Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

Covid 19 Part XXVII- 62,002 ROI (1,915 deaths) 39,609 NI (724 deaths) (02/11) Read OP

1119120122124125320

Comments

  • Posts: 10,049 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]



    No harm, it’s not like people on here get their knickers in a twist before making themselves aware of facts


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 671 ✭✭✭Will Yam


    seamus wrote: »
    Swab numbers in early today.

    17,746 tests, 1038 positive, 5.85% positivity.

    7-day positivity rate down to 6.6%.

    I doubt nphet will be referencing this improvement


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,468 ✭✭✭wirelessdude01


    There’s a lot more to come on it fro what I’ve heard.

    Go on, spill.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,108 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    kwestfan08 wrote: »
    So with 1,618 deaths in total and 1,531 having underlying conditions, Covid has only killed 87 "healthy" people.

    I get its serious and we should all be taking precautions but at a certain point we have to start coming onto the fact that if you aren't compromised and are under 65 you're overwhelmingly likely to be just fine.

    That's at least 30% of the population.

    The largest demographic for ICU admissions in Ireland in first wave was 55-64.

    In the US 20% of covid deaths were under 65.
    4% of covid deaths were under 65 without co-morbidities.

    So, "just fine" ... if you have ICU there for you.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 716 ✭✭✭Paddygreen


    RobertKK wrote: »
    https://www.irishtimes.com/business/health-pharma/if-lockdown-has-morphed-from-tactic-to-strategy-the-state-has-failed-1.4388434

    Good article.

    This lockdown is a result of the failure of the state from the start of the pandemic.
    Personally I am fed up of people who think we have done a good job when we are now told we will be in a series of rolling lockdowns.

    But it was the public that failed to listen to the guidelines guys. The reality of the matter is it was rule breaking house party animals and their lack of social distancing and being in it together holding firm that has resulted in us now all wondering if deaths cold grey hand will reach out from the frozen mist for us when the dark cold nights of a grim black winter close in on us all as we all watch the situation get even more stark, hopeless, and sobering on RTE going forward.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 186 ✭✭Kickstart1.3


    It's beyond me how many times it needs to be explained that while you may be perfectly fine if you are under 65, you are also perfectly fine to pass it on to someone/many over 65.
    Sounds like it'll be illegal to be a young person soon


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,311 ✭✭✭✭weldoninhio


    lawred2 wrote: »
    that's a bit of a facebook post

    what have you heard?

    Same sanitiser is being used in all primary care centres and some hospitals. Email went around today not to use it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,132 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,100 ✭✭✭KrustyUCC


    Jeez that's a lot of places that will need to replace sanitiser so


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 671 ✭✭✭Will Yam


    Great! Daily + rate reached a peak of 7.9% on 17th October, and now we've been below 6% for 2 days in a row. Looking like exponential decay to me :)

    Tuesday. 1269

    Wednesday. 1167

    Thursday. 1066

    Friday. 1038


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,446 ✭✭✭✭Sardonicat


    mloc123 wrote: »
    at almost 18,000 tests a day... it seems the weekend contact tracing "drop off" is not evident... Unless they went out and rounded up a few thousands randomers to test to bump up the numbers :)

    Well, that is a good sign so. Hopefully we'll see even more of a drop in a fortnight's time as Level 5 starts to show.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 385 ✭✭AUDI20


    Paddygreen wrote: »
    But it was the public that failed to listen to the guidelines guys. The reality of the matter is it was rule breaking house party animals and their lack of social distancing and being in it together holding firm that has resulted in us now all wondering if deaths cold grey hand will reach out from the frozen mist for us when the dark cold nights of a grim black winter close in on us all as we all watch the situation get even more stark, hopeless, and sobering on RTE going forward.

    How far into your book are you now Paddy?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,077 ✭✭✭Away With The Fairies


    is_that_so wrote: »
    Hmm, wonder just how this will work in practice but at least there is a plan.

    https://www.rte.ie/sport/basketball/2020/1023/1173482-outdoor-basketball-training-permitted-but-no-passing/

    No passing the ball? Thought there's less risk picking up covid through contact? But then if you're following the HSE guidelines, they go on about contact.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 671 ✭✭✭Will Yam


    Sardonicat wrote: »
    Well, that is a good sign so. Hopefully we'll see even more of a drop in a fortnight's time as Level 5 starts to show.

    The big question for me is that if the trend carries through and cases keep going down, why did that happen?

    They tell us level 3 didnt work. But level 5 hasn’t caused this drop.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,177 ✭✭✭Sweet.Science


    Will Yam wrote: »
    The big question for me is that if the trend carries through and cases keep going down, why did that happen?

    They tell us level 3 didnt work. But level 5 hasn’t caused this drop.

    They didnt give level 3 a chance. Tony wanted level 5 and he gets what he wants


  • Posts: 10,049 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Will Yam wrote: »
    Tuesday. 1269

    Wednesday. 1167

    Thursday. 1066

    Friday. 1038

    That’s a daily average of 6%. Keep that up and you would be on track for a weekly 40% drop. Done and dusted in time for Black Friday


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,802 ✭✭✭✭ACitizenErased


    Spanish PM said today that the actual number of cases in Spain is upwards of 3 million. 3 times their case total.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,593 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    Will Yam wrote: »
    The big question for me is that if the trend carries through and cases keep going down, why did that happen?

    They tell us level 3 didnt work. But level 5 hasn’t caused this drop.

    There hasn't been a drop, there has been a slow down in growth. Cases are still growing.

    Too many external factors to determine whether we are getting there or not, there has been false dawns before.

    We should start to know for sure in the next 7-10 days.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 671 ✭✭✭Will Yam


    They didnt give level 3 a chance. Tony wanted level 5 and he gets what he wants

    Dublin is also dropping but too soon to say if its a trend.

    But level 3 has been in place for 5 weeks so how can you say they didnt give it enough time?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 671 ✭✭✭Will Yam


    Boggles wrote: »
    There hasn't been a drop, there has been a slow down in growth. Cases are still growing.

    Too many external factors to determine whether we are getting there or not, there has been false dawns before.

    We should start to know for sure in the next 7-10 days.

    They aren’t growing - they are falling.

    1269/1167/1066/1038 is not growing.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,630 ✭✭✭MerlinSouthDub


    Will Yam wrote: »
    Dublin is also dropping but too soon to say if its a trend.

    But level 3 has been in place for 5 weeks so how can you say they didnt give it enough time?

    only in place for just over 2 weeks outside Dublin.


  • Posts: 10,049 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Boggles wrote: »
    There hasn't been a drop, there has been a slow down in growth. Cases are still growing.

    Too many external factors to determine whether we are getting there or not, there has been false dawns before.

    We should start to know for sure in the next 7-10 days.

    3 successive days of falling numbers is an interesting trend, myself however, I would wait for 5 days of failing 7 day average before calling a peak though


  • Posts: 9,005 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    This is going to be a make of break weekend in the hospitals. Situation is deteriorating rapidly. Staff been out. The problem isn't patients been admitted, it's staff that are postive/self isolating. I imagine there will be significant ward closures next week across most HSE hospitals.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 671 ✭✭✭Will Yam


    only in place for just over 2 weeks outside Dublin.

    Yes, but you cant say they didnt give level 3 a chance in Dublin. They gave it 5 weeks.

    I would accept its too early to say in the case of dublin but the overall drop nationally since Tuesday is encouraging.

    My main question is - is there really a correlation between restrictions and number of cases.

    In the UK they have a better record right now than we do. About 800 cases per day (pro rata) vs c 1200 here.

    And all their pubs restaurants open.

    Something doesn’t add up here.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,054 ✭✭✭D.Q


    Paddygreen wrote: »
    But it was the public that failed to listen to the guidelines guys. The reality of the matter is it was rule breaking house party animals and their lack of social distancing and being in it together holding firm that has resulted in us now all wondering if deaths cold grey hand will reach out from the frozen mist for us when the dark cold nights of a grim black winter close in on us all as we all watch the situation get even more stark, hopeless, and sobering on RTE going forward.

    Paddy can we stay in touch when this is all over


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 146 ✭✭fabo1thecross


    Quick question folks. Child was a close contact and got the results of the second test today negative so happy out. The date to restrict movements is the 28th but the nurse said second test negative so no need to restrict movement anymore. What's the story there


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 671 ✭✭✭Will Yam


    3 successive days of falling numbers is an interesting trend, myself however, I would wait for 5 days of failing 7 day average before calling a peak though

    I think you may be right here.

    But why do rte ignore any positive news?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,593 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    Will Yam wrote: »
    They aren’t growing - they are falling.

    1269/1167/1066/1038 is not growing.

    I can show you 4 days of corresponding data in Dublin to show that it had slumped completely.

    That's why people don't make concrete assumptions on 4 days of data.

    The reality is we dropped the positivity rate by 0.4% but we did 16,000 more tests.

    There is a test for everyone in the audience now if they want one.

    Also I'm pretty sure the metric used is confirmed positive cases, not swabs.


  • Posts: 10,049 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Quick question folks. Child was a close contact and got the results of the second test today negative so happy out. The date to restrict movements is the 28th but the nurse said second test negative so no need to restrict movement anymore. What's the story there

    Nurse is wrong. Is unbelievable how many people don’t get this. Incubation can take up to 14 days, and before then the virus may not be detectable, hence the requirement to restrict movements for 14 days. Purpose of the day 1 and day 7 test is to catch any follow on contacts they may have if they test positive in the interim


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,593 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    3 successive days of falling numbers is an interesting trend, myself however, I would wait for 5 days of failing 7 day average before calling a peak though

    It is, even more interesting given the backdrop.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement