Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Why are so many people still going to work

1235»

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,709 ✭✭✭c68zapdsm5i1ru


    _Kaiser_ wrote: »
    Exactly!

    Plus, a lot of people don't have the setup for prolonged WFH - maybe they're renting a house with 3 others, maybe they don't have enough space for a home office, maybe the distractions of kids and family are impacting on their ability to work...

    Then because the capacity on public transport is restricted, or because they see it as increased risk, many are driving where they otherwise wouldn't - adding to the traffic H8 is seeing


    But ultimately, we have to remember... despite all the negativity from Tony H and co, despite the constant calls to "do more" and finger-wagging at those living their lives, deaths continue to be extremely low and many of the new cases are within hospitals themselves.

    Plus, this is a seasonal virus. We were always going to see increased cases in the colder months and in the spring/early summer they'll reduce to single/double digits as they did earlier in the year. It means nothing.. OUTCOME of cases is the important metric and for the overwhelming majority, the outcome is positive.

    Tony H is desperate now as he sees his grip on the population failing. He's tried shaming the youth, people having a drink in the open air, people wanting to come home for Christmas in a year when it's even more important to them than ever, and now it's people working to pay their bills and support themselves and their families.

    Even the Government have had to remind him this week that he doesn't make the decisions and his media appearances and edicts are unwelcome.

    Lockdown in ending in a week and a half whether he likes it or not.

    Gosh you obviously know it all. Why on earth aren't you running the Hse, or even the country.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,414 ✭✭✭bladespin


    No one's saying it can be. But official advice is that unless your work is absolutely essential and can't be done from home then don't go into work. But obviously many people are ignoring that and covid cases are going up.

    The vast majority of work is considered essential according to current guidelines, the essential list looks small enough but it’s actually enormous.

    MasteryDarts Ireland - Master your game!



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,709 ✭✭✭c68zapdsm5i1ru


    bladespin wrote: »
    The vast majority of work is considered essential according to current guidelines, the essential list looks small enough but it’s actually enormous.

    Yes but how much is essential and cannot be done from home?

    I know in my workplace there are people regularly going in and everyone else is wondering why as their presence in the office isn't essential. They just prefer to go in.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,030 ✭✭✭✭_Kaiser_


    Why do people insist on spreading lies? What exactly is your source on that, Donald Trump? You think north Brazil is cold in July (winter) and that's why they have so many cases and deaths?

    A rise in temperature slightly lowers the death rates and slightly slows the spread. Slightly. We saw few cases and deaths in the summer because we locked down and locking down works.

    Locking down does nothing except cause a lot of other issues - economic, social, physical and mental health, and of course other medical issues that aren't caught in time because of the fear factor. As soon as you open up again, the cases start to rise. It's not realistic nor desirable to lock a population down indefinitely.

    I'll say it again. Out of a population of 5 million, after 9 months, we have seen only 2000-ish deaths when compared to initial predictions of several times that.
    Despite the significantly increased case numbers since the start of autumn, ICU admissions continue to be extremely low, and actual deaths even lower.
    Many people don't even realise that they have CV-19 until they're told they've tested positive, that's how little risk it is to them.

    In other words, this virus is nowhere near as deadly as was first feared and Ireland has, on the whole, come through it very well. Yes, the deaths that have occurred are sad and a loss to their families and loved ones, but let's not forget many of those deaths have been the direct result of the scandalous decisions made regarding elderly patients and nursing homes in the early phases, and the continued inability of the HSE to manage hospitals and treatment generally.

    It's a fallacy to believe that people won't die, and indeed are dying, regardless of CV-19 and it's very likely that many more will die because of the negative effects that all this has had on other essential care like cancer screenings and treatment.

    The other thing lockdown has done is cause significant social issues in this country with "we're all in this together" rapidly changing to "you're with us or you're against us" and "everyone is in this with me".

    We've seen it very evident on this site alone where battle lines are drawn between those who are in agreement with the restrictions and those who question the need and proportionality of the decisions, but it's rife amongst social and mainstream media platforms generally and more concerning is the targeting and shouting down (to the point of hounding them out of their jobs in some cases) of other medical professionals and experts who are not "on message" with the accepted narrative on those platforms. Whatever your views on restrictions, this is a dangerous turn for free speech and debate in a society.

    Just as worrying is the apparent relegation of our elected Government in favour of the edicts of the same group of medical professionals and civil servants who have mismanaged the response and health service generally. That's not healthy for our democracy as a whole.

    The bottom line is that all lockdown has ultimately done in Ireland is make the situation worse.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,975 ✭✭✭✭Zebra3


    No one's saying it can be. But official advice is that unless your work is absolutely essential and can't be done from home then don't go into work. But obviously many people are ignoring that and covid cases are going up.

    Each person's work is essential to them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,936 ✭✭✭✭Weepsie


    _Kaiser_ wrote: »
    Locking down does nothing except cause a lot of other issues - economic, social, physical and mental health, and of course other medical issues that aren't caught in time because of the fear factor. As soon as you open up again, the cases start to rise. It's not realistic nor desirable to lock a population down indefinitely.

    I'll say it again. Out of a population of 5 million, after 9 months, we have seen only 2000-ish deaths when compared to initial predictions of several times that.
    Despite the significantly increased case numbers since the start of autumn, ICU admissions continue to be extremely low, and actual deaths even lower.
    Many people don't even realise that they have CV-19 until they're told they've tested positive, that's how little risk it is to them.

    In other words, this virus is nowhere near as deadly as was first feared and Ireland has, on the whole, come through it very well. Yes, the deaths that have occurred are sad and a loss to their families and loved ones, but let's not forget many of those deaths have been the direct result of the scandalous decisions made regarding elderly patients and nursing homes in the early phases, and the continued inability of the HSE to manage hospitals and treatment generally.


    The other thing lockdown has done is cause significant social issues in this country with "we're all in this together" rapidly changing to "you're with us or you're against us" and "everyone is in this with me".


    .

    That number of deaths shows lockdown might have worked.

    I'm astounded that people who generally don't give a **** about real mental health issues are all of a sudden experts.

    Society has ways been like that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,030 ✭✭✭✭_Kaiser_


    Gosh you obviously know it all. Why on earth aren't you running the Hse, or even the country.

    Childishness and grandstanding for likes aside, have you anything add or counter what I've said?

    What I find amazing is how people like yourself have blind faith in the same group of officials and organisation who have mismanaged the health service for decades, squandered ever increasing budgets without real improvements being delivered, and stumbled from crisis to scandal throughout.

    Why exactly do you believe that they're suddenly any more professional or competent on this issue? I'm guessing you'll probably be surprised when the inevitable enquiries and tribunal come along into the handling of the situation once this IS finally all over.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,414 ✭✭✭bladespin


    Yes but how much is essential and cannot be done from home?

    I know in my workplace there are people regularly going in and everyone else is wondering why as their presence in the office isn't essential. They just prefer to go in.

    This is where it becomes difficult, I've and managed (usually) to work remotely quite often, a very recent example: an essential medical customer had a line down issue due to a computer failure on one of their machines, new computer sourced, software loaded and of course it still didn't work, traced to a software driver issue, if you work with software you'll understand that a driver update is literally a 5 minute job (no exaggeration) BUT with their engineers and myself all working remotely it suddenly became complicated, especially as they cannot allow outside access to their internal network - cue IT managers, line managers, myself and some poor unfortunate picked from those present at the factory - eventually done but it took nearly a full day to do, it would have been quicker for me to jump in the car and drive from Dublin to Galway, do the job and head back.
    In future I'd be very unlikely to try to do that remotely again due to hassle, cost etc.

    (sorry that looks a bit long winded)

    MasteryDarts Ireland - Master your game!



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 7,270 Mod ✭✭✭✭cdeb


    _Kaiser_ wrote: »
    What I find amazing is how people like yourself have blind faith in the same group of officials and organisation who have mismanaged the health service for decades, squandered ever increasing budgets without real improvements being delivered, and stumbled from crisis to scandal throughout.
    The HSE are made up of qualified medical personnel, taking their guidance here from the WHO, also a body of very experienced medical professionals. Both bodies include specialists on infectious diseases.

    Medical professionals the world over are taking very similar steps to us, so we're hardly an outlier.

    Could you set out your own medical qualifications for us? That will help us decide whether to listen to the HSE/WHO or to a random punter on the internet.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 105 ✭✭8k71ps


    cdeb wrote: »
    The HSE are made up of qualified medical personnel, taking their guidance here from the WHO, also a body of very experienced medical professionals. Both bodies include specialists on infectious diseases.

    Medical professionals the world over are taking very similar steps to us, so we're hardly an outlier.

    Could you set out your own medical qualifications for us? That will help us decide whether to listen to the HSE/WHO or to a random punter on the internet.

    Medical professionals who refused to accept the efficacy of masks and bungled the response right from the beginning, with the airports remaining opening and covid freely able to spread for months. However the truth that the covid-deniers don't get is that the government is utterly destroying the response not by going too far, but by not doing nearly enough to bring about a return to normality. There is simply no alternative to lockdown without proper testing, tracing and quarantining, which they have utterly failed to do. If they can't even properly quantify the risks of schools being open (which at the very least has many other countries far more wary of the situation then us) then they aren't fit to rule or advise.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,030 ✭✭✭✭_Kaiser_


    cdeb wrote: »
    The HSE are made up of qualified medical personnel, taking their guidance here from the WHO, also a body of very experienced medical professionals. Both bodies include specialists on infectious diseases.

    Medical professionals the world over are taking very similar steps to us, so we're hardly an outlier.

    Could you set out your own medical qualifications for us? That will help us decide whether to listen to the HSE/WHO or to a random punter on the internet.

    I'm sure I have the same qualifications as you do in that regard. Your point is also self-defeating. Why should anyone listen to you either unless you have MD in your background.

    You like the other poster I quoted are exactly what I was referring to earlier also. Your argument is nothing more than a replay of the 'accepted narrative' to show how "on message" you are, and an attempt to attack my credibility because that's how you deal with differing views these days.

    It doesn't dismiss anything I've said nor the validity of it - feel free to prove me wrong though


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 7,270 Mod ✭✭✭✭cdeb


    I'm not asking you to compare your medical qualifications to mine though.

    I'm asking you to compare your medical qualifications to the medically qualified experts in infectious diseases whose opinion you are so dismissive of us having "blind faith" in.

    I'm happy to follow said medical experts - across the world, not just in Ireland - over a random punter on the internet if you have nothing to show in response. Which evidently you don't, or you wouldn't have answered a different question to the one I asked.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,118 ✭✭✭Melanchthon


    Zebra3 wrote: »
    Each person's work is essential to them.

    True I am not a work from home zealot I can't myself anyway and I know enough people that hate it but its a fact that unlike the last lockdown there is people working from offices that do not need to, these are literally people that successfully worked from home during that lockdown


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,975 ✭✭✭✭Zebra3


    cdeb wrote: »
    I'm not asking you to compare your medical qualifications to mine though.

    I'm asking you to compare your medical qualifications to the medically qualified experts in infectious diseases whose opinion you are so dismissive of us having "blind faith" in.

    I'm happy to follow said medical experts - across the world, not just in Ireland - over a random punter on the internet if you have nothing to show in response. Which evidently you don't, or you wouldn't have answered a different question to the one I asked.

    Just like the financial experts who promised us the cheapest bank bailout in history.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 7,270 Mod ✭✭✭✭cdeb


    I mean, that has absolutely nothing to do with the point at hand.

    Bankers are there to make money only, so ultimately human nature means it's not surprising they're a shower of corrupt numpties.

    Medical people are there to make money - so yeah, there's issues with excessive consultants' fees going through health insurance systems, etc.

    But that doesn't mean anything when we're talking about their medical knowledge.

    If you want to disprove what the medical experts are saying, then "Yeah, well the finance experts made a mess of the bailout" is pretty much akin to saying "I have no idea what I'm talking about, but I want to have an opinion anyway". And the correct response to that is to smile politely and move on.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,192 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    cdeb wrote: »
    The HSE are made up of qualified medical personnel, taking their guidance here from the WHO, also a body of very experienced medical professionals. Both bodies include specialists on infectious diseases.
    And as has been noted C the HSE were all over the place with advice from early on. One of their "very experienced qualified medical professionals" was giving out advice in March that asymptomatic spread wasn't a problem and living with a known contact Covid person was of little risk unless they started showing symptoms of a runny nose. A month after even interwebs eejits with a functioning search engine could have pointed to research and results that showed this to be a complete nonsense. And that's before the whole masks don't work/magically work in some places, but not in others debacle, or the handling or lack of same around care homes. Overall our response has been pretty good, but it can be argued our lower population density and type of housing played as big a role as HSE advice.

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 7,270 Mod ✭✭✭✭cdeb


    So at the start of all this, the HSE and WHO were learning as they went along.

    I think that's fine. It's a new illness.

    But it still doesn't mean that we should listen to _Kaiser_, a random punter on the internet, when they say it's a seasonal illness (based on...well, I don't know what), or that we should continue to ignore the HSE now (based not on their medical experience, but on their management experience).


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 187 ✭✭On the Beach


    Anyone backing the HSE is having a laugh. They've been a disgrace for years. I wouldn't be hanging my hat on the WHO either. A lot of people like to hang on to the notion that those above us know what they're at or have our best interests at heart as it's more comforting and reassuring than not trusting them. It's the same with the government, governments around the world and a lot of big global organisations. A lot of the time when they're doing stuff, it's a PR exercise to make it look like they're fixing the problem when a lot of the time they're not. That's politics.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,975 ✭✭✭✭Zebra3


    cdeb wrote: »
    I mean, that has absolutely nothing to do with the point at hand.

    Bankers are there to make money only, so ultimately human nature means it's not surprising they're a shower of corrupt numpties.

    Medical people are there to make money - so yeah, there's issues with excessive consultants' fees going through health insurance systems, etc.

    But that doesn't mean anything when we're talking about their medical knowledge.

    If you want to disprove what the medical experts are saying, then "Yeah, well the finance experts made a mess of the bailout" is pretty much akin to saying "I have no idea what I'm talking about, but I want to have an opinion anyway". And the correct response to that is to smile politely and move on.

    It's totally relevant as we're discussing government ineptitude.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 7,270 Mod ✭✭✭✭cdeb


    Zebra3 wrote: »
    It's totally relevant as we're discussing government ineptitude.
    But as I say, managing a large organisation like the HSE (with government interference) is different from being able to give a professionally qualified expert opinion on something, with backup data from similar organisations and experts all around the world.

    So if you're going to disagree with a medical expert on a medical matter, then fine, but let's have a solid reason why we should listen to, say, Zebra3 instead, who would in all likelihood exhibit greater ineptitude if put into the government positions you're talking about.

    Or if _Kaiser_ comes in mickey swinging and saying the HSE are a bunch of clowns best ignored and this is a season disease no worse than flu (can't remember who said the last part; maybe it wasn't _Kaiser_) and gives no reasons, then the correct first step is to call the poster out on what he's saying.

    No-one has yet managed to give a reason why I shouldn't just dismiss _Kaiser_ with a bit of a patronising smile tbh.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,975 ✭✭✭✭Zebra3


    cdeb wrote: »
    But as I say, managing a large organisation like the HSE (with government interference) is different from being able to give a professionally qualified expert opinion on something, with backup data from similar organisations and experts all around the world.

    So if you're going to disagree with a medical expert on a medical matter, then fine, but let's have a solid reason why we should listen to, say, Zebra3 instead, who would in all likelihood exhibit greater ineptitude if put into the government positions you're talking about.

    Or if _Kaiser_ comes in mickey swinging and saying the HSE are a bunch of clowns best ignored and this is a season disease no worse than flu (can't remember who said the last part; maybe it wasn't _Kaiser_) and gives no reasons, then the correct first step is to call the poster out on what he's saying.

    No-one has yet managed to give a reason why I shouldn't just dismiss _Kaiser_ with a bit of a patronising smile tbh.

    Well why should anyone trust NPHET when their advice radically changed when one person re-entered the group?


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 7,270 Mod ✭✭✭✭cdeb


    There isn't really enough there in the question for me to go on to be honest.

    Medical professionals aren't perfect of course - especially in the context of a brand new disease that we're trying to contain as we learn it. However, they have spent years of their lives working with stuff like this and by now - 8 months in - I'd trust them to have a reasonable handle on what is effectively their job, especially when you add in the support they have from many similar organisations around the world, all of whom are on roughly the same page here.

    And I'll ask my question again - do you think we should go with the view of a random internet poster instead? Online anonymity can bring out a lot of faux experts (not just with covid - there's similar experts on the Stephen Kenny thread talking about motivational videos for example)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,246 ✭✭✭✭Dyr


    Interesting to see the press round on the Danish study of masks immediately as it challenged the narrative. The idea that the likes of the WHO and the HSE are making decisions that are not primarily political is hilariously naive.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,709 ✭✭✭c68zapdsm5i1ru


    _Kaiser_ wrote: »
    I'm sure I have the same qualifications as you do in that regard. Your point is also self-defeating. Why should anyone listen to you either unless you have MD in your background.

    You like the other poster I quoted are exactly what I was referring to earlier also. Your argument is nothing more than a replay of the 'accepted narrative' to show how "on message" you are, and an attempt to attack my credibility because that's how you deal with differing views these days.

    It doesn't dismiss anything I've said nor the validity of it - feel free to prove me wrong though

    You're not making any sense. The 'accepted narrative' is advice from the Who and our own national health experts. Yet you somehow think you know better than them????

    Should we also be going to you for legal advice, when our pets are ill, when our kids need counselling, when we need tax advice??


Advertisement