non covid care and that looks in an increasingly precarious position.

    Probably do what they did at the start stop electives and consults unless important.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 492 ✭✭ax530


    Turtwig wrote: »
    Given current rise in hospitalisation I can't see how non Covid care will be able function effectively if the rate continues. This is no longer just about covid cases in hospital it's also about maintaining non covid care and that looks in an increasingly precarious position.

    This is the concern
    UK & NI have had a large number of cases over a prolonger period of time hear things are bad in London now but NI are they still able to maintain non covid care ? They actually tried the closing schools for 2 weeks up there made no difference to numbers continued to climb.
    on the call for full lockdown the current restrictions advise 'stay at home' however shops ect are open. Is the idea that they should be open with no customers just the staff ? obviously not relistic that people can keep business open with no customers.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,251 ✭✭✭speckle


    thelad95 wrote: »
    Large numbers of people at "beauty spots" seems to have been a sore point for people from day one of this but I'm just wondering is there actually evidence of any sort of cluster related to say an outing at Glendalough due to people having had to brush past someone on a narrow path for approximately one tenth of a second?

    The 5km limit is nonsense and very few European countries have tried to have such Draconian limits on movement. I think it would do a lot for people's health to be able to explore the country a little bit at the weekends or even during the week for the 100,000 plus about to be sat on their arse again for the next few weeks.

    As long as they dont head all for the same few beauty spots and put locals under severe pressure as happened earlier in the year. OPW need to take a leading role here and publicize guidelines... and pointers to good websites with the 1000s of diffferent outdoor nature spots and people if a small rural beauty spot place is buzy stay in their car and drive elsewhere etc.
    Have a checklist including but not exclusive too
    Weather can turn bad quickly in Ireland so prepare
    Dont stay if too buzy
    Bring home your rubbish especially masks.. etc
    Avoid peak times
    Dont block local roads
    Bring your own food
    Dont hang around chatting near other peoples cars
    Avoid touching farm gates
    Dont put yourself at risk up hills or swimming. we dont need to clog up emergency services.
    Many of you are new to being out in nature at this time of year so wecome.. but learn how to thread lightly, safely and responsibly etc etc

    Anhyhow ye get the drift of my suggestion..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43 Fade Into You


    https://twitter.com/Cork City/status/12...908804063?s=20


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,578 ✭✭✭✭Turtwig


    bennyl10 wrote: »
    That completely contradicts what the documentation’s actually says though!

    Messaging has been a joke throughout this.

    (That being said I’m limerick due to return to Dublin so I’m
    Not complaining, it’s just madness on clarity!)

    If you really want some fun. Read the NPHET letters. Then read the mashed up remix that is published government guidelines. Then watch some politican interviews where they provide their own flavourings.

    The guidance is quite clearly analogous to the Pirate Code from Pirates of the Caribbean.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,037 ✭✭✭Polar101


    It would be helpful if the Government would define more clearly what consists "essential retail", and "non essential retail", the definition doesn't appear anywhere in official documentation

    There is a list of "essential retail" on the government site, but they've done a fairly decent job of not linking to it from anywhere else. And as always, they might always do last minute changes - this one hasn't been updated since September.

    https://www.gov.ie/en/publication/625292-updated-list-of-essential-retail-outlets-27th-march-2020/%20


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 8,666 CMod ✭✭✭✭Sierra Oscar


    Turtwig wrote: »
    Given current rise in hospitalisation I can't see how non Covid care will be able function effectively if the rate continues. This is no longer just about covid cases in hospital it's also about maintaining non covid care and that looks in an increasingly precarious position.

    Yeah it is looking like elective procedures, out-patient appointments and screening services could be severely restricted yet again. It's a terrible decision to have to take considering it simply will lead to lives being lost as a result of delayed and missed diagnosis and so on.

    It's astonishing that people still cannot understand, even at this late stage in the pandemic, the need to suppress the virus to prevent decisions such as the above having to be taken. The UK are about to have to start prioritising and rationing critical care services in their hospitals. Critical care patients who end up in hospital for non-Covid reasons will die when they would ordinarily survive.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 705 ✭✭✭thebronze14


    Benimar wrote: »
    I have been generally supportive of the level of restrictions but this is just pigheadedness by the Government.

    Leave schools off till the 18th. Scrap the midterm if need be or cut the Easter holidays. Time can be made up. Allowing this sort of movement and gatherings in indoor spaces given our numbers is silly.

    I've said this a few times but large amounts of time can't really be made up...There's a reason the school holidays are the way they are and it isn't for the benefit of the teachers as some think. Near the end of term the kids are exhausted and aren't able to work effectively and behaviour also becomes an issue. It's not as simple as just getting rid of the Easter Holidays for example or mid-term. You could maybe take a few days off the Easter Holidays, that's it....If they are to take a few days off now then it should move to online learning. It isn't as effective but better than the alternatives


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 671 ✭✭✭Will Yam


    Hubertj wrote: »
    Ah some trumped up self important union rep is now also a public health expert again? I thought tjey were put in their place earlier in the year. Teachers unions are there to argue with government and hold parents to ransom, nothing else.

    I see they have already rejected their next proposed pay rise on grounds that teachers deserve more than everyone else.

    This on top of their demand for extra holidays pre Christmas because of the stress they suffered since their last holiday in November.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,219 ✭✭✭giveitholly


    Would this be the reason for such a dramatic rise in hospital admissions

    https://twitter.com/RiochtConor2/status/1344226682425782272?s=19


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 705 ✭✭✭thebronze14


    KrustyUCC wrote: »
    True but if you change schedule at all the unions will try to find ways to keep schools closed again

    It won't just be a delay of a week or two

    'Look numbers are still increasing it's not safe' etc

    Don't know where you are getting this. The vast majority of teachers are happy to be working. There are issues regarding the reporting in school, what constitutes a close contact, a revocation of the 40% cut in PPE allowances and the frustration that the Government refuse to say that schools have an impact on growth of rates. If these things were sorted we would have no issue. Teachers in general have ZERO interest in any prolonged period of time out of classroom setting


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,496 ✭✭✭lulublue22


    I've said this a few times but large amounts of time can't really be made up...There's a reason the school holidays are the way they are and it isn't for the benefit of the teachers as some think. Near the end of term the kids are exhausted and aren't able to work effectively and behaviour also becomes an issue. It's not as simple as just getting rid of the Easter Holidays for example or mid-term. You could maybe take a few days off the Easter Holidays, that's it....If they are to take a few days off now then it should move to online learning. It isn't as effective but better than the alternatives

    It would’ve been handy if the dep had put a remote learning plan in place during March to June. Instead the focus has been on keeping all schools open which is fine except if schools really do need to close then we are right back to the shambles of March - with individual schools doing their best with whatever resources they had with the net result that some parents were happy and others weren’t. It’s the one area where the dep / gov have really dropped the ball. A clear central remote learning plan outlining expectations and procedures to be followed would have insured better teaching and learning outcomes for all.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 671 ✭✭✭Will Yam


    KrustyUCC wrote: »
    True but if you change schedule at all the unions will try to find ways to keep schools closed again

    It won't just be a delay of a week or two

    'Look numbers are still increasing it's not safe' etc

    And this is one of the reasons the U.K. are wondering about how to reopen the schools once they shut.

    If they close, (even by delaying the reopening for a week), every time they move to reopen them the teachers unions will be out in force demanding they be shut again.

    An odd country. Schoolteachers upset because they have work to go to. Bar staff, hairdressers upset becuse they have no work to go to.

    It’s also ironic that those who want to work are on PUP. Those who dont want to work will get paid regardless.................


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 671 ✭✭✭Will Yam


    khalessi wrote: »


    Since August when the schools went back, the governement have closed nearly everything to keep virus at bay, except schools and no real success. How about they give schools closed a go and see what happens?


    ]

    You seem to have forgotten that schools closed on Tuesday of last week.

    We have seen what happens

    Remind us what happened to the virus numbers since then.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,432 ✭✭✭SusanC10


    Does anyone know what time approx should we expect to be enlightened on the latest restrictions?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 671 ✭✭✭Will Yam


    Don't know where you are getting this. The vast majority of teachers are happy to be working. There are issues regarding the reporting in school, what constitutes a close contact, a revocation of the 40% cut in PPE allowances and the frustration that the Government refuse to say that schools have an impact on growth of rates. If these things were sorted we would have no issue. Teachers in general have ZERO interest in any prolonged period of time out of classroom setting

    You may well be right about the majority of teachers. But the teachers unions are a somewhat different matter.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 671 ✭✭✭Will Yam


    SusanC10 wrote: »
    Does anyone know what time approx should we expect to be enlightened on the latest restrictions?

    I would imagine unofficially about 3.30, officially about 6 pm.


  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 51,690 Mod ✭✭✭✭Stheno


    SusanC10 wrote: »
    Does anyone know what time approx should we expect to be enlightened on the latest restrictions?

    Its been leaked, no need to wait:D

    Id say before the six o'clock news or on it


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 382 ✭✭oldtimeyfella


    SusanC10 wrote: »
    Does anyone know what time approx should we expect to be enlightened on the latest restrictions?

    I'd imagine Leo will spill the beans in the next couple of hours.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,090 ✭✭✭prunudo


    Would this be the reason for such a dramatic rise in hospital admissions

    https://twitter.com/RiochtConor2/status/1344226682425782272?s=19

    Something is going on for sure, the rise in hospital cases don't match the case numbers 10-14 days ago. Or certainly not to the same proportions as back in October. Whether that is down to demographics or something else at play I'm not quite sure.


  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 56,321 Mod ✭✭✭✭Necro


    Will Yam wrote: »
    I see they have already rejected their next proposed pay rise on grounds that teachers deserve more than everyone else.

    This on top of their demand for extra holidays pre Christmas because of the stress they suffered since their last holiday in November.
    Will Yam wrote: »
    And this is one of the reasons the U.K. are wondering about how to reopen the schools once they shut.

    If they close, (even by delaying the reopening for a week), every time they move to reopen them the teachers unions will be out in force demanding they be shut again.

    An odd country. Schoolteachers upset because they have work to go to. Bar staff, hairdressers upset becuse they have no work to go to.

    It’s also ironic that those who want to work are on PUP. Those who dont want to work will get paid regardless.................
    Will Yam wrote: »
    You seem to have forgotten that schools closed on Tuesday of last week.

    We have seen what happens

    Remind us what happened to the virus numbers since then.
    Will Yam wrote: »
    You may well be right about the majority of teachers. But the teachers unions are a somewhat different matter.


    Mod:

    Last time I checked there was a schools thread, stop posting your gripes in this one


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,216 ✭✭✭khalessi


    Norma Foley just appears so far out of her depth. The only thing I recall her doing is saying the children should get a day off homework before xmas

    Agreed, very out of her depth but she also showed us her easel of pictures painted by the boys and girls and got edited into the #GRMA video as she wasnt in the original draft. It has been a busy time for her.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,183 ✭✭✭Neamhshuntasach


    Would this be the reason for such a dramatic rise in hospital admissions

    https://twitter.com/RiochtConor2/status/1344226682425782272?s=19

    When you read hospital admission in the context of covid. The obvious interpretation is that people have presented to hospital with covid symptoms and were admitted because they required hospitalisation due to said symptoms. But this is not the case. My wife is a doctor in a main Dublin hospital that has been primarily dealing with covid patients and she does not understand the figures in these HSE reports.

    From what she understands, the term admission does not necessarily mean someone has presented with covid symptoms. Nor does it mean someone has just presented to hospital for the first time. They may already be in the hospital or returning for follow up. And they have tested positive without any complaints of covid like symptoms. A lot are asymptomatic. Of course some are presenting specifically with covid like symptoms. But a lot are not. For example, there are 2 covid admissions in her hospital but the reported figures are much higher. That is 2 specifically admitted with breathing difficulties etc. Similarly, her understanding of discharge does not necessarily mean the person has left the hospital. They are just no longer counted as a covid patient in hospital. They may be physically discharged or they may be moved back to a non covid ward for the original purpose of hospital admittance.

    If a doctor working day in and day out in a hospital in which the HSE are reporting on can't fully wrap their head around the figures. Then there has to be some clarity nd context missing in what is being reported.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    Stheno wrote: »
    Its been leaked, no need to wait:D

    Id say before the six o'clock news or on it

    They've just released the unsurprising agenda. Closing non-essential retail and the return of the 5km limit is about the extent of it. Logically they should leave the exercise and sports but gyms and leisure centres may also take a hit. The only question is for how long and whether the Jan 12 review is pushed back to say the end of January.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,017 ✭✭✭jackboy


    is_that_so wrote: »
    They've just released the unsurprising agenda. Closing non-essential retail and the return of the 5km limit is about the extent of it. Logically they should leave the exercise and sports but gyms and leisure centres may also take a hit. The only question is for how long and whether the Jan 12 review is pushed back to say the end of January.

    It’s highly likely to last till after paddy’s day.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,389 ✭✭✭irishguy1983


    is_that_so wrote: »
    They too are dealing with this, badly by the looks of some comments. We need to stop looking for people to blame. All that can be done is to keep drilling home the public health messages.

    Correct but some people would break your heart - those having big house parties, etc.

    Apparently gatherings, house hold gatherings is the biggest driver....It has resulted in those wanting maybe who want to play golf outdoors, etc not being able to do so....

    I get what you are saying though...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,155 ✭✭✭✭Arghus


    Yeah it is looking like elective procedures, out-patient appointments and screening services could be severely restricted yet again. It's a terrible decision to have to take considering it simply will lead to lives being lost as a result of delayed and missed diagnosis and so on.

    It's astonishing that people still cannot understand, even at this late stage in the pandemic, the need to suppress the virus to prevent decisions such as the above having to be taken. The UK are about to have to start prioritising and rationing critical care services in their hospitals. Critical care patients who end up in hospital for non-Covid reasons will die when they would ordinarily survive.

    What's even more doubly astonishing is that a lot of the same people will rage against restrictions and attempts to suppress the disease on the grounds that they're thinking about the people not receiving treatment in hospital - and they completely miss the point that if you don't suppress the disease in the community first and foremost there's even less chance of non-Covid care continuing and less chance of non-Covid patients receiving the level of care required. The complete illogic of that argument is always frustrating to read. People who require hospital treatment aren't helped by increasing levels of Covid.

    And some of them - not all, but some - downplay rising case numbers and hospital admittences as being only to do with outbreaks in hospitals, which is false to begin with, but is equally galling because that's then used to justify a blithe attitude towards the levels of risk for the general puplic and to downplay the seriousness of the situation and to rail against the efforts to suppress the disease.

    Less restrictions, equals more Covid, which equals less hospital treatments and patient care across the board.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,137 ✭✭✭✭niallo27


    jackboy wrote: »
    It’s highly likely to last till after paddy’s day.

    Retail closed until Paddy's day, are you mad.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    jackboy wrote: »
    It’s highly likely to last till after paddy’s day.
    I think they may announce 6-8 weeks, but 4 weeks for sure. Paddy's Day is too far away to have any reasonable compliance with a 5km restriction plus we should be well into the initial groups by March, certainly the first 5 groups.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement