IgoPAP wrote: » Is the mock exam for today not appearing for anybody else.
Lawlaw12 wrote: » It was only available until 2pm today
IgoPAP wrote: » I'm such an f-ing idiot. I thought it was from 2pm on Friday! Can anybody explain what it's like before I panic.
Aoibhin511 wrote: » I took some pictures send me your email and I'll send them to you so you can see the layout
IgoPAP wrote: » PM'd!
Supermax1988 wrote: » Just phoned the law society there as I had a minor panic attack wondering about what would happen if the timer for the exam hit zero before you've clicked to submit the exam for grading and was told that it looks like they're going to give us an extra 30 minutes at the end to have time to review and submit our exam. She said we should get notice about it shortly.
SS_98 wrote: » Wondering if anyone can help! I thought the mock exam started at 2 today but turns out that’s the time it ended. After about 5 mins from logging in I got a warning saying return to exam and then I was kicked.. just wondering did I do something wrong or is this what happens when the exam is over? Can’t get through to anyone from the law society!
Lawlaw12 wrote: » For constitutional, would people plan on doing the case note questions? I know it might be hard to avoid depending on the particular paper. But for EU people generally recommend avoiding case notes, so just wondering if it's the same for constitutional?
LawCopy16 wrote: » Hi guys, I was not able to do the practice exam on better examinations, due to personal reasons I wasn't able to be available during the window when the practice exam was scheduled. I have installed the proctorio extension on my browser myself but I'm just wondering if there is anything else I need to do? I have had a look at the betterexaminations software but I am not clear about how the exam will appear for me on the day. Would anyone be able to give me even just a brief run down of how the exam will appear - like is it a split screen situation where the exam is on one side and the answer book on the other? and how we access the notepad feature that allows us to take rough notes? Sorry for all the questions and thanks in advance for any help!
Jeremiah25 wrote: » Case notes for Cons. are even more unpredictable than those in EU. Think the same case has only appeared once. However, there does tend to be a focus on some relatively recent case law so could be worth reading up on the big judgments from this year.
SKLaw wrote: » Update on the LS website is that we’ll have an extra 30 minutes for the exams “Exam timetable All examinations will be held between 10.00am and 1.30pm: Download the November 2020 FE-1 timetable (updated 23 October 2020)”
Aoibhin511 wrote: » Great! The phrasing is funny though. Does it mean that we all have 3.5 hours or that we have 3 hours between 10 and 1:30, like in case we are slow logging in or something? The word between is throwing me I think
Lawlaw12 wrote: » When you click on the timetable link it still says 10am-1pm though? I'm even more confused now
CoconutHeadMia wrote: » Do we have to show our workspace beforehand does anybody know? Also, can someone just drop in at any random time and ask us to show them our workspace? Not sure from the mock exam how somebody could enter the room at random
Fe123 wrote: » So lost for equity guys!! Any tips not sure what to cover
Aoibhin511 wrote: » Big case on fair procedures/natural justice this year - Damache v Minister for justice (same guy as DPP v Damache, they wanted to revoke his citizenship after all his shenanigans) Also Corcoran v Garda commissioner, its about that eviction that turned into a riot a couple years back in roscommon or somewhere. Court said journalists can't use freedom of exp. to protect their sources. both are easy to find on courts.ie and you'll probably find a few articles about them to since the backstories are semi juicyEdit: there was also that big environment case at the end of the summer, SC said gov's climate plan sucks and wasn't specific enough. but refused to find an unenumerated right to a healthy environment in this case, but didn't entirely rule it our either. Not quite sure what section this would fit into though