Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

FE1 Exam Thread (Read 1st post!) NOTE: YOU MAY SWAP EXAM GRIDS

1240241243245246334

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 552 ✭✭✭awsah


    insantiy is an internal factor, automatism is an external factor. this is copied from my manual;

    Insanity v Automatism
    [10-20] The distinction between insanity and automatism is particularly important and has
    been expressed in various ways. In R. v Rabey5 (a case we will look at in more detail later)
    Martin JA for the Ontario Court of Appeal said the distinction is between a malfunctioning of
    the mind caused by an internal factor (insanity) and one that is caused by an external factor
    (automatism):
    “[T]he distinction to be drawn is between a malfunctioning of the mind arising from some
    cause that is primarily internal to the accused, having its source in his psychological or
    emotional make-up, or in some organic pathology, as opposed to a malfunctioning of the
    mind, which is the transient effect produced by some specified external factor such as,
    for example, concussion. Any malfunctioning of the mind, or mental disorder having its
    source primarily in some subjective condition or weakness internal to the accused
    (whether fully understood or not) may be a ‘disease of the mind’ if it prevents the accused
    from knowing what he is doing, but transient disturbances of consciousness due to
    certain specific external factors do not fall within the concept of ‘disease of the mind’.”
    [10-21] In R v Falconer
    6 Malcolm C.J. in the Court of Criminal Appeal of Western Australia
    drew a distinction between “non-insane automatism” (automatism) and “insane automatism”
    (insanity), saying:
    “In the context of automatism, if the accused did not know the nature and quality of his
    act because of something other than a defect of reason from disease of the mind, then
    his act may not be properly described as voluntary. In such a case he would be entitled
    to be acquitted on the ground that the Crown had failed to prove beyond a reasonable
    doubt that the relevant act was voluntary. This is the significance of non-insane
    automatism. If the failure to realise the nature and quality of the act was due to a defect

    4 Section 20(4).
    5 (1977) 37 CCC (2d) 461.
    6 (1990) 171 CLR 30.
    THE DEFENCES CHAPTER 10
    156 | P a g e
    © Griffith College Professional Law School
    of reason from disease of the mind, then according to the McNaghten Rules, the accused
    would be not guilty, but insane … This is the significance of insane automatism … The
    rationale of the distinction lies in the need to protect the community from the recurrent
    conduct of persons suffering from a disease of the mind.”

    External factors capable in law of causing a state of Automatism
    [10-22] In R. v Quick7 Lawton L.J said, “[a] malfunctioning of the mind of transitory effect
    caused by the application to the body of some external factor such as violence, drugs, including
    anaesthetics, alcohol and hypnotic influences cannot fairly be said to be due to disease.”


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 343 ✭✭IgoPAP


    Is the mock exam for today not appearing for anybody else.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 99 ✭✭Lealaw


    IgoPAP wrote: »
    Is the mock exam for today not appearing for anybody else.

    Think it was only available until 2pm. Hope you logged in and got to have a look around it


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 134 ✭✭Lawlaw12


    IgoPAP wrote: »
    Is the mock exam for today not appearing for anybody else.

    It was only available until 2pm today


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 343 ✭✭IgoPAP


    Lawlaw12 wrote: »
    It was only available until 2pm today

    I'm such an f-ing idiot. I thought it was from 2pm on Friday! Can anybody explain what it's like before I panic.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 208 ✭✭Aoibhin511


    IgoPAP wrote: »
    I'm such an f-ing idiot. I thought it was from 2pm on Friday! Can anybody explain what it's like before I panic.


    I took some pictures send me your email and I'll send them to you so you can see
    the layout


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 343 ✭✭IgoPAP


    Aoibhin511 wrote: »
    I took some pictures send me your email and I'll send them to you so you can see
    the layout

    PM'd!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5 SS_98


    Wondering if anyone can help!

    I thought the mock exam started at 2 today but turns out that’s the time it ended. After about 5 mins from logging in I got a warning saying return to exam and then I was kicked.. just wondering did I do something wrong or is this what happens when the exam is over? Can’t get through to anyone from the law society!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 189 ✭✭Supermax1988


    Just phoned the law society there as I had a minor panic attack wondering about what would happen if the timer for the exam hit zero before you've clicked to submit the exam for grading and was told that it looks like they're going to give us an extra 30 minutes at the end to have time to review and submit our exam. She said we should get notice about it shortly.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 99 ✭✭Lealaw


    IgoPAP wrote: »
    PM'd!

    Did you get sorted?

    The paper itself was the march 2020 criminal from what I could make out.

    It was pretty nice to navigate I thought. If you login to the practice exam on better examination, it is pretty similar. All of them with the text box like questions 2. It has additional functionality of the sticky note and the note pad. The last bit is the same in the review of the paper and finish.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 125 ✭✭Hazel774


    Just phoned the law society there as I had a minor panic attack wondering about what would happen if the timer for the exam hit zero before you've clicked to submit the exam for grading and was told that it looks like they're going to give us an extra 30 minutes at the end to have time to review and submit our exam. She said we should get notice about it shortly.

    "shortly"... their favourite word lol


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 99 ✭✭Lealaw


    SS_98 wrote: »
    Wondering if anyone can help!

    I thought the mock exam started at 2 today but turns out that’s the time it ended. After about 5 mins from logging in I got a warning saying return to exam and then I was kicked.. just wondering did I do something wrong or is this what happens when the exam is over? Can’t get through to anyone from the law society!


    The exam was only available until 2pm. I'm sure that is why it ended.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32 LawCopy16


    Hi guys,

    I was not able to do the practice exam on better examinations, due to personal reasons I wasn't able to be available during the window when the practice exam was scheduled.
    I have installed the proctorio extension on my browser myself but I'm just wondering if there is anything else I need to do? I have had a look at the betterexaminations software but I am not clear about how the exam will appear for me on the day. Would anyone be able to give me even just a brief run down of how the exam will appear - like is it a split screen situation where the exam is on one side and the answer book on the other? and how we access the notepad feature that allows us to take rough notes? Sorry for all the questions and thanks in advance for any help! 


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 191 ✭✭Jeremiah25


    Lawlaw12 wrote: »
    For constitutional, would people plan on doing the case note questions?

    I know it might be hard to avoid depending on the particular paper. But for EU people generally recommend avoiding case notes, so just wondering if it's the same for constitutional?

    Case notes for Cons. are even more unpredictable than those in EU. Think the same case has only appeared once.

    However, there does tend to be a focus on some relatively recent case law so could be worth reading up on the big judgments from this year.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35 bkm2020


    LawCopy16 wrote: »
    Hi guys,

    I was not able to do the practice exam on better examinations, due to personal reasons I wasn't able to be available during the window when the practice exam was scheduled.
    I have installed the proctorio extension on my browser myself but I'm just wondering if there is anything else I need to do? I have had a look at the betterexaminations software but I am not clear about how the exam will appear for me on the day. Would anyone be able to give me even just a brief run down of how the exam will appear - like is it a split screen situation where the exam is on one side and the answer book on the other? and how we access the notepad feature that allows us to take rough notes? Sorry for all the questions and thanks in advance for any help! 

    Hi.

    The questions are individually listed- so if you click question 1, you will be brought to that question. Directly underneath the question is a box where u type your answer. On the right side of this page they're are icons ( sticky note, note pad, highlight). All these features are the same for each question. So, if you have a sticky note on question 5, it will stay on question 5. If that makes sense?
    Someone in a previous post has photos of it.
    I hope this helps somehow!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11 yipyop


    Hey just wondering if anyone has condensed notes for the Landlord and Tenant chapter of Property? I have useful revision guides if anyone needs.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 134 ✭✭Lawlaw12


    Jeremiah25 wrote: »
    Case notes for Cons. are even more unpredictable than those in EU. Think the same case has only appeared once.

    However, there does tend to be a focus on some relatively recent case law so could be worth reading up on the big judgments from this year.

    Thanks :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 162 ✭✭SKLaw


    Update on the LS website is that we’ll have an extra 30 minutes for the exams

    “Exam timetable

    All examinations will be held between 10.00am and 1.30pm:

    Download the November 2020 FE-1 timetable (updated 23 October 2020)”


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 208 ✭✭Aoibhin511


    SKLaw wrote: »
    Update on the LS website is that we’ll have an extra 30 minutes for the exams

    “Exam timetable

    All examinations will be held between 10.00am and 1.30pm:

    Download the November 2020 FE-1 timetable (updated 23 October 2020)”


    Great!
    The phrasing is funny though. Does it mean that we all have 3.5 hours or that we have 3 hours between 10 and 1:30, like in case we are slow logging in or something?
    The word between is throwing me I think


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 162 ✭✭SKLaw


    Aoibhin511 wrote: »
    Great!
    The phrasing is funny though. Does it mean that we all have 3.5 hours or that we have 3 hours between 10 and 1:30, like in case we are slow logging in or something?
    The word between is throwing me I think

    I'm not entirely sure either. My hopeful brain would like to believe that we have 3.5 hours but knowing the LS who knows

    The timetable still says 10:00 and 1:00pm though


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 134 ✭✭Lawlaw12


    When you click on the timetable link it still says 10am-1pm though?
    I'm even more confused now


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81 ✭✭maggie95


    Lawlaw12 wrote: »
    When you click on the timetable link it still says 10am-1pm though?
    I'm even more confused now

    I think they've updated it - the website and pdf timetable both say 10:00 - 1:30pm now!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 76 ✭✭Fe123


    So lost for equity guys!! Any tips not sure what to cover


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 134 ✭✭Lawlaw12


    They've uploaded an FAQ's document on the website:

    Bathroom breaks, water and legislation are all permitted and it confirms there is an extra 30 minutes
    No rough work paper, no printing

    Also mentions that your work will be saved every 60 seconds, so should be saved in the event that you wifi goes out and you should call them to register that you encountered a problem


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 62 ✭✭CoconutHeadMia


    Do we have to show our workspace beforehand does anybody know? Also, can someone just drop in at any random time and ask us to show them our workspace? Not sure from the mock exam how somebody could enter the room at random


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 208 ✭✭Aoibhin511


    Do we have to show our workspace beforehand does anybody know? Also, can someone just drop in at any random time and ask us to show them our workspace? Not sure from the mock exam how somebody could enter the room at random

    As far as I can gather, there are no people involved on the other end, so I would say no you won't be stopped during the exam to show your room


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31 arubamuuu


    Fe123 wrote: »
    So lost for equity guys!! Any tips not sure what to cover

    According to the prep course I did if you cover the following you would be able to answer 5 questions out of 8 for the past 15+ exams (excluding the 2/3 question):
    1. Injunctions
    2. Express Trusts
    3. Charitable Trusts
    4. Resulting Trusts
    5. Trustees
    6. Tracing
    7. Specific Performance
    8. Constructive Trusts
    9. Undue Influence
    We were also told it's recommended to study estoppel as well if we have time.

    I decided I'm gonna do Equity in March next instead of this sitting so I haven't narrowed it down further so can't help you any more than that I'm afraid!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17 feliznavidab


    Could anyone telling me what came up in the Spring 2020 Equity paper?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 554 ✭✭✭Creol1


    LawCopy16 wrote: »
    Hi guys,

    I was not able to do the practice exam on better examinations, due to personal reasons I wasn't able to be available during the window when the practice exam was scheduled.
    I have installed the proctorio extension on my browser myself but I'm just wondering if there is anything else I need to do? I have had a look at the betterexaminations software but I am not clear about how the exam will appear for me on the day. Would anyone be able to give me even just a brief run down of how the exam will appear - like is it a split screen situation where the exam is on one side and the answer book on the other? and how we access the notepad feature that allows us to take rough notes? Sorry for all the questions and thanks in advance for any help! 
    SS_98 wrote: »
    Wondering if anyone can help!

    I thought the mock exam started at 2 today but turns out that’s the time it ended. After about 5 mins from logging in I got a warning saying return to exam and then I was kicked.. just wondering did I do something wrong or is this what happens when the exam is over? Can’t get through to anyone from the law society!

    It was reasonably straightforward. I'm not sitting criminal law so I imagined I was answering a constitutional law question to get the feel of it. I normally look at the screen when typing rather than at the keyboard but I found that the speed at which the typed text appeared wasn't quite instantaneous which I found slightly threw my typing so I looked at the keyboard instead.

    In a normal exam, I would try to write out practice answers by hand, which helps give me a rough idea of how many pages I should aim for in the time available. Obviously quality is more important than quantity but I like to have a quantitative framework to bear in mind as it helps structure my writing. The mock version didn't include a word count so the only quantitative metric was lines and paragraphs. I counted roughly 20 words per line so that will be useful to bear in mind in considering roughly what type of length I should be looking at.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 554 ✭✭✭Creol1


    Aoibhin511 wrote: »
    Big case on fair procedures/natural justice this year - Damache v Minister for justice (same guy as DPP v Damache, they wanted to revoke his citizenship after all his shenanigans)
    Also Corcoran v Garda commissioner, its about that eviction that turned into a riot a couple years back in roscommon or somewhere. Court said journalists can't use freedom of exp. to protect their sources.

    both are easy to find on courts.ie and you'll probably find a few articles about them to since the backstories are semi juicy

    Edit: there was also that big environment case at the end of the summer, SC said gov's climate plan sucks and wasn't specific enough. but refused to find an unenumerated right to a healthy environment in this case, but didn't entirely rule it our either.
    Not quite sure what section this would fit into though

    I think it would be quite relevant to separation of powers and unenumerated rights.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement