Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Relaxation of Restrictions, Part V - **Read OP for Mod Warnings**

1202203205207208329

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 734 ✭✭✭Dionaibh


    Penfailed wrote: »
    Entitled much?

    Were people entitled when they walked into the swimming pool before all of this?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,681 ✭✭✭Penfailed


    Dionaibh wrote: »
    Wear them in public

    Yeah, indoors in shops. Most people don't outdoors in my experience.

    Gigs '24 - Ben Ottewell and Ian Ball (Gomez), The Jesus & Mary Chain, The Smashing Pumpkins/Weezer, Pearl Jam, Green Day, Stendhal Festival, Forest Fest, Electric Picnic, Pixies, Ride, Therapy?, Public Service Broadcasting, IDLES, And So I Watch You From Afar

    Gigs '25 - Spiritualized, Supergrass, Stendhal Festival, Forest Fest, Queens of the Stone Age, Electric Picnic, Vantastival



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,489 ✭✭✭dalyboy


    Dionaibh wrote: »
    Not yet, but I imagine most people do.

    I wear a face covering (bandana) in shops because it’s mandatory and I don’t want the hassle from security or a fine slap , that’s the only reason.

    If they make them mandatory to be worn outside / streets / beaches / parks then it’s off to Russia / Sweden/ Czech Republic I’m going as there is no way in hell Im going to accept that level of pseudoscience brainwashing in my life.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,681 ✭✭✭Penfailed


    Dionaibh wrote: »
    Were people entitled when they walked into the swimming pool before all of this?

    'All of this' means you now have to book. The fact that you think you're above all that and shouldn't have to means, yeah...entitled. Perspective required. I get it...you think it's all a conspiracy to control the masses and Bill Gates is out to kill most people and microchip the rest. I think that you are wrong.

    Gigs '24 - Ben Ottewell and Ian Ball (Gomez), The Jesus & Mary Chain, The Smashing Pumpkins/Weezer, Pearl Jam, Green Day, Stendhal Festival, Forest Fest, Electric Picnic, Pixies, Ride, Therapy?, Public Service Broadcasting, IDLES, And So I Watch You From Afar

    Gigs '25 - Spiritualized, Supergrass, Stendhal Festival, Forest Fest, Queens of the Stone Age, Electric Picnic, Vantastival



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 487 ✭✭Jim Root


    dalyboy wrote: »
    I wear a face covering (bandana) in shops because it’s mandatory and I don’t want the hassle from security or a fine slap , that’s the only reason.

    If they make them mandatory to be worn outside / streets / beaches / parks then it’s off to Russia / Sweden/ Czech Republic I’m going as there is no way in hell Im going to accept that level of pseudoscience brainwashing in my life.

    See ya


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 734 ✭✭✭Dionaibh


    Penfailed wrote: »
    'All of this' means you now have to book. The fact that you think you're above all that and shouldn't have to means, yeah...entitled. Perspective required. I get it...you think it's all a conspiracy to control the masses and Bill Gates is out to kill most people and microchip the rest. I think that you are wrong.

    I don't think I'm above booking. I just think it's ridiculous. I never mentioned Bill Gates.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 734 ✭✭✭Dionaibh


    dalyboy wrote: »
    I wear a face covering (bandana) in shops because it’s mandatory and I don’t want the hassle from security or a fine slap , that’s the only reason.

    If they make them mandatory to be worn outside / streets / beaches / parks then it’s off to Russia / Sweden/ Czech Republic I’m going as there is no way in hell Im going to accept that level of pseudoscience brainwashing in my life.

    But isn't there a long list of exemptions there? Severe distress being one, if I'm not mistaken.

    Russia is the place to be. Or living off the grid. Western Europe is horrible.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,681 ✭✭✭Penfailed


    Dionaibh wrote: »
    I never mentioned Bill Gates.

    Not in this thread. You have mentioned him though.

    Gigs '24 - Ben Ottewell and Ian Ball (Gomez), The Jesus & Mary Chain, The Smashing Pumpkins/Weezer, Pearl Jam, Green Day, Stendhal Festival, Forest Fest, Electric Picnic, Pixies, Ride, Therapy?, Public Service Broadcasting, IDLES, And So I Watch You From Afar

    Gigs '25 - Spiritualized, Supergrass, Stendhal Festival, Forest Fest, Queens of the Stone Age, Electric Picnic, Vantastival



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 734 ✭✭✭Dionaibh


    Penfailed wrote: »
    Not in this thread. You have mentioned him though.

    Yes, but why does that matter when I haven't mentioned him in this thread?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,681 ✭✭✭Penfailed


    Dionaibh wrote: »
    Yes, but why does that matter when I haven't mentioned him in this thread?

    It doesn't really.

    Gigs '24 - Ben Ottewell and Ian Ball (Gomez), The Jesus & Mary Chain, The Smashing Pumpkins/Weezer, Pearl Jam, Green Day, Stendhal Festival, Forest Fest, Electric Picnic, Pixies, Ride, Therapy?, Public Service Broadcasting, IDLES, And So I Watch You From Afar

    Gigs '25 - Spiritualized, Supergrass, Stendhal Festival, Forest Fest, Queens of the Stone Age, Electric Picnic, Vantastival



  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 734 ✭✭✭Dionaibh


    Penfailed wrote: »
    It doesn't really.

    And I'm not against having to book a slot. I just think it's another annoying rule to make daily life even more depressing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,978 ✭✭✭growleaves


    Before NPHET re-shuttered the theatres in Dublin they were expecting theatre audiences to wear masks during the performance (unlike in cinemas).

    I'd rather stay at home and read a playscript than sit through that.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 734 ✭✭✭Dionaibh


    growleaves wrote: »
    Before NPHET re-shuttered the theatres in Dublin they were expecting theatre audiences to wear masks during the performance (unlike in cinemas).

    I'd rather stay at home and read a playscript than sit through that.

    Are those people completely void of humanity? They seem to get a kick out of torturing people. Imagine wearing that hideous thing at the theatre.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,668 ✭✭✭walus


    A stupid question: will Sweden have a second wave of covid? Why?

    ”Where’s the revolution? Come on, people you’re letting me down!”



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,536 ✭✭✭Silentcorner


    Dionaibh wrote: »
    Are those people completely void of humanity? They seem to get a kick out of torturing people. Imagine wearing that hideous thing at the theatre.

    It's all nuts...

    What I don't understand is how hand dryers in public bathrooms are ok...those things suck in air from the bathroom and blow it all over a punters hand... but sitting quietly near someone in a theatre is dangerous.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,852 ✭✭✭HBC08


    hmmm wrote: »
    If I remember right from the start of the year our hospitals have some surge capacity and can create more beds.

    Beds however are easy. Trained ICU staff can't be created in the space of months.

    Presumably there would be some trained ICU staff in the 73000 people who answered to call to come home.


  • Posts: 4,727 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    The only positive about the Dublin lockdown is it will provide us with even more evidence that lockdown does NOT work.

    Shame we had to destroy so many lives to see that hiding under the bed doesn’t make the virus go away.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 842 ✭✭✭Hego Damask


    Posted this on main thread , but it's busy there so could get lost ... also some lunatic on my ignore list replied almost immediately with the usual drivel ...


    So regarding vaccines, let's just assume by early next year they are massively rolling them out to the most vulnerable and front line workers.

    Will the restrictions continue for the rest of us ? mask wearing, kids wearing masks at school, classes sent home for 2 weeks if a case is found / pubs closed .. etc ...or will they let the virus work through the non vulnerable population as in theory with vulnerable vaccinated hospitals won't get overwhelmed ?

    And what about borders ? will summer 2021 be a write off regarding travel ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,621 ✭✭✭FintanMcluskey


    Posted this on main thread , but it's busy there so could get lost ... also some lunatic on my ignore list replied almost immediately with the usual drivel ...


    So regarding vaccines, let's just assume by early next year they are massively rolling them out to the most vulnerable and front line workers.

    Will the restrictions continue for the rest of us ? mask wearing, kids wearing masks at school, classes sent home for 2 weeks if a case is found / pubs closed .. etc ...or will they let the virus work through the non vulnerable population as in theory with vulnerable vaccinated hospitals won't get overwhelmed ?

    And what about borders ? will summer 2021 be a write off regarding travel ?

    It only makes sense to vaccinate the same people who would avail of the flu vaccine I would have thought?

    I have spoken to people who are incredible diligent with the nonsense restrictions, but, they have said under no circumstances would they take a vaccine if it becomes available


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 842 ✭✭✭Hego Damask


    So , in theory they should lift the restrictions once a significant proportion of the vulnerable are vaccinated ?


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 24,713 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    It only makes sense to vaccinate the same people who would avail of the flu vaccine I would have thought?

    I have spoken to people who are incredible diligent with the nonsense restrictions, but, they have said under no circumstances would they take a vaccine if it becomes available

    So you how spoken to people who are idiot anti-vaxers it would appear.

    A vaccine is no good unless the vast majority of people get the vaccine.
    So , in theory they should lift the restrictions once a significant proportion of the vulnerable are vaccinated ?

    No, only if the vast majority of the population are vaccinated. Anyone who thinks only the vulnerable need to be vaccinated do not understand how vaccines work or they are anti-vax to some degree.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,312 ✭✭✭paw patrol


    apologies , I posted then ran cos I was busy only see these responses now.


    pjohnson wrote: »
    So you still think "a few" = permanent?

    Not suprised unfortunately.


    you missed the next bit of the quote, "until something changes" in other words he doesn't know. There isn't a plan.

    I think the restrictions are wrong for many reasons but I'd grumble and accept them if we had an exit plan and time-frame.
    We don't have any exit plan or criteria to end restrictions - level 1 still has restrictions.
    Leo mentioned a vaccine but that may never happen or could be years.
    Penfailed wrote: »
    A couple of years isn't permanent.

    The effects will be as people will be effected by long term effects of these conditions esp the young having their formative years limiting contact with people and believing their very being is a weapon against granny's health.
    You also commented that 10 years isn't permanent. In terms of development ,your life and society , it might as well be.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,224 ✭✭✭Del Griffith


    walus wrote: »
    A stupid question: will Sweden have a second wave of covid? Why?

    No they won't. Only the early lockdown countries (that were patting themselves on the back in July) still have to face the music.

    Sweden now have less daily cases then their neighbours despite a significantly higher population.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,312 ✭✭✭paw patrol


    KaneToad wrote: »
    I think it's insanity to believe that NPHET have an ulterior motive. I think it's insanity to ignore the science/facts because you don't like them.


    Do I think NPHET have ulterior motives? I don't know. But I believe they have a superiority or savior complex.


    It isn't helped that to escape political accountability the former Taoiseach handed them the reins for the country which has now continued under Michael Martin.


    NPHET believe they are right and now have the power to inflict their views on us despite being unelected. They decide this virus is worth killing the country for and we must suck it up. They decide many things and there is no counter to them. They pretty much rule by decree. In fact, perhaps not their call, but we see dissenters within their field silenced quite viciously too. This is tyrannical.

    Our decision making and personal risk assessment have been removed from us by this unelected body to massive effect. That is my gripe about them.



    I suspect that because within 6 months, they are now the new rockstar super group, if that doesn't effect your psyche then you are a better man than me - and any other human. They have gone from being not well known to celebrities with the Dail, Media and public hanging and acting on their every utterance (and brain fart) as if it was gospel. I know I'd swagger about erect 24/7 with that level of adulation and unbridled control of the country.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,466 ✭✭✭Ninthlife


    paw patrol wrote: »
    Do I think NPHET have ulterior motives? I don't know. But I believe they have a superiority or savior complex.


    It isn't helped that to escape political accountability the former Taoiseach handed them the reins for the country which has now continued under Michael Martin.


    NPHET believe they are right and now have the power to inflict their views on us despite being unelected. They decide this virus is worth killing the country and we must suck it up. They decide many things and there is no counter to them. They pretty much rule by decree. In fact, perhaps not their call, but we see dissenters within their field silenced quite viciously too. This is tyrannical.

    Our decision making and personal risk assessment have been removed from us by this unelected body to massive effect. That is my gripe about them.



    I suspect that because within 6 months they are now the new rockstar super group, if that doesn't effect your psyche then you are a better man than me - and any other human. They have gone from be not well known to celebrities with the Dail, Media and public hanging and acting on their every utterance (and brain fart) as if it was gospel. I know I'd swagger about erect 24/7 with that level of adulation and unbridled control of the country.


    You do know they only make recommendations and its up to the Government whether to act on the advice or not.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,668 ✭✭✭walus


    The only positive about the Dublin lockdown is it will provide us with even more evidence that lockdown does NOT work.

    Shame we had to destroy so many lives to see that hiding under the bed doesn’t make the virus go away.

    Pity that nphet don’t know that yet. They see the number of cases go up but they do not have the clue why. So it is the blind man in the fog situation - banning travel (I know they didn’t’ really, but the court will say to the contrary), now the community transmission and additional restrictions. They are setting us up for yet another blanket style lockdown leading to Christmas. I’m yet to see the so called “experts” come out and say “ we don’t know”. They normally pretend that they do in fact know for as long as that keeps them in the driving seat.

    And, no, there is no such thing as a second or subsequent waves. There is only one wave as Sweden’s case shows. Spikes in cases come from lockdowns. More lockdowns - more ”waves”. Lockdowns only push the cases out in time.

    Current government strategy assumes a vaccine becomes available next year. They are in for a big disappointment I’d say.

    ”Where’s the revolution? Come on, people you’re letting me down!”



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,312 ✭✭✭paw patrol


    Ninthlife wrote: »
    You do know they only make recommendations and its up to the Government whether to act on the advice or not.


    really? I'd hate to call you naive.
    The previous administration they pretty much said they defer to NPHET which has been most of the lockdown.


    Anyway I dealt with that point by stating my belief that Leo has absolved himself of all blame because

    if we win , he will say "i am great, I hired NPHET"


    if it goes tits up he will say "I hired NPHET, they are the experts. Whats a Taoiseach to do? BTW I am great"


    This is Leo, along with decent speaking skills and good PR.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,399 ✭✭✭✭ThunbergsAreGo


    Ninthlife wrote: »
    You do know they only make recommendations and its up to the Government whether to act on the advice or not.

    Its very hard for the Government.

    Reject anything from NPHET and its "not doing X despite medical advice cost lives"

    Look at Trump etc.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,749 ✭✭✭uli84


    walus wrote: »

    And, no, there is no such thing as a second or subsequent waves. There is only one wave as Sweden’s case shows. Spikes in cases come from lockdowns. More lockdowns - more ”waves”.

    Spikes in cases come from lockdowns - This is so obvious and evident and logical that it hurts. When will they cop on.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,993 ✭✭✭Captain_Crash


    A vaccine is no good unless the vast majority of people get the vaccine
    If that were the case, many of the vaccines that already exist are of no use then! Isn’t there only about a 20% uptake on the flu vaccine? Does that mean it’s useless?
    Ninthlife wrote: »
    You do know they only make recommendations and its up to the Government whether to act on the advice or not.
    To quote MM this week “NPHET retain discretion” he has told the country that whatever they say goes, so while in theory they only advise, in practice they dictate!


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement