Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/

If the world goes completely vegan

16791112

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 676 ✭✭✭Gary kk


    Gary kk wrote: »
    I don't really know, would it be swapped out for palm oil. But surly they could of broke down the uses if it was such a groundbreaking investigation.

    Edit : Just to clarify I don't know because I am having a hell of a time trying to locate solid figures on what products are produced and value of the products produced.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 790 ✭✭✭richie123


    That lab grown meat is years away.
    50 dolllers for a chicken nugget ??
    Maddness,its 30 year minimum before it hits a price point close on today's prices.
    When it does hit that price point the countryside will just be abandoned.
    Beware of the law of unintended consequences.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,555 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    Abandoned countryside brimming with wildlife and trees id what some people want :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,631 ✭✭✭El Tarangu


    Gary kk wrote: »
    https://www.cargill.co.uk/en/liverpool-location

    Its crushed for oil it never mentioned that in the article.


    "Twenty-six percent of the Planet’s ice-free land is used for livestock grazing
    and 33 percent of croplands are used for livestock feed production. "

    http://www.fao.org/3/ar591e/ar591e.pdf

    Perhaps some of this 33% of all of the croplands in use, in the world, produces from soy bean oil for human consumption as well - well, we can only hope. But I'm not sure that this detracts much from the argument that animal husbandry is a huge driver for deforestation and habitat loss.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 790 ✭✭✭richie123


    Abandoned countryside brimming with wildlife and trees id what some people want :)

    I know :)
    Any one know of any companies doing labgrown meat in a quicker timescale and at a cheaper price point ?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,555 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    richie123 wrote: »
    I know :)
    Any one know of any companies doing labgrown meat in a quicker timescale and at a cheaper price point ?

    Not yet, but some day, i reckon. I cant see it ever replacing meat totally it will just be another option, so you wont be out of a job any time soon.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,555 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    Gary kk wrote: »
    Edit : Just to clarify I don't know because I am having a hell of a time trying to locate solid figures on what products are produced and value of the products produced.

    If you look at it from a veggie/vegan perspective, the only place we hear that this stuff is grown for humans primarily, is a few posters on boards. It's not just the Guardian who I know farmers hate, even the Daily Mail are running stories on the Amazon being destroyed for British meat.
    I mean should one of you not inform these news agencies that they're wrong?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 676 ✭✭✭Gary kk


    If you look at it from a veggie/vegan perspective, the only place we hear that this stuff is grown for humans primarily, is a few posters on boards. It's not just the Guardian who I know farmers hate, even the Daily Mail are running stories on the Amazon being destroyed for British meat.
    I mean should one of you not inform these news agencies that they're wrong?

    At this stage if you can give me a breakdown of the numbers from the EU or UN I will take them at face value.

    To be fair it's been a while since the Guardain was unbiased.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 676 ✭✭✭Gary kk


    El Tarangu wrote: »
    "Twenty-six percent of the Planet’s ice-free land is used for livestock grazing
    and 33 percent of croplands are used for livestock feed production. "

    http://www.fao.org/3/ar591e/ar591e.pdf

    Perhaps some of this 33% of all of the croplands in use, in the world, produces from soy bean oil for human consumption as well - well, we can only hope. But I'm not sure that this detracts much from the argument that animal husbandry is a huge driver for deforestation and habitat loss.

    And of the 66% cropland how much is for confectionery for alcohol and other products we don't necessarily need maybe we could rewind that land first. And no I don't expect anyone to agree to that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,631 ✭✭✭El Tarangu


    richie123 wrote: »
    That lab grown meat is years away.
    50 dolllers for a chicken nugget ??
    Maddness,its 30 year minimum before it hits a price point close on today's prices.
    When it does hit that price point the countryside will just be abandoned.
    Beware of the law of unintended consequences.

    While I am hope (indeed, I'm certain) that the farmers of Ireland will be able to adapt and compete with this new entrant to the market, I'm afraid that I don't really find it a compelling argument to continue killing 50,000,000,000 chickens* each and every year in order to safeguard against some job losses in the poultry industry

    * indeed the figure is actually much, much greater than that - this only counts the number of chickens killed in order to eat their meat; it doesn't count the chickens killed in egg production who are too old to lay everyday any longer, or the male chicks in egg production, who, not to harp on this point, are ground up alive the day they are born.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,555 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    Gary kk wrote: »
    And of the 66% cropland how much is for confectionery for alcohol and other products we don't necessarily need maybe we could rewind that land first. And no I don't expect anyone to agree to that.

    Some of us need alcohol


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 676 ✭✭✭Gary kk


    Some of us need alcohol

    Lol me included.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,555 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    Gary kk wrote: »
    Lol me included.

    You can make quite a lot of alcohol with not that much sugar and a packet of yeast and a few flavourings, I make a ginger beer easy enough that comes in at about 7.2%, I wonder what the biological footprint of that is.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,631 ✭✭✭El Tarangu


    Gary kk wrote: »
    And of the 66% cropland how much is for confectionery for alcohol and other products we don't necessarily need maybe we could rewind that land first. And no I don't expect anyone to agree to that.

    Again - this post is an example from posters from the F & F forum asking posters on this forum to solve all the problems of agricultural production, of any kind.

    Perhaps you should try on the beer, wine and spirits forum, because tbh I don't see how this question is relevant to this forum.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 676 ✭✭✭Gary kk


    You can make quite a lot of alcohol with not that much sugar and a packet of yeast and a few flavourings, I make a ginger beer easy enough that comes in at about 7.2%, I wonder what the biological footprint of that is.

    7.2% I would be ko after a pint.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 676 ✭✭✭Gary kk


    El Tarangu wrote: »
    Again - this post is an example from posters from the F & F forum asking posters on this forum to solve all the problems of agricultural production, of any kind.

    Perhaps you should try on the beer, wine and spirits forum, because tbh I don't see how this question is relevant to this forum.

    Cool


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 857 ✭✭✭ElKavo


    The boss of Eat Just called it "one of the most significant milestones in the food industries" but challenges remain.

    Firstly, it is much more expensive to produce lab-grown meat than plant-based products.

    Case in point: Eat Just previously said it would sell lab-grown chicken nuggets at $50 each.

    The cost has since come down but it will still be as expensive as premium chicken.

    SRC: https://www.bbc.com/news/business-55155741

    Although it was $50 the price has already come down. Thought the article doesn't give a todays price. It certainly wont take 30 years before we see these directly competing with the cheapest nuggets on the market. Tech moves quick, far quicker than any optimization in animal farming.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,555 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    I wonder how it works... do they have to feed soy to some kind of meat lab monster?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 857 ✭✭✭ElKavo


    I wonder how it works... do they have to feed soy to some kind of meat lab monster?

    Well 66% anyway :wink:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,250 ✭✭✭Seamai


    https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2020/dec/02/no-kill-lab-grown-meat-to-go-on-sale-for-first-time

    Cultured fake chicken approved in Singapore. I wonder how long before this kind of stuff will become available in Europe?

    I read that earlier, sounds vile. There was a time when some people shifted towards vegetarian diets for health reasons, (myself included for almost 10 years). However veganism seems a very different animal (no pun intended) to me.
    In the last few years there has been a huge drive towards producing all manner of vegan options to pretty much everything, much of it highly processed and not healthy. A few years ago I was in vegan supermarket in Germany and was struck by how processed and unnatural much of the food was. I only eat meat a few times a week but I'd never substitute it with any sort of fake meat.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,555 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    Seamai wrote: »
    I read that earlier, sounds vile. There was a time when some people shifted towards vegetarian diets for health reasons, (myself included for almost 10 years). However veganism seems a very different animal (no pun intended) to me.
    In the last few years there has been a huge drive towards producing all manner of vegan options to pretty much everything, much of it highly processed and not healthy. A few years ago I was in vegan supermarket in Germany and was struck by how processed and unnatural much of the food was. I only eat meat a few times a week but I'd never substitute it with any sort of fake meat.

    Vegan or not, everyone eats too much processed food. It's a big market now for vegans but the staples of a good vegan diet would be pulses and veg.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,992 ✭✭✭✭gozunda


    Gary kk wrote: »
    Edit : Just to clarify I don't know because I am having a hell of a time trying to locate solid figures on what products are produced and value of the products produced.

    I'd agree with that much of what is published is at best confusing.

    I think what we do know is that 86% of livestock feed is not suitable for human consumption and much of that is crop residues and by-products

    On the article quoted above
    Analysis of shipping data shows that Cargill imported 1.5m tonnes of Brazilian soya to the UK in the six years 

    That works out at approx. 250,000 kg of Brazilian soybeans imported into the UK each year. And as you pointed out those soybeans are processed for their oil and the leftover meal is sent for animal feed.

    Don't agree with growing soy there - but looking at total Soybean production for Brazil - that's a drop in the ocean tbh. Production figures show that more than 122 million metric tons of soy beans were grown in Brazil in 2019/ 2020.

    In the same period combined domestic use and exports of soy beans to China made up 87% (106.6 million metric tons) of all soybeans grown in Brazil

    Leaving approx 13 % of all Brazilian soybeans being exported to other countries globally - of which the main importers were the Netherlands, Iran and Spain Thailand and Turkey.

    I'd like to see all countries stopping such imports from Brazil. Not sure how that would go down with China tbh.

    At present approx two thirds of all soybeans are grown outside of Brazil with the United States as the leading soybean producing country globally. No reason Brazilian production cant be moved to other suitable regions which don't involve deforestation tbh.


  • Posts: 6,995 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2020/dec/02/no-kill-lab-grown-meat-to-go-on-sale-for-first-time

    Cultured fake chicken approved in Singapore. I wonder how long before this kind of stuff will become available in Europe?

    It’s clear where all this is heading and it’s great to see.

    The numbers in there are crazy and this is from the article - https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2019/02/chart-of-the-day-this-is-how-many-animals-we-eat-each-year/

    This will be an easy transition for your average carnist to make and especially the younger carnist who wants to make better choices for, what will be, their planet.

    It’s also good to see the terms ‘drug-free’ and ‘cruelty-free meat’ in that article as I’ve never understood the struggle to accept that those terms have common use.

    The Guardian has always provided great journalism and I’m happy to make my regular contributions to access their online content. I would encourage more people to do this. I do it through PayPal.

    This article gives hope and it’s great to think that within 20 years we could see that 60% of meat provided will not come from dead animals - https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/jun/12/most-meat-in-2040-will-not-come-from-slaughtered-animals-report

    That’s great news for the environment and for the billions of animals that won’t face slaughter.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,555 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    The Guardian have this as their main story tonight

    https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2020/dec/02/humanity-is-waging-war-on-nature-says-un-secretary-general-antonio-guterres

    They are the only major news source that are taking the environmental crisis seriously. That is why I have given them contributions. Also love their sport content.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 790 ✭✭✭richie123


    Not yet, but some day, i reckon. I cant see it ever replacing meat totally it will just be another option, so you wont be out of a job any time soon.

    Why wouldn't it replace meat it's basically the same thing ?
    Only problem I have with this is it'll just be big conglomerate s that will be allowed produce it!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,555 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    richie123 wrote: »
    Why wouldn't it replace meat it's basically the same thing ?
    Only problem I have with this is it'll just be big conglomerate s that will be allowed produce it!

    Well you're talking to a tiny subsection of people in this sub, most people would probably prefer to eat real animals, for now anyway. I just hope we can find a way to balance nature with food production, worldwide.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 790 ✭✭✭richie123


    Well you're talking to a tiny subsection of people in this sub, most people would probably prefer to eat real animals, for now anyway. I just hope we can find a way to balance nature with food production, worldwide.

    Lab grown has some battle to become mainstream.beef at the minute is produced below cost and it's dirt cheap ..vast majority on the planet don't care what they eat so long as it's cheap


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,955 ✭✭✭White Clover


    richie123 wrote: »
    Lab grown has some battle to become mainstream.beef at the minute is produced below cost and it's dirt cheap ..vast majority on the planet don't care what they eat so long as it's cheap

    True, but the conglomerates aim is money, they will keep banging the drum that food is manufactured by them in a factory.
    Essentially, a certain amount of people will be dependent on these manufacturers for their food. The remainder will still realise that they can produce their own food of much higher quality without swelling the coffers of big business.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,119 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tar.Aldarion


    richie123 wrote: »
    Lab grown has some battle to become mainstream.beef at the minute is produced below cost and it's dirt cheap ..vast majority on the planet don't care what they eat so long as it's cheap

    I wonder how cheap they can make it, should have low costs when it is at scale. In 4 years it got 30,000 times cheaper to make.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,494 ✭✭✭✭patsy_mccabe


    No farm yard animals = no farm yard manure

    No farm yard manure = no organic fertiliser

    No organic fertiliser = no sustainable food production for 8.3 billion people


    It really is that simple.


    .


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement