Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

How will schools be able to go back in September? (Continued)

1200201203205206328

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,511 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    2 classes sent home?

    What about the teachers?

    Be grand?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,480 ✭✭✭Blondini


    PCros wrote: »
    3 kids now in total though right?

    Wrong.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,089 ✭✭✭PCros


    Boggles wrote: »
    2 classes sent home?

    What about the teachers?

    Be grand?

    Do teachers have to remain in the building? That's odd.

    I thought they would be able to remotely teach at home? Pointless doing that in an empty classroom...


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,980 ✭✭✭s1ippy


    PCros wrote: »
    3 kids now in total though right?
    God it's even worse than we thought if those supposed three children were orphans with no siblings, classmates or teacher around them.

    Afaik they don't release who the initial case is in; they said the staff of the school in Clare were close contacts of a confirmed case but they only mentioned it because the school had to close entirely as there were no permanent staff available to come in and keep the place going.

    It could be two children in a given school, it could be 200, I suspect the only people who will know are their families. I just hope they're facilitated in self-isolating and not going in to work or other schools like.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,480 ✭✭✭Blondini


    Boggles wrote: »
    2 classes sent home?

    What about the teachers?

    Be grand?

    The Russian, the multiple personality, and the covid-deniers will be here soon to tell us we are being hysterical .


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,089 ✭✭✭PCros


    Blondini wrote: »
    Wrong.

    Thanks, informative reply.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,511 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    PCros wrote: »
    Do teachers have to remain in the building? That's odd.

    I thought they would be able to remotely teach at home? Pointless doing that in an empty classroom...

    It's a secondary school.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,089 ✭✭✭PCros


    Boggles wrote: »
    It's a secondary school.

    I see.

    Would it be different for primary schools I wonder.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,511 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    PCros wrote: »
    I see.

    Would it be different for primary schools I wonder.

    I just asked the question about the teachers in secondary and what happens them, the reason I asked the question is because I don't know.

    If I don't know how can I possible muse or compare to primary?

    :confused:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,150 ✭✭✭TonyMaloney


    Eh, actually it's probably a primary school

    https://twitter.com/ciaraquill/status/1301514912284504064?s=20


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,089 ✭✭✭PCros


    Boggles wrote: »
    I just asked the question about the teachers in secondary and what happens them, the reason I asked the question is because I don't know.

    If I don't know how can I possible muse or compare to primary?

    :confused:

    Don't be confused.

    It was more of a question to the forum...a few teachers are on here I believe.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 288 ✭✭DSN


    Here are some questions.

    Is there any advice anywhere in the reopening of schools documents regarding high risk parents?
    Is there anything in it anywhere about kids who have gone back to school meeting their grandparents?

    And if this information isn't in it, why isn't it?

    Are people literally waiting to be told what to do at every turn now? Have a chat with the grandparents, if grandparents are comfortable & kids have no symptoms or known contacts in area positive, then I will still visit with the kids & them us. Again, if parents at risk, they have to assess their own situation. There was a lady on TV other night with double lung disease & took decision to send her only child to school to be with his friends & have an education. I guess her child changes clothes & scrubs hands etc after school. I mean the risk is there but what else can she do or what else do you expect a document from the HSE to tell her to do?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,134 ✭✭✭caveat emptor


    Here's the algo for determining what happens in the unfortunate event. We are not sticking with ECDC guidelines. Why are we not following them.
    We must know better. :rolleyes:

    Only POD tested under 13 even if distance between PODS not maintained.

    525189.jpeg

    525187.jpeg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,089 ✭✭✭PCros


    DSN wrote: »
    Are people literally waiting to be told what to do at every turn now? Have a chat with the grandparents, if grandparents are comfortable & kids have no symptoms or known contacts in area positive, then I will still visit with the kids & them us. Again, if parents at risk, they have to assess their own situation. There was a lady on TV other night with double lung disease & took decision to send her only child to school to be with his friends & have an education. I guess her child changes clothes & scrubs hands etc after school. I mean the risk is there but what else can she do or what else do you expect a document from the HSE to tell her to do?

    I agree with this.

    People are going on like as if we'll have to send grandparents to the round tower and not come out until the vaccine is here.

    From our perspective we will still bring our kids to walk the grandparents dog with them and hang with them out their back garden. We'll keep an eye on social distancing and I think that will be fine.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,980 ✭✭✭s1ippy


    https://twitter.com/kerryman_ie/status/1301498847278125056?s=20

    https://twitter.com/kerryman_ie/status/1301519729568473090?s=20

    So that's five now; two Dublin, two Kerry and one Clare. Really unlucky or coincidental given children don't spread the virus.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,511 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    What is astonishing is, the advice seems to be even if children are awaiting on a test result is to send them to school.

    1 or 2 cases in a few days, yeah you could write that off as reckless parents, but a trend has emerged. Public Health is telling them send them in, be grand!

    This will not end well.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,432 ✭✭✭SusanC10


    Boggles wrote: »
    What is astonishing is, the advice seems to be even if children are awaiting on a test result is to send them to school.

    1 or 2 cases in a few days, yeah you could write that off as reckless parents, but a trend has emerged. Public Health is telling them send them in, be grand!

    This will not end well.

    Where are you seeing to send Kids to school who are awaiting Test results?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,455 ✭✭✭✭TheValeyard


    s1ippy wrote: »
    https://twitter.com/kerryman_ie/status/1301498847278125056?s=20

    https://twitter.com/kerryman_ie/status/1301519729568473090?s=20

    So that's five now; two Dublin, two Kerry and one Clare. Really unlucky or coincidental given children don't spread the virus.

    And a school in Kildare may be added to that list very shortly unfortunately. Hopefully not

    All eyes on Kursk. Slava Ukraini.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,511 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    SusanC10 wrote: »
    Where are you seeing to send Kids to school who are awaiting Test results?

    Because there is a trend emerging that cannot be simply written off by reckless parenting.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Boggles wrote: »
    Because there is a trend emerging that cannot be simply written off by reckless parenting.

    They go back to contacts 48 hours prior to first symptoms. If some one got a positive result this morning having been tested yesterday with symptoms starting Tuesday evening, they may well have appeared fine and been in school Monday and Tuesday


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 288 ✭✭DSN


    s1ippy wrote: »
    https://twitter.com/kerryman_ie/status/1301498847278125056?s=20

    https://twitter.com/kerryman_ie/status/1301519729568473090?s=20

    So that's five now; two Dublin, two Kerry and one Clare. Really unlucky or coincidental given children don't spread the virus.

    In Kerry there was just one positive, 2 classes sent home as precautionary.
    In Clare far as I aware no positive test in school, but staff were a close contact of a case, so school shut while staff get tested & can return.

    To me so far so good cases are being caught & their contacts sent home as precautionary & presume will have to get tested?

    Also where does it say to send to school while awaiting test results - that's the opposite of the advice afaik! Anyone awaiting test results due to symptoms or being a contact of a positive case - be in school, work whatever needs to stay home until they get the result!


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    s1ippy wrote: »
    https://twitter.com/kerryman_ie/status/1301498847278125056?s=20

    https://twitter.com/kerryman_ie/status/1301519729568473090?s=20

    So that's five now; two Dublin, two Kerry and one Clare. Really unlucky or coincidental given children don't spread the virus.

    Honestly believe there has been enough time for these kids to have caught the virus at school, incubated, developed symptoms, been tested and gotten results since schools returned?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,511 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    They go back to contacts 48 hours prior to first symptoms. If some one got a positive result this morning having been tested yesterday with symptoms starting Tuesday evening, they may well have appeared fine and been in school Monday and Tuesday

    There is no 24 hour turn around in community testing.

    If they contacted their GP Wednesday morning, they would have got tested at best until the afternoon, that test result would not have been back this morning before school opened.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,432 ✭✭✭SusanC10


    DSN wrote: »
    In Kerry there was just one positive, 2 classes sent home as precautionary.

    I read on Twitter The Kerryman (can't make quote come on here) that it is 1 Primary plus 1 Secondary.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Boggles wrote: »
    There is no 24 hour turn around in community testing.

    If they contacted their GP Wednesday morning, they would have got tested at best until the afternoon, that test result would not have been back this morning before school opened.

    Yes there is. Most people are tested on the same day if they contact the gp in the morning. And one individual I know called the doctor at 2 and was tested by half 4.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,858 ✭✭✭Lillyfae


    Yes there is. Most people are tested on the same day if they contact the gp in the morning. And one individual I know called the doctor at 2 and was tested by half 4.

    Turnaround is achieved when the results come back


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,511 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    Yes there is. Most people are tested on the same day if they contact the gp in the morning. .

    Yes I know. I said that in the post you quoted.
    If they contacted their GP Wednesday morning, they would have got tested at best until the afternoon

    The point remains there is no 24 hour turn around testing in the community, or 16 hour for that matter.

    There is absolutely no way that test happened yesterday and the school was informed before they opened this morning.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Lillyfae wrote: »
    Turnaround is achieved when the results come back

    And in the case I referred to the test was Wednesday evening and result first thing Friday morning, So not beyond the realms of possibility that if you are tested earlier, results will be back the next day.

    In fact - do contact tracing within work, and someone from work was sent for test about 12 today. Will see if they get results tomorrow


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Boggles wrote: »
    Yes I know. I said that in the post you quoted.



    The point remains there is no 24 hour turn around testing in the community, or 16 hour for that matter.

    There is absolutely no way that test happened yesterday and the school was informed before they opened this morning.

    They may have been tested Tuesday and were in Monday. Some schools were back last week.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,511 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    They may have been tested Tuesday and were in Monday. Some schools were back last week.

    Or they may have been sent to school awaiting on a test result.

    The question is, is that policy or reckless parenting?

    Or is the media fúcking this up and they are not positive cases at all but close contacts of someone awaiting a test who turned out positive.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement