Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Covid 19 Part XXV-44,159 ROI (1,830 deaths) 21,898 NI (598 deaths) (13/10) Read OP

18182848687323

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,840 ✭✭✭hetuzozaho


    Polar101 wrote: »
    I'm starting to think some people want a "strong leader", and think Leo is it. He did well in March, but there's a reason he was voted out of the office in the elections before that.

    I found his "none of those nphetians would go on PUP" completely disingenuous, a poor attempt at pretending to be a man of the people.

    There was no need for his show, all he did was guarantee that the next time NPHET makes a recommendation, the public do not trust it.

    I do agree with Leo and friends that level 5 didn't make sense, though.

    Yeah he's been like that since he got his new ministry which makes sense I guess. He has to be seen to be fighting for them now.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 284 ✭✭TexasTornado



    People moving indoors to socialise maybe?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,440 ✭✭✭sideswipe


    AdamD wrote: »
    Tanaiste says level 5 is not appropriate now but may be in the future. There is nothing wrong with that statement. Suppose some want to be outraged by everything.

    +1

    Also people need to take personal responsibility rather than waiting for the levels in place to dictate how they behave.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,116 ✭✭✭bazermc


    "Uncontrolled consumption of alcohol"

    What a great line - I love it


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 42,971 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    AdamD wrote:
    Tanaiste says level 5 is not appropriate now but may be in the future. There is nothing wrong with that statement. Suppose some want to be outraged by everything.
    Can you explain to me why he expected NPHET to have recommendations outside of the health status and way to improve the national health? That's what he said he asked them on national TV.
    Can you explain why level 5 is not appropriate now? We have a lockdown which is affecting businesses and jobs. Are we not better to go straight to the harsher more restrictive measures and be back in a less restrictive position quicker? Would it not make more sense from an economic and employment perspective to limit the amount of time in lockdown?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,376 ✭✭✭Funsterdelux


    A traffic management crew with a trailer load of cones could accomplish what the guards are doing and probably at a fraction of the cost.


  • Site Banned Posts: 2,225 ✭✭✭TonyMaloney


    People moving indoors to socialise maybe?

    Possibly. Though most of those that died would have likely contracted covid weeks ago.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,949 ✭✭✭ChikiChiki


    Boggles wrote: »
    Tánaiste tells FG meeting Level 5 'circuit break' is highly possible



    You couldn't write it.

    I know the FG grass roots and party as a whole prefer Convey, but surely it is time to give a him a crack.

    FFs- Leo was a hero the other night and a villain today. All he is doing is managing expectations.

    The flip flopping hysterics are laughable.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 442 ✭✭Feria40


    eagle eye wrote: »
    Can you explain to me why he expected NPHET to have recommendations outside of the health status and way to improve the national health? That's what he said he asked them on national TV.
    Can you explain why level 5 is not appropriate now? We have a lockdown which is affecting businesses and jobs. Are we not better to go straight to the harsher more restrictive measures and be back in a less restrictive position quicker? Would it not make more sense from an economic and employment perspective to limit the amount of time in lockdown?

    Numerous reasons why it couldn't be put in place now regardless of whether it should be done or not.

    1. PUP has been rolled back in recent weeks, that would need to be undone with the additional cost of 1m people seeking it taken into budgetary account.

    2. Most mortgage holders and business owners were able to get a 6 month loan break in the first wave of they so wished. This was a free pass provided by the EU and did not affect your credit score. The EU has made it abundantly clear that this is now over and anyone that needs help will be going down normal forbearance routes, this would have monumental impacts on business and would lead to businesses going bust. Before anyone goes down the bank bashing route their hands are completely tied on this.

    3. How long would stage 5 last and what would the course of action be next? What level would cases need to drop to say over 3 weeks for us to fall back to stage 4? Stage 4 as 5 are very similar by the way. What would we do differently to avoid the troughs and peaks of the virus case numbers? or would stage 3/4/5 be regular occurances given our shared border? What would that do to the economy and to non Covid healthcare?

    I think all of the above are the reasons we could not simply decide to go stage 5 at the drop of a hat with no prior notice


  • Site Banned Posts: 2,225 ✭✭✭TonyMaloney


    528520.JPG

    It's hard to argue with data like this.

    If it continues our restrictions will be an example for other countries to follow. Ireland's message to the world will be that you should close your pubs. I did not see that coming.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 18,098 Mod ✭✭✭✭ixoy


    eagle eye wrote: »
    Can you explain why level 5 is not appropriate now?
    Can you explain what's in Level 5 that will suddenly reduce transmissions when the principal social vectors are already severely curtailed and schools are open? It's attitudes that need to shift.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,587 ✭✭✭SeaBreezes


    There IS no living WITH this virus, not without a vaccine
    Read the comments on this thread about reinfection. It is the norm once antibodies wane.

    We just dont have a choice.

    https://twitter.com/devisridhar/status/1313733782235680768?s=20


  • Posts: 543 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    SeaBreezes wrote: »
    Read the comments on this thread about reinfection. It is the norm once antibodies wane.



    https://twitter.com/devisridhar/status/1313733782235680768?s=20

    No. It isn't.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 44,336 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    ixoy wrote: »
    Can you explain what's in Level 5 that will suddenly reduce transmissions when the principal social vectors are already severely curtailed and schools are open? It's attitudes that need to shift.

    The advice on schools and level 5 changed a couple of weeks ago.
    Recommendations based on situation and evidence at time.

    The whole thing seems to be a live document, every time I look at it something has changed.

    #clarity


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 44,336 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    A traffic management crew with a trailer load of cones could accomplish what the guards are doing and probably at a fraction of the cost.

    They'd have the same "powers" anyway.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,587 ✭✭✭SeaBreezes


    Hardyn wrote: »
    No. It isn't.

    Yes, it is.

    Follow this guy: John Hopkins Doctorate in Tcell Immunology. Hes been bang on so far, with published peer reviewed docs proving his Tcell theories.

    https://twitter.com/fitterhappierAJ?s=20

    He says: https://twitter.com/fitterhappierAJ/status/1313776712879046656?s=20


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,192 ✭✭✭GeorgeBailey


    With all the talk of who people dislike most whether it's Leo or Tony, I have to say whoever it was that leaked the level 5 news on Sunday night needs to be taken out and given the beating of their life.

    I'm sure I'm not the only small business owner who was in a very dark place on Sunday night thinking everything was going to fall apart instantly. If level 5 was to be introduced like that with no warning I would have lost all my remaining 2020 wedding bookings. Instead now with remaining in level 3 I have 2 weddings this weekend. A couple more and I'll be able to hang on until April and see where I go from there.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 713 ✭✭✭manniot2


    SeaBreezes wrote: »
    I think the opposite. Stamp it out fast over 2-4 weeks then we CAN open up for xmas.

    The only countries that have managed it have reacted hard and fast initally, then strict test, trace isolate.

    To my mind Its like wildfire, we are trying a controlled slow burn, prob there is, sparks up and we are fire fighting again.

    we almost stamped it out this summer and were still the slowest to exit lockdown. there is no way a short sharp lockdown will be followed by normality. it will be level 5 back to level 3 at best.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,168 ✭✭✭✭Gael23


    30 cases in a Nursing Home in Donegal


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,144 ✭✭✭amadangomor


    Your one that got hit, who goes by a pseudonym is not a well known looney lefty?? Why was she at an alleged "far right" march??

    She's so left that she circumnavigates the political spectrum and comes around to the right? :D


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,173 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    I did some very rough projections based on what we're seeing in Dublin. This is probably pretty pessimistic, but I think it's a half-decent stab.

    Nationally, we can expect case numbers to keep rising until the week of 21st - 28th of October. This is because even with level 3, these infections are "locked in" - this is the people who have already contracted the virus and will begin showing symptoms over the next 4-14 days, and their family units who like show symptoms 4-14 days after that again.

    Even with level 5, the case numbers would continue to rise per the graph.

    So you can see why NPHET are worried. At the peak you're talking about 8,600 new cases over a 14-day period, or 614 cases per day. However, because this is a rolling average, we will most likely see 3 or 4 days of 700+ cases and one or two days with 1000+.

    The goal of a level 5 would kick in towards the end of the week of the bank holiday. Under level 5, new cases would begin to drop off a cliff. Under level 3, you can see they drop off more gradually. Level 3 means the hospitals are under pressure for longer, where level 5 provides a more immediate release valve.

    My personal opinion is that the hospitals or ICUs still won't be as swamped as they were in April. It will not be an ideal position, they'll be under pressure, some non-Covid patients will be bumped from ICU to a normal ward. But it will be the lesser evil if we can keep more businesses afloat and keep non-critical hospital services running. IMHO.

    528529.png


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 42,971 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    Feria40 wrote:
    3. How long would stage 5 last and what would the course of action be next? What level would cases need to drop to say over 3 weeks for us to fall back to stage 4? Stage 4 as 5 are very similar by the way. What would we do differently to avoid the troughs and peaks of the virus case numbers? or would stage 3/4/5 be regular occurances given our shared border? What would that do to the economy and to non Covid healthcare?
    Stage 5 would last until we flatten the curve again.
    While at stage 5 we draw up new laws to deter people from doing the stupid stuff that's causing the surges.
    We warn everybody that their futures are spending a lot of time at home if they don't remain careful, wear masks, wash their hands regularly and social distance.
    I heard for the first time only yesterday or the day before that a politician called for a meeting between north and south to try and come up with a shared approach to battling this thing. I've been saying this should have happened since the beginning.
    Non-covid healthcare should improve during a lockdown and make it safer for those people. Obviously those needing treatment have underlying conditions so we are trying to make things safer for them too.

    ixoy wrote:
    Can you explain what's in Level 5 that will suddenly reduce transmissions when the principal social vectors are already severely curtailed and schools are open? It's attitudes that need to shift.
    We need to close the schools immediately. It won't cause that much disruption as they are getting a mid-term break very soon. Having the lockdown encompass the mid-term break would be a very smart thing to do.


  • Posts: 10,049 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    SeaBreezes wrote: »
    There IS no living WITH this virus, not without a vaccine
    Read the comments on this thread about reinfection. It is the norm once antibodies wane.

    We just dont have a choice.

    https://twitter.com/devisridhar/status/1313733782235680768?s=20

    But if getting the virus promotes no long term immunity, a vaccine wont either, and living with the virus is then the only long term option


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 42,971 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    But if getting the virus promotes no long term immunity, a vaccine wont either, and living with the virus is then the only long term option
    You can get the vaccine as often as is required. Your body won't build antibodies on its own.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,886 ✭✭✭✭Roger_007


    People moving indoors to socialise maybe?

    I think this is the number 1 reason why cases are increasing. When we embarked on ‘flattening the curve’ back in March/April, it coincided with absolutely brilliant weather when most people wanted to be outdoors most of the time. There was no problem meeting up with other people in gardens, parks and beaches.
    Now that the weather is colder outdoor socialising is not going to happen. We have been told that the spread of the virus is 20 times greater indoors than outdoors. If this is true, why is anyone surprised that the numbers are increasing.
    You cannot stop people socialising. It is the oxygen of human life. If socialising stops then life itself stops. You cannot change nature with a few government regulations.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 716 ✭✭✭Paddygreen


    With all the talk of who people dislike most whether it's Leo or Tony, I have to say whoever it was that leaked the level 5 news on Sunday night needs to be taken out and given the beating of their life.

    I'm sure I'm not the only small business owner who was in a very dark place on Sunday night thinking everything was going to fall apart instantly. If level 5 was to be introduced like that with no warning I would have lost all my remaining 2020 wedding bookings. Instead now with remaining in level 3 I have 2 weddings this weekend. A couple more and I'll be able to hang on until April and see where I go from there.

    Maybe you should retrain and reskill in another sector there George like minister for social protection (former minister for arts:pac:) Heather Humphreys suggested to musicians and artists. Cleaning is booooooming atm. Unfortunately the career path you chose involves fun and enjoyment. Unfortunately these are sobering times and fun spreads the virus.


  • Posts: 543 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    SeaBreezes wrote: »
    Yes, it is.

    Follow this guy: John Hopkins Doctorate in Tcell Immunology. Hes been bang on so far, with published peer reviewed docs proving his Tcell theories.

    https://twitter.com/fitterhappierAJ?s=20

    He says: https://twitter.com/fitterhappierAJ/status/1313776712879046656?s=20

    There's a big difference between immunity waning and reinfection becoming the norm.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 42,971 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    People moving indoors to socialise maybe?
    Or schools?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,168 ✭✭✭✭Gael23


    14 hospital admissions in the last 12 hours


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,173 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    Roger_007 wrote: »
    You cannot stop people socialising. It is the oxygen of human life. If socialising stops then life itself stops. You cannot change nature with a few government regulations.
    No, but in the original lockdown, people did stop socialising. Indoors and outdoors. Remember all the Zoom parties?

    With sufficient motivation, people will do that again. Socialising comes second to a roof over your head and food in our bellies. If people can still go to work and get paid, then they will be willing to knock the gatherings on the head. If they're forced out of work - AGAIN - and asked to stop socialising, that's where you'll lose people.

    In an ideal world there is an argument for promoting restaurants and pubs over takeaways and cans. If people can socialise in small groups at the restaurant, then they're less likely to all go to someone's house and get a takeaway.

    The problem comes in policing it. How do you stop someone from going to the pub five nights a week and meeting a different group of people every night? But I guess if someone is going to do that in the pub, they'll probably do it at home, lockdown or no lockdown.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement
Advertisement